Research ArticleRxFiles

Thoughtful prescribing for patients with difficult-to-treat depression

Amy Soubolsky, Jessica Visentin and Alex Crawley
Canadian Family Physician November 2023; 69 (11) 777-783; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6911777

Major depressive disorder is highly prevalent. Approximately 1 in 20 Canadians are diagnosed with it each year, and it is the second highest cause of disability worldwide.1 Nonresponse to treatment is common, with response rates between 30% to 60% after initial antidepressant therapy.2-7 Only around 50% of people remit after 2 sequential treatments, and around 30% experience chronic residual symptoms.2-7 The term treatment-resistant depression is often used to refer to an insufficient response despite an adequate trial of at least 2 antidepressants, although there is no universal consensus on this definition.3,5,7,8 There is, however, broad agreement on the importance of early treatment optimization, since with each treatment failure the chance of success declines, the likelihood of recurrence increases, and the burden of disease intensifies.2,4,9,10

Informed by the available evidence and guidelines,8,11-17 this article discusses an approach to managing difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) and applies practical recommendations to a patient case. To reflect recent changes to terminology in this field, the term difficult-to-treat depression will be used in this article rather than treatment-resistant depression and will refer to no response or only partial response (ie, less than 50% reduction in symptom severity) to at least 1 adequate antidepressant trial.13

Case presentation

Mia is a nonbinary 23-year-old who uses they-them pronouns (female sex). They present today for a follow-up visit for depression. You diagnosed Mia with moderate to severe depression 6 months ago. They have no other medical conditions. Their family history is relevant for mental health disorders (their mother has anxiety and depression, their father may possibly have bipolar disorder, and their sister has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety). Mia participated in 8 sessions of online, group cognitive behavioural therapy and completed an 8-week trial of 20 mg of escitalopram daily, which was minimally helpful. You tried switching Mia to venlafaxine, which they have been taking for the past 6 weeks at a dose of 225 mg daily. Mia is not taking any other medications and is not currently pregnant or sexually active.

Today Mia reports that, while still struggling, they have noted some small improvements. Mia is still experiencing sadness, guilt, and anhedonia most days, but these feelings have been less overwhelming lately. While Mia would previously sleep most of the day, they are now able to get out of bed for a few hours each day to get chores done around the house. They have no trouble sleeping throughout the night. Mia has noted a slight improvement in their irritability, resulting in fewer arguments and confrontations with friends and family than previously. Mia reports an increased appetite and is worried about gaining weight. Mia is still on leave from work and does not feel well enough to go back. They are having trouble “thinking straight,” feeling too tired or unmotivated to do most daily activities, and worrying about what their co-workers will think about them.

Thorough reassessment

Before adjusting therapy, it is important to reassess the patient’s status and factors that might influence therapy.8,14 For example, the dose may be subtherapeutic, the duration of therapy might not have been long enough, or the patient may not be taking their antidepressant as prescribed. There may be medical conditions or medications causing or worsening depression. Additionally, it is crucial to assess the patient formally and regularly for any symptoms on the mania spectrum or risk factors for bipolar disorder.18 The Mood Disorders Questionnaire or Rapid Mood Screener can be used to assist in reassessment; specialists also suggest investigating for agitation, irritability, or distractibility as potential flags for depression with mixed features or bipolar disorder.19-21 A list of questions to consider is presented in Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1.

Questions to consider before adjusting therapy for a patient with insufficient response to an antidepressant

Back to the case

You confirm with Mia that they have been taking 225 mg of venlafaxine daily as prescribed for the past 6 weeks. They are not taking any other prescription or over-the-counter medications that could be contributing to their depressive symptoms or interfering with venlafaxine metabolism. You inquire about alcohol and other substances and discover that Mia is drinking 4 to 6 beers a day and is not using any other substances. Findings of laboratory workup from 6 months ago are unremarkable. Mia reports that their family life at home is “not great” but things have been like this for years, with no recent new stressors or adversity. You complete the Mood Disorders Questionnaire, and the score is not positive for bipolar disorder. However, you do note that Mia is experiencing irritability and distractibility, which could potentially be indicative of depression with mixed features. Additionally, their symptoms of hypersomnia and increased appetite are consistent with atypical features of depression.

According to Mia, the most impairing symptoms are hypersomnia, anhedonia, and inability to concentrate. They also worry about how their illness affects their relationships. Mia endorses some passive suicidal thoughts, but says they have no formalized plans. Mia’s mom joins at the end of the appointment and adds that she has noted some improvement in Mia’s mood and that Mia has had more positive interactions with family since taking venlafaxine.

Approach to therapy

After reassessment and ensuring a therapeutic dose has been used for a minimum of 4 weeks, there are 3 main options for managing inadequate response to depression treatment: continue the present management for up to 12 weeks, switch medications (even within the same drug class), or add a medication with a different mechanism of action. International guidelines agree there is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend one strategy over another, as success is possible with any option and it is unclear if any one strategy is superior.2,5,8,13,22,23 Delaying medication change can be controversial. Many studies indicate early improvement (ie, in the first 2 weeks) is a good predictor of full response, and thus some specialists suggest a change should be made if there is no response within 2 to 4 weeks.8,10,24 However, other studies show that waiting 12 weeks before changing therapy can increase response rates and is appropriate for some patients, especially if they have already tried 2 or more antidepressants and have no acute safety risks.2,15,22,25-27 The choice between switching or adding medication is largely guided by expert opinion. Consensus-based recommendations are summarized in Table 2.8,15

View this table:
Table 2.

Considerations to guide treatment strategy after insufficient response to an adequate antidepressant trial

Back to the case

You discuss possible next steps with Mia. They decline any formal help to address their high-risk alcohol consumption, but they agree to try to cut back on their own. You advise that a venlafaxine dose increase is unlikely to improve response and may cause side effects. Mia wants to make a medication change today rather than waiting for another 6 weeks, so you suggest either switching to another antidepressant or adding another medication. Mia does not want to give up the slight progress they have had with venlafaxine, nor to go through the process of trying a third antidepressant monotherapy. Together, you agree to add a medication to venlafaxine.

Selecting an adjunctive medication

Since there is limited evidence to guide medication selection in DTD and variation across guidelines,11-17 one consensus-based approach is to tailor medication choice to specific symptoms and incorporate patient preference when possible. Informed by international guidelines, systematic reviews, and individual trials, medications that have demonstrated efficacy as an adjunct to antidepressants in DTD are summarized below. Table 3 compares drug-specific benefits and harms that may help guide medication selection.28-35

View this table:
Table 3.

Factors that may help guide adjunctive medication selection for patients with DTD

Antipsychotics. Multiple meta-analyses indicate adjunctive atypical antipsychotics are efficacious, and some estimate that 1 in every 7 to 12 patients treated for 4 to 12 weeks will respond or remit.36-40 However, due to uncertainty about the degree of clinical importance of efficacy outcomes, lack of direct comparison with other options, and a high burden of adverse effects, antipsychotics are not necessarily an automatic choice for adjunctive therapy.12,17,36,41,42 The risk of discontinuation due to adverse effects is 2 to 6 times greater than placebo in short-term studies, and there are well-established harms with long-term use.36-40 The evidence for antipsychotics also has limitations, such as short study durations (average of 6 to 8 weeks), high heterogeneity in patient populations and methods, impact on function or quality of life not being adequately assessed, exclusion of participants who demonstrated prior response to placebo, and high rates of competing interests from study authors. Nevertheless, second- or third-generation antipsychotics, especially quetiapine and aripiprazole, remain among first-line options to use adjunctively in patients with DTD as these agents have the most robust evidence among all options.8,13-15

Lithium. According to meta-analyses, around 1 in every 3 to 9 patients with DTD treated with adjunctive lithium for 3 to 6 weeks may respond.39,43,44 While response rates appear comparable to other adjunctive options, many trials were of short duration, had small sample sizes, and studied lithium as an adjunct to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).2,39,40,43,44 Lithium was reported to decrease all-cause mortality (number needed to treat of about 36) and reduce deaths by suicide (number needed to treat of about 28) over an average of 81 weeks compared with TCAs, phenelzine, and placebo (pooled data); however, there is low confidence in these data due to heterogeneity and reliance on post hoc analyses.45,46 Discontinuation rates due to adverse effects range from 4% to 23% across trials, and 20% to 30% of patients have gradual renal decline over many years (eg, ≥20 years), but end-stage renal disease is uncommon (0.5%).44,47-49 Serum lithium level monitoring is recommended to maintain a target of 0.5 to 0.8 mmol/L (primarily to prevent toxicity rather than to target a specific therapeutic range). Canadian guidelines recommend adjunctive lithium as a second-line treatment, Australian–New Zealand and British guidelines recommend lithium as a first-line treatment, and it is listed by other groups as a reasonable option.8,12-15

Bupropion. Although commonly used in practice, adjunctive bupropion has mixed evidence in patients with DTD. Bupropion efficacy is supported by a few randomized controlled trials and the large, naturalistic STAR*D (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression) study.2,50-52 Bupropion had comparable efficacy to adjunctive aripiprazole in a randomized controlled trial in a United States veteran population.53 Conversely, in a large study of patients with chronic recurrent depression, adjunctive bupropion was not different than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy, one unpublished industry-sponsored trial also had negative results, and some meta-analyses suggest its efficacy is not different than placebo.39,40,54,55 Bupropion is often well tolerated. Canadian guidelines list adjunctive bupropion as a second-line treatment in patients with DTD, and some other groups also list it as an option.8,12,15,17

Mirtazapine. Adjunctive mirtazapine for patients with DTD lacks evidence from controlled trials. Efficacy is supported by a very small randomized controlled trial (N=26) in American patients and a large, open-label randomized controlled trial (N=1646) in Japanese patients.56,57 Conversely, there is compelling evidence from a randomized controlled trial (N=480) carried out in the United Kingdom that adding mirtazapine to an SSRI or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) does not result in better outcomes compared with continuing current SSRI or SNRI therapy.58 A Cochrane review also found no difference in depressive symptom severity compared with placebo when mirtazapine was added to SSRIs or SNRIs.59 Furthermore, the controlled trial conducted in Japan showed that while adding mirtazapine to an SSRI or SNRI was superior to placebo, it was not different than switching to mirtazapine monotherapy. Additionally, some studies indicate switching to a TCA has equal or superior efficacy compared with adding mirtazapine.2,57,60,61 Even so, adjunctive mirtazapine may provide benefit for some patients and trialling this option can usually be done without much risk, as pooled dropout rates (due to adverse effects or any cause) were not statistically different than for placebo.41 Canadian, British, and American guidelines list adjunctive mirtazapine as a second-line treatment and other guidelines also list it as an option.8,12,14

Other. Other adjunctive medication options for patients with DTD are less supported by the evidence and guideline recommendations vary. Olanzapine and risperidone have been studied and have conflicting results and a low degree of certainty on positive outcomes.36-40,59,62 Brexpiprazole and cariprazine have less data and inconsistent results in controlled trials.39,40,63 The use of adjunctive lamotrigine is mainly supported by expert opinion rather than evidence, but it is usually well tolerated and may provide benefit for patients with labile or irritable mood symptoms.14,64 Liothyronine (triiodothyronine) might be efficacious as an adjunct, especially in those with subclinical hypothyroidism, and there is evidence to support its use; however, it is not commonly prescribed.2,12,49,65,66 Stimulating medications such as modafinil and lisdexamfetamine may be helpful for depression symptoms of fatigue and poor concentration, although the evidence base is small and imprecise, and cardiovascular adverse effects and potential risk of misuse may be of concern in some patients.67,68 Buspirone efficacy data come from open-label studies and the STAR*D trial, whereas blinded controlled studies do not demonstrate superiority to placebo.2,69,70 Ketamine given intranasally or intravenously has demonstrated immediate and considerable reductions in depressive symptoms and may be a preferred option in some patients with severe refractory depression; however, long-term efficacy and safety are still largely unknown and access is a substantial barrier.12,71-74 While it is not drug therapy, neurostimulation such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or electroconvulsive therapy can be effective options to consider for patients after trialling 2 to 3 medications.75,76

Back to the case

You review the above options with Mia to decide which adjunctive medication might be best suited. You rule out bupropion because of Mia’s alcohol use and mirtazapine because it will likely contribute to their symptoms of hypersomnia and increased appetite. You consider quetiapine and aripiprazole next. You review Mia’s cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors and deem Mia low risk. Compared with quetiapine, aripiprazole may have a more favourable effect on Mia’s hypersomnia, impaired concentration, and increased appetite. Quetiapine may be an equally reasonable option for the mixed features of depression, but it comes with an added risk of sedation and weight gain. Lithium may help improve Mia’s irritability and suicidality; however, Mia prefers the side effect profile of the atypical antipsychotics. You defer consideration of the other adjunctive medications, as they have less robust evidence. You inquire about medication affordability and find out that Mia is currently covered under their mom’s plan. Together with Mia, you choose to prescribe 2 mg of aripiprazole daily as an adjunct to 225 mg of venlafaxine daily.

Practical tips for prescribing and monitoring adjunctive antipsychotics

For people with DTD, adjunctive antipsychotics are typically prescribed at the lowest dose and slowly titrated to effect. Higher doses within the labelled range (Table 3)28-35 do not consistently demonstrate superior efficacy but do increase the risk of most adverse effects.77 Consider using measurement-based care to support clinical assessment (eg, Patient Health Questionnaire–9, Beck Depression Inventory, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, the Clinical Global Impressions scale).8,16,78 To monitor for efficacy in DTD, it is helpful to set goals that focus on specific symptoms, global function, and patient-important outcomes, rather than targeting complete remission of core depression symptoms.79,80 Monitoring is required for metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurologic adverse effects (Table 4),81-84 as well as for general tolerability (eg, sedation, anticholinergic effects, sexual dysfunction). Regularly revisit conversations with patients to see if they are willing and able to add psychotherapy to their overall treatment approach, and explore what other nonpharmacologic support or interventions may be beneficial.85,86

View this table:
Table 4.

Suggested monitoring parameters for patients prescribed second- and third-generation antipsychotics: A dash indicates the test is not necessary.

Case resolution

You discuss specific goals, focusing on function and outcomes that are important to Mia (being able to get out of bed without substantial struggle by 11:00 AM, getting into fewer arguments with their mom and sister, being able to concentrate on and find pleasure in daily activities). You document relevant baseline findings. You advise Mia to self-monitor for any troublesome side effects, such as akathisia, worsening sedation or agitation, weight gain, or changes in impulsivity. You provide Mia with information about various nonpharmacologic strategies and encourage them to continue with psychotherapy. You plan to follow up with Mia in 2 weeks.

Conclusion

Depression can be difficult to adequately treat, and there is limited evidence to guide pharmacologic therapy. After a thorough reassessment and ensuring contributing factors are addressed, treatment approaches and medication selection should be individualized based on available evidence, clinical factors, and patient preference. Offer nonpharmacologic strategies that best suit each patient and encourage psychotherapy. When considering adjunctive medication, clinicians are encouraged to interpret the literature cautiously, prescribe antipsychotics selectively, and discontinue medications not providing benefit or when harm outweighs benefit. Regular monitoring for symptoms, adverse effects, suicide risk, and patient’s level of functioning is essential.

Acknowledgment

We thank the following people for their contributions as reviewers of this article: Loren Regier, Marlys LeBras, Kit Shan Lee, and Helen Lowry.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The RxFiles Academic Detailing Program is funded through a grant from Saskatchewan Health to the University of Saskatchewan; additional “not for profit; not for loss” revenue is obtained from sale of books, online subscriptions, and annual conference registrations. No external funding was received for the production of this manuscript. For works not related to this manuscript, Amy Soubolsky has received an honorarium as a chapter co-editor for the Clinical Handbooks of Psychotropic Drugs, 25th edition. No conflicts of interest are reported by the other authors.

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de novembre 2023 à la page e221.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lam RW,
    2. McIntosh D,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Enns MW,
    5. Kolivakis T,
    6. Michalak EE, et al.
    Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 1. Disease burden and principles of care. Can J Psychiatry 2016;61(9):510-23. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rush AJ,
    2. Trivedi MH,
    3. Wisniewski SR,
    4. Nierenberg AA,
    5. Stewart JW,
    6. Warden D, et al.
    Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163(11):1905-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fava M,
    2. Davidson KG
    . Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996;19(2):179-200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Malhi GS,
    2. Mann JJ
    . Depression. Lancet 2018;392(10161):2299-312. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Thase ME,
    2. Rush AJ
    . When at first you don’t succeed: sequential strategies for antidepressant nonresponders. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58(Suppl 13):23-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Arroll B,
    2. Elley CR,
    3. Fishman T,
    4. Goodyear-Smith FA,
    5. Kenealy T,
    6. Blashki G, et al.
    Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):CD007954.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Nemeroff CB
    . Prevalence and management of treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(Suppl 8):17-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kennedy SH,
    2. Lam RW,
    3. McIntyre RS,
    4. Tourjman SV,
    5. Bhat V,
    6. Blier P, et al.
    Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 3. Pharmacological treatments. Can J Psychiatry 2016;61(9):540-60. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Erratum in: Can J Psychiatry 2017;62(5):356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lundberg J,
    2. Cars T,
    3. Lööv SÅ,
    4. Söderling J,
    5. Sundström J,
    6. Tiihonen J, et al.
    Association of treatment-resistant depression with patient outcomes and health care resource utilization in a population-wide study. JAMA Psychiatry 2023;80(2):167-75.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mann JJ,
    2. Rizk MM
    . Rethinking the medication management of major depression. Expert Rev Neurother 2023;23(4):331-63. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Taylor RW,
    2. Marwood L,
    3. Oprea E,
    4. DeAngel V,
    5. Mather S,
    6. Valentini B, et al.
    Pharmacological augmentation in unipolar depression: a guide to the guidelines. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2020;23(9):587-625.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Giakoumatos CI,
    2. Osser D
    . The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: an update on unipolar nonpsychotic depression. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2019;27(1):33-52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Malhi GS,
    2. Bell E,
    3. Bassett D,
    4. Boyce P,
    5. Bryant R,
    6. Hazell P, et al.
    The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2021;55(1):7-117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Depression in adults: treatment and management. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222. Accessed 2023 Oct 13.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cleare A,
    2. Pariante CM,
    3. Young AH,
    4. Anderson IM,
    5. Christmas D,
    6. Cowen PJ, et al.
    Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines. J Psychopharmacol 2015;29(5):459-525. Epub 2015 May 12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gelenberg AJ,
    2. Freeman MP,
    3. Markowitz JC,
    4. Rosenbaum JF,
    5. Thase ME,
    6. Trivedi MH, et al.
    Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2010. Available from: https://psychiatryonline.org/pb/assets/raw/sitewide/practice_guidelines/guidelines/mdd-1410197717630.pdf. Accessed 2023 Oct 13.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Qaseem A,
    2. Owens DK,
    3. Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I,
    4. Tufte J,
    5. Cross JT Jr,
    6. Wilt TJ, et al.
    Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments of adults in the acute phase of major depressive disorder: a living clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2023;176(2):239-52. Epub 2023 Jan 24. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 2023;176(8):1143-4. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yatham LN,
    2. Kennedy SH,
    3. Parikh SV,
    4. Schaffer A,
    5. Bond DJ,
    6. Frey BN, et al.
    Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2018;20(2):97-170. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. McIntyre RS,
    2. Patel MD,
    3. Masand PS,
    4. Harrington A,
    5. Gillard P,
    6. McElroy SL, et al.
    The Rapid Mood Screener (RMS): a novel and pragmatic screener for bipolar I disorder. Curr Med Res Opin 2021;37(1):135-44. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.
    1. Yatham LN
    . Bipolar disorder in primary care: diagnosis and management. Can Prim Care Today 2023;1(1):18-23. Available from: https://canadianprimarycaretoday.com/cpct/article/view/1-1-3-Yatham. Accessed 2023 Oct 13.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Suppes T,
    2. Ostacher M
    . Mixed features in major depressive disorder: diagnoses and treatments. CNS Spectr 2017;22(2):155-60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Schosser A,
    2. Serretti A,
    3. Souery D,
    4. Mendlewicz J,
    5. Zohar J,
    6. Montgomery S, et al.
    European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD)—where have we gone so far: review of clinical and genetic findings. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2012;22(7):453-68. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rush AJ,
    2. Warden D,
    3. Wisniewski SR,
    4. Fava M,
    5. Trivedi MH,
    6. Gaynes BN, et al.
    STAR*D: revising conventional wisdom. CNS Drugs 2009;23(8):627-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Boyce P,
    2. Hopwood M,
    3. Morris G,
    4. Hamilton A,
    5. Bassett D,
    6. Baune BT, et al.
    Switching antidepressants in the treatment of major depression: when, how and what to switch to? J Affect Disord 2020;261:160-3. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Warden D,
    2. Rush AJ,
    3. Trivedi MH,
    4. Fava M,
    5. Wisniewski SR
    . The STAR*D project results: a comprehensive review of findings. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2007;9(6):449-59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    1. Henssler J,
    2. Kurschus M,
    3. Franklin J,
    4. Bschor T,
    5. Baethge C
    . Trajectories of acute antidepressant efficacy: how long to wait for response? A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term, placebo-controlled acute treatment trials. J Clin Psychiatry 2018;79(3):17r11470.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bschor T,
    2. Baethge C
    . No evidence for switching the antidepressant: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of a common therapeutic strategy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010;121(3):174-9. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Stahl SM,
    2. Morrissette DA,
    3. Faedda G,
    4. Fava M,
    5. Goldberg JF,
    6. Keck PE, et al.
    Guidelines for the recognition and management of mixed depression. CNS Spectr 2017;22(2):203-19. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.
    1. Trivedi MH,
    2. Thase ME,
    3. Fava M,
    4. Nelson CJ,
    5. Yang H,
    6. Qi Y, et al.
    Adjunctive aripiprazole in major depressive disorder: analysis of efficacy and safety in patients with anxious and atypical features. J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69(12):1928-36. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Lenze EJ,
    2. Mulsant BH,
    3. Blumberger DM,
    4. Karp JF,
    5. Newcomer JW,
    6. Anderson SJ, et al.
    Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of augmentation pharmacotherapy with aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression in late life: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386(10011):2404-12. Epub 2015 Sep 27. Erratum in: Lancet 2015;386(10011):2394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    1. Wilkinson D,
    2. Holmes C,
    3. Woolford J,
    4. Stammers S,
    5. North J
    . Prophylactic therapy with lithium in elderly patients with unipolar major depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;17(7):619-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    1. Kok RM,
    2. Vink D,
    3. Heeren TJ,
    4. Nolen WA
    . Lithium augmentation compared with phenelzine in treatment-resistant depression in the elderly: an open, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(8):1177-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Reichenpfader U,
    2. Gartlehner G,
    3. Morgan LC,
    4. Greenblatt A,
    5. Nussbaumer B,
    6. Hansen RA, et al.
    Sexual dysfunction associated with second-generation antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2014;37(1):19-31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.
    1. Montejo AL,
    2. Prieto N,
    3. de Alarcón R,
    4. Casado-Espada N,
    5. de la Iglesia J,
    6. Montejo L
    . Management strategies for antidepressant-related sexual dysfunction: a clinical approach. J Clin Med 2019;8(10):1640.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Bloom R,
    2. Amber KT
    . Identifying the incidence of rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in patients taking lamotrigine: a systematic review of 122 randomized controlled trials. An Bras Dermatol 2017;92(1):139-41.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Spielmans GI,
    2. Berman MI,
    3. Linardatos E,
    4. Rosenlicht NZ,
    5. Perry A,
    6. Tsai AC
    . Adjunctive atypical antipsychotic treatment for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of depression, quality of life, and safety outcomes. PLoS Med 2013;10(3):e1001403. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    1. Nelson JC,
    2. Papakostas GI
    . Atypical antipsychotic augmentation in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166(9):980-91. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.
    1. Komossa K,
    2. Depping AM,
    3. Gaudchau A,
    4. Kissling W,
    5. Leucht S
    . Second-generation antipsychotics for major depressive disorder and dysthymia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(12):CD008121.
  39. 39.↵
    1. Nuñez NA,
    2. Joseph B,
    3. Pahwa M,
    4. Kumar R,
    5. Resendez MG,
    6. Prokop LJ, et al.
    Augmentation strategies for treatment resistant major depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2022;302:385-400. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Scott F,
    2. Hampsey E,
    3. Gnanapragasam S,
    4. Carter B,
    5. Marwood L,
    6. Taylor RW, et al.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmentation and combination treatments for early-stage treatment-resistant depression. J Psychopharmacol 2023;37(3):268-78. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1.9 Further-line treatment. In: Depression in adults: treatment and management. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222/chapter/Recommendations#further-line-treatment. Accessed 2023 Oct 13.
  42. 42.↵
    1. Turgeon R,
    2. Allan GM
    . Antipsychotics for depression: an acceptable risk/benefit profile. Tools for Practice. Edmonton, AB: Alberta College of Family Physicians; 2012. Available from: https://www.acfp.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1397837410_20120123_084835.pdf. Accessed 2023 Oct 13.
  43. 43.↵
    1. Bauer M,
    2. Adli M,
    3. Ricken R,
    4. Severus E,
    5. Pilhatsch M
    . Role of lithium augmentation in the management of major depressive disorder. CNS Drugs 2014;28(4):331-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Nelson JC,
    2. Baumann P,
    3. Delucchi K,
    4. Joffe R,
    5. Katona C
    . A systematic review and meta-analysis of lithium augmentation of tricyclic and second generation antidepressants in major depression. J Affect Disord 2014;168:269-75. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cipriani A,
    2. Hawton K,
    3. Stockton S,
    4. Geddes JR
    . Lithium in the prevention of suicide in mood disorders: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;346:f3646.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Cipriani A,
    2. Pretty H,
    3. Hawton K,
    4. Geddes JR
    . Lithium in the prevention of suicidal behavior and all-cause mortality in patients with mood disorders: a systematic review of randomized trials. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(10):1805-19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Gitlin M
    . Lithium side effects and toxicity: prevalence and management strategies. Int J Bipolar Disord 2016;4(1):27. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.
    1. McKnight RF,
    2. Adida M,
    3. Budge K,
    4. Stockton S,
    5. Goodwin GM,
    6. Geddes JR
    . Lithium toxicity profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012;379(9817):721-8. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Nierenberg AA,
    2. Fava M,
    3. Trivedi MH,
    4. Wisniewski SR,
    5. Thase ME,
    6. McGrath PJ, et al.
    A comparison of lithium and T3 augmentation following two failed medication treatments for depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163(9):1519-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Cheon EJ,
    2. Lee KH,
    3. Park YW,
    4. Lee JH,
    5. Koo BH,
    6. Lee SJ, et al.
    Comparison of the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole versus bupropion augmentation in patients with major depressive disorder unresponsive to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a randomized, prospective, open-label study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2017;37(2):193-9.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.
    1. Blier P,
    2. Ward HE,
    3. Tremblay P,
    4. Laberge L,
    5. Hébert C,
    6. Bergeron R
    . Combination of antidepressant medications from treatment initiation for major depressive disorder: a double-blind randomized study. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167(3):281-8. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Gulrez G,
    2. Badyal DK,
    3. Deswal RS,
    4. Sharma A
    . Bupropion as an augmenting agent in patients of depression with partial response. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2012;110(3):227-30. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Mohamed S,
    2. Johnson GR,
    3. Chen P,
    4. Hicks PB,
    5. Davis LL,
    6. Yoon J, et al.
    Effect of antidepressant switching vs augmentation on remission among patients with major depressive disorder unresponsive to antidepressant treatment: the VAST-D randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318(2):132-45.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    1. Rush AJ,
    2. Trivedi MH,
    3. Stewart JW,
    4. Nierenberg AA,
    5. Fava M,
    6. Kurian BT, et al.
    Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED): acute and long-term outcomes of a single-blind randomized study. Am J Psychiatry 2011;168(7):689-701. Epub 2011 May 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. GlaxoSmithKline
    . Study in patients with depression not responding to selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00296517. Bethesda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2009. Available from: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00296517. Accessed 2023 Oct 13.
  56. 56.↵
    1. Carpenter LL,
    2. Yasmin S,
    3. Price LH
    . A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of antidepressant augmentation with mirtazapine. Biol Psychiatry 2002;51(2):183-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Furukawa TA,
    3. Mantani A,
    4. Kurata K,
    5. Kubouchi H,
    6. Hirota S, et al.
    Optimising first- and second-line treatment strategies for untreated major depressive disorder - the SUN-D study: a pragmatic, multi-centre, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. BMC Med 2018;16(1):103.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Kessler DS,
    2. MacNeill SJ,
    3. Tallon D,
    4. Lewis G,
    5. Peters TJ,
    6. Hollingworth W, et al.
    Mirtazapine added to SSRIs or SNRIs for treatment resistant depression in primary care: phase III randomised placebo controlled trial (MIR). BMJ 2018;363:k4218. Erratum in: BMJ 2018;363:k4691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Davies P,
    2. Ijaz S,
    3. Williams CJ,
    4. Kessler D,
    5. Lewis G,
    6. Wiles N
    . Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;(12):CD010557.
  60. 60.↵
    1. Navarro V,
    2. Boulahfa I,
    3. Obach A,
    4. Jerez D,
    5. Diaz-Ricart M,
    6. Gastó C, et al.
    Switching to imipramine versus add-on mirtazapine in venlafaxine-resistant major depression: a 10-week randomized open study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2019;39(1):63-6.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    1. Xiao L,
    2. Zhu X,
    3. Gillespie A,
    4. Feng Y,
    5. Zhou J,
    6. Chen X, et al.
    Effectiveness of mirtazapine as add-on to paroxetine v. paroxetine or mirtazapine monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder with early non-response to paroxetine: a two-phase, multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Psychol Med 2021;51(7):1166-74. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.↵
    1. Zhou X,
    2. Ravindran AV,
    3. Qin B,
    4. Del Giovane C,
    5. Li Q,
    6. Bauer M, et al.
    Comparative efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of augmentation agents in treatment-resistant depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2015;76(4):e487-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Carter B,
    2. Strawbridge R,
    3. Husain MI,
    4. Jones BDM,
    5. Short R,
    6. Cleare AJ, et al.
    Relative effectiveness of augmentation treatments for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 2020;32(5-6):477-90. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Goh KK,
    2. Chen CH,
    3. Chiu YH,
    4. Lu ML
    . Lamotrigine augmentation in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. J Psychopharmacol 2019;33(6):700-13. Epub 2019 May 13.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    1. Cooper-Kazaz R,
    2. Lerer B
    . Efficacy and safety of triiodothyronine supplementation in patients with major depressive disorder treated with specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008;11(5):685-99. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Agid O,
    2. Lerer B
    . Algorithm-based treatment of major depression in an outpatient clinic: clinical correlates of response to a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor and to triiodothyronine augmentation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2003;6(1):41-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Trivedi MH,
    2. Cutler AJ,
    3. Richards C,
    4. Lasser R,
    5. Geibel BB,
    6. Gao J, et al.
    A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate as augmentation therapy in adults with residual symptoms of major depressive disorder after treatment with escitalopram. J Clin Psychiatry 2013;74(8):802-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Goss AJ,
    2. Kaser M,
    3. Costafreda SG,
    4. Sahakian BJ,
    5. Fu CHY
    . Modafinil augmentation therapy in unipolar and bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry 2013;74(11):1101-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Landén M,
    2. Björling G,
    3. Šgren H,
    4. Fahlén T
    . A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of buspirone in combination with an SSRI in patients with treatment-refractory depression. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(12):664-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Appelberg BG,
    2. Syvälahti EK,
    3. Koskinen TE,
    4. Mehtonen OP,
    5. Muhonen TT,
    6. Naukkarinen HH
    . Patients with severe depression may benefit from buspirone augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: results from a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, placebo wash-in study. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(6):448-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Swainson J,
    2. McGirr A,
    3. Blier P,
    4. Brietzke E,
    5. Richard-Devantoy S,
    6. Ravindran N, et al.
    The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) task force recommendations for the use of racemic ketamine in adults with major depressive disorder. Can J Psychiatry 2021;66(2):113-25. Epub 2020 Nov 11. Erratum in: Can J Psychiatry 2021;66(12):1102. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.
    1. McIntyre RS,
    2. Rosenblat JD,
    3. Nemeroff CB,
    4. Sanacora G,
    5. Murrough JW,
    6. Berk M, et al.
    Synthesizing the evidence for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: an international expert opinion on the available evidence and implementation. Am J Psychiatry 2021;178(5):383-99. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.
    1. Oliver PA,
    2. Snyder AD,
    3. Feinn R,
    4. Malov S,
    5. McDiarmid G,
    6. Arias AJ
    . Clinical effectiveness of intravenous racemic ketamine infusions in a large community sample of patients with treatment-resistant depression, suicidal ideation, and generalized anxiety symptoms: a retrospective chart review. J Clin Psychiatry 2022;83(6):21m14336.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.↵
    1. Dean RL,
    2. Hurducas C,
    3. Hawton K,
    4. Spyridi S,
    5. Cowen PJ,
    6. Hollingsworth S, et al.
    Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with unipolar major depressive disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;(9):CD011612.
  75. 75.↵
    1. Milev RV,
    2. Giacobbe P,
    3. Kennedy SH,
    4. Blumberger DM,
    5. Daskalakis ZJ,
    6. Downar J, et al.
    Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 4. Neurostimulation treatments. Can J Psychiatry 2016;61(9):561-75. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. UK ECT Review Group
    . Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2003;361(9360):799-808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Jha MK,
    2. Mathew SJ
    . Pharmacotherapies for treatment-resistant depression: how antipsychotics fit in the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape. Am J Psychiatry 2023;180(3):190-9.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    1. Trivedi MH,
    2. Rush AJ,
    3. Wisniewski SR,
    4. Nierenberg AA,
    5. Warden D,
    6. Ritz L, et al.
    Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163(1):28-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Keitner GI,
    2. Mansfield AK
    . Management of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2012;35(1):249-65. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Demyttenaere K,
    2. Donneau AF,
    3. Albert A,
    4. Ansseau M,
    5. Constant E,
    6. van Heeringen K
    . What is important in being cured from depression? Discordance between physicians and patients (1). J Affect Disord 2015;174:390-6. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    1. Galletly C,
    2. Castle D,
    3. Dark F,
    4. Humberstone V,
    5. Jablensky A,
    6. Killackey E, et al.
    Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the management of schizophrenia and related disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2016;50(5):410-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.
    1. Zaidi S,
    2. Heald AH,
    3. Belgamwar RB,
    4. Fryer AA
    . Monitoring drug interventions in people with bipolar disorder. BMJ 2023;380:e070678.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  83. 83.
    1. Marder SR,
    2. Cannon TD
    . Schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 2019;381(18):1753-61.
    OpenUrl
  84. 84.↵
    1. Bool J,
    2. Crawley A,
    3. Wanson A,
    4. Davis B,
    5. Halpape K
    . Pharmacotherapy management of schizophrenia for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2021;67:350-4 (Eng), e115-20 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    1. Cuijpers P,
    2. Sijbrandij M,
    3. Koole SL,
    4. Andersson G,
    5. Beekman AT,
    6. Reynolds CF 3rd
    . Adding psychotherapy to antidepressant medication in depression and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 2014;13(1):56-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    1. Cuijpers P,
    2. Dekker J,
    3. Hollon SD,
    4. Andersson G
    . Adding psychotherapy to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depressive disorders in adults: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2009;70(9):1219-29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Podcast

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Thoughtful prescribing for patients with difficult-to-treat depression
Amy Soubolsky, Jessica Visentin, Alex Crawley
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2023, 69 (11) 777-783; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6911777
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section