Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticlePraxis

Rapid recommendations

Updates from 2020 guidelines: part 2

Danielle O’Toole
Canadian Family Physician January 2022; 68 (1) 36-38; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.680136
Danielle O’Toole
Practising family physician in Academic Family Medicine and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.
MD MSc CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Continuing professional development is an essential component of a career in medicine, but keeping up with the growing volume of medical literature can be overwhelming. This article is the second part of a 3-part series1 summarizing guideline updates from 2020. This synopsis is meant to highlight changes in recommendations and encourage clinicians to explore topics of interest more fully. Readers should note that many of these updates are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion and should be considered through a primary care lens before integrating them into practice.

Guideline updates

The European Society of Cardiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend using an age-adjusted threshold for serum d-dimer levels when assessing patients for pulmonary embolism (class of recommendation IIa, level of evidence B).2 d-dimer specificity decreases with age. Using an age-adjusted d-dimer cutoff value improves specificity without sacrificing sensitivity. To rule out pulmonary embolism in patients who are 50 years or older, use a threshold below the patient’s age multiplied by 10 (eg, if the patient is 68, a negative d-dimer test result is less than 680 µg/L). For patients younger than 50 years old, use the conventional threshold of 500 µg/L. This approach is supported by Thrombosis Canada but should be used only if pulmonary embolism is unlikely (ie, a Wells score less than 4.5).3

The American Thoracic Society recommends varenicline over nicotine patches (strong recommendation, moderate certainty), bupropion (strong recommendation, moderate certainty), and electronic cigarettes (conditional recommendation, very low certainty) as first-line treatment for adults with tobacco dependency.4 In most trials, patients taking varenicline reported higher abstinence rates and experienced little to no differences in adverse events. The combination of varenicline and nicotine patches was superior to varenicline alone. In patients with comorbid psychiatric conditions, the guideline’s authors recommend varenicline over nicotine patches. Varenicline can be started before tobacco discontinuation to help promote abstinence. The authors also recommend an extended duration of 12 weeks or more over a standard course of 6 to 12 weeks.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council recommends that patients 4 years and older with moderate to severe asthma be treated with a single inhaler combining an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and the long-acting β2-agonist formoterol as both controller and reliever therapy (strong recommendation for patients between 4 and 11 years old; conditional recommendation for those 12 years and older).5,6 Most studies have been done with budesonide-formoterol (Symbicort). The Council recommends 1 to 2 puffs once or twice a day for maintenance and then as needed, for a maximum formoterol dose of 8 puffs (36 mg) for patients 4 to 11 years old and 12 puffs (54 mg) for patients 12 years and older.5 This regimen improves asthma control and quality of life and might reduce corticosteroid-associated harms.5 As outlined in Table 1, for patients 5 to 11 years old, this guideline recommends add-on formoterol in step 3,5 while the Canadian Thoracic Society 2017 position statement recommends increasing low doses of ICS to medium doses before adding on a long-acting β2-agonist, which potentially exposes children to higher doses of ICS.7 It is worth noting the Canadian monograph for Symbicort indicates that safety and efficacy have not been established in children younger than 12 years.8 Add-on long-acting muscarinic antagonists can be prescribed to patients 12 years and older whose asthma is uncontrolled despite treatment with ICS-formoterol.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Asthma treatment recommendations

A practice parameter update developed by a joint task force of experts provides medication algorithms for allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in patients 12 years or older.9 Mild symptoms can be defined as those that do not affect the patient’s quality of life or that the patient rates as less than 5 out of 10 on a visual analogue scale; moderate or severe symptoms affect the patient’s quality of life or are rated on the visual analogue scale as 5 out of 10 or greater. Intermittent symptoms occur fewer than 4 days per week or fewer than 4 consecutive weeks per year, while persistent symptoms occur 4 or more days per week and more than 4 consecutive weeks per year. The treatments described in Figure 1 can be used in conjunction with nasal saline as needed. If the initial presentation is severe, consider a course of oral corticosteroids for 5 to 7 days.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Medication algorithms for allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in patients

A practice parameter update developed by a joint task force of experts recommends against the use of glucocorticoids or antihistamines to prevent biphasic anaphylaxis (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).10 Studies have not shown clear benefit, with confidence intervals crossing 1. Patients are considered at high risk of a biphasic reaction if they require more than 1 dose of epinephrine for initial treatment. These patients require extended clinical observation. The authors recommend considering glucocorticoids or antihistamines for secondary treatment of anaphylaxis.

A consensus statement from 10 societies including the American Academy of Neurology, the European Academy of Neurology, and the European Geriatric Medicine Society have recommended avoiding terms such as altered mental status, acute brain failure, and acute confusional state.11 These terms may have relevance in education but should not be used in clinical or research practices. Use the term delirium for a clinical presentation as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, and use subsyndromal delirium for acute cognitive changes consistent with delirium that do not fulfill all criteria. The term coma can be used for a patient with depressed responsiveness and severely decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score. Finally, use acute encephalopathy to describe the rapidly developing process in the brain that can lead to a clinical presentation of subsyndromal delirium, delirium, or coma.

The authors of the Fifth Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD5) recommend considering acetylsalicylic acid for patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia with covert brain infarcts on neuroimaging without a history of stroke (grade 2C evidence).12 The benefit of using acetylsalicylic acid is unclear, as it is unknown whether it prevents new or recurrent covert infarcts or vascular cognitive impairment.13 This recommendation is not for covert white matter lesions without a history of stroke or brain infarcts. The authors also gave a weak recommendation to consider intensive blood pressure lowering in middle-aged adults with vascular risk factors to decrease the risk of mild cognitive impairment (grade 2C evidence).

The CCCDTD5 recommends anatomical neuroimaging (with a preference for magnetic resonance imaging) in most situations when investigating cognitive impairment (grade 1C evidence).14 Magnetic resonance imaging has a higher sensitivity to vascular lesions than noncontrast computed tomography (grade 2C evidence). Neuroimaging is recommended for any of the following: onset in the past 2 years, unexpected decline in a patient with known dementia, recent and clinically significant head trauma, unexplained neurological symptoms, history of cancer, risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage, symptoms of normal pressure hydrocephalus, or considerable vascular risk factors. There is no longer a recommendation to perform imaging for all patients younger than 60 years, as this age threshold was arbitrary.

The CCCDTD5 recommends testing gait speed (grade 1B evidence), frailty (grade 1B evidence), neuropsychiatric symptoms (grade 1B evidence), sleep history (grade 1A evidence), and hearing (grade 1B evidence) in patients with concerns of cognitive impairment.15 A gait speed of less than 0.8 m/s is associated with a 94% increase in short-term risk of dementia. Several meta-analyses also identified the frailty index and the frailty phenotype as predictors of dementia when combined with cognitive impairment (hazard ratio of 5.36). In addition, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as low mood, disturbed sleep, low appetite, and personality changes are associated with a higher risk of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia and can be assessed using tools such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory or the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist. Finally, midlife hearing loss is one of the most easily modifiable risk factors for dementia (relative risk of 1.94), although there is no evidence that correcting hearing loss prevents cognitive impairment.16

The CCCDTD5 recommends discontinuing a cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine if the patient has been taking it for more than 12 months and there has been clinically significant worsening of the dementia over 6 months in the absence of other medical conditions or environmental factors (grade 1B evidence).11 These drugs should also be discontinued if the patient has intolerable side effects or poor adherence or if the patient has severe or end-stage dementia. Cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine should not be discontinued until psychotic symptoms, agitation, or aggression have stabilized, unless symptoms are related to the medication (grade 2B evidence). Patients who have had improved neuropsychiatric symptoms with cognitive enhancers should continue taking them despite any cognitive or functional decline (grade 2B evidence).

Conclusion

This article is part 2 of a 3-part series1 summarizing guideline updates in the areas of respiratory disease, allergies, and neurology. It is recommended that clinicians review and appraise these updates further to expand their knowledge or confirm current practice.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright © 2022 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. O’Toole D.
    Rapid recommendations. Updates from 2020 guidelines: part 1. Can Fam Physician 2021;67:912-4 (Eng), e326-8 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Konstantinides SV,
    2. Meyer G,
    3. Becattini C,
    4. Bueno H,
    5. Geersing GJ,
    6. Harjola VP, et al.
    2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020;41(4):543-603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Thrombosis Canada
    . Pulmonary embolism (PE): diagnosis. Whitby, ON: Thrombosis Canada; 2020. Available from: https://thrombosiscanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Pulmonary-Embolism-Diagnosis_23Jan-2020.pdf. Accessed 2021 Jan 26.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Leone FT,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Evers-Casey S,
    4. Evins AE,
    5. Eakin MN,
    6. Fathi J, et al.
    Initiating pharmacologic treatment in tobacco-dependent adults. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;202(2):e5-31.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cloutier MM,
    2. Baptist AP,
    3. Blake KV,
    4. Brooks EG,
    5. Bryant-Stephens T,
    6. DiMango E, et al.
    2020 focused updates to the asthma management guidelines: a report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;146(6):1217-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cloutier MM,
    2. Dixon AE,
    3. Krishnan JA,
    4. Lemanske RF Jr,
    5. Pace W,
    6. Schatz M.
    Managing asthma in adolescents and adults: 2020 asthma guideline update from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. JAMA 2020;324(22):2301-17.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. FitzGerald JM,
    2. Lemiere C,
    3. Lougheed MD,
    4. Ducharme FM,
    5. Dell SD,
    6. Ramsey C, et al.
    Recognition and management of severe asthma: a Canadian Thoracic Society position statement. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med 2017;1(4):199-221.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. AstraZeneca
    . Product monograph. Symbicort Turbuhaler. Mississauga, ON: AstraZeneca Canada Inc; 2021. Available from: https://www.astrazeneca.ca/content/dam/az-ca/downloads/productinformation/symbicort-turbuhaler-product-monograph-en.pdf. Accessed 2021 Apr 9.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dykewicz MS,
    2. Wallace DV,
    3. Amrol DJ,
    4. Baroody FM,
    5. Bernstein JA,
    6. Craig TJ, et al.
    Rhinitis 2020: a practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;146(4):721-67. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shaker MS,
    2. Wallace DV,
    3. Golden DBK,
    4. Oppenheimer J,
    5. Bernstein JA,
    6. Campbell RL, et al.
    Anaphylaxis—a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;145(4):1082-123. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Slooter AJC,
    2. Otte WM,
    3. Devlin JW,
    4. Arora RC,
    5. Bleck TP,
    6. Claassen J, et al.
    Updated nomenclature of delirium and acute encephalopathy: statement of ten societies. Intensive Care Med 2020;46(5):1020-2. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ismail Z,
    2. Black SE,
    3. Camicioli R,
    4. Chertkow H,
    5. Herrmann N,
    6. Laforce R Jr, et al.
    Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2020;16(8):1182-95. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Smith EE,
    2. Barber P,
    3. Field TS,
    4. Ganesh A,
    5. Hachinski V,
    6. Hogan DB, et al.
    Canadian Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD)5: guidelines for management of vascular cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2020;6(1):e12056.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Brisson M,
    2. Brodeur C,
    3. Létourneau-Guillon L,
    4. Masellis M,
    5. Stoessl J,
    6. Tamm A, et al.
    CCCDTD5: clinical role of neuroimaging and liquid biomarkers in patients with cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2020;6(1):e12098.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Montero-Odasso M,
    2. Pieruccini-Faria F,
    3. Ismail Z,
    4. Li K,
    5. Lim A,
    6. Phillips N, et al.
    CCCDTD5 recommendations on early non cognitive markers of dementia: a Canadian consensus. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2020;6(1):e12068.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Rockwood K,
    2. Andrew MK,
    3. Aubertin-Leheudre M,
    4. Belleville S,
    5. Bherer L,
    6. Bowles SK, et al.
    CCCDTD5: reducing the risk of later-life dementia. Evidence informing the Fifth Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD-5). Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2020;6(1):e12083.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 68 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 68, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rapid recommendations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rapid recommendations
Danielle O’Toole
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2022, 68 (1) 36-38; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.680136

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Rapid recommendations
Danielle O’Toole
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2022, 68 (1) 36-38; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.680136
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Guideline updates
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Rapid recommendations: Updates from 2020 guidelines: part 3
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Éponge à haut rebond comme outil de simulation d’une suture périnéale
  • High-rebound sponge as a simulation tool for perineal suture
  • Assessment and management of disability due to mental disorders
Show more Praxis

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire