Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
LetterLetters

Formula choices in infants with cow’s milk allergy

Joel R. Lexchin
Canadian Family Physician May 2021, 67 (5) 318-319; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6705318_1
Joel R. Lexchin
Toronto, Ont
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The recent article in Canadian Family Physician about the choice of formula for infants with cow’s milk allergy1 neglects to discuss the spate of industry-sponsored guidelines in the United Kingdom in which authors have financial conflicts of interest with companies making the products. The first and second international guidelines in 2007 and 2010, respectively, were both funded by infant formula manufacturers, with many guideline authors declaring conflicts of interest:

Five of the 11 authors of the 2011 food allergy guidelines from the NICE [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence], ten of the 12 authors of the 2012 European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines, all five authors of the 2013 Milk Allergy in Primary Care (MAP) guideline, and all 12 authors of the 2017 iMAP [International Milk Allergy in Primary Care] guideline declared interests with infant formula manufacturers either at the time of writing or subsequently.2

During roughly the same period as when the guidelines were produced, prescriptions for specialist formula milks in the United Kingdom for infants with cow’s milk protein allergy increased by nearly 500% despite the lack of any data showing a substantial change in the prevalence of the condition.2

The 2011 report from the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Medicine) recommends that most of the membership of clinical practice guideline committees should not have conflicts of interest.3 None of the above guidelines published after the report was released conform to that recommendation.

The Canadian Family Physician article mentions 2 guidelines. The guideline from the World Allergy Organization4 does not provide financial conflict of interest statements for the authors but does say that the organization’s Special Committee on Food Allergy is supported through unrestricted educational grants from various charities and companies that are representative of the food industry: Danone, Heinz, Ordesa, Nestlé Nutrition Institute, Dicofarm, and Invest for Children. The other set of guidelines is the one from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition5 mentioned above.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    In 2017 to 2020, Dr Lexchin received payments for being on a panel at the American Diabetes Association; for talks at the Toronto Reference Library; for writing a brief on an action for side effects of a drug for Michael F. Smith, Lawyer, and a second brief on the role of promotion in generating prescriptions for Goodmans LLP; and from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for presenting at a workshop on conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines. He is currently a member of research groups that are receiving money from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. He is a member of the Foundation Board of Health Action International and the Board of Canadian Doctors for Medicare. He receives royalties from University of Toronto Press and James Lorimer and Co, Ltd, for books he has written.

  • Copyright © the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kipfer S,
    2. Goldman RD.
    Formula choices in infants with cow’s milk allergy. Can Fam Physician 2021;67:180-2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Van Tulleken C.
    Overdiagnosis and industry influence: how cow’s milk protein allergy is extending the reach of infant formula manufacturers. BMJ 2018;363:k5056. Erratum in: BMJ 2018;363:k5206.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Institute of Medicine
    . Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fiocchi A,
    2. Brozek J,
    3. Schünemann H,
    4. Bahna SL,
    5. von Berg A,
    6. Beyer K
    , et al. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action Against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guidelines. World Allergy Organ J 2010;3(4):57-161. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Koletzko S,
    2. Niggemann B,
    3. Arato A,
    4. Dias JA,
    5. Heuschkel R,
    6. Husby S
    , et al. Diagnostic approach and management of cow’s-milk protein allergy in infants and children: ESPGHAN GI Committee practical guidelines. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;55(2):221-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 67 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 67, Issue 5
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Formula choices in infants with cow’s milk allergy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Formula choices in infants with cow’s milk allergy
Joel R. Lexchin
Canadian Family Physician May 2021, 67 (5) 318-319; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6705318_1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Formula choices in infants with cow’s milk allergy
Joel R. Lexchin
Canadian Family Physician May 2021, 67 (5) 318-319; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6705318_1
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Letters

  • Third year will erase rural medicine
  • Consult the members
  • Offer CME and accelerate licensing
Show more Letters

Correspondance

  • Consult the members
  • Offer CME and accelerate licensing
  • Response
Show more Correspondance

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire