Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleTeaching Moment

Continuity in the academic family medicine teaching environment

Exploring the potential of the CFPC’s Patient’s Medical Home

José François and Émilie Fowler
Canadian Family Physician January 2022; 68 (1) 74-76; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.680174
José François
Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine in the Max Rady College of Medicine at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg.
MD MMedEd CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jose.francois@umanitoba.ca jfrancois@centredesante.mb.ca
Émilie Fowler
Family medicine resident in the Department of Family Medicine in the Max Rady College of Medicine at the University of Manitoba at the time of writing.
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Continuity is at the heart of family medicine, and its benefits are many: increased efficiency, improved health outcomes, enhanced trust, and increased satisfaction for both patient and physician.1-8 Continuity is also a pillar of the Patient’s Medical Home (PMH) model developed by the College of Family Physicians of Canada, yet it can be challenging to achieve in academic teaching environments.9-11

Continuity is also a central element of the College’s Triple C curriculum framework.12 The move to competency-based medical education, with its systems of graduated supervision, places greater emphasis on the longitudinal resident-preceptor relationship. Residency programs across Canada must aim to meet this standard, but the path to achieving continuity in education is strewn with practical problems. Many authors have attempted to define continuity and find solutions for its challenges, but we have yet to find a consensus on what it should mean, what it should look like, or how it should be implemented.13,14

In this commentary, we will review the concepts of continuity in patient care and continuity in education, and the challenges of their execution in an academic setting. We will discuss the opportunities within and outside the PMH model to bring together continuity for both patient care and resident education.

Continuity of care in the clinical setting

Although continuity has traditionally been viewed as following patients over time, in different settings, and experiencing relationships and responsibility of care, continuity as a concept has multiple dimensions. According to a widely embraced definition from the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, there are 3 types of continuity of health care: informational continuity, management continuity, and relational continuity15:

  • Informational continuity for clinical care involves the seamless flow of information linking the care from one provider to another across care settings.

  • Management continuity for clinical care is defined as consistent patient-centred management of health conditions across care settings. Management continuity is achieved when services are delivered in a harmonious and timely manner, as well as when management plans are communicated between different teams to provide consistency for the patient.

  • Relational continuity for clinical care consists of the maintenance of ongoing therapeutic relationships between a patient and one or more care providers across care settings. It is considered one of the strongest predictors of positive physician satisfaction and patient outcomes.2-4,7

Continuity in the educational setting

Recognizing that continuity in the learning environment is also multifaceted, Bowen et al argue that its dimensions can be viewed in a manner analogous to those of continuity in clinical care11:

  • Informational continuity for learning involves the need for learners to track learning from their patient encounters across a variety of care settings, ideally within an electronic portfolio. The ability of residents and their competency coach to access a variety of information (field notes, in-training assessments, procedure logs, etc) facilitates educational planning and supports the graduated autonomy of learners.

  • Management continuity for learning involves the development and periodic updating of a longitudinal educational plan for learners.

  • Relational continuity for learning emphasizes the longitudinal relationships between residents and their preceptors, which are critical to the learners’ experience.16,17 Relational continuity for learning, which includes teaching and assessment, is facilitated by assigning a primary preceptor (or competency coach) and a small group of supervising family medicine faculty who will follow the resident throughout residency. In addition to facilitating the frequent observations required to support competency-based medical education approaches, relational continuity allows supervising faculty to better tailor their strategies in the context of the resident’s needs and personal goals.18,19

Relational continuity for learning also extends to the clinical learning environment. Limiting the number and frequency of changes in learning sites provides residents more time to focus on learning rather than on becoming oriented to new environments every rotation.12,18 Continuity of the clinical learning environment allows residents an opportunity to develop relationships with other professionals, thus fostering interprofessional learning and practice.12,18

Challenges of continuity in the academic family medicine environment

There are many factors affecting continuity of clinical care and continuity for learning in the academic family medicine environment, including patient preferences, evolving models of care, scheduling and office processes, and educational program formats.

Although patients would prefer to see their regular providers for their care, they often trade off continuity for quick access to primary care.20,21 In a recent study comparing multiple attributes of primary care clinic access, researchers found that patient choices for appointment bookings were primarily influenced by the speed of getting the appointment (access), followed by the professional position of the provider (family doctor, resident, nurse, or nurse practitioner), and the patient’s familiarity with the provider (continuity).21

New models of care have promoted team-based approaches to expand access to care and to gain efficiencies by allowing other health professionals to work to a fuller scope. In these models, patients do not always see their own family physicians (or family medicine residents) but interact with other team members. In these new models, family physicians, residents, and their teams must become skilled at optimizing other dimensions for continuity (informational continuity for clinical care and management continuity for clinical care).

For a number of reasons, including the need to maintain their personal wellness, family physicians are increasingly choosing part-time work. Those working in academic environments must further divide their time between clinical work and the range of academic activities necessary to maintain and advance the discipline. In addition to reducing these family physicians’ availability to patients, part-time clinical practice limits the time they have available to supervise residents.

Resident scheduling in a 2-year family medicine residency program creates challenges in developing continuity of care.18,22 To develop a genuine appreciation of the value of relational continuity for clinical care often requires multiple patient-physician encounters over an extended period. Many residencies in Canada work as “block” residencies, whereby residents change specialty areas, locations, and preceptors as often as every month. Residency programs have attempted to mitigate the problems with part-time presence in clinic in many ways. Some have created a “half-day back” for learners to return to their family medicine clinic on a weekly basis while they are on other discipline-specific rotations. This strategy has numerous logistic challenges and has had mixed results in terms of continuity.12 Some programs have adopted the “mini-blocks” system, with 2-week scheduling intervals.23 Others have chosen horizontal experiences, where a resident spends half the day in hospital and the other half in clinic,24 or have “max-packed” clinic time into 12 consecutive months of family medicine.22,24 Unfortunately, it is unclear which format is most favourable for continuity, and it is likely that many factors in individual residency programs make one particular format better than others for them.

Dealing with challenges and exploring new opportunities

The redesign of primary care practices to PMH models of care is changing our learning environments. Below, we offer 4 recommendations to maximize the opportunity for academic PMHs to support all dimensions for clinical and educational continuity.

Ensure that residents understand and value continuity in the PMH model. Although continuity is a core value, teaching how to optimize continuity in the clinical environment (both for family medicine rotations and off-service rotations) is not part of the formal curriculum. Teaching and implementing strategies to ensure optimal informational, management, and relational continuity should be integrated into the residency curriculum, ideally as a component of a larger residency curriculum on the PMH.

Ensure patients’ needs are at the centre. Academic primary care sites should embrace the PMH model as a way of enabling and fostering long-term relationships between patients and the care team (which includes the family medicine resident), thereby ensuring continuous care over the patient’s lifespan. By optimizing informational and management continuity, the care site ensures its role as the coordinator of all the medical services their patients receive throughout the medical community. In terms of relational continuity, practices should ensure scheduling and office processes that optimize not only patients’ access but also continuity with their main provider and the provider’s team.

Academic PMH teams should, whenever possible, aim to ensure that continuity of care is provided for their patients across different settings, including the office, the hospital, long-term care, and the patient’s home. This effort should include the judicious use of technologies for virtual care to support continuity.

Embrace the interprofessional model for clinical and educational continuity. The individual patient-physician relationship has traditionally been the focus for measures of continuity, but it is time to shift some attention to also measuring patient continuity with the team, to better reflect the growing importance of interprofessional collaborative practice in the PMH model. Micro-teams, small interprofessional teams responsible for the care of a common patient panel, are a promising model to increase relational, management, and informational continuity of care, as well as educational continuity.22,24,25 Ideally, residents would have longitudinal continuity with a core interprofessional primary care practice team that would include a core group of supervising faculty. As Bowen et al have previously recommended, residents should be integral to the team, caring for the team’s panel of patients, whom they would understand as “their own.”

Optimize residency scheduling for continuity. Based on their practice context, residency programs should carefully reconsider their residency schedule formats, looking for opportunities to maximize continuity by reducing the number of transitions between different environments and teams when possible. When feasible, programs should integrate horizontal clinical experiences, ideally with the same clinical and supervising teams.

Conclusion

Continuity is a core clinical and educational value in family medicine and many factors make it difficult to achieve in academic teaching environments. By embracing the PMH models and making thoughtful changes in residency curricula, programs have an opportunity to optimize care for patients and ensure that all residents become skilled in, and experience the joys of, continuity of care.

Notes

Teaching tips

▸ Continuity is a pillar of the Patient’s Medical Home (PMH) and the Triple C Competency-based Curriculum framework and provides multiple benefits. However, many factors make it difficult to achieve in academic teaching environments.

▸ The dimensions of continuity in the academic learning environment are similar to those of continuity in clinical care, involving informational, management, and relational continuity for learning. Relational continuity for learning also extends to the clinical learning environment.

▸ The redesign of primary care practices to PMH models of care is changing the learning environment. Patient preferences, scheduling and office processes, the formats of educational programs, and other factors play a role in achieving continuity of care in the learning environment.

▸ Academic primary care sites can maximize the opportunity to support all dimensions for clinical and educational continuity by ensuring that residents understand and value continuity; by embracing the PMH model and ensuring patients’ needs are at the centre; by embracing interprofessional collaboration; and by optimizing residency scheduling for continuity. Thoughtful changes in residency curricula might give programs an opportunity to optimize care for patients and ensure that all residents become skilled in, and experience the joys of, continuity of care.

Teaching Moment is a quarterly series in Canadian Family Physician, coordinated by the Section of Teachers of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. The focus is on practical topics for all teachers in family medicine, with an emphasis on evidence and best practice. Please send any ideas, requests, or submissions to Dr Viola Antao, Teaching Moment Coordinator, at viola.antao{at}utoronto.ca.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de janvier 2022 à la page e18.

  • Copyright © 2022 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Saultz JW,
    2. Albedaiwi W.
    Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(5):445-51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mainous AG 3rd,
    2. Koopman RJ,
    3. Gill JM,
    4. Baker R,
    5. Pearson WS.
    Relationship between continuity of care and diabetes control: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Public Health 2004;94(1):66-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Shin DW,
    2. Cho J,
    3. Yang HK,
    4. Park JH,
    5. Lee H,
    6. Kim H, et al.
    Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. Ann Fam Med 2014;12(6):534-41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wolinsky FD,
    2. Bentler SE,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Geweke JF,
    5. Cook EA,
    6. Obrizan M, et al.
    Continuity of care with a primary care physician and mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010;65(4):4218. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.
    1. Hjortdahl P,
    2. Laerum E.
    Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1992;304(6837):1287-90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    1. Weiss LJ,
    2. Blustein J.
    Faithful patients: the effect of long-term physician-patient relationships on the costs and use of health care by older Americans. Am J Public Health 1996;86(12):1742-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Guthrie B,
    2. Wyke S.
    Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ridd M,
    2. Shaw A,
    3. Salisbury C.
    ‘Two sides of the coin’—the value of personal continuity to GPs: a qualitative interview study. Fam Pract 2006;23(4):461-8. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    A vision for Canada. Family practice—the Patient’s Medical Home 2019. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2019. Available from: https://patientsmedicalhome.ca/files/uploads/PMH_VISION2019_ENG_WEB_2.pdf. Accessed 2021 Nov 26.
  10. 10.
    1. Darden PM,
    2. Ector W,
    3. Moran C,
    4. Quattlebaum TG.
    Comparison of continuity in a resident versus private practice. Pediatrics 2001;108(6):1263-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bowen JL,
    2. Hirsh D,
    3. Aagaard E,
    4. Kaminetzky P,
    5. Smith M,
    6. Hardman J, et al.
    Advancing educational continuity in primary care residencies: an opportunity for patient-centered medical homes. Acad Med 2015;90(5):587-93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tannenbaum D,
    2. Kerr J,
    3. Konkin J,
    4. Organek A,
    5. Parsons E,
    6. Saucier D, et al.
    Triple C competency-based curriculum. Report of the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review—part 1. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011. Available from: https://www.cfpc.ca/CFPC/media/Resources/Education/WGCR_TripleC_Report_English_Final_18Mar11.pdf. Accessed 2021 Nov 26.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Haggerty JL,
    2. Reid RJ,
    3. Freeman GK,
    4. Starfield BH,
    5. Adair CE,
    6. McKendry R.
    Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003;327(7425):1219-21.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Saultz JW.
    Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med 2003;1(3):134-43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Reid R,
    2. Haggerty J,
    3. McKendry R.
    Defusing the confusion: concepts and measures of continuity of health care. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2002.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Schultz K.
    Strategies to enhance teaching about continuity of care. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:666-8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lee A,
    2. Kennett S,
    3. Khera S,
    4. Ross S.
    Perceptions, practice, and “ownership:” experiences in continuity of the patient-doctor relationship in a family medicine residency. Can Med Educ J 2017;8(4):e74-85.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kerr J,
    2. Walsh AE,
    3. Konkin J,
    4. Tannenbaum D,
    5. Organek AJ,
    6. Parsons E, et al.
    Continuity: middle C—a very good place to start. Can Fam Physician 2011;57(11):1355-6 (Eng), e457-9 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hirsh DA,
    2. Ogur B,
    3. Thibault GE,
    4. Cox M.
    “Continuity” as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med 2007;356(8):858-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cheraghi-Sohi S,
    2. Hole AR,
    3. Mead N,
    4. McDonald R,
    5. Whalley D,
    6. Bower P, et al.
    What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Ann Fam Med 2008;6(2):107-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Oliver D,
    2. Deal K,
    3. Howard M,
    4. Qian H,
    5. Agarwal G,
    6. Guenter D.
    Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e023578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gupta R,
    2. Dubé K,
    3. Bodenheimer T.
    The road to excellence for primary care resident teaching clinics. Acad Med 2016;91(4):458-61.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Knox M,
    3. Syer S.
    Interprofessional care in teaching practices: lessons from “bright spots.” Acad Med 2018;93(10):1445-7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Walker J,
    2. Payne B,
    3. Clemans-Taylor BL,
    4. Snyder ED.
    Continuity of care in resident outpatient clinics: a scoping review of the literature. J Grad Med Educ 2018;10(1):16-25.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Risi L,
    2. Bhatti N,
    3. Cockman P,
    4. Hall J,
    5. Ovink E,
    6. Macklin S, et al.
    Micro-teams for better continuity in Tower Hamlets: we have a problem but we’re working on a promising solution! Br J Gen Pract 2015;65(639):536.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 68 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 68, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Continuity in the academic family medicine teaching environment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Continuity in the academic family medicine teaching environment
José François, Émilie Fowler
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2022, 68 (1) 74-76; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.680174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Continuity in the academic family medicine teaching environment
José François, Émilie Fowler
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2022, 68 (1) 74-76; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.680174
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Continuity of care in the clinical setting
    • Continuity in the educational setting
    • Challenges of continuity in the academic family medicine environment
    • Dealing with challenges and exploring new opportunities
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • La continuité dans les milieux d’enseignement universitaire
  • Continuity in the age of virtual care
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Continuity in the age of virtual care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teaching residents about cognitive behavioural therapy
  • Approach to teaching active listening in the age of artificial intelligence
  • Simple tool for teaching patient safety through incident analysis
Show more Teaching Moment

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire