Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherPractice

Supporting patient and clinician mental health during COVID-19

Via trauma-informed interdisciplinary systems

Dillon Browne, Sylvain Roy, Marjory Phillips, Sandy Shamon and Michael Stephenson
Canadian Family Physician July 2020, 66 (7) e190-e192;
Dillon Browne
Registered clinical psychologist and Canada Research Chair in Child and Family Clinical Psychology at the University of Waterloo in Ontario.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvain Roy
Registered neuropsychologist in Toronto, Ont, Past President of the Ontario Psychological Association, and Lead of the Ontario Psychological Association Disaster Response Network.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marjory Phillips
Registered clinical psychologist and a faculty member of the University of Waterloo Clinical Psychology Program.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandy Shamon
Private-practice family physician and palliative care specialist in Cambridge, Ont, and an adjunct faculty member of the Degroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Stephenson
Director of Sanctuary Refugee Health Centre in Kitchener, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The swift spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the globe has challenged health service providers in unprecedented ways. Among the disruptions for general practitioners and allied specialists have been the need to provide in-person care with only limited access to personal protective equipment; a sudden influx of patient concerns related to COVID-19 and a displacement of non–COVID-19 care; desperate calls to redeploy clinicians to emergency departments or other disaster response settings; a rapid shift to telehealth and virtual care (often without previous training or the technologic resources); and increasing complexity in their patients’ needs in the context of trauma responses that exacerbate mental health and other comorbidities. Ethical dilemmas abound in a system that cannot meet patient demands.1 Further, a sizable body of research has demonstrated that the trauma experienced by patients, clinicians, and society during events such as the current pandemic reaches and reflects across all levels of the health care system, ultimately leading to “vicarious trauma” and “compassion fatigue” for providers, administrators, and the very structures most responsible for providing care.2

At the same time, our patients need us more than ever. As infection and illness spread in the community, more individuals are being separated from their loved ones, either because they are staying at home because of physical distancing guidelines, or they are living in institutional care settings where visits are restricted. All the while, the social determinants of health (exacerbated by a catastrophic economic situation) are leading to the psychosocial and relational stressors that compromise health for families (eg, marital conflict, disrupted parent-child relationships, potential for violence).3 While the virus does not discriminate, providers for patients traditionally viewed as vulnerable might particularly notice these risk factors flaring up as the crisis worsens. The illness and hardship these patients experience during the pandemic could, collectively, lead to new trauma or retraumatization across adult patients’ lifespans, while increasing the incidence of adverse childhood experiences for younger patients.4

As we wrestle with this situation, the purpose of this article is to humbly offer a few realistic and actionable suggestions that could immediately be of use to providers and policy makers, drawing upon the central tenets of trauma-informed health care systems.4 The importance of partnership with specialty providers of mental health services (eg, clinical psychologists and social workers) is emphasized, including the role of telehealth. We want to convey hope that clinicians can (and will) weather the storm, providing optimal patient-centred services while they also take care of themselves and their families as we “flatten the curve.”

Challenges

Challenge 1: balancing patient mental health with COVID-19 best practices.

In the face of a deadly pandemic, it would be easy to think that patient mental health and psychosocial concerns “take a back seat” for the time being. This idea might arise from acute concerns in patients and clinicians regarding COVID-19 contagion and morbidity, or from feelings that mental health concerns are less important in the face of catastrophic illness. We caution against this approach and, instead, encourage clinicians to continue assessment for the documented positive feedback loop linking presentations that might otherwise be simplified into either psychosocial or medical domains.5,6 This feedback loop is certainly evident in the case of trauma, where psychiatric symptoms can interact with and exacerbate medical illness.7 Furthermore, emotional distress might limit an individual’s capacity to learn new information and follow instructions, which could be extended to pandemic public health measures, including hand-washing, not touching one’s face, and physical distancing.

In following the central tenets of trauma-informed health care, clinicians will consider the role of adversity (in particular, life-threatening events) in the development of human suffering, and respond compassionately with universal and targeted practices to optimize care and outcomes.8,9 The theme of a patient’s subjective feelings of safety is paramount to avoid interventions that might exacerbate psychological symptoms and reduce service-seeking behaviour. Thus, given the ubiquity of COVID-19, our recommendation is the trauma-informed universal practice of approaching each encounter open to the possibility that mental health problems and feelings of safety have become an increasing concern for patients. This stance will create a compassionate ethos for patient-provider alliance, thereby facilitating the raising of concerns such as health-related anxiety, loss, and compounding hardship, which likely interact with the primary presenting concerns.

Challenge 2: allocating a realistic amount of time to discuss psychosocial concerns.

When health care providers first begin trauma-informed practice, a paradox emerges: we are asking them to do more, it seems, when they have less (time, resources, and energy). However, trauma-informed care does not necessarily mean longer appointments. Brief strategies can be effective in the facilitation of trauma-informed communication surrounding mental health in primary care.10 Indeed, clinicians might begin encounters in an open-ended way, following up with questions regarding emotional well-being (now, specifically in relation to the pandemic) and providing brief psychoeducation or motivational interviewing around the role of stress in health. Follow-up questions can include querying around mood, anxiety, unhealthy coping strategies (eg, substances), and family conflict, while considering the potential of routine physical examinations acquiring additional emotional valence (ie, being “triggering”). In encounters with pediatric patients, clinicians can apply the familiar strategy of using developmentally appropriate language around “germs” and take the opportunity to punctuate parent-child attachment by emphasizing what caregivers are doing to promote safety (eg, “Your mommy and daddy are making sure everyone stays at home so that children are safe and don’t get sick, because they are loved very much”).11

Thus, by inserting a brief and targeted conversation around emotional well-being early during patient encounters, providers can help cultivate a warm, secure, and (where applicable, developmentally appropriate) patient-provider alliance, without derailing the usual flow of care and while still addressing presenting concerns. In extreme situations (where mental health problems merit ongoing treatment, eg, grief counseling), providers can remind patients about the importance of their concern, which is why they are making a high-quality referral (see challenge 3), as well as providing their own follow-up at the next encounter. Engaging patients in shared decision making as much as possible in this process further enhances the therapeutic alliance and the outcomes of clinical encounters.

Challenge 3: access to high-quality referrals in a disrupted health care system.

Clinicians might have found their referral networks have ground to a halt. In some instances, these referrals might simply be delayed without great consequence. In other instances, crucial medical care (eg, cancer treatment and surgery) might be deferred due to the crisis, or acute mental health concerns might warrant nonemergency treatment. In all instances, psychological services might be beneficial to address pre-existing or newly arising mental health concerns.12 However, most outpatient mental health services have closed their doors to prevent the spread of the virus. As such, we recommend that providers become aware of local mental health professionals providing disaster response services using telehealth.13 It is important that physicians refer patients to telehealth providers with operations in the jurisdiction in which patients are eligible. Finding them might require a Google search of the provincial or state professional psychology association for a list of providers. Many jurisdictions are rapidly onboarding licensed providers to expand coverage, and introducing new billing codes for the provision of telehealth, as in the case of the Ontario Health Insurance Program (the authors’ jurisdiction) or Medicaid and Medicare in the United States (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of recommendations and additional resources: Trauma-informed suggestions for balancing clinician and patient mental health during COVID-19.

Challenge 4: balancing self-care with increasing service demands.

Heightened levels of clinician distress, fatigue, burnout, and mental health challenges are understandable and expected consequences of this pandemic.14 Research has shown that burnout can spill over into the clinician’s own family life, creating interpersonal difficulties with family members and exacerbating an already difficult situation.15

Clinical wisdom tells us that those who enter helping professions often struggle to shift to “being the patient” themselves. If there was ever a time for front-line practitioners to consider their own use of supportive mental health care, it is now. Counseling for physicians with symptoms of burnout statistically significantly reduces distress and need for extended sick leave.16 Physicians who take up this suggestion should do so free of guilt about “overcrowding” a struggling system. Instead, they can take to heart the World Health Organization’s declaration that an effective pandemic response demands medical and affiliated health care providers who are emotionally, physically, cognitively, and spiritually well.17

Thus, our final recommendation is to consider specialized telehealth psychotherapy or counseling for front-line providers during the disaster response, especially for those responding to elevated levels of acute illness, emergency care, resource scarcity, and death. If this is not something being discussed in your clinic, agency, service, ward, unit, or care setting, we encourage you, junior clinicians and senior administrators alike, to facilitate these conversations. Many professional psychological associations are now providing these resources to front-line clinicians at no cost (Table 1).

Conclusion

Every large-scale disaster has depended on the medical and health services community’s heroic response. The COVID-19 pandemic is no exception. Perhaps an important difference in today’s situation is the remarkable development and expansion of trauma-informed health care paradigms and interdisciplinary practice across all sectors of health and social services, especially primary care.18 Technologic advancements in virtual care and telehealth have also been used tremendously during this pandemic, and new creative solutions can be designed with collaborative work. It is important to mobilize these partnerships and advancements to ease the burden on general practitioners and other providers treating the direct biomedical fallout of COVID-19. To borrow an often-used proverb, the response to COVID-19 is certainly “taking a village”—one that is global and more digitally connected than ever. Among those ready to respond are nonphysician providers of trauma-informed mental health care (such as registered clinical psychologists doing telehealth). This sharing of the load, in concert with manageable and effective trauma-informed approaches taken by general practitioners and other front-line providers during their encounters with patients, will undoubtedly be the best path forward.

Notes

We encourage readers to share some of their practice experience: the neat little tricks that solve difficult clinical situations. Praxis articles can be submitted online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cfp or through the CFP website (www.cfp.ca) under “Authors and Reviewers.”

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rosenbaum L
    . Facing Covid-19 in Italy—ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. N Engl J Med 2020;382(20):1873-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Van Mol MMC,
    2. Kompanje EJO,
    3. Benoit DD,
    4. Bakker J,
    5. Nijkamp MD
    . The prevalence of compassion fatigue and burnout among healthcare professionals in intensive care units: a systematic review. PloS One 2015;10(8):e0136955.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Browne DT,
    2. Plamondon A,
    3. Prime H,
    4. Puente-Duran S,
    5. Wade M
    . Cumulative risk and developmental health: an argument for the importance of a family-wide science. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 2015;6(4):397-407. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Herzog JI,
    2. Schmahl C
    . Adverse childhood experiences and the consequences on neurobiological, psychosocial, and somatic conditions across the lifespan. Front Psychiatry 2018;9:420.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Maani N,
    2. Galea S
    . The role of physicians in addressing social determinants of health. JAMA 2020;323(16):1551-2. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Duan L,
    2. Zhu G
    . Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7(4):300-2. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cromer KR,
    2. Sachs-Ericsson N
    . The association between childhood abuse, PTSD, and the occurrence of adult health problems: moderation via current life stress. J Trauma Stress 2006;19(6):967-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Raja S,
    2. Hasnain M,
    3. Hoersch M,
    4. Gove-Yin S,
    5. Rajagopalan C
    . Trauma informed care in medicine: current knowledge and future research directions. Fam Community Health 2015;38(3):216-26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Machtinger EL,
    2. Cuca YP,
    3. Khanna N,
    4. Rose CD,
    5. Kimberg LS
    . From treatment to healing: the promise of trauma-informed primary care. Womens Health Issues 2015;25(3):193-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Roy-Byrne P,
    2. Veitengruber JP,
    3. Bystritsky A,
    4. Edlund MJ,
    5. Sullivan G,
    6. Craske MG,
    7. et al
    . Brief intervention for anxiety in primary care patients. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22(2):175-86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Thompson LA,
    2. Rasmussen SA
    . What does the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mean for families? JAMA Pediatr 2020;174(6):628.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . COVID-19: operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak: interim guidance, 25 March 2020. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331561. Accessed 2020 Apr 6.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Smith AC,
    2. Thomas E,
    3. Snoswell CL,
    4. Haydon H,
    5. Mehrotra A,
    6. Clemensen J,
    7. et al
    . Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare 2020;26(5):309-13. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak, 18 March 2020. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331490. Accessed 2020 Apr 6.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Adám S,
    2. Györffy Z,
    3. Susánszky E
    . Physician burnout in Hungary: a potential role for work-family conflict. J Health Psychol 2008;13(7):847-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Isaksson Rø KE,
    2. Gude T,
    3. Tyssen R,
    4. Aasland OG
    . Counselling for burnout in Norwegian doctors: one year cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Strengthening the health systems response to COVID-19. Technical guidance #1. Maintaining continuity of essential health care services while mobilizing the health workforce for COVID-19 response. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://euro.sharefile.com/share/view/sbc0659718fd4c8aa. Accessed 2020 Apr 6.
  18. 18.↵
    1. McDaniel SH,
    2. deGruy FV 3rd
    . An introduction to primary care and psychology. Am Psychol 2014;69(4):325-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 66 (7)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 66, Issue 7
1 Jul 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Supporting patient and clinician mental health during COVID-19
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Supporting patient and clinician mental health during COVID-19
Dillon Browne, Sylvain Roy, Marjory Phillips, Sandy Shamon, Michael Stephenson
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2020, 66 (7) e190-e192;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Supporting patient and clinician mental health during COVID-19
Dillon Browne, Sylvain Roy, Marjory Phillips, Sandy Shamon, Michael Stephenson
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2020, 66 (7) e190-e192;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Challenges
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Approach to diagnosis and management of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
Show more Practice

Praxis

  • Rapid recommendations
  • Recommandations rapides
  • Aide à la décision d’utiliser ou non les gliflozines pour l’insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d’éjection supérieure à 40 %, à l’intention des patients
Show more Praxis

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire