Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleChoosing Wisely Canada

Curb unnecessary computed tomography scans for pediatric concussions

Laura Purcell, Erika Persson and Kristin Houghton
Canadian Family Physician September 2022, 68 (9) 667-669; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6809667
Laura Purcell
Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Pediatrics at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.
MD FRCPC DipSportMed
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Persson
Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Alberta in Edmonton and President of the Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine for 2022 to 2023.
MD FRCPC DipSportMed
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristin Houghton
Clinical Associate Professor in the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.
MD FRCPC DipSportMed
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Clinical question

When should computed tomography (CT) scans be ordered to assess concussions in pediatric patients?

Bottom line

Concussions are common injuries, particularly among children and youth. Computed tomography scans are often ordered in these situations, despite the low risk of clinically significant intracranial pathology in this setting. However, CT scans are expensive and expose patients to ionizing radiation, increasing the risk of cancer. Several head injury rules have been developed to help clinicians decide when CT scans are necessary for patient management. Clinicians are encouraged to apply these rules for minor head injuries and concussions to minimize the number of unnecessary CT scans being performed and to optimize patient care.

The Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine has developed a list of Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations for pediatric sport and exercise medicine, including the following: Do not order a head CT scan for minor head injuries or concussion (Box 1).1

Box 1.

Eight tests or treatments to question in pediatric sport and exercise medicine

  1. Do not order knee radiographs to diagnose Osgood-Schlatter disease in children

  2. Do not order ultrasound as an initial investigation for shoulder or knee injuries in children

  3. Do not order scoliosis radiographic series for back pain

  4. Do not order thoracic spine radiographs if there is clinical concern about scoliosis

  5. Do not order oblique radiographic views for investigation of spondylolysis

  6. Do not order a head CT scan for minor head injuries or concussion

  7. Do not immobilize a joint with suspected amplified pain syndrome (complex regional pain syndrome)

  8. Do not order follow-up radiographs for buckle fractures of the distal radius if there are no clinical symptoms at the time of follow-up

CT—computed tomography.

Reproduced with permission from Choosing Wisely Canada.1

Evidence

In Canada, approximately 200,000 concussions occur every year.2,3 This is most likely an underestimation of the true incidence, as many patients are seen in physicians’ offices or walk-in clinics or do not see a doctor at all, and these cases are not captured by injury surveillance mechanisms. Most concussions are sport related and two-thirds of these injuries occur in the pediatric population (Figure 1).2,3 Rugby, ice hockey, and ringette are the sports with the highest numbers of concussions in the 5- to 19-year-old age group, accounting for 27% to 44% of all injuries occurring while playing these sports.3,4

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Rates of ED visits related to sports and recreation–related brain and head injuries in Ontario (2002-2003 to 2017-2018) and Alberta (2010-2011 to 2017-2018) by sex, age-specific rates per 100,000 persons

The use of CT scans for minor head injuries has historically been high despite educational initiatives to decrease overuse. In Canadian pediatric emergency departments (EDs), CT use for minor head injuries increased from 15% in 1995 to 53% in 2005.5,6 Another study in pediatric EDs in the United States showed that the rate of use of CT scans in minor head injuries in children remained consistent at 32% between 2007 and 2015, despite educational efforts to decrease unnecessary use.7 Why? Identified factors include establishment of trust, anxiety on the parts of the patient and the provider, and patient expectations.8

Unnecessary use of CT scans for minor head injuries and concussions contributes substantially to health care costs because CT scans are expensive tests, each costing several hundreds of dollars.9,10 It can also increase the burden of overcrowding in EDs and result in costly, time-consuming patient transfers from centres that do not have CT scanners.10 In pediatric patients, there may be an added risk of sedation required to obtain images.7 However, one of the biggest risks of unnecessary CT scans is exposure to ionizing radiation.9,11,12

While radiation exposure is a concern in both adults and children, concern is greater for children because they are more sensitive to the effects of ionizing radiation; children have longer life expectancy and therefore more time for the effects of ionizing radiation to be expressed; and children may receive proportionately larger doses of radiation, particularly in nonpediatric centres.11,12 Studies have shown that exposure to CT scans in childhood can triple the risk of leukemia and brain cancer in children, amounting to 1 case of cancer for every 10,000 CT scans performed.11,12 Cumulative doses of ionizing radiation from repeat CT scans also increase the risk of cancer later in life.11,12

Approach

A concussion is a traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by a bump or blow to the head, face, or neck or by a blow to the body that transmits a force to the brain, resulting “in the rapid onset of short-lived impairment of neurological function that resolves spontaneously.”13 Signs and symptoms of concussion reflect a functional injury rather than a structural injury and, therefore, no abnormality is observed with standard neuroimaging.13 As such, neuroimaging is not indicated in the setting of concussion in the absence of red flags, which include decreased level of consciousness, focal neurologic signs, signs of skull fracture, seizures, or persistent vomiting.13,14 The risk of clinically significant intracranial pathology is less than 1%.15

To decrease the number of unnecessary CT scans performed for minor head injuries, a number of clinical decision rules have been developed to help guide clinicians when considering ordering CT scans. Separate guidelines have been developed for adults and children that use various combinations of history features, presenting signs and symptoms, or simple tests to determine risk of brain injury. Head imaging rules developed for children include the CATCH (Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head injury) rule (Canada), the PECARN (Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network) rule (United States), and the CHALICE (Children’s Head Injury Algorithm for the Prediction of Important Clinical Events) rule (United Kingdom).6,15-18 These guidelines have been validated in the pediatric age group, but when directly compared, the CATCH rule had the greatest sensitivity and specificity (Box 2).16,18 By applying these rules, particularly to patients in the ED, patients are less likely to be exposed to radiation from CT scans unnecessarily.

Box 2.

Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head injury (CATCH) rule

CT of the head is required for children with minor head injury* and any 1 of these findings:

High risk for neurosurgical intervention

  • GCS score <15 at 2 h after injury

  • Suspected open or depressed skull fracture

  • History of worsening headache

  • Irritability on examination

Medium risk for brain injury on CT

  • Any sign of basal skull fracture†

  • Large, boggy hematoma of the scalp

  • Dangerous mechanism of injury‡

CT—computed tomography, GCS—Glasgow Coma Scale.

*Minor head injury defined as injury within the past 24 h associated with witnessed loss of consciousness, definite amnesia, witnessed disorientation, persistent vomiting (>1 episode), or persistent irritability (in a child aged <2 y) in a patient with a GCS score of 13-15.

†Signs of basal skull fracture include hemotympanum, raccoon eyes, otorrhea or rhinorrhea of the cerebrospinal fluid, and Battle sign.

‡Dangerous mechanism is a motor vehicle crash, a fall from an elevation ≥3 ft (≥91 cm) or 5 stairs, or a fall from a bicycle with no helmet. Reproduced with permission from CMAJ.16

Implementation

Any patient presenting with a potential concussion should be assessed with a thorough history, including timing and mechanism of injury as well as occurrence of loss of consciousness, seizures, amnesia, or vomiting. Physical examination should include a thorough neurologic examination, including determination of level of consciousness using the Glasgow Coma Scale and a cognitive assessment.13,14

Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with concussion can be discharged home without imaging under the care of a responsible adult, with clear written instructions describing what to monitor for (such as worsening headache, persistent vomiting, or decreased level of consciousness) and when to return for follow-up.19 Patients who are more symptomatic but do not meet criteria for imaging can be monitored for signs of deterioration in the ED for 4 to 6 hours.19 If symptoms do not improve while being observed, patients can be admitted to hospital for further observation or a CT scan can be ordered if patient signs and symptoms show potential structural injury (worsening headache, persistent vomiting, decreased level of consciousness, or focal neurologic signs).7,16,19

The use of clinical head injury rules can help clinicians appropriately order CT scans for head injuries and reduce the number of unnecessary CT scans in the pediatric age group.

Notes

Choosing Wisely Canada is a campaign designed to help clinicians and patients engage in conversations about unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures and to help physicians and patients make smart and effective choices to ensure high-quality care is provided. To date there have been 13 family medicine recommendations, but many of the recommendations from other specialties are relevant to family medicine. Articles produced by Choosing Wisely Canada in Canadian Family Physician are on topics related to family practice where tools and strategies have been used to implement one of the recommendations and to engage in shared decision making with patients. If you are a primary care provider or trainee who has used Choosing Wisely recommendations or tools in your practice and you would like to share your experience, please contact us at info{at}choosingwiselycanada.org.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières de septembre 2022 à la page e264.

  • Copyright © 2022 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine
    . Eight tests and treatments to question in pediatric sport and exercise medicine. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2022. Available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendation/sport-and-exercise-medicine/. Accessed 2022 May 16.
  2. 2.↵
    Statistics on brain injury. Ottawa, ON: Brain Injury Canada; 2022. https://braininjurycanada.ca/en/statistics/#Concussion. Accessed 2022 May 16.
  3. 3.↵
    Injury in review 2020 edition. Spotlight on traumatic brain injuries across the life course. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2020. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/injury-prevention/canadian-hospitals-injury-reporting-prevention-program/injury-reports/2020-spotlight-traumatic-brain-injuries-life-course.html. Accessed 2022 May 16.
  4. 4.↵
    Concussion in sport. Sport and recreation-related traumatic brain injuries among Canadian children and youth [infographic]. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2018. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/diseases-conditions/PHAC-concussion-sport-infographic_may8-eng.pdf. Accessed 2022 Aug 10.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Klassen TP,
    2. Reed MH,
    3. Stiell IG,
    4. Nijssen-Jordan C,
    5. Tenenbein M,
    6. Joubert G, et al.
    Variation in utilization of computed tomography scanning for the investigation of minor head trauma in children: a Canadian experience. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(7):739–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Osmond MH,
    2. Klassen TP,
    3. Wells GA,
    4. Correll R,
    5. Jarvis A,
    6. Joubert G, et al.
    CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury. CMAJ 2010;182(4):341–8. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Burstein B,
    2. Upton JEM,
    3. Terra HF,
    4. Neuman MI.
    Use of CT for head trauma: 2007-2015. Pediatrics 2018;142(4):e20180814. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Melnick ER,
    2. Shafer K,
    3. Rodulfo N,
    4. Shi J,
    5. Hess EP,
    6. Wears RL, et al.
    Understanding overuse of computed tomography for minor head injury in the emergency department: a triangulated qualitative study. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22(12):1474–83. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Stiell IG,
    2. Wells GA,
    3. Vandemheen K,
    4. Clement C,
    5. Lesiuk H,
    6. Laupacis A, et al.
    The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357(9266):1391–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Stiell IG,
    2. Clement CM,
    3. Rowe BH,
    4. Schull MJ,
    5. Brison R,
    6. Cass D, et al.
    Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294(12):1511–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pearce MS,
    2. Salotti JA,
    3. Little MP,
    4. McHugh K,
    5. Lee C,
    6. Kim KP, et al.
    Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380(9840):499–505. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Radiation risks and pediatric computed tomography (CT): a guide for health care providers. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2018. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/pediatric-ct-scans. Accessed 2022 Apr 4.
  13. 13.↵
    1. McCrory P,
    2. Meeuwisse W,
    3. Dvořák J,
    4. Aubry M,
    5. Bailes J,
    6. Broglio S, et al.
    Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med 2017;51(11):838–47. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Purcell LK; Canadian Paediatric Society, Healthy Active Living and Sports Medicine Committee
    . Sport-related concussion: evaluation and management. Paediatr Child Health 2014;19(3):153–8.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kuppermann N,
    2. Holmes JF,
    3. Dayan PS,
    4. Hoyle JD Jr,
    5. Atabaki SM,
    6. Holubkov R, et al.
    Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009;374:1160–70. Epub 2009 Sep 14. Erratum in: Lancet 2014;383(9914):308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Osmond MH,
    2. Klassen TP,
    3. Wells GA,
    4. Davidson J,
    5. Correll R,
    6. Boutis K, et al.
    Validation and refinement of a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury in the emergency department. CMAJ 2018;190(27):E816–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Dunning J,
    2. Daly JP,
    3. Lomas JP,
    4. Lecky F,
    5. Batchelor J,
    6. Mackway-Jones K, et al.
    Derivation of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Arch Dis Child 2006;91(11):885–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Babl FE,
    2. Borland ML,
    3. Phillips N,
    4. Kochar A,
    5. Dalton S,
    6. McCaskill M, et al.
    Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017;389(10087):2393–2402. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Farrell CA; Canadian Paediatric Society, Acute Care Committee
    . Management of the paediatric patient with acute head trauma. Paediatr Child Health 2013;18(5):253–8.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 68 (9)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 68, Issue 9
1 Sep 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Curb unnecessary computed tomography scans for pediatric concussions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Curb unnecessary computed tomography scans for pediatric concussions
Laura Purcell, Erika Persson, Kristin Houghton
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2022, 68 (9) 667-669; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6809667

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Curb unnecessary computed tomography scans for pediatric concussions
Laura Purcell, Erika Persson, Kristin Houghton
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2022, 68 (9) 667-669; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6809667
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Clinical question
    • Bottom line
    • Evidence
    • Approach
    • Implementation
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Limiter les tomodensitométries inutiles pour une commotion cérébrale pédiatrique
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reduce unnecessary routine vitamin D testing
  • Top POEMs of 2022 for choosing wisely in practice
  • Informed decision making to avoid overdiagnosis of labour dystocia
Show more Choosing Wisely Canada

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire