Research ArticleChild Health Update

Language outcomes after cochlear implant

Sophie McGregor and Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician October 2022, 68 (10) 737-738; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6810737

Abstract

Question A young infant seen in our practice was diagnosed with profound congenital hearing loss. Their parents want to pursue cochlear implant surgery for their child, but they are concerned about language acquisition before and after the surgery. What should they know about the procedure, and how can they improve language outcomes?

Answer Congenital hearing loss is often identified on newborn screening hearing tests. Cochlear implants may lead to overall improved spoken language skills among children with profound hearing loss. Some factors associated with successful language acquisition in children after cochlear implant surgery include having the procedure at an earlier age and family engagement in early intervention programs. Learning sign language before cochlear implant surgery may improve subsequent language outcomes and support the child’s cognitive and socioemotional success.

Congenital hearing loss affects 1 to 3 of 1000 live births.1 Hearing disorders disrupt language development and as a result can affect a child’s social development and literacy.2 Most high-income countries, including Canada, have implemented hearing detection and intervention programs for infants and children shortly after birth to address hearing health proactively.3 These programs include universal newborn hearing screening, communication support such as sign-language classes, family support for infants with permanent and irreversible hearing loss, and hearing aids and cochlear implants.3,4

It is important to note that the use and promotion of cochlear implants are controversial topics among people who are deaf or hard of hearing and their supporters.5 In this hypothetical case the parents have decided to proceed with cochlear implant surgery for their child, thus a detailed examination of the controversy is beyond the scope of this article. However, clinicians should familiarize themselves with these concerns and acknowledge them in individualized discussions with patients’ parents.

Cochlear implants process sound electronically and then transmit electric stimulation to the cochlea.6 In general, infants with moderate to severe permanent hearing impairment who have no contraindications to surgery are candidates for cochlear implantation.4 More than 90% of children with deafness or hearing loss are born to hearing parents and most of these parents opt for their children to gain access to sound and spoken language.7 Cochlear implants may lead to overall better spoken-language skills for children with profound hearing loss.8

There is statistically significant variability in the rate of success in language development among children with congenital hearing loss who receive cochlear implants.9,10 Primary care providers play a role in enhancing the likelihood of successful language acquisition2 by using tools to support and improve outcomes after cochlear implants.

Improving outcomes

Several factors are associated with successful language acquisition in children after cochlear implant surgery.

Age at implantation. Children with substantial congenital hearing impairment who receive cochlear implants at a younger age have better speech and language acquisition outcomes.11 The auditory cortex has the most neural plasticity at birth, and this plasticity decreases over time. The critical period of learning and language development is within the first 3.5 years of life. Early cochlear implantation, ideally before 12 months of age, is associated with the highest rate of successful hearing and oral language production after surgery.12,13

A prospective study of 350 children from Australia reported that 5-year-old children who received cochlear implants at 24 months of age had mean global language scores that were 1.4 standard deviations below those of children who received cochlear implants at 6 months of age, based on 20 measures of language outcomes (−21.4 score points, 95% CI −33.9 to −9.0).14 A multicentre study of 209 children with congenital hearing loss reported that children with cochlear implants placed before 12 months of age had statistically significantly better receptive language skills and cognitive outcomes at school entry (5 to 7 years of age) than children who received cochlear implants between 12 and 60 months of age.15

A 12-year retrospective study at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa revealed that 118 of 187 children (63%) received cochlear implants after 12 months of age.16 Almost 10% of the implantations that occurred more than 12 months after diagnosis were delayed owing to family indecision, emphasizing the difficulties in decision making about the surgical procedure.17

Family involvement. Interventions focused on parent-child interactions can improve language outcomes for children with cochlear implants.18 A retrospective cohort study of 42 children with cochlear implants in Australia found that intensive family involvement in early intervention programs was associated with greater scores on a standardized measure of single-word receptive vocabulary.19

A meta-analysis of 27 studies of children with cochlear implants reported that the effect of parental linguistic input, including all language types they exposed their children to, accounted for one-third (31.7%) of the variance in the children’s language outcomes (r=0.564, P<.001, 95% CI 0.449 to 0.660).20 The authors concluded that high-quality parent-child language interactions after cochlear implant surgery are important to successful language acquisition. Higher family socioeconomic status8 and higher levels of maternal education8,21 were associated with improved language outcomes.

Disabilities. Having an additional disability was associated with poor language outcomes in children with cochlear implants. Among 3-year-old children with hearing loss, having additional disabilities accounted for 15% to 21% of variance in language outcomes.21 Nonverbal cognitive ability was a statistically significant predictor of receptive and expressive language outcomes in children with disabilities who received cochlear implants, and was positively correlated with all language and speech measures.10 Access to early cochlear implant surgery and the role of multidisciplinary care teams were extremely important to ensuring favourable outcomes in this population.21

Learning sign language

Cochlear implantation is usually scheduled 6 to 12 months after the diagnosis of congenital hearing loss,16 and children may be at high risk of limited language exposure (linguistic deprivation) during that time, which may result in long-term language delay.13

There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to suggest whether learning a visual language such as American Sign Language before implantation improves oral language acquisition later in life.22-24 However, providing access to sign language at a young age will offer children an initial language and support cognitive and socioemotional success.25-27

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation may enable children to learn oral or sign language. Implant surgery early in life and family involvement in care are associated with favourable outcomes in children, while the presence of additional disabilities may delay language development. Learning sign language before cochlear implantation may help avoid language deprivation. Primary care providers and multidisciplinary care teams can initiate counseling, surgery, and postimplant follow-up, and families can seek additional support from provincial or territorial services.

Notes

Child Health Update is produced by the Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) program (http://www.pretx.org) at the BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, BC. Sophie McGregor is a member and Dr Ran D. Goldman is Director of the PRETx program. The mission of the PRETx program is to promote child health through evidence-based research in therapeutics in pediatric emergency medicine.

Do you have questions about the effects of drugs, chemicals, radiation, or infections in children? We invite you to submit them to the PRETx program by fax at 604 875-2414; they will be addressed in future Child Health Updates. Published Child Health Updates are available on the Canadian Family Physician website (https://www.cfp.ca).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 739.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fortnum HM,
    2. Summerfield AQ,
    3. Marshall DH,
    4. Davis AC,
    5. Bamford JM.
    Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. BMJ 2001;323(7312):536-40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ching TYC,
    2. Dillon H,
    3. Leigh G,
    4. Cupples L.
    Learning from the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5-year findings and implications. Int J Audiol 2018;57(Sup 2):S105-11. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bagatto M,
    2. Moodie S,
    3. Fitzpatrick E,
    4. Kealey C,
    5. Campbell B,
    6. Aiken S, et al.
    Status of early hearing detection and intervention programs in Canada: results from a country-wide survey. Can J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 2020;44(3):107-24.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fitzpatrick EM,
    2. Cologrosso E,
    3. Sikora L.
    Candidacy for amplification in children with hearing loss: a review of guidelines and recommendations. Am J Audiol 2019;28(4):1025-45. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cooper A.
    Hear me out. Hearing each other for the first time: the implications of cochlear implant activation. Mo Med 2019;115(6):469-71.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kral A,
    2. O’Donoghue GM.
    Profound deafness in childhood. N Engl J Med 2010;363(15):1438-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mitchell RE,
    2. Karchmer MA.
    Chasing the mythical ten percent: parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Lang Stud 2004;4(2):138-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Niparko JK,
    2. Tobey EA,
    3. Thal DJ,
    4. Eisenberg LS,
    5. Wang NY,
    6. Quittner AL, et al.
    Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA 2010;303(15):1498-506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Santarelli R,
    2. De Filippi R,
    3. Genovese E,
    4. Arslan E.
    Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study. Audiol Neurootol 2008;13(4):257-65. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cupples L,
    2. Ching TYC,
    3. Button L,
    4. Leigh G,
    5. Marnane V,
    6. Whitfield J, et al.
    Language and speech outcomes of children with hearing loss and additional disabilities: identifying the variables that influence performance at five years of age. Int J Audiol 2018;57(Sup 2):S93-104. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Yang Y,
    2. Chen M,
    3. Zheng J,
    4. Hao J,
    5. Liu B,
    6. Liu W, et al.
    Clinical evaluation of cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months of age. Pediatr Investig 2020;4(2):99-103.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Leigh J,
    2. Dettman S,
    3. Dowell R,
    4. Briggs R.
    Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age. Otol Neurotol 2013;34(3):443-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Tobey EA,
    2. Thal D,
    3. Niparko JK,
    4. Eisenberg LS,
    5. Quittner AL,
    6. Wang NY, et al.
    Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2013;52(4):219-29. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ching TYC,
    2. Dillon H,
    3. Button L,
    4. Seeto M,
    5. Van Buynder P,
    6. Marnane V, et al.
    Age at intervention for permanent hearing loss and 5-year language outcomes. Pediatrics 2017;140(3):e20164274. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dettman SJ,
    2. Dowell RC,
    3. Choo D,
    4. Arnott W,
    5. Abrahams Y,
    6. Davis A, et al.
    Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months: a multicenter study. Otol Neurotol 2016;37(2):e82-95.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fitzpatrick EM,
    2. Ham J,
    3. Whittingham J.
    Pediatric cochlear implantation: why do children receive implants late? Ear Hear 2015;36(6):688-94.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hyde M,
    2. Punch R,
    3. Komesaroff L.
    Coming to a decision about cochlear implantation: parents making choices for their deaf children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2010;15(2):162-78. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lam-Cassettari C,
    2. Wadnerkar-Kamble MB,
    3. James DM.
    Enhancing parent-child communication and parental self-esteem with a video-feedback intervention: outcomes with prelingual deaf and hard-of-hearing children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2015;20(3):266-74. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yanbay E,
    2. Hickson L,
    3. Scarinci N,
    4. Constantinescu G,
    5. Dettman SJ.
    Language outcomes for children with cochlear implants enrolled in different communication programs. Cochlear Implants Int 2014;15(3):121-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Holzinger D,
    2. Dall M,
    3. Sanduvete-Chaves S,
    4. Saldaña D,
    5. Chacón-Moscoso S,
    6. Fellinger J.
    The impact of family environment on language development of children with cochlear implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear 2020;41(5):1077-91.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ching TYC,
    2. Dillon H.
    Major findings of the LOCHI study on children at 3 years of age and implications for audiological management. Int J Audiol 2013;52(Suppl 2):S65-8. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Fitzpatrick EM,
    2. Hamel C,
    3. Stevens A,
    4. Pratt M,
    5. Moher D,
    6. Doucet SP, et al.
    Sign language and spoken language for children with hearing loss: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2016;137(1):e20151974. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    1. Geers AE,
    2. Mitchell CM,
    3. Warner-Czyz A,
    4. Wang NY,
    5. Eisenberg LS; CDaCI Investigative Team
    . Early sign language exposure and cochlear implantation benefits. Pediatrics 2017;140(1):e20163489. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Campbell R,
    2. MacSweeney M,
    3. Woll B.
    Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: the relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:834.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Humphries T,
    2. Kushalnagar P,
    3. Mathur G,
    4. Napoli DJ,
    5. Padden C,
    6. Pollard R, et al.
    What medical education can do to ensure robust language development in deaf children. Med Sci Educ 2014;24:409-19.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.
    1. Knoors H,
    2. Marschark M.
    Language planning for the 21st century: revisiting bilingual language policy for deaf children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2012;17(3):291-305. Epub 2012 May 9. Errata in: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2012;17(4):535, J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2013;18(4):563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Cochlear implants. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of the Deaf; 2015. Available from: http://cad.ca/issues-positions/cochlear-implants. Accessed 2022 Aug 27.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Language outcomes after cochlear implant
Sophie McGregor, Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2022, 68 (10) 737-738; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6810737
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section