Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleEditorial

Rethinking body mass index

Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician June 2022; 68 (6) 399; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6806399
Sarah Fraser
MSc MD CCFP
Roles: ASSOCIATE SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

While at the hospital recently for a diagnostic imaging procedure, Dr Stephanie Hart felt humiliated. Both the gowns and the imaging machine were too small for her body. This was not the first time the medical system had failed her because of her size.

In a CFP Podcast released in March 2022, Dr Hart describes her experiences as a family doctor who is obese.1 In addition to discussing her powerful personal story, we explore the validity (or lack thereof) of the frequently used body mass index (BMI) metric. Invented in the 1830s by Belgian statistician and polymath Lambert Adolphe Jacques Quetelet, BMI is calculated as kilograms (of body weight) divided by metres squared (of height). Initially known as the Quetelet Index, it was intended for use in epidemiological studies.2 The term body mass index was proposed in 1972 by Ancel Keys, an influential but controversial American physiologist.3 It was Keys who also discovered an association between cholesterol and heart disease. Eventually, the insurance industry co-opted BMI to determine risk and coverage for policy holders, and the metric is now commonly used in family medicine.

Today BMI is being questioned as a marker of metabolic health.4 Dr Katherine Flegal and colleagues challenged the conventional narrative in a systematic review published in JAMA in 2013.5 Among their findings was that people with BMI values in the overweight category had reduced mortality compared with people with BMI values in the normal category. The topic is one of hot debate in both the scientific community and the mainstream media.6

Despite its questionable scientific validity, we still ascribe great importance to BMI. We calculate it, plot it on charts, and relay concerns to our patients if their BMIs fall outside the “normal” range. We check weight regularly and tell our patients to eat less and move more, often unaware of how ineffective and even harmful these statements can be. Indeed, pathologizing larger bodies in itself can be a cause of detrimental health effects. Women who are categorized as obese, for example, are less likely to have Papanicolaou tests than women who are not obese.7 This raises a couple questions: Are obesity-associated cancers secondary to increased adiposity? Or do larger people have lower screening rates because they feel judged or degraded when seeking testing and sometimes avoid it altogether?

This month’s clinical review addresses another stigmatizing health issue: binge eating disorder (page 416).8 The article presents tools that family doctors can use to help treat patients with this common yet underdiagnosed condition. Patients with binge eating disorder may also be obese, but not necessarily. In addressing binge eating disorder and BMI in the same editorial, it may seem I am implying that these entities fall into the same category. Not so. While BMI is a flawed metric for assessing health risks, binge eating disorder is a physical manifestation of psychological suffering recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition.

Obesity as a construct is easier to dismantle. Straightforward interventions such as appropriately sized office chairs, gowns, and diagnostic equipment could go a long way in helping larger patients feel more comfortable, thus making them more likely to access medical care when they need it. Eating disorders, however, are often the end result of trauma.9 And while the causes of disordered eating are broader than the images we see portrayed in the media, the messages that young people internalize from them are also implicated.10

In this, obesity and binge eating disorder have a lot in common. The quest for a normative, “perfect” body is both harmful and impossible to achieve. It is time to revisit how we think about weight and stop setting harmful, unrealistic standards—in both medicine and society.

Notes

Scan to listen to the podcast with Drs Fraser and Hart.

Figure

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 401.

  • Copyright © 2022 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    Third Rail: the stigma of obesity in medicine. In: CFP Podcast. Mississauga, ON: Canadian Family Physician; 2022. Available from: https://cfppodcast.libsyn.com/. Accessed 2022 May 10.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Czerniawski AM.
    A 200-year weight debate. Contexts 2017;16(3):68-9.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Blackburn H,
    2. Jacobs D Jr.
    Origins and evolution of body mass index (BMI): continuing saga. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):665-9. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tomiyama AJ,
    2. Hunger JM,
    3. Nguyen-Cuu J,
    4. Wells C.
    Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005-2012. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016;40(5):883-6. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Flegal KM,
    2. Kit BK,
    3. Orpana H,
    4. Graubard BI.
    Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2013;309(1):71-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Milne V,
    2. Tierney M,
    3. Caulfield T.
    ‘An imperfect tool’: the controversy over whether BMI is the best measure of obesity. Healthy Debate 2016 Jan 14. Available from: https://healthydebate.ca/2016/01/topic/bmi-obesity/. Accessed 2022 May 10.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Maruthur NM,
    2. Bolen SD,
    3. Brancati FL,
    4. Clark JM.
    The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17(2):375-81. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Keshen A,
    2. Kaplan AS,
    3. Masson P,
    4. Ivanova I,
    5. Simon B,
    6. Ward R, et al.
    Binge eating disorder. Updated overview for primary care practitioners. Can Fam Physician 2022;68:416-21 (Eng), 422-8 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schaefer LM,
    2. Hazzard VM,
    3. Wonderlich SA.
    Treating eating disorders in the wake of trauma. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022;6(5):286-8. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Saul JS,
    2. Rodgers RF.
    Adolescent eating disorder risk and the online world. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2018;27(2):221-8. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 68 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 68, Issue 6
1 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rethinking body mass index
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rethinking body mass index
Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2022, 68 (6) 399; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6806399

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Rethinking body mass index
Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2022, 68 (6) 399; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6806399
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Repenser l’indice de masse corporelle
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pride and learning in reverse
  • Fierté et apprentissage en sens inverse
  • Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire