Research ArticleResearch

Use and overuse of diagnostic neck ultrasound in Ontario

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Stephen F. Hall and Rebecca Griffiths
Canadian Family Physician February 2020, 66 (2) e62-e68;

Abstract

Objective To provide an overview of the use and possible overuse of diagnostic neck ultrasound (DNUS) by describing and comparing both the ordering rates and the downstream results of DNUS by regions across Ontario.

Design Retrospective population-based cohort study based on electronic health care data.

Setting Ontario.

Participants Ontario residents (adults aged > 18 years) who had a diagnosis of thyroid cancer between October 1, 1999, and June 30, 2014, and residents who had a DNUS in 2012.

Main outcome measures Proportion of Ontario residents in each sub–Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) group who had their first DNUS in 2012 and went on to other relevant tests, diagnoses, and surgery. The sub-LHIN groups were based on increasing age- and sex-adjusted rates of first DNUS.

Results There were 77 238 DNUS tests in 2012 and there was a 7.4-fold variation in the rate of test ordering across the sub-LHIN populations leading to variable rates of actual disease, suggesting screening or uncertain indications for tests.

Conclusion Across Ontario, the indications for ordering DNUS are variable, and screening or testing without indication might be a common practice. Establishing effective guidelines for the ordering of DNUS would potentially reduce costs and ultimately reduce the rates of thyroid cancer.

The overuse of medical tests is the ordering of tests that are unnecessary or inappropriate, and represents poor use of resources. Berwick and Hackbarth1 estimated that 6% to 8% of annual health care expenses in the Unites States (the equivalent at least $270 billion) could have been defined as overuse in 2013. Research on the overuse of medical tests in inpatient and outpatient medical practice2–5 has led to the development of campaigns and coalitions such as Choosing Wisely,6,7 the Right Care Alliance,8,9 and Wiser Healthcare.10 Owing to many factors, including the over-reporting of poor evidence by various media, many physicians and members of the public believe that more tests are better, as they might uncover treatable disease,11,12 and in clinical practice, physicians order routine tests for a variety of reasons.13

The diagnosis of thyroid cancer is increasing at epidemic rates throughout Canada,14–16 the United States,17 and the world.18,19 It is now agreed that the increasing “incidence” is actually the increasing detection19–22 of smaller cancers owing to the increasing use and sophistication of diagnostic neck ultrasound (DNUS), as there is no evidence of increased incidence of thyroid cancer or changes in causation.19 Although there are indications for DNUS, rates of use vary widely.15,21

The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the use and possible overuse of DNUS by describing and comparing both the ordering rates of DNUS and the downstream results of DNUS by regions across Ontario. The universal health care and electronic data holdings at ICES, which include all health care encounters for the population of Ontario, provided the opportunity to perform this audit and feedback study.

METHODS

Data set creation

The electronic data holdings of ICES include all health care–related events for the complete population of insured Ontario residents linked using anonymous unique identifiers. Linkages include all hospital encounters and all physician billing data for treatments, investigations, and procedures thus creating the clinical story for each anonymized patient.

Setting

The population of the province of Ontario is approximately 14 million. For the funding and provision of health care, Ontario is divided into 14 regions (Local Health Integration Networks [LHINs]); however, as the LHINs vary in size, geography, rurality, and ethnicity of the population, they are subdivided into 97 sub-LHINs to improve homogeneity for analysis.

Data sources

We used several data sources for this study:

  • The Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) is a population-based cancer registry that includes all incident cases of cancer, patient demographic characteristics, and dates of diagnoses.

  • The Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) database contains data on all fee-for-service claims submitted by and paid to physicians, including office visits, consultations, laboratory tests, imaging tests, and biopsies. The data include the dates of all encounters, the referring physician, and the physician type or specialty.

  • The Registered Person’s Database provides demographic information on all residents of Ontario who are eligible for OHIP.

  • The Canadian Institute for Health Information includes the Discharge Abstract Database, with information on all hospital discharges, and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System data set of outpatient hospital visits.

We used version 9 of the sub-LHIN boundaries (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, 2010) for this project.

Overview and study populations

Based on diagnostic codes in the OHIP fee schedule for DNUS (J105, J405), we identified all patients in Ontario older than 18 years of age who had their first DNUS in 2012. We excluded patients who had had a previous DNUS (within 2 years) or a previous diagnosis (within 10 years) of thyroid cancer, head and neck cancer, or leukemia or lymphoma. We were interested in the use of DNUS as a screening test, so we included only tests ordered by family doctors, emergency department physicians, and geriatricians.

The yearly incidence of thyroid cancer was based on all patients older than age 18 with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer (ICD code 193) in the OCR between October 1, 1999, and June 30, 2014, who had initial therapeutic thyroid surgery (hemithyroidectomy, subtotal thyroidectomy, or total thyroidectomy) based on Canadian Institute for Health Information codes between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013 (N = 26 311). All patients were included regardless of histology findings.

Outcomes

The outcomes were the downstream tests and diagnoses after the first DNUS in 2012 and included 1 or more events within 1 year (a second DNUS, another imaging test [computed tomography of neck, magnetic resonance imaging of neck, barium swallow, computed tomography of chest], any neck surgery for common benign [eg, branchial cleft cyst] or malignant neck disease [eg, neck dissection]) or the diagnosis of other cancers that present as neck masses, including head and neck cancers, lymphoma, and lung cancer within 2 years. A diagnosis of thyroid cancer was based on the ICD code 193 in the OCR and included only those who had initial therapeutic thyroid surgery (hemithyroidectomy, subtotal thyroidectomy, or total thyroidectomy) (CCP codes 19.1, 19.2, 19.21, 19.29; CCI codes 1FU87, 1FU89). Rates of downstream events are reported as the proportion of those who had the initial DNUS in each sub-LHIN group and are not adjusted for age or sex.

Analysis

The 97 sub-LHINs of Ontario were divided into 5 evenly spaced groups (fixed bins) based on the range of the increasing age- and sex-standardized rates (age > 18 years) of DNUS in 2012, with the denominator of the population of each sub-LHIN in 2012 according to the Registered Persons Database. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to assess linear trend in outcome proportions across increasing exposure categories.

Ethics

Ethics approval was granted by the ethics review boards of Queen’s University in Kingston, Ont, and Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto, Ont.

RESULTS

There were 115 660 DNUS tests in 2012; 37 443 residents who had had a previous DNUS and 979 who had a previous diagnosis of thyroid, head and neck cancer, or hematologic cancer were excluded—leaving a total of 77 238 DNUS tests.

The overall rate of DNUS across the province was 1900.70 per 100 000 people. The rates of DNUS for the 5 sub-LHIN groups in increasing order were 1049.44, 1394.07, 2189.12, 2776.82, and 3512.84 per 100 000 people. The rates across all 97 sub-LHINs ranged from 505.90 to 3715.47 per 100 000 people, representing a 7.4-fold difference across Ontario (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

The proportion of a first DNUS in 2012, by sub-LHIN groups

DNUS—diagnostic neck ultrasound, LHIN—Local Health Integration Network.

The downstream events (second ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration, other imaging test, neck surgery within 1 year, and new cancer diagnosis within 2 years) overall and the proportion of those who had had the initial DNUS in 2012 (sub-LHIN groups) are presented in Table 1. The rates of subsequent tests (that might suggest a reported abnormality on the initial DNUS) such as needle biopsy or other relevant imaging declined with increasing use of the initial DNUS. The rates of thyroid or neck surgery declined with increasing use of DNUS. Overall, 24.36% of patients had a second DNUS, but paradoxically the rates of a second DNUS increased with increasing rates of the initial DNUS. The true incidence of thyroid cancer in the general population is not known, and interestingly the rates of thyroid cancer initially rose with increasing tests and then declined, suggesting a threshold or saturation effect. The rates of other malignancy declined with increasing use of DNUS.

View this table:
Table 1.

Downstream events: The proportion of the Ontario patients in each sub-LHIN group who had their first DNUS in 2012 who went on to other relevant tests, diagnoses, and surgery. The sub-LHIN groups are based on increasing age- and sex-adjusted rates of first neck ultrasound in adults.

Figure 2 presents the 180% increase in thyroid cancer diagnosis by year across Ontario.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer diagnosis in Ontario, by year

DISCUSSION

The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the use and possible overuse of DNUS against the backdrop of the increasing rate of thyroid cancer detection and the variation in the rates of thyroid cancer across Ontario.15 We found a 7.4-fold difference in the rates of ordering DNUS across the sub-LHIN regions, consistent with previous Ontario reports on both DNUS and the geographic differences in rates of thyroid cancer diagnosis.15,23 When we examined the outcomes of 77 238 tests, we found both low yield and that the frequency of important events declined with increasing use of initial tests, suggesting that DNUS might be being used for screening or for testing without indication. The increasing rates of a second DNUS within 1 year suggest that repeat imaging also might have variable indications.

Overdiagnosis occurs “when a condition is diagnosed that would otherwise not go on to cause symptoms or death,”24 and typically refers to the detection of subclinical diseases or conditions by tests that were not indicated.15,19 The importance of these results is the waste of resources—not only the imaging test but also the subsequent cascade of tests, consultations, surgery, and follow-up when it is clear that most patients were not going to need treatment, as they would never have been diagnosed. There is no evidence that the actual prevalence of thyroid cancer has increased and there is no new pathogenesis or cause.19 The increased rates of new cases are the result of detection by DNUS of what were previously undetected cases. There is ample evidence from sources such as autopsy studies,25 incidence versus mortality curves,24,26 population-based studies,27,28 and observational trials29–31 that a large proportion of thyroid cancer cases behave in a benign way, would never have appeared, and would never have needed treatment. Differentiated thyroid cancer has a 98% 15-year survival28–32 even after treatment delay.27,31

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi have suggested guidelines for the investigation of thyroid disease: “ultrasound evaluation is recommended for patients who are at risk for thyroid malignancy … have palpable thyroid nodules or goiter, or have neck lymphadenopathy suggestive of a malignant lesion.”33 Choosing Wisely Canada, and more specifically the second of 5 recommendations from the Canadian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism, states, “Don’t routinely order a thyroid ultrasound in patients with abnormal thyroid function tests unless there is a palpable abnormality of the thyroid gland.”34 For the investigation of a patient with other suspect benign, malignant, or infectious diseases with no previous neck disease, there are at least 6 clinical indications for DNUS (a palpable neck mass, a visible neck mass or asymmetry, the sensation of swelling in the neck, unexplained pain in the anterior or lateral neck, abnormal parathyroid hormone levels, and further investigation of an incidental thyroid abnormality on other imaging). It is unlikely that rates of these indications would vary 7 times across the sub-LHINs of Ontario, suggesting indistinct indications for DNUS, screening, testing without indications, and test overuse.

The definition of overuse by Chassin et al35 is “the provision of medical services for which the potential for harm exceeds the potential for benefit,” and overuse is particularly relevant in thyroid cancer, in which the rates of complications of treatment exceed the rates of disease-specific mortality.20,27,32,36,37 Our data suggest that the use of DNUS without clinical indication or as a screening test might be at least partially responsible for the 180% increase in the rate of diagnosis of thyroid cancer from 2000 to 2012 in Ontario.

In our recently published study on medical test variations, we used an entirely different methodology.38 We divided 6849 Ontario physicians based on their OHIP billing codes for 23 routine laboratory and imaging tests for their 4.9 million patients over 5 years into higher testers (26%), typical testers (41%), and lower testers (33%). We found that the higher testers ordered 80% more imaging tests than typical testers did and, not surprisingly, diagnosed more thyroid (and prostate) cancers than the typical and lower testers did. The lower testers diagnosed fewer thyroid cancers. We also found wide variation in the rates of ordering the 23 common tests.

“A cautionary tale for the rest of the world” about screening has been presented by Ahn et al18 based on the experience of South Korea. In 1999 South Korea introduced optional routine DNUS screening for thyroid cancer. After 1999, the very slow gradual increase in thyroid cancer cases abruptly changed; the incidence of thyroid cancer increased 15 times between 1993 and 2011, and thyroid cancer became the most commonly diagnosed cancer in South Korea (in Canada, thyroid cancer is the fifth leading cancer in women behind breast, lung, colon, and uterine cancer39). Park et al of the Korean National Cancer Control Institute recommends that “concerted efforts are needed at [a] national level to reduce unnecessary ultrasound examination of the thyroid in the asymptomatic general population, unless clinically indicated.”40

Strengths and limitations

The study design and the complete data set are the strengths of this study. There are 3 potential limitations. In the ideal study, the indications for the test would be included in the analysis but this is not available in the OHIP data set. The second limitation is that we cannot differentiate between thyroid and general neck ultrasound requests, as the OHIP fee code is the same for both. The third limitation is that we cannot assess the effect of access, as we had no data on the density of ultrasound equipment or clinics in Ontario.

There are 2 studies on the appropriateness of thyroid ultrasound and 1 on the appropriateness of general DNUS. Liel and Fraenkel41 reported that 93% of thyroid ultrasounds were inappropriately ordered based on 208 new patient referrals in an endocrinology clinic. Landry et al42 reported in a Canadian study that 18.8% of thyroid ultrasounds were inappropriately ordered based on a review of 620 ultrasound requests by GPs. Russell and Madani43 reviewed 68 neck ultrasound requests at a single diagnostic facility; they found 16% were inappropriate based on the iRefer guidelines and suggested reducing access to DNUS as a potential solution.

Falchook et al44 provided a useful example of the inappropriate use of bone scans in prostate cancer patients. They reported that 21% of patients at low risk and 48% of patients at moderate risk of bone metastases underwent at least 1 scan despite recommendations against screening in these groups. They calculated the estimated cost of the overuse to be more than $11 million (US) per year. In Ontario, if one-third of the DNUS examinations in 2012 were not performed, the savings would have been almost $2 million for those 25 746 tests alone,45 not including the subsequent tests, investigations, treatments, follow-up, and complications of potentially unnecessary treatments.

Conclusion

Across Ontario, the indications for ordering DNUS are variable and screening or testing without indication might be a common practice. Establishing effective guidelines for the ordering of DNUS would potentially reduce costs and ultimately reduce the rates of thyroid cancer.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Applied Health Research Question program of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (OMHLT). This project was approved by the Cancer Program at ICES, which is an independent, non-profit research organization that is funded with an annual grant from OMHLT. The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors. No endorsement by ICES or OMHLT is intended or should be inferred. The data set creation and data analysis were performed at ICES Queen’s by Ms Rebecca Griffiths. The sub–Local Health Integration Networks map was created by Dr Paul Nguyen of ICES Queen’s. Parts of this work are based on data and information provided by Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). The opinions, results, views, and conclusions reported in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of CCO. No endorsement by CCO is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this work are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The analyses, conclusions, opinions, and statements expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. This research was presented at conferences including Preventing OverDiagnosis in Barcelona, Spain, in September 2016, and the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery in Saskatoon, Sask, in June 2017.

Notes

Editor’s key points

  • ▸ The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the use and possible overuse of diagnostic neck ultrasound (DNUS) against the backdrop of the increasing rate of thyroid cancer detection and the variation in the rates of thyroid cancer across Ontario. This study found a 7.4-fold difference in the rates of ordering DNUS across the sub–Local Health Integration Network regions of Ontario.

  • ▸ When the authors examined the outcomes of 77 238 DNUS tests, they found both low yield and that the frequency of important events declined with increasing use of initial tests, suggesting that DNUS might be being used for screening or for testing without indication. The increasing rates of a second DNUS within 1 year suggest that repeat imaging also might have variable indications.

Points de repère du rédacteur

  • ▸ Cette étude avait pour but de donner un aperçu de l’utilisation et de la possible surutilisation de l’échographie diagnostique du cou (EDC) dans le contexte de la hausse du taux de dépistage du cancer de la thyroïde et de la variation des taux de cancers thyroïdiens dans les différentes régions de l’Ontario. L’étude a fait valoir une disparité de l’ordre de 7,4 dans les taux de prescription de l’EDC dans les divers sous-groupes des Réseaux locaux d’intégration des services de santé de l’Ontario.

  • ▸ Lorsque les auteurs ont examiné les issues des 77 238 examens par EDC, ils ont trouvé à la fois un faible rendement, de même que le déclin de la fréquence des événements importants avec le recours accru de l’utilisation des tests initiaux, ce qui porte à croire que les EDC pourraient être utilisés pour un dépistage ou des examens en l’absence d’indications. Les taux accrus d’une deuxième EDC durant la même année suggèrent aussi que l’imagerie répétée pourrait aussi avoir des indications variables.

Footnotes

  • Contributors

    Dr Hall designed the study, is responsible for all aspects of data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. Ms Griffiths performed the data acquisition, performed the analysis, provided critical revisions to the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Berwick DM,
    2. Hackbarth AD
    . Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012;307(14):1513-6. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Brownlee S,
    2. Chalkidou K,
    3. Doust J,
    4. Elshaug G,
    5. Glasziou P,
    6. Heath I,
    7. et al
    . Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017;390(10090):156-68. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Korenstein D,
    2. Falk R,
    3. Howell E,
    4. Bishop T,
    5. Keyhani S
    . Overuse of health care services in the United States: an understudied problem. Arch Int Med 2012;172(2):171-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Morgan DJ,
    2. Brownlee S,
    3. Leppin AL,
    4. Kressin N,
    5. Dhruva SS,
    6. Levin L,
    7. et al
    . Setting a research agenda for medical overuse. BMJ 2015;351:h4534.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Nassery N,
    2. Segal JB,
    3. Chang E,
    4. Bridges JF
    . Systematic overuse of healthcare services: a conceptual model. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2015;13(1):1-6.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Levinson W,
    2. Huynh T
    . Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: Choosing Wisely Canada. CMAJ 2014;186(5):325-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Levinson W,
    2. Kallewaard M,
    3. Bhatia R,
    4. Wolfson D,
    5. Shortt S,
    6. Kerr EA
    . ‘Choosing Wisely’: a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24(2):167-74. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Right Care Alliance [website]. Brookline, MA: Right Care Alliance; 2020. Available from: www.rightcarealliance.org. Accessed 2020 Jan 7.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Saini V,
    2. Brownlee S,
    3. Elshaug A,
    4. Glasziou P,
    5. Heath I
    . Addressing overuse and underuse around the world. Lancet 2017;390(10090):105-7. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Wiser Healthcare [website]. Sydney, Aust: Wiser Healthcare; 2020. Available from: www.wiserhealthcare.org.au. Accessed 2020 Jan 7.
  11. 11.↵
    1. McCaffery K,
    2. Jansen J,
    3. Scherer LD,
    4. Thornton H,
    5. Hersch J,
    6. Carter SM,
    7. et al
    . Walking the tightrope: communicating overdiagnosis in modern healthcare. BMJ 2016;352:i348.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Welch G,
    2. Schwartz L,
    3. Woloshin S
    . Overdiagnosed: making people sick in the pursuit of health. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 2011.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Saini V,
    2. Garcia-Armesto S,
    3. Klemperer D,
    4. Paris V,
    5. Elshaug A,
    6. Brownlee S,
    7. et al
    . Drivers of poor medical care. Lancet 2017;390(10090):178-90. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Corsten MJ,
    2. Hearn M,
    3. McDonald JT,
    4. Johnson-Obaseki S
    . Incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer in Canada by city of residence. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;44(1):36.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hall SF,
    2. Irish JC,
    3. Groome P,
    4. Griffiths R
    . Access, excess and overdiagnosis: the case for thyroid cancer. Cancer Med 2014;3(1):154-61. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Topstad D,
    2. Dickinson J
    . Thyroid cancer incidence in Canada: a national cancer registry analysis. CMAJ Open 2017;5(3):E612-6.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Davies L,
    2. Welch H
    . Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140(4):317-22.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ahn H,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Welch HG
    . Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”—screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 2014;371(19):1765-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Vaccarella S,
    2. Franceschi S,
    3. Bray F,
    4. Wild CP,
    5. Plummer M,
    6. Dal Maso L
    . Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 2016;375(7):614-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Brito JP,
    2. Morris JC,
    3. Montori VM
    . Thyroid cancer: zealous imaging has increased detection and treatment of low risk tumors. BMJ 2013;347:f4706.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Udelsman R,
    2. Zhang Y
    . The epidemic of thyroid cancer in the United States: the role of endocrinologists and ultrasounds. Thyroid 2014;24(3):472-9. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zevallos JP,
    2. Hartman CM,
    3. Kramer JR,
    4. Sturgis EM,
    5. Chiao EY
    . Increased thyroid cancer incidence corresponds to increased use of thyroid ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration: a study of the Veterans Affairs health care system. Cancer 2015;121(5):741-6. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hall SF,
    2. Irish JC,
    3. Groome PA,
    4. Urbach DR
    . Practice patterns in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario Canada 2000–2008. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;43:29.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Welch HG,
    2. Black WC
    . Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(9):605-13. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Harach HR,
    2. Franssila KO,
    3. Wasenius VM
    . Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a “normal” finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study. Cancer 1985;56(3):531-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. La Vecchia C,
    2. Malvezzi M,
    3. Bossetti C,
    4. Garavello W,
    5. Bertuccio P,
    6. Levi F,
    7. et al
    . Thyroid cancer mortality and incidence: a global overview. Int J Cancer 2015;136(9):2187-95. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Davies L,
    2. Welch HG
    . Thyroid cancer survival in the United States: observational data from 1973 to 2005. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136(5):440-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hall SF,
    2. Irish J,
    3. Groome P,
    4. Griffiths R,
    5. Hurlbut D
    . Do lower-risk thyroid cancer patients who lived in regions with more aggressive treatments have better outcomes? Thyroid 2017;27(10):1246-57.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ito Y,
    2. Miyauchi A,
    3. Inoue H,
    4. Fukushima M,
    5. Kihara M,
    6. Higashiyama T,
    7. et al
    . An observational trial for papillary microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J Surg 2010;34(1):28-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Ito Y,
    2. Miyauchi A
    . Nonoperative management of low-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol 2015;27(1):15-20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Oda E,
    2. Miyauchi A,
    3. Ito Y,
    4. Yoshioka K,
    5. Nakayama A,
    6. Sasai H,
    7. et al
    . Incidences of unfavorable events in the management of low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid by active surveillance versus immediate surgery. Thyroid 2016;26(1):150-5. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Jonklaas J,
    2. Sarlis NJ,
    3. Litofsky D,
    4. Ain KB,
    5. Bigos ST,
    6. Brierley JD,
    7. et al
    . Outcomes of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma following initial treatment. Thyroid 2006;16(12):1229-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Gharib H,
    2. Papini E,
    3. Garber JR,
    4. Duick DS,
    5. Harrell RM,
    6. Hegedüs L,
    7. et al
    . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules—2016. Endocr Pract 2016;22(Suppl 1):1-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Canadian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism
    . Five things physicians and patients should question. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2017. Available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/endocrinology-and-metabolism/. Accessed 2020 Jan 8.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Chassin MR,
    2. Brook RH,
    3. Park RE,
    4. Keesey J,
    5. Fink A,
    6. Kosecoff J,
    7. et al
    . Variation in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 1986;314(5):285-90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Hoang JK,
    2. Nguyen XV
    . Understanding the risks and harms of management of incidental thyroid nodules: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;143:718-24.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Sawka AM,
    2. Brierley JD,
    3. Ezzat S,
    4. Goldstein DP
    . Managing newly diagnosed thyroid cancer. CMAJ 2014;186(4):269-75.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hall SF,
    2. Webber C,
    3. Groome P,
    4. Booth C,
    5. Nguyen,
    6. de Witt Y
    . Do doctors who order more routine medical tests diagnose more cancers? A population-based study from Ontario Canada. Cancer Med 2019;8(2):850-9.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee
    . Canadian cancer statistics 2019. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2019. Available from: www.cancer.ca/∼/media/cancer.ca/CW/cancer%20information/cancer%20101/Canadian%20cancer%20statistics/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2019-EN.pdf?la=en. Accessed 2020 Jan 8.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Park S,
    2. Chang-Mo O,
    3. Cho H,
    4. Lee JY,
    5. Jung KW,
    6. Jun JK,
    7. et al
    . Association between screening and the thyroid cancer “epidemic” in South Korea: evidence from a nationwide study. BMJ 2016;355:i5745.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Liel Y,
    2. Fraenkel N
    . Brief report: use and misuse of thyroid ultrasound in the initial workup of patients with suspected thyroid problems referred by primary care physicians to an endocrine clinic. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20(8):766-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Landry B,
    2. Barnes D,
    3. Keough V,
    4. Watson A,
    5. Rowe J,
    6. Mallory A,
    7. et al
    . Do family physicians request ultrasound scans appropriately? Can Fam Physician 2011;57:e299-304. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/cfp/57/8/e299.full.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jan 8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Russell J,
    2. Madani G
    . Appropriateness of GP requests for head and neck ultrasound—should we close the door on open access? London, UK: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust; 2015.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Falchook AD,
    2. Salloum RG,
    3. Hendrix LH,
    4. Chen RC
    . Use of bone scan during initial prostate cancer workup, downstream procedures, and associated Medicare costs. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2014;89(2):243-8. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care [website]
    . Schedule of benefits: physician services under the Health Insurance Act. Ottawa, ON: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2020. Available from: www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/sob/. Accessed 2020 Jan 8.
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Use and overuse of diagnostic neck ultrasound in Ontario
Stephen F. Hall, Rebecca Griffiths
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2020, 66 (2) e62-e68;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Subjects