Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Article CommentaryCommentary

Breast density notification

Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management?

Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician November 2023; 69 (11) 748-750; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6911748
Anna N. Wilkinson
Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, a family physician with the Ottawa Academic Family Health Team, a general practitioner oncologist at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Program Director of PGY-3 FP-Oncology, and Regional Cancer Primary Care Lead for Champlain Region.
MD MSc CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anwilkinson@toh.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Breast density notification: Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management
    Roni Y Kraut
    Published on: 31 December 2023
  • Published on: (31 December 2023)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Breast density notification: Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management
    RE: Breast density notification: Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management
    • Roni Y Kraut, Familiy physician, University of Alberta

    Dr. Wilkinson’s commentary, “Breast density notification: Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management?,” outlines why and how she believes family physicians should counsel women on breast density.[1] While I agree with Dr. Wilkinson that family physicians need to be prepared to counsel women with denser breasts, the counselling she suggests appears not to take into account all the available evidence.

    Dr. Wilkinson asserts that women with dense breasts have an increased risk of breast cancer and therefore need additional screening. She is correct that dense breasts increase the risk of breast cancer diagnosis, [2] but shouldn’t screening decisions be based on the ability to reduce mortality and morbidity. rather than the risk of diagnosis? A diagnosis of cancer is not relevant if it will never cause any harm. For instance, for prostate cancer males have an increased risk, and screening will diagnose more prostate cancer. Yet, screening is not recommended as it is unlikely to improve mortality and is associated with substantial harm. [3]

    Based on current evidence, more intensive screening of women with dense breasts may be comparable to screening for prostate cancer. The majority of large observational studies suggest that dense breasts are not associated with an increase in breast cancer mortality, [4-11] only three Swedish studies suggest an association. [12-14] Moreover, while a combination of mammography and sonography or yearly...

    Show More

    Dr. Wilkinson’s commentary, “Breast density notification: Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management?,” outlines why and how she believes family physicians should counsel women on breast density.[1] While I agree with Dr. Wilkinson that family physicians need to be prepared to counsel women with denser breasts, the counselling she suggests appears not to take into account all the available evidence.

    Dr. Wilkinson asserts that women with dense breasts have an increased risk of breast cancer and therefore need additional screening. She is correct that dense breasts increase the risk of breast cancer diagnosis, [2] but shouldn’t screening decisions be based on the ability to reduce mortality and morbidity. rather than the risk of diagnosis? A diagnosis of cancer is not relevant if it will never cause any harm. For instance, for prostate cancer males have an increased risk, and screening will diagnose more prostate cancer. Yet, screening is not recommended as it is unlikely to improve mortality and is associated with substantial harm. [3]

    Based on current evidence, more intensive screening of women with dense breasts may be comparable to screening for prostate cancer. The majority of large observational studies suggest that dense breasts are not associated with an increase in breast cancer mortality, [4-11] only three Swedish studies suggest an association. [12-14] Moreover, while a combination of mammography and sonography or yearly mammograms increase the diagnosis of breast cancer for women with dense breasts, there is a lack of evidence about whether it improves survival. [15-17] There is, however, evidence that this additional screening may be harmful because of false positives, overdiagnosis, and mental health sequelae. [17-19]

    Having had patients, friends, and family members heartbreakingly pass away from breast cancer, I would wholeheartedly support increased screening if the evidence supported it, but the current evidence is equivocal. It is important that women be informed of the nuance between the risk of diagnosis and the risk of mortality and the evidence for both the benefit and harm of additional screening. The 9-point checklist Dr. Wilkinson provides for “shared decision-making” is unlikely to accomplish this. The updated Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care recommendations, expected in 2024, will hopefully provide a more balanced approach.

    1. Wilkinson AN. Breast density notification: Are family doctors prepared to counsel patients on risks and management? Can Fam Physician. 2023;69(11):748-750.
    2. Bodewes FTH, van Asselt AA, Dorrius MD, Greuter MJW, de Bock GH. Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Breast 2022;66:62-68.
    3. Bell N, Gorber SC, Shane A, Joffres M, Singh H, Dickinson J et al. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test. CMAJ 2014;186(16):1225-34.
    4. Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Burrell HC, James JJ, Lee AH, et al. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J. Roentgenol. 2007;188(3):676-83.
    5. Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, Brinton LA, Farhat GN, Vacek PM, et al. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(16):1218-27.
    6. Zhang S, Ivy JS, Diehl KM, Yankaskas BC. The association of breast density with breast cancer mortality in African American and white women screened in community practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(1):273-83.
    7. Maskarinec G, Pagano IS, Little MA, Conroy SM, Park SY, Kolonel LN. Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer survival: the Multiethnic Cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15(1):R7.
    8. Hwang KT, Chu AJ, Kim J, Lee JY, Chang JH, Oh S, et al. Prognostic Influence of Preoperative Mammographic Breast Density in Operable Invasive Female Breast Cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16075.
    9. van der Waal D, Verbeek ALM, Broeders MJM. Breast density and breast cancer-specific survival by detection mode. BMC Cancer 2018;18(1):386.
    10. Heindl F, Fasching PA, Hein A, Hack CC, Heusinger K, Gass P, et al. Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients. Breast 2021;59:51-7.
    11. Pizzato M, Carioli G, Rosso S, Zanetti R, La Vecchia C. Mammographic breast density and survival in women with invasive breast cancer. Cancer Causes & Control 2022;33(9):1207-13.
    12. Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabár L, Smith RA, Chen HH. Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 May;19(5):1219-28.
    13. Olsson Å, Sartor H, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Manjer J. Breast density and mode of detection in relation to breast cancer specific survival: a cohort study. BMC Cancer 2014;28;14:229.
    14. Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg LU, Törnberg S, Humphreys K, Hall P. Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15(3):R48.
    15. Glechner A, Wagner G, Mitus JW, Teufer B, Klerings I, Böck N, et al. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023;3(3):CD009632.
    16. Seely JM, Peddle SE, Yang H, Chiarelli AM, McCallum M, Narasimhan G. Breast Density and Risk of Interval Cancers: The Effect of Annual Versus Biennial Screening Mammography Policies in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022;73(1):90-100.
    17. Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Geller B, Dittus K, Braithwaite D., et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(9):807-16.
    18. Hayse B, Lannin DR. Supplemental ultrasound screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med 2015;162(11):801-2.
    19. Brodersen J, Siersma VD. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Ann Fam Med 2013;11(2):106-15.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 69 (11)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 69, Issue 11
1 Nov 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breast density notification
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Breast density notification
Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2023, 69 (11) 748-750; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6911748

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Breast density notification
Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2023, 69 (11) 748-750; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6911748
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Breast density: definitions and risks
    • Determining optimal management
    • Checklist for shared decision making
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Notification de la densité mammaire
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Breast density notification
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Equipping family physicians to thrive
  • Will blended family physician payment models revive primary care in Canada?
  • Toward an identity and team-based practice rooted in transdisciplinarity
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire