Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
EditorialEditorial

Family physicians can counter misinformation

Lessons from Motherisk to mask wearing

Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician April 2021; 67 (4) 227; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6704227
Sarah Fraser
MSc MD CCFP, EDITORIAL FELLOW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Like radioactive elements, health information decays. Half of what we know today might be untrue in a few years.1 The COVID-19 pandemic has only accelerated this phenomenon, making it challenging for clinicians to stay up to date and communicate clearly with patients and the public. Family doctors have an even more crucial role to play in health communication because the trust we build with patients helps them navigate our changing advice.

Early on, when personal protective equipment was in short supply, I did not think asymptomatic public mask wearing was advisable and I expressed that. My opinion echoed that of infectious disease specialists,2 Dr Theresa Tam, and the World Health Organization. We now understand that masks might play an important role in reducing community transmission.3 As we work through the ever evolving data, how much preventable harm is being done? Sometimes, when we are wrong, that harm can be considerable.

I first learned about Motherisk as a student. During my medical training, we referred patients to the Motherisk helpline for advice about the safety of various foods and medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Motherisk also routinely tested hair samples for drug and alcohol levels in cases referred to Child and Family Services. From 1995 until 2015, Canadian Family Physician published monthly content from Motherisk. This content was not subject to a typical double-blind peer review because of Motherisk’s reputation as a leader in maternal health. Then we learned very disturbing news. Not only had the founder of Motherisk failed to claim ties to drug companies, but Motherisk’s hair sample testing was flawed. Tragically, results of these tests were used in decisions to remove children from their families.4 Canadian Family Physician has since corrected and retracted the problematic Motherisk articles,5 but the legal proceedings for those affected by the hair testing scandal are ongoing. The harms to these families are unimaginable.

Motherisk demonstrates how easily trust in our profession can break down, with implications for clinical practice. A systematic review from 2017 showed that trust in the health care provider affects health outcomes.6 Perhaps a lack of trust can also make our patients feel disillusioned, turning to alternatives that are not evidence-based. Look at the popularity of the pseudoscientific wellness brand goop. Its success is built on blind faith in a well-loved celebrity; products such as the “Implant O-Rama System At-Home Coffee Enema” (for only $135 [US]) are not purchased because of good evidence, but because of trust in the brand.

The false assertions of goop are an example of disinformation—objectively false information with the intention to mislead. Contrast that with misinformation—incorrect information presented inadvertently, as with our position on masks during the early days of COVID-19. Medicine got it wrong because we simply did not know better (although we ultimately correctly interpreted the data). The nuanced differences between how goop and science get things wrong can feel like splitting hairs to a public that has lost trust in institutions, but the differentiation is important.

If there is a bright spot in COVID-19, it is that we have seen more science-based health care professionals in the media. Nonetheless, I frequently see able-bodied, cis-gendered, white men. They are often subspecialists talking about the extraordinary times we are in. Rarely have I seen a family physician, nurse, or other community-based allied health professional on the news, and I wonder why.

Fear of wading into an increasingly polarized public discourse should not silence physicians who want to inform the public about the best available science. Without us, there is a vacuum where pseudoscience can thrive. If you are considering writing an article, sharing information on social media, or taking part in a virtual town hall, I encourage you to do so. As family physicians who form longitudinal relationships and build trust over time, we can also serve as visible, informed public resources in this period of uncertainty. If we get it wrong, we must also be ready to admit it. Facts might change, but our ability to be fearless and trustworthy is something we can always hold on to.

Notes

We want to hear from you!

  • Connect with us on Instagram or Twitter @CFPJournal

  • Listen to and share the CFP podcast

  • Contribute to our journal by writing a CFP blog (cfp.ca/content/cfp-blog-guidelines)

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 228.

  • Copyright© 2021 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Arbesman S.
    The half-life of facts: why everything we know has an expiration date. New York, NY: Penguin Group; 2013.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Vogel L.
    Who should wear a face mask? Experts weigh in on Canada’s COVID-19 response. CMAJ 2020;192(16):E440-1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Howard J,
    2. Huang A,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Tufekci Z,
    5. Zdimal V,
    6. van der Westhuizen HM, et al.
    An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021;118(4):e2014564118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mendleson R.
    Motherisk: separated by a hair. Toronto Star 2017 Oct 19.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pimlott N,
    2. Tsuyuki RT.
    Risks of maternal codeine intake in breastfed infants: a joint statement of retraction from Canadian Family Physician and the Canadian Pharmacists Journal [notice of retraction]. Can Fam Physician 2020;66:793-4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Huang ECH,
    2. Pu C,
    3. Chou YJ,
    4. Huang N.
    Public trust in physicians—health care commodification as a possible deteriorating factor: cross-sectional analysis of 23 countries. Inquiry 2018;55:46958018759174.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 67 (4)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 67, Issue 4
1 Apr 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family physicians can counter misinformation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Family physicians can counter misinformation
Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2021, 67 (4) 227; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6704227

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Family physicians can counter misinformation
Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2021, 67 (4) 227; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6704227
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Les médecins de famille peuvent contrer l’information erronée
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • How do we know what we know?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pride and learning in reverse
  • Fierté et apprentissage en sens inverse
  • Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire