Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleTools for Practice

Virtual versus in-person primary care visits

Logan Sept, Jessica Kirkwood and Christina S. Korownyk
Canadian Family Physician December 2020, 66 (12) 904; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6612904
Logan Sept
Medical student at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Kirkwood
Family physician at Boyle McCauley Health Centre in Edmonton.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina S. Korownyk
Family physician and Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Clinical question

What is the diagnostic accuracy of virtual compared with in-person visits for undifferentiated presentations?

Bottom line

Based on limited, lower-level evidence, diagnostic accuracy of virtual visits was between 71% and 91% using standardized patients or case review at 3 months. Diagnostic accuracy or agreement of virtual care seems similar to in-person visits. These studies do not address continuity of care or patient outcomes.

Evidence

  • In a diagnostic cohort of 97 adults at their first visit to a general medicine clinic, in-person visits were followed by a videoconference with a different physician.1

    • - Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between in-person visits (83%) and videoconferences (80%). The most common presentations were respiratory (22%), digestive (19%), or circulatory (10%); 57% of presentations were acute and 43% were chronic.

    • - Limitations: all patients were assessed in person first and there was no long-term follow-up.

  • In an audit of 599 virtual visits with 67 standardized patients with 1 of 6 presentations (ankle pain, viral or bacterial pharyngitis, recurrent urinary tract infection, rhinosinusitis, and low back pain),2 diagnostic accuracy varied depending on presentation (71% for rhinosinusitis, 91% for urinary tract infection).

    • - There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy with video versus telephone.

    • - Limitations: limited, single concerns; not real patients.

  • A primary care crossover trial randomized 175 adults to 1 videoconference and 1 in-person visit or 2 inperson visits. Both visits were with different physicians.3 Diagnostic agreement was not significantly different between groups (84% vs 80%).

    • - Limitations: small numbers; trial included both undifferentiated concerns and chronic diseases.

  • Systematic reviews of virtual care reported on access, satisfaction, cost, and clinical load; however, evidence on diagnostic accuracy is limited.4,5

Context

  • Concerns about virtual visits include difficulty building rapport and risks to follow-up and continuity of care.6,7

    • - Continuity of care results in lower costs, hospitalizations, and mortality in the long term.8,9

  • Diagnostic error is difficult to assess. Observational studies10 with longer follow-up estimate a rate of out-patient diagnostic errors of about 5%.

  • Most “missed” diagnoses were common conditions in primary care: pneumonia (6.7%), heart failure (5.7%), acute renal failure (5.3%), and cancer (5.3%).11

Implementation

New guidelines for practical implementation of virtual care are slowly appearing. The Canadian Medical Association has developed a playbook of practical ideas and suggestions for the incorporation of virtual visits into daily practice.12 As continuity of care is linked to improved outcomes, virtual care that facilitates continuity should be prioritized over virtual visits with clinicians with whom patients do not have an established relationship.

Notes

Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in Canadian Family Physician are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician and are peer reviewed. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to toolsforpractice@cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • Copyright © the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ohta M,
    2. Ohira Y,
    3. Uehara T,
    4. Keira K,
    5. Noda K,
    6. Hirukawa M, et al
    . How accurate are first visit diagnoses using synchronous video visits with physicians? Telemed J E Health 2017;23(2):119-29.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Schoenfeld AJ,
    2. Davies JM,
    3. Marafino BJ,
    4. Dean M,
    5. DeJong C,
    6. Bardach NS, et al
    . Variation in quality of urgent health care provided during commercial virtual visits. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176(5):635-42.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dixon RF,
    2. Stahl JE
    . A randomized trial of virtual visits in a general medicine practice. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15(3):115-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Flodgren G,
    2. Rachas A,
    3. Farmer AJ,
    4. Inzitari M,
    5. Shepperd S
    . Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(9):CD002098.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lake R,
    2. Georgiou A,
    3. Li J,
    4. Li L,
    5. Byrne M,
    6. Robinson M, et al
    . The quality, safety and governance of telephone triage and advice services—an overview of evidence from systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17(1):614.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hammersley V,
    2. Donaghy E,
    3. Parker R,
    4. McNeilly H,
    5. Atherton H,
    6. Bikker A, et al
    . Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69(686):e595-604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hardcastle L,
    2. Ogbogu U
    . Virtual care: enhancing access or harming care? Healthc Manage Forum 2020;33(6):288-92.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bazemore A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Bruno R,
    5. Chung Y,
    6. Phillips RL Jr
    . Higher primary care physician continuity is associated with lower costs and hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med 2018;16(6):492-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pereira Gray DJ,
    2. Sidaway-Lee K,
    3. White E,
    4. Thorne A,
    5. Evans PH
    . Continuity of care with doctors— a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open 2018;8(6):e021161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Singh H,
    2. Meyer AND,
    3. Thomas EJ
    . The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23(9):727-31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Singh H,
    2. Giardina TD,
    3. Meyer AND,
    4. Forjuoh SN,
    5. Reis MD,
    6. Thomas EJ
    . Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(6):418-25.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dermer M
    . Virtual care playbook. Ottawa, ON: CMA; 2020. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/Virtual-Care-Playbook_mar2020_E.pdf. Accessed 2020 Oct 1.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 66 (12)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 66, Issue 12
1 Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Virtual versus in-person primary care visits
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Virtual versus in-person primary care visits
Logan Sept, Jessica Kirkwood, Christina S. Korownyk
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2020, 66 (12) 904; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6612904

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Virtual versus in-person primary care visits
Logan Sept, Jessica Kirkwood, Christina S. Korownyk
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2020, 66 (12) 904; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6612904
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Clinical question
    • Bottom line
    • Evidence
    • Context
    • Implementation
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Topical combination products for facial acne
  • Budesonide bests COVID-19
  • Exercise for peripheral artery disease
Show more Tools for Practice

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2022 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire