Article Figures & Data
Tables
RCT COMPARATORS NO. OF PATIENTS ASSESSED USING ... FINAL FOLLOW-UP, MO MEAN CLINICAL OUTCOME SUPERIOR TREATMENT RISK OF BIAS PRP injection vs saline solution injection1 40 SPADI, VAS, WORC Index 1 SPADI: 14.6 vs 15.4; P > .05
VAS: 0.8 vs 1.0;P > .05
WORC Index: 85.6 vs 79.7; P > .05
Equal Low PRP injection vs exercise therapy1 42 DASH, VAS, WORC Index 6 Exercise therapy Moderate PRP injection vs exercise therapy2 62 DASH, VAS 12 DASH: 35.6 vs 36.4; P = .79
VAS: 2.70 vs 2.59;P = .798
Equal Moderate PRP injection vs dry needling3 30 SPADI, VAS 6 SPADI: PRP injection from 62.3 to 17.7 vs dry needling from 62.8 to 29.5
PRP injection, but both were clinically effective Moderate PRP injection vscorticosteroidinjection1 40 ASES, CMS, SST 6 ASES: 83.4 vs 78.9; P > .05
CMS: 90.5 vs 87.3; P > .05
SST: 10.2 vs 9.2;P > .05
Equal High PRP injection with surgery vs surgery without PRP injection4 781 ASES, CMS, UCLA Shoulder Scale, VAS 1.5 to 24 PRP injection for 3 of the 4 measures Moderate PRP injection with surgery vs surgery without PRP injection5 1116 ASES, CMS, SST, UCLA Shoulder Scale, VAS 6.5 to > 12 Inconsistent and not clinically important Moderate ASES—American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; CMS—Constant-Murley Score; DASH—Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; MD—mean difference; PRP—platelet-rich plasma; RCT—randomized controlled trial; SPADI—Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; SST—Simple Shoulder Test; UCLA—University of California Los Angeles; VAS—visual analogue scale; WORC—Western Ontario Rotator Cuff; WMD—weighted mean difference.
↵* Statistically significant in favour of control.
↵† Statistically significant in favour of PRP injection.