Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleChoosing Wisely Canada

Diagnosing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Importance of pulmonary function testing

Samir Gupta
Canadian Family Physician June 2022, 68 (6) 441-444; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6806441
Samir Gupta
Respirologist and clinician-scientist at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Ont, and Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Clinical question

How important is it to perform pulmonary function testing when asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are suspected?

Bottom line

Respiratory complaints are common in primary care, and many patients receive treatment for suspected asthma or COPD without objective testing. Unfortunately, these clinical diagnoses are often incorrect, exposing patients to the possible harms of unnecessary therapies while also missing the true diagnoses. Accordingly, guidelines recommend pulmonary function testing (starting with spirometry and bronchodilator testing) for the diagnosis of asthma and COPD. There are multiple barriers to the effective use of spirometry in primary care settings, and successful interventions for addressing this problem will likely need to be multifaceted. However, ensuring that providers are knowledgeable about the importance of objective diagnosis for these common conditions is a vital first step.

Evidence

Both providers and patients report that respiratory complaints are the most common reason for a primary care visit.1 These complaints often lead to diagnoses of asthma or COPD, which are among the most commonly diagnosed chronic diseases, with approximately 11% of the Canadian population carrying a diagnostic label of asthma and 6% a label of COPD.2

Although guidelines clearly recommend that a diagnosis of asthma or COPD requires pulmonary function testing3,4 (starting with spirometry and a bronchodilator response test), studies show that only 43% of Canadian patients who received a diagnostic label of asthma5 and 36% of those with a label of COPD6 had a pulmonary function test (PFT) within 1 year before or after their diagnoses.

This care gap is important because clinical diagnoses of these conditions are often inaccurate. A large population-based study found that 33% of Canadians with a diagnostic label of asthma did not have asthma when tested objectively, and 79% of these falsely labelled patients reported using asthma medications.7 With COPD, this overdiagnosis similarly occurs in anywhere from 31% to 44% of cases.6,8,9

Even when patients do have COPD, lung function testing carries benefits. Studies suggest that providers tend to underestimate COPD severity without spirometry,10 and they prescribe more appropriate (evidence-supported) medications when spirometry has been performed.11 This translates to both lower hospital admission rates and lower mortality rates when COPD diagnoses are made with spirometry rather than clinically.11

The main consequence of overdiagnosis of asthma and COPD is unnecessary treatment, resulting in possible medication side effects and avoidable costs.12 Furthermore, patients’ actual diagnoses may be overlooked, resulting in ongoing symptoms and diagnostic delays.7

As a result, multiple expert groups, including the Canadian Thoracic Society,12 the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, have included statements regarding the importance of objective testing before initiating therapy for suspected asthma or COPD in their Choosing Wisely Canada lists of recommendations by specialty.13

Approach

Major guidelines do not recommend routine screening for asthma14 or COPD15 in practice. However, when patients present with respiratory symptoms suggestive of airways disease, it is important to consider the possibility of asthma or COPD (referred to as case finding), as these conditions are also often missed.16

Typical asthma symptoms include wheeze, shortness of breath, and chest tightness. Specific clues include worsening of these symptoms at night or early in the morning, the variable and episodic nature of symptoms, and triggers for symptoms (eg, viral infections, exercise, allergens, and irritants such as strong smells or cold air). On the other hand, patients presenting with an isolated dry cough, a productive cough, or chest pain are less likely to have asthma.17 Unfortunately, many of the suggestive features can also be seen in other conditions. In a Canadian study, the most common mimics leading to an erroneous clinical diagnosis of asthma were allergic or nonallergic rhinitis with postnasal drip, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and anxiety disorders.7

Symptoms of COPD are similar to those of asthma and include dyspnea and chronic cough (with or without sputum), with or without wheeze. However, COPD is unlikely in patients younger than 40 years of age and diagnosis requires a history of exposure to risk factors, the most common being smoking (≥10 pack years)18,19 or exposure to biomass smoke (such as that created by burning coal indoors for cooking or heating).19 The dyspnea in COPD is usually triggered by exertion20 and tends to be progressive in nature. Another hint is the presence of recurrent lower respiratory tract infections.21 Although chronic cough is a hallmark feature of COPD, as with asthma, other common causes such as postnasal drip, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors render this symptom nonspecific for COPD.21

While a thorough history is an essential starting point for identifying a patient who merits objective testing, there are no individual questions or combinations thereof that are accurate enough to render a high-likelihood diagnosis of either condition. In fact, even formal case-finding questionnaires for asthma and COPD have not been found to be sufficiently accurate for use in practice. For example, the Asthma Screening Questionnaire, a 6-question tool that was found to be accurate for identifying asthma in adults in an initial small study with 50 participants,22 had a specificity of only 16% upon external validation.23 Similarly, the widely studied COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire24 had a specificity of only 34% in a population-based sample.23 The high false-positive rates associated with these questionnaires render them impractical for use in primary care.25

Unfortunately, physical examination also has a limited diagnostic role in each condition. The examination findings will usually be normal in patients with asthma. Although an expiratory wheeze is suggestive, the adage that “all that wheezes is not asthma” must be kept in mind, as wheeze can also be related to laryngeal disease (such as vocal cord dysfunction), heart failure, and bronchiectasis, among other causes. Similarly, physical examination is rarely diagnostic in COPD,26 although wheeze may again be present.

Accordingly, for both conditions, guidelines recommend objective testing, starting with spirometry with bronchodilator response testing in anyone 6 years of age or older.3,4,14,21 In asthma, diagnosis requires the presence of obstruction (ie, a reduced forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity ratio) and an improvement in the FEV1 of at least 12% and 200 mL from the baseline value after administration of the bronchodilator.4 Although this finding is sufficient to make the diagnosis, if a bronchodilator response is absent, it does not rule out asthma. Among patients suspected of having asthma, about 40% will have a falsely negative bronchodilator response test result27 and require a methacholine challenge test for diagnosis. For COPD, diagnosis simply requires the presence of obstruction on postbronchodilator spirometry, and no further testing is required in most cases.

Implementation

Some primary care providers are able to offer testing with an in-office spirometer, but most must refer patients to an independent PFT laboratory. Unfortunately, there are several barriers to the successful use of spirometry in each of these scenarios. Studies have identified a lack of physician belief in the importance of spirometry and insufficient skills for spirometry interpretation.28 In-office testing is further limited by a lack of staff available to perform the test as well as a lack of training and expertise among existing personnel, costs, impact on work flows, and logistical difficulties with accessing and maintaining the spirometer. On the other hand, unique barriers to laboratory PFTs include patient reluctance to undergo the test (owing to delays and the cost or inconvenience of travel), patient non-attendance at testing appointments, and prolonged wait times.28 In some rural and remote settings, wait times may be particularly long or spirometry may be altogether unavailable. Concerns about viral spread and corresponding requirements for improved ventilation and extensive personal protective equipment29 have only increased the cost and scarcity of PFTs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.30

Addressing these barriers will likely require multiple approaches. For example, physician knowledge gaps might be addressed by providing better spirometry interpretation training in medical school and family medicine residency programs, and through the provision of primary care–focused continuing professional development programs such as those offered by groups like the Lung Health Foundation, available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/airways/#education. Staff performing in-office testing should also have greater access to training and maintenance-of-certification programs (eg, through subsidies). An example of such a course is the online RESPTREC course, available from https://www.resptrec.org/course/spirometry.php.

System-level solutions may include better remuneration for in-office spirometry performance and interpretation and greater PFT laboratory capacity to reduce wait times and address access in rural settings. Patient-level barriers may be addressed by empowering patients with knowledge about the risks associated with overdiagnosis and the corresponding importance of objective diagnosis. This is the focus of a new national campaign led by Choosing Wisely Canada, the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and the Canadian Thoracic Society, featuring a video and handouts for patients along with materials for health care providers, available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/airways/.

Practically, providers who cannot quickly access spirometry but who have a high degree of suspicion of COPD and particularly of asthma (given the acuity with which asthma patients often present) in a patient may need to start therapy on speculation. When held for a sufficient period to allow for drug clearance before testing, first-line therapies (bronchodilators) are unlikely to render spirometry results falsely negative in COPD. However, first-line asthma therapy includes inhaled corticosteroids, which have downstream biological effects that require a longer washout period to mitigate their impact on test sensitivity.27

Providers who encounter patients already taking prescribed therapy but without an objective diagnosis of asthma or COPD, or who start patients on therapy while awaiting objective testing, should ask patients to hold their bronchodilator use before spirometry testing. For patients with suspected COPD, this is often all that will be required to rule in or rule out the diagnosis (see Figure 1). For patients with suspected asthma, if the test results are nondiagnostic, a confirmatory methacholine challenge test should be ordered. If the methacholine challenge test results are negative, the inhaled corticosteroid (with or without a long-acting β2-agonist) dose can then safely be decreased by 50%, followed by a repeat methacholine challenge test as soon as 3 weeks thereafter. If results of that test are negative, it is safe to stop these medications altogether and repeat the test while the patient is not taking any therapy to rule in or rule out asthma more definitively.7 Also, a clinical worsening at any point should halt the medication taper and would be highly suggestive of asthma. This approach is outlined in Figure 2. However, given that methacholine challenge testing is often even more difficult to access than spirometry, this strategy might be difficult to implement efficiently in some settings. Another diagnostic approach suggested in guidelines4—a substantial (≥12%) improvement in FEV1 with therapeutic trial—may be more realistic in such settings. Another option may be to have patients gradually decrease therapies as long as they remain asymptomatic; methacholine challenge testing would then be requested only once they have stopped taking all therapies.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Approach for confirming or rejecting a suspected or clinical diagnosis of COPD when spirometry access is delayed: Although treatment is seldom urgent in COPD, if there are long delays in accessing spirometry testing, it may be reasonable to start therapy on speculation while ordering spirometry at the same time and planning for a brief therapeutic hold, which allows for bronchodilator clearance before spirometry. Note that this algorithm does not account for an overlap of asthma and COPD diagnoses, restrictive lung diseases, and other conditions that may be suggested on spirometry testing.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Approach for confirming or rejecting a suspected or clinical diagnosis of asthma when spirometry access is delayed (children ≥6 years and adults): If asthma is suspected and there are long delays in accessing spirometry testing, it may be reasonable to start therapy on speculation while ordering spirometry at the same time and planning for a brief therapeutic hold, which allows for bronchodilator clearance before spirometry. If spirometry findings are negative, methacholine challenge testing is then required; if the results are negative, therapy can be progressively decreased with repeated methacholine challenge testing until a positive result or a negative result while holding therapy. If the patient demonstrates an acute worsening of asthma symptoms with therapeutic wean, therapy should be restored and a diagnosis of asthma is likely. This algorithm does not account for an overlap of asthma and COPD diagnoses, restrictive lung diseases, and other conditions that may be suggested on spirometry testing.

Notes

Choosing Wisely Canada is a campaign designed to help clinicians and patients engage in conversations about unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures and to help physicians and patients make smart and effective choices to ensure high-quality care is provided. To date there have been 13 family medicine recommendations, but many of the recommendations from other specialties are relevant to family medicine. Articles produced by Choosing Wisely Canada in Canadian Family Physician are on topics related to family practice where tools and strategies have been used to implement one of the recommendations and to engage in shared decision making with patients. If you are a primary care provider or trainee who has used Choosing Wisely recommendations or tools in your practice and you would like to share your experience, please contact us at info@choosingwiselycanada.org.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright © 2022 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Finley CR,
    2. Chan DS,
    3. Garrison S,
    4. Korownyk C,
    5. Kolber MR,
    6. Campbell S, et al.
    What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review. Can Fam Physician 2018;64:832-40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Report from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System: asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Canada, 2018. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2018. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/asthma-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-canada-2018/pub-eng.pdf. Accessed 2022 May 9.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bourbeau J,
    2. Bhutani M,
    3. Hernandez P,
    4. Aaron SD,
    5. Balter M,
    6. Beauchesne MF, et al.
    Canadian Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline on pharmacotherapy in patients with COPD—2019 update of evidence. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med 2019;3(4):210-32. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yang CL,
    2. Hicks EA,
    3. Mitchell P,
    4. Reisman J,
    5. Podgers D,
    6. Hayward KM, et al.
    Canadian Thoracic Society 2021 guideline update: diagnosis and management of asthma in preschoolers, children and adults. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med 2021;5(6):348-61. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gershon AS,
    2. Victor JC,
    3. Guan J,
    4. Aaron SD,
    5. To T.
    Pulmonary function testing in the diagnosis of asthma: a population study. Chest 2012;141(5):1190-6. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gershon AS,
    2. Hwee J,
    3. Chapman KR,
    4. Aaron SD,
    5. O’Donnell DE,
    6. Stanbrook MB, et al.
    Factors associated with undiagnosed and overdiagnosed COPD. Eur Respir J 2016;48(2):561-4. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Aaron SD,
    2. Vandemheen KL,
    3. FitzGerald JM,
    4. Ainslie M,
    5. Gupta S,
    6. Lemière C, et al.
    Reevaluation of diagnosis in adults with physician-diagnosed asthma. JAMA 2017;317(3):269-79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Walters JA,
    2. Walters EH,
    3. Nelson M,
    4. Robinson A,
    5. Scott J,
    6. Turner P, et al.
    Factors associated with misdiagnosis of COPD in primary care. Prim Care Respir J 2011;20(4):396-402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hill K,
    2. Goldstein RS,
    3. Guyatt GH,
    4. Blouin M,
    5. Tan WC,
    6. Davis LL, et al.
    Prevalence and underdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among patients at risk in primary care. CMAJ 2010;182(7):673-8. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mapel DW,
    2. Dalal AA,
    3. Johnson P,
    4. Becker L
    5. Goolsby Hunter A.
    A clinical study of COPD severity assessment by primary care physicians and their patients compared with spirometry. Am J Med 2015;128(6):629-37. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gershon A,
    2. Mecredy G,
    3. Croxford R,
    4. To T,
    5. Stanbrook MB,
    6. Aaron SD, et al.
    Outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosed with or without pulmonary function testing. CMAJ 2017;189(14):e530-38. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gupta S,
    2. Goodridge D,
    3. Pakhalé S,
    4. McIntyre K,
    5. Pendharkar SR.
    Choosing wisely: the Canadian Thoracic Society’s list of six things that physicians and patients should question. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med 2017;1(2):54-61. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Recommendations and resources, by specialty. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2019. Available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations/. Accessed 2022 Mar 18.
  14. 14.↵
    Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Fontana, WI: Global Initiative for Asthma; 2021. Available from: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/GINA-Main-Report-2021-V2-WMS.pdf. Accessed 2022 May 9.
  15. 15.↵
    US Preventive Services Task Force issues draft recommendation statement on screening for COPD [USPSTF bulletin]. Washington, DC: US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021. Available from:https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/file/supporting_documents/copd-screening-draft-rec-bulletin.pdf. Accessed 2022 Mar 18.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Delmas MC,
    2. Bénézet L,
    3. Ribet C,
    4. Iwatsubo Y,
    5. Zins M,
    6. Nadif R, et al.
    Underdiagnosis of obstructive lung disease: findings from the French CONSTANCES cohort. BMC Pulm Med 2021;21(1):319.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2021 report. Fontana, WI: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; 2021 Available from: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GOLD-REPORT-2021-v1.1-25Nov20_WMV.pdf. Accessed 2022 May 9.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bhatt SP,
    2. Kim YI,
    3. Harrington KF,
    4. Hokanson JE,
    5. Lutz SM,
    6. Cho MH, et al.
    Smoking duration alone provides stronger risk estimates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than pack-years. Thorax 2018;73(5):414-21. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Assad NA,
    2. Balmes J,
    3. Mehta S,
    4. Cheema U,
    5. Sood A.
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease secondary to household air pollution. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015;36(3):408-21. Epub 2015 May 29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cherian M,
    2. Jensen D,
    3. Tan WC,
    4. Mursleen S,
    5. Goodall EC,
    6. Nadeau GA, et al.
    Dyspnoea and symptom burden in mild–moderate COPD: the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease Study. ERJ Open Res 2021;7(2):00960-2020.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2022 report. Fontana, WI: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; 2022. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/GOLD-REPORT-2022-v1.1-22Nov2021_WMV.pdf. Accessed 2022 Mar 18.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Shin B,
    2. Cole SL,
    3. Park SJ,
    4. Ledford DK,
    5. Lockley RF.
    A new symptom-based questionnaire for predicting the presence of asthma. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010;20(1):27-34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Preteroti M,
    2. Whitmore GA,
    3. Vandemheen KL,
    4. FitzGerald JM,
    5. Lemière C,
    6. Boulet LP, et al.
    Population-based case-finding to identify subjects with undiagnosed asthma or COPD. Eur Respir J 2020;55(6):2000024.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kotz D,
    2. Nelemans P,
    3. van Schayck CP,
    4. Wesseling GJ.
    External validation of a COPD diagnostic questionnaire. Eur Respir J 2008;31(2):298-303. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Guirguis-Blake JM,
    2. Senger CA,
    3. Webber EM,
    4. Mularski RA,
    5. Whitlock EP.
    Screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016;315(13):1378-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Holleman DR Jr,
    2. Simel DL.
    Does the clinical examination predict airflow limitation? JAMA 1995;273(4):313-9. Erratum in: JAMA 1995;273(17):1334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Selvanathan J,
    2. Aaron SD,
    3. Sykes JR,
    4. Vandemheen KL,
    5. FitzGerald JM,
    6. Ainslie M, et al.
    Performance characteristics of spirometry with negative bronchodilator response and methacholine challenge testing and implications for asthma diagnosis. Chest 2020;158(2):479-90. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Yamada J,
    2. Cheung JLS,
    3. Gagne M,
    4. Spiegel-Feld C,
    5. Aaron SD,
    6. FitzGerald JM, et al.
    Barriers and enablers to objective testing for asthma and COPD in primary care: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework. Chest 2022;161(4):888-905. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Stanojevic S,
    2. Beaucage F,
    3. Comondore V,
    4. Faughnan M,
    5. Kovesi T,
    6. McCoy C, et al.
    Resumption of pulmonary function testing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a position statement from the Canadian Thoracic Society and the Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med 2022;6(2):78-81.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kouri A,
    2. Gupta S,
    3. Yadollahi A,
    4. Ryan CM,
    5. Gershon AS,
    6. To T, et al.
    Addressing reduced laboratory-based pulmonary function testing during a pandemic. Chest 2020;158(6):2502-10. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 68 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 68, Issue 6
1 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnosing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnosing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Samir Gupta
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2022, 68 (6) 441-444; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6806441

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Diagnosing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Samir Gupta
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2022, 68 (6) 441-444; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6806441
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Clinical question
    • Bottom line
    • Evidence
    • Approach
    • Implementation
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rethinking a history of recurrent urinary tract infections
  • Ordering investigations after hours
Show more Choosing Wisely Canada

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2022 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire