Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Review ArticlePractice

Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool

Facilitating breast cancer survivorship care for family physicians and patients

Anna N. Wilkinson and Catherine E. Boutet
Canadian Family Physician May 2020, 66 (5) 321-326;
Anna N. Wilkinson
Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Program Director of the PGY3 Family Practice Oncology program at the University of Ottawa in Ontario and is Chair of the Cancer Care Member Interest Group of the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anwilkinson@toh.ca
Catherine E. Boutet
Internal medicine resident at McGill University in Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • CFPlus
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To create an evidence-based national Breast Cancer Survivorship (BCS) Tool that facilitates appropriate care of breast cancer patients by primary care providers after patients have completed adjuvant therapy.

Sources of information MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from 2002 to 2018 with the key words breast cancer, survivorship, survivorship care plan, guideline, review, meta-analysis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, treatment complications, adverse effects, late effects, screening, health promotion, and follow up care. National or provincial cancer care organization guidelines were also reviewed. Evidence was graded as level I, II, or III.

Main message The BCS Tool provides an evidence-based template to ensure seamless transitions of care from cancer centres to primary care. Four steps of survivorship care are outlined in this article: care knowledge and coordination, cancer surveillance, management of long-term side effects of treatment, and health promotion.

Conclusion The BCS Tool will support primary care providers in ensuring breast cancer survivors receive high-quality, evidence-based care.

Nearly 1 in 8 women will develop breast cancer during the course of their lives, with an astounding 26 300 new cases in Canada in 2017.1 Fortunately, important recent advances have been made in therapies for breast cancer, including surgery, chemotherapy, and biologic, endocrine, and radiation therapies, with an improvement in the 5-year survival rate to 87%.1 As a result, scarce cancer centre resources have become overwhelmed managing the care of survivors as well as patients receiving active treatment. Consequently, there has been a progressive shift in the care of stable breast cancer survivors to the domain of primary care; however, there has been little education for primary care providers to enable and support the provision of this care in an evidence-based fashion.2 Indeed, survivorship care plans currently vary from centre to centre, and from province to province.3–6

The Cancer Care Member Interest Group is a College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) committee of family physicians who have a special interest in oncology, with representation from across Canada. As part of its mandate to support family physicians in oncology, this committee developed an evidence-based Breast Cancer Survivorship (BCS) Tool, for use by both patients and providers to ensure uniform, appropriate care for these patients. The tool and its development are presented in this article. An easy-to-print version of the BCS Tool can be downloaded from CFPlus* and it is available on the CFPC website and can be found through a Google search.7

Case description

Mrs X. is a 59-year-old woman who has recently completed treatment for cancer in her left breast (T2N1M0—2 primary tumours, 1 regional lymph node involved, and no distant metastases; estrogen receptor–progesterone receptor positive; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive). Her treatment has included lumpectomy with sentinel node biopsy; adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel; trastuzumab; bisphosphonate; and radiation therapy. She is taking an aromatase inhibitor, which she is expected to continue taking for at least 5 years. She is discharged from the cancer centre and returned to your care for ongoing follow-up. What do you need to do to ensure her care is adequate?

Sources of Information

The BCS Tool was created based on the results of a systematic literature review. MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from 2002 to 2018 with the following MESH terms: breast cancer, survivorship, survivorship care plan, guideline, review, meta-analysis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, treatment complications, adverse effects, late effects, screening, health promotion, and follow up care. National (American and Canadian) or provincial cancer organization guidelines with an evidence-based approach to breast cancer screening and surveillance, posttreatment side effects, posttreatment surveillance, and health promotion in survivorship care in the primary care setting were also reviewed where available.

Evidence was categorized as level I, II, or III depending on whether recommendations were based on randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses (level I); non-randomized, cohort, case-control, or epidemiologic studies (level II); or expert opinion or consensus statements (level III).

Key recommendations and themes were amalgamated into a tool, and levels of evidence were noted wherever possible. The BCS Tool was reviewed by medical oncologists and members of the CFPC Cancer Care Program Committee to ensure the appropriateness of content and national applicability.

Main message

The BCS Tool (page 1 appears in Figure 1) presents evidence-based standard-of-care recommendations for breast cancer patients following adjuvant therapy. The tool is designed to be used by both patients and primary care providers. The tool is broken down into 4 steps:

  • know your patient,

  • cancer surveillance,

  • management of long-term side effects of treatment, and

  • health promotion.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

This is page 1 of the Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool. The full tool is available from CFPlus. Go to the full text of the article online and click on the CFPlus tab.

Step 1: know your patient.

The BCS Tool highlights that breast cancer therapies can vary considerably from patient to patient, depending on the pathology of their tumours (Table 1).8,9 The first step of providing appropriate breast cancer survivor care is understanding exactly which therapies the patient has received. Treatment side effects and monitoring requirements will vary widely based on the specific therapies.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Potential adjuvant therapies for breast cancer

The adjuvant therapy that a breast cancer patient receives depends on the risk of recurrence. Treatment might include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and, if a patient’s tumour expresses the HER2 receptor (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), she might also be offered the targeted therapy trastuzumab.

Endocrine therapy is offered to patients with tumours that are estrogen receptor–progesterone receptor positive. Estrogen blockade has been shown to decrease breast cancer mortality by about one-third throughout the first 15 years after definitive therapy.10 Postmenopausal women are offered endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors, which block peripheral conversion of androgens to estrogen. Although more effective than tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors are contraindicated in premenopausal women, as lower peripheral levels of estrogen will induce the hypothalamus and pituitary gland to increase ovarian estrogen production.11 Premenopausal or perimenopausal women can therefore take tamoxifen or, if they wish to obtain the added benefits conferred by therapy with an aromatase inhibitor, they must first achieve ovarian suppression via surgery or treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and GnRH agonists all have unique side effect profiles that require specific follow-up care.

Bisphosphonates have been found to be associated with a reduction in breast cancer recurrence in bone (rate ratio of 0.76) and in mortality (rate ratio of 0.82) in postmenopausal women.12 Current guidelines suggest that postmenopausal women with intermediate- or high-risk cancers should receive zoledronic acid every 6 months for 3 years.13 Family physicians should interpret bone mineral density (BMD) measurements with the knowledge that their patients might have received, or are still receiving, bisphosphonates.

Step 2: cancer surveillance.

All breast cancer survivors should have follow-up visits with primary care providers every 6 months for the first 5 years after treatment completion. These appointments should include a thorough history, screening for signs and symptoms of local or distant recurrence, and treatment of side effects.8,14 The BCS Tool highlights common sites of disease recurrence and associated symptoms, as well as common complications of therapy, which will help family physicians in their directed review of systems.

All breast cancer survivors should be screened for fatigue, depression, and anxiety, as one-third of ambulatory cancer patients report moderate to severe depressive symptoms, and fears around recurrence create considerable distress and anxiety.15 Clinical breast examinations should be done every 6 months, with specific attention paid to the regional lymph nodes, chest wall, lungs, and abdomen. Patients should be advised to perform monthly breast self-examinations.14 A diagnostic mammogram should be done annually.8 The cumulative effects of cancer therapy—chemotherapy, glucocorticoids (as antiemetics), and endocrine therapy—cause a degree of bone loss that is considerably greater than expected age-related bone loss.16 Baseline BMD measurement should therefore be performed for all postmenopausal women completing breast cancer therapy, as well as those patients with chemotherapy-induced premature menopause or those taking endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors or GnRH agonists.6 Patients who continue taking aromatase inhibitors are at increased risk of osteoporosis and should be screened on an ongoing basis with BMD measurement every 2 years,17 although clinical judgment should be employed to adjust the interval of BMD measurement depending on fracture risk. Lipid levels should also be monitored while patients are taking aromatase inhibitors, as these agents can cause hyperlipidemia.14,18

Family physicians are in the unique circumstance of caring for patients as well as their extended families, and this position might allow for detection of familial cancer syndromes. Consider referring patients for genetic screening if criteria outlined in Box 1 are met.19–22

Box 1.

Criteria for referral for familial breast cancer syndrome

Consider referring patients for genetic testing if any of the following criteria are met:

  • Breast cancer diagnosis at age < 50 y (especially < 35 y)

  • Triple-negative breast cancer at age < 60 y

  • Ovarian cancer at any age

  • Bilateral breast cancer

  • Breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman or family

  • Multiple breast cancers on the same side of family (maternal or paternal)

  • Male breast cancer

  • Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity

Data from Falleti et al21 and Reuter-Lorenz and Cimprich.22

Step 3: long-term side effects of treatment.

The BCS Tool highlights common long-term side effects from all treatments and appropriate management. Side effects might present immediately after therapy or might become apparent many years after completion of therapy. Regardless of the therapy received, breast cancer survivors are at a higher risk of cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and psychological distress.21–24 Breast cancer therapy can affect all spheres of life and might contribute to relationship issues, financial hardship, and ongoing anxiety around disease recurrence. Providers should be sensitive to psychological distress and should screen regularly and refer patients for counseling where appropriate.15 If pharmacotherapy is required, caution should be used if prescribing paroxetine or fluoxetine, as these agents might interact with tamoxifen, decreasing its efficacy.17

Lymphedema is the most common surgical complication; however, incidence has declined to 9% with sentinel node dissection compared with 40% with axillary dissection. Optimal management of lymphedema includes weight loss, compression sleeves, and massage therapy, with referral to a lymphedema specialist where available.25

Patients taking tamoxifen have a relative increase in venous thromboembolic disease by a factor of 2 to 3, and have an increase in the relative risk of endometrial cancer of 2.7.17 Any vaginal bleeding in postmenopausal women taking tamoxifen must be investigated to rule out endometrial cancer. Aromatase inhibitors can cause considerable and often dose-limiting arthralgias and myalgias and increase the relative risk of osteoporotic fractures by 47%.9,26

Cardiovascular health can be affected by all breast cancer therapies. The anthracycline chemotherapeutic agents epirubicin and doxorubicin might cause a decrease in ejection fraction, which can manifest as heart failure many years after completion of treatment.27 Trastuzumab can also cause a decrease in heart function while taking the therapy, although this might be reversible if trastuzumab is discontinued.28 Left-sided radiation can compound cardiotoxicity by causing fibrosis of any component of the heart, including valves, blood vessels, myocardium, and the conduction system.29,30 Finally, aromatase inhibitors can contribute to the development of hypertension and hyperlipidemia.18 Ongoing surveillance of cardiac function in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors is currently not recommended16; however, primary care providers should view any symptoms of heart failure that might develop at any time after breast cancer treatment in the context of this therapy.

Step 4: health promotion.

Breast cancer survivors who are physically active, maintain a healthy weight, and avoid smoking and excessive alcohol use have a decreased risk of breast cancer recurrence.31–33 Family doctors should actively engage with their patients who are breast cancer survivors to promote a healthy lifestyle.

With the myriad recommendations for breast cancer survivorship care, routine preventive health maneuvers can be overlooked. One Canadian study found that during a 4-year period, 65% of breast cancer survivors were never screened for colorectal cancer, and 40% were not screened for cervical cancer.34 Primary care providers must ensure that survivorship care also includes appropriate preventive care.

Case resolution

Mrs X. should have an appointment with her family physician every 6 months, during which a review of systems should be done to look for signs of recurrence, side effects of therapy, and symptoms of fatigue, anxiety, or depression. These visits should include a clinical examination, including the breasts, regional lymph nodes, chest, and abdomen. Mrs X. should be encouraged to do breast self-examination every month. She should have a mammogram ordered, which should be performed 1 year after her original diagnostic mammogram and repeated annually. Given that Mrs X. is taking an aromatase inhibitor, she should have her BMD measured every 2 years and annual lipid level monitoring. She should continue with her regular preventive health care. With the combination of anthracycline, left-sided radiation, and trastuzumab, any signs suggestive of cardiac dysfunction (eg, dyspnea, pedal edema) should be investigated immediately, with a low threshold for referral to cardiology. The BCS Tool can be shared with Mrs X. to encourage her involvement in her survivorship care.

Conclusion

Family physicians are increasingly responsible for survivorship care as cancer centres continue to be overburdened. Survivorship care clearly belongs within the primary care domain. Family physicians are better positioned than cancer centres to provide optimal breast cancer survivor care, as they have the benefit of long-term relationships with their patients, in-depth knowledge of patients’ social supports and families, a strong interest in preventive care, and an awareness and comprehension of a patient’s medical issues beyond cancer.

The BCS Tool presented in this article is a means to build bridges between oncology, primary care, and patients. The BCS Tool enables patients to advocate for their own care with an easily accessible, peer-reviewed guideline that is user friendly. The use of the BCS Tool will allow primary care providers to be confident that they are providing high-quality, evidence-based, standardized care for their breast cancer patients.

Acknowledgments

Dr Boutet received a Patient Education Grant for Family Medicine Residents and a Support Program Grant from the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Notes

Editor’s key points

  • ▸ Advances in adjuvant breast cancer therapies have led to an improved 5-year survival rate of 87%. As a result, cancer centre resources have become overwhelmed with the management of survivors as well as patients receiving active treatment, and there has been a progressive shift in the care of stable breast cancer survivors to primary care.

  • ▸ This article aims to outline an evidence-based survivorship care plan to facilitate care of breast cancer survivors in primary care.

  • ▸ The Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool enables patients to advocate for their own care with an easily accessible, peer-reviewed guideline that is user friendly. Use of the tool will allow primary care providers to be confident that they are providing high-quality, evidence-based standardized care for their patients who have had breast cancer.

Footnotes

  • ↵* An easy-to-print version of the Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool is available from CFPlus. Go to the full text of the article online and click on the CFPlus tab.

  • Contributors

    Both authors contributed to the literature review, its interpretation, and preparing the manuscript for submission.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de mai 2020 à la page e142.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee
    . Canadian cancer statistics. A 2018 special report on cancer incidence by stage. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2018. Available from: cancer.ca/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2018-EN. Accessed 2019 Jan 30.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Luctkar-Flude M,
    2. Aiken A,
    3. McColl MA,
    4. Tranmer J,
    5. Langley H
    . Are primary care providers implementing evidence-based care for breast cancer survivors? Can Fam Physician 2015;61:978-84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Olson R
    , editor. Your cancer survivorship care plan. Vancouver, BC: BC Cancer Agency, Northern Health; 2012. Available from: www.bccancer.bc.ca/survivorship-site/Documents/Generic%20CP%20Electronic%20-%20revised%20June%202013.pdf. Accessed 2020 Mar 31.
  4. 4.
    1. Hamilton Health Sciences, Juravinski Cancer Center
    . Breast cancer survivorship care plan. Hamilton, ON: Hamilton Health Sciences;
  5. 5.
    1. The Ottawa Hospital
    . Wellness Beyond Cancer Program. Survivorship. Ottawa, ON: The Ottawa Hospital; Available from https://www.ottawahospital.on.ca/en/clinical-services/deptpgrmcs/programs/cancer-program/what-we-offer-our-programs-and-services/wellness-beyond-cancer-program/. Accessed 2017 Dec 1.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cancer Care Ontario
    . Ontario breast cancer follow-up care clinical guidance summary. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario; 2019. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/sites/ccocancercare/files/guidelines/summary/SurvivorshipClinicalGuidanceBreast.pdf. Accessed 2020 Mar 31.
  7. 7.↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada
    . Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2019. Available from: https://portal.cfpc.ca/resourcesdocs/uploadedFiles/Directories/Committees_List/BCS_Tool_Eng_Sep30_2019.pdf. Accessed 2020 Apr 9.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Khatcheressian JL,
    2. Hurley P,
    3. Bantug E,
    4. Esserman LJ,
    5. Grunfeld E,
    6. Halberg F,
    7. et al
    . Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(7):961-65. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Crew KD,
    2. Greenlee H,
    3. Capodice J,
    4. Raptis G,
    5. Brafman L,
    6. Fuentes D,
    7. et al
    . Prevalence of joint symptoms in postmenopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(25):3877-83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
    . Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;365(9472):1687-717.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pistelli M,
    2. Della Mora A,
    3. Ballatore Z,
    4. Berardi R
    . Aromatase inhibitors in premenopausal women with breast cancer: the state of the art and future prospects. Curr Oncol 2018;25(2):e168-75. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
    . Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomized trials. Lancet 2015;386(10001):1353-61. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Errata in: Lancet 2016;387(10013):30, Lancet 2017;389(10088):2472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dhesy-Thind S,
    2. Fletcher GG,
    3. Blanchette PS,
    4. Clemons MJ,
    5. Gandhi S,
    6. Gupta R,
    7. et al
    . Use of adjuvant bisphosphonates and other bone-modifying agents in breast cancer. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario; 2016. Guideline 1-22-A.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sisler J,
    2. Chaput G,
    3. Sussman J,
    4. Ozokwelu E
    . Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. Practical guide to survivorship care for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:805-11. (Eng), e578–85 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Howell D,
    2. Keshavarz H,
    3. Esplen MJ,
    4. Hack T,
    5. Hamel M,
    6. Howes J,
    7. et al
    . Pan-Canadian practice guideline: screening, assessment and management of psychosocial distress, depression and anxiety in adults with cancer. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology; 2015. Version 2.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Runowicz CD,
    2. Leach CR,
    3. Henry NL,
    4. Henry KS,
    5. Mackey HT,
    6. Cowens-Alvarado RL,
    7. et al
    . American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(6):611-35. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Awan A,
    2. Esfahani K
    . Endocrine therapy for breast cancer in the primary care setting. Curr Oncol 2018;25(4):285-91. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Foglietta J,
    2. Inno A,
    3. de Iuliis F,
    4. Sini V,
    5. Duranti S,
    6. Turazza M,
    7. et al
    . Cardiotoxicity of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2017;17(1):11-7. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Moyer VA,
    2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
    . Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014;160(4):271-81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Heisey R,
    2. Carroll JC
    . Identification and management of women with a family history of breast cancer. Practical guide for clinicians. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:799-803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Falleti MG,
    2. Sanfilippo A,
    3. Maruff P,
    4. Weih L,
    5. Phillips KA
    . The nature and severity of cognitive impairment associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of the current literature. Brain Cogn 2005;59(1):60-70. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Reuter-Lorenz PA,
    2. Cimprich B
    . Cognitive function and breast cancer: promise and potential insights from functional brain imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;137(1):33-43. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. Ahles TA,
    2. Saykin AJ
    . Breast cancer chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Clin Breast Cancer 2002;3(Suppl 3):S84-90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Correa DD,
    2. Ahles TA
    . Cognitive adverse effects of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2007;1(1):57-62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gradishar WJ,
    2. Anderson BO,
    3. Balassanian R,
    4. Blair SL,
    5. Burstein HJ,
    6. Cyr A,
    7. et al
    . Breast cancer, version 4.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16(3):310-20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Amir E,
    2. Seruga B,
    3. Niraula S,
    4. Carlsson L,
    5. Ocaña A
    . Toxicity of adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Canc Inst 2011;103(17):1299-309. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Raj S,
    2. Franco VI,
    3. Lipshultz SE
    . Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2014;16(6):315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lenihan DJ,
    2. Oliva S,
    3. Chow EJ,
    4. Cardinale D
    . Cardiac toxicity in cancer survivors. Cancer 2013;119(Suppl 11):2131-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Straub JM,
    2. New J,
    3. Hamilton CD,
    4. Lominska C,
    5. Shnayder Y,
    6. Thomas SM
    . Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015;141(11):1985-94. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Roychoudhuri R,
    2. Robinson D,
    3. Putcha V,
    4. Cuzick J,
    5. Darby S,
    6. Møller H
    . Increased cardiovascular mortality more than fifteen years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a population based study. BMC Cancer 2007;7(9).
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kushi LH,
    2. Doyle C,
    3. McCullough M,
    4. Rock CL,
    5. Demark-Wahnefried W,
    6. Bandera EV,
    7. et al
    . American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62(1):30-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    1. Rock CL,
    2. Doyle C,
    3. Demark-Wahnefried W,
    4. Meyerhardt J,
    5. Courneya KS,
    6. Schwartz AL,
    7. et al
    . Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62(4):243-74. Epub 2012 Apr 26. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63(3)215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Kwan ML,
    2. Kushi LH,
    3. Weltzien E,
    4. Tam EK,
    5. Castillo A,
    6. Sweeney C,
    7. et al
    . Alcohol consumption and breast cancer recurrence and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer: the Life After Cancer Epidemiology study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(29):4410-6. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Grunfeld E,
    2. Moineddin R,
    3. Gunraj N,
    4. Del Giudice ME,
    5. Hodgson DC,
    6. Kwon JS,
    7. et al
    . Cancer screening practices of cancer survivors. Population-based, longitudinal study. Can Fam Physician 2012;58:980-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 66 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 66, Issue 5
1 May 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool
Anna N. Wilkinson, Catherine E. Boutet
Canadian Family Physician May 2020, 66 (5) 321-326;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Breast Cancer Survivorship Tool
Anna N. Wilkinson, Catherine E. Boutet
Canadian Family Physician May 2020, 66 (5) 321-326;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case description
    • Sources of Information
    • Main message
    • Case resolution
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • CFPlus
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Outil de soutien aux survivantes du cancer du sein
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
Show more Practice

Clinical Review

  • Parkinson disease primer, part 2: management of motor and nonmotor symptoms
  • Parkinson disease primer, part 1: diagnosis
  • Prescribing for common complications of spinal cord injury
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire