Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Article CommentaryCommentary

Breast density notification

Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management?

Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician November 2023; 69 (11) 748-750; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6911748
Anna N. Wilkinson
Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, a family physician with the Ottawa Academic Family Health Team, a general practitioner oncologist at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Program Director of PGY-3 FP-Oncology, and Regional Cancer Primary Care Lead for Champlain Region.
MD MSc CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anwilkinson@toh.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A deeper understanding of the importance of breast density as a breast cancer risk factor has prompted a number of provincial and territorial screening programs to inform women of their breast density test results directly. Seven Canadian provinces inform all women of their breast density. Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador are committed to implementation of density notification. The Northwest Territories and Yukon notify only those with extremely dense breasts, while Quebec does not notify any women of density. Nunavut does not have a screening program.1 On March 9, 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration mandated national reporting of breast density to patients and their health care providers in the United States to be implemented within 18 months.2 These system changes will translate into many women looking to their FPs for more information on breast density. It is known that FPs are uncertain about best practices for discussing dense breasts and managing patients with dense breasts.3,4 With breast density notification becoming nearly universal, it is time for FPs to become adequately prepared to counsel Canadian women about breast density, inherent risks of dense breasts, and appropriate management.

Breast density: definitions and risks

Dense breasts have a higher proportion of fibroglandular tissue than fatty tissue.5 Breast density cannot be determined by any means other than mammogram screening—there is no way to tell fibroglandular density based on appearance, clinical examination, or size of breasts. Density can be expressed as a percentage or using categories of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (Figure 1)1,6: A, for fatty-replaced, low-density tissue; B, for scattered areas of fibroglandular tissue density; C, for heterogeneously dense tissue; and D, for extremely dense tissue. Category D corresponds to density greater than 75%. Dense breasts are considered to be those in categories C and D and are seen in approximately 40% of women between the ages of 40 to 74 years, according to US estimates.7 Breast density tends to diminish over time: close to 60% of women in their 40s have high breast density compared with only about 25% of women in their 70s.7 However, breast density does not decline with age in all women, and those whose breast density does not decrease over time are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer.8 Although many nonmodifiable factors, such as genetics and race (eg, Asian heritage) contribute to breast density, modifiable factors such as hormone exposure (eg, oral contraceptive pill use, hormone replacement therapy), alcohol intake, and diet can also contribute to increased breast density.9

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Mammogram examples that correspond to categories of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System for grading breast density: A, fatty-replaced, low-density tissue; B, tissue with scattered areas of fibroglandular density; C, heterogeneously dense tissue; and D, extremely dense tissue.

The risks of dense breasts are 3-fold. First, extremely dense breasts confer a risk of breast cancer that is greater than that of having a first-degree relative with breast cancer.10 Breast cancer risk increases with breast density, and the risk for women with category D breast density is up to 4 to 6 times higher than for women whose breasts are mostly low-density tissue.11,12 Second, breast cancers are masked by fibroglandular tissue in dense breasts, making mammogram screening much less effective at finding cancers.13 Only those cancers with calcifications or architectural distortion will be visible on mammograms of dense breast tissue. Sensitivity for mammogram screening of breasts is 98% for those with category A density, but only 50% for those with category D density.14 Finally, women with extremely dense breasts are therefore 5 to 13 times more likely to present with interval cancers—cancers found after a normal screening mammogram—which have a poorer prognosis than screen-detected cancers.15

Determining optimal management

It is suggested that screen-eligible women with extremely dense breasts have annual mammography to reduce the chances of “underdiagnosis” and interval cancers.16,17 Additional imaging modalities that are effective for dense breasts include ultrasound, digital breast tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and contrast-enhanced mammography.18 Supplementing mammogram screening with MRI or ultrasound screening can improve breast cancer detection in women with category C or D breast density. Supplemental MRI finds an additional 16 breast cancers per 1000 screens after normal mammogram findings in women with dense breasts, but this can be difficult for FPs to access for their patients.19,20 Supplemental ultrasound screening detects an average of an additional 2 to 3 cancers per 1000 women screened after normal mammogram findings in women with dense breasts,19 and 1 Canadian centre detected 7 more cancers for every 1000 screens of women with dense breasts.21 The decision to pursue supplemental screening in women with dense breasts should be a shared decision based on patient preference, and discussions should include not only the benefits but also the risks, such as the possibility of recalls and benign biopsies. Currently, supplemental ultrasound screening is funded in British Columbia and Alberta for women whose breast density is categorized as C or D; in Prince Edward Island for women with category D density; and in Quebec for women with category D density and a family history of breast cancer.1,22 Ontario Health has recently recommended publicly funding supplemental screening as an adjunct to mammography for people with extremely dense breasts.23

The International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) risk assessment tool is extremely helpful for FPs in determining optimal management for women with dense breasts.24 This tool incorporates breast density in estimating a woman’s lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Lifetime breast cancer risk is a key detail to include in shared decision-making discussions with patients about individual risk and breast cancer screening. Supplemental ultrasound scanning should be considered seriously in women whose lifetime risk of developing breast cancer is 15% or higher.25 Women are accepted into the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening program if their lifetime risk is 25% or greater based on personal and family history.26

Checklist for shared decision making

So, what should FPs do if they receive a mammogram report showing that a patient has dense breasts? What should an FP say to a patient who is notified directly of her breast density by a screening program and comes in to discuss this issue? The following checklist will guide FPs in counselling patients with dense breasts and facilitate appropriately informed shared decision making:

  • Address any modifiable factors that may be contributing to breast density (eg, hormone exposure, diet).

  • Address modifiable risk factors that may increase the risk of breast cancer (eg, smoking, postmenopausal obesity, sedentary lifestyle).

  • Explain the increased risk of breast cancer in women with dense breasts.

  • Explain the reduced effectiveness of screening mammography in women with dense breasts.

  • Encourage these women to be aware of their breasts and act on any changes that they notice.

  • Do not be reassured by a recent normal mammogram result if your patient with dense breasts presents with a new breast finding.

  • Order yearly mammogram screening for eligible women with category D breast density. Annual mammogram screening is done automatically in many Canadian screening programs, but not in all.13

  • Discuss the risks and benefits of supplemental screening. Women with dense breasts can benefit from MRI or ultrasound examinations in conjunction with mammograms.

  • Become familiar with the IBIS tool to help quantify an individual’s risk.24 Women with a lifetime risk of breast cancer 15% or higher should be considered for supplemental MRI or ultrasound screening.25 Women with a lifetime risk of 25% or greater may qualify for high-risk screening programs, where they are available.26

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 752.

  • Copyright © 2023 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    Get informed. Finding out my density. Toronto, ON: Dense Breasts Canada; 2023. Available from: https://densebreastscanada.ca/. Accessed 2023 Oct 10.
  2. 2.↵
    FDA updates mammography regulations to require reporting of breast density information and enhance facility oversight [news release]. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2023. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/press-announcements/fda-updates-mammography-regulations-require-reporting-breast-density-information-and-enhance. Accessed 2023 Mar 24.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nickel B,
    2. Copp T,
    3. Brennan M,
    4. Farber R,
    5. McCaffery K,
    6. Houssami N
    . Breast density notification: a systematic review of the impact on primary care practitioners. J Women Health (Larchmt) 2021;30(10):1457-68. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Eggertson L
    . Breast density disclosure may do more harm than good. CMAJ 2020;192(2):E48-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Conant EF,
    2. Sprague BL,
    3. Kontos D
    . Beyond BI-RADS density: a call for quantification in the breast imaging clinic. Radiology 2018;286(2):401-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sickles EA,
    2. D’Orsi CJ,
    3. Bassett LW,
    4. Appleton CM,
    5. Berg WA,
    6. Burnside ES
    . ACR BI-RADS mammography. Chapter 2: reporting system. In: ACR BI-RADS atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013. Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/BI-RADS/Mammography-Reporting. Accessed 2023 Oct 11.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sprague BL,
    2. Gangnon RE,
    3. Burt V,
    4. Trentham-Dietz A,
    5. Hampton JM,
    6. Wellman RD, et al.
    Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106(10):dju255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mokhtary A,
    2. Karakatsanis A,
    3. Valachis A
    . Mammographic density changes over time and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(19):4805.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lester SP,
    2. Kaur AS,
    3. Vegunta S
    . Association between lifestyle changes, mammographic breast density, and breast cancer. Oncologist 2022;27(7):548-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Engmann NJ,
    2. Golmakani MK,
    3. Miglioretti DL,
    4. Sprague BL,
    5. Kerlikowske K, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
    . Population-attributable risk proportion of clinical risk factors for breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017;3(9):1228-36. Erratum in: JAMA Oncol 2019;5(11):1643
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Boyd NF,
    2. Dite GS,
    3. Stone J,
    4. Gunasekara A,
    5. English DR,
    6. McCredie MR, et al.
    Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347(12):886-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. McCormack VA,
    2. dos Santos Silva I
    . Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(6):1159-69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Boyd NF,
    2. Guo H,
    3. Martin LJ,
    4. Sun L,
    5. Stone J,
    6. Fishell E, et al.
    Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):227-36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Weigel S,
    2. Heindel W,
    3. Heidrich J,
    4. Hense HW,
    5. Heidinger O
    . Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density. Eur Radiol 2017;27(7):2744-51. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ciatto S,
    2. Visioli C,
    3. Paci E,
    4. Zappa M
    . Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening. Br J Cancer 2004;90(2):393-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Breast (chest) density information for healthcare providers. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/guidelines-advice/cancer-continuum/screening/breast-density-provider-information. Accessed 2023 Jul 13.
  17. 17.↵
    CAR/CSBI position statement on mammographic breast density and supplemental screening. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Radiologists and Canadian Society of Breast Imaging; 2019. Available from: https://car.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CAR-CSBI-Breast-Density-Position-Statement-En.pdf. Accessed 2023 Jul 19.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Gordon PB
    . The impact of dense breasts on the stage of breast cancer at diagnosis: a review and options for supplemental screening. Curr Oncol 2022;29(5):3595-636.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Seely JM,
    2. Peddle SE,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Chiarelli AM,
    5. McCallum M,
    6. Narasimhan G, et al.
    Breast density and risk of interval cancers: the effect of annual versus biennial screening mammography policies in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022;73(1):90-100. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mann RM,
    2. Athanasiou A,
    3. Baltzer PAT,
    4. Camps-Herrero J,
    5. Clauser P,
    6. Fallenberg EM, et al.
    Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI). Eur Radiol 2022;32(6):4036-45. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wu T,
    2. Warren LJ
    . The added value of supplemental breast ultrasound screening for women with dense breasts: a single center Canadian experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022;73(1):101-6. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    It’s your health. Be breast informed. Toronto, ON: Dense Breasts Canada. Available from: https://mybreastscreening.ca/. Accessed 2023 Oct 11.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ontario Health
    . Supplemental screening as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in people with dense breasts: recommendation. Toronto, ON: King’s Printer for Ontario; 2023. Available from: https://www.hqontario.ca/Portals/0/Documents/evidence/open-comment/recommendation-hta-supplemental-screeningas-an-adjunct-to-mammography-for-breast-cancer-screening-in-people-with-densebreasts-draft-2303-en.pdf. Accessed 2023 Oct 17.
  24. 24.↵
    IBIS (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study). Online Tyrer-Cuzick Model Breast Cancer Risk Evaluation Tool. Richardson, TX: Ikonopedia. Available from: https://ibis.ikonopedia.com. Accessed 2023 Mar 24.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kim G,
    2. Bahl M
    . Assessing risk of breast cancer: a review of risk prediction models. J Breast Imaging 2021;3(2):144-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Breast cancer screening for people at high risk. Toronto ON: Cancer Care Ontario. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/guidelines-advice/cancer-continuum/screening/breast-cancer-high-risk. Accessed 2023 Sep 24.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 69 (11)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 69, Issue 11
1 Nov 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breast density notification
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Breast density notification
Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2023, 69 (11) 748-750; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6911748

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Breast density notification
Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2023, 69 (11) 748-750; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6911748
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Breast density: definitions and risks
    • Determining optimal management
    • Checklist for shared decision making
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Notification de la densité mammaire
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Breast density notification
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reflections on the value of Canadian multiculturalism in health care delivery
  • The environmental elephant in the office: medications
  • Six-sentence and 3-citation research proposals
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire