Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleTools for Practice

The value of family medicine

An impossible job, done impossibly well

Michael R. Kolber, Christina S. Korownyk, Jennifer Young, Scott Garrison, Jessica Kirkwood and G. Michael Allan
Canadian Family Physician April 2023, 69 (4) 269-270; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6904269
Michael R. Kolber
Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina S. Korownyk
Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Young
Family physician practising in Collingwood, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Garrison
Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Kirkwood
Family physician and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Michael Allan
Director of Programs and Practice Support at the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Family medicine physicians manage the highest complexity of conditions in their practices.1 Family physicians must actively stay up to date on new advances and recent evidence; care for patients of all ages and throughout many stages of their lives; share patients’ struggles and triumphs; diagnose undifferentiated diseases; advocate for their patients at all levels of the health care system and coordinate complex treatment regimens; and help patients balance their care options with their values. They are also frequently carrying out these functions while running a full-time business. It is a career that can feel like an extraordinary blessing and a burden at the same time.

Unfortunately, many articles suggest primary care is suboptimal. Within a week of our starting to write this article, a study of patients with diabetes treated in Canadian primary care concluded that “target achievement … was suboptimal in all patient groups.”2 Guidelines, frequently with little family medicine input,3 have piled on recommendations targeting primary care without reflection on the time burden or lost opportunity costs. It is estimated that to meet guideline recommendations for preventive care and chronic disease, primary care providers require more than 21 hours per day.4 Given the seemingly impossible nature of primary care, as defined by guidelines, many are calling for guidelines to consider competing priorities in primary care5 and to provide an estimated “time needed to treat” for each guideline recommendation.6

Despite the challenges, studies focusing on patient-oriented outcomes provide evidence that clearly underscores the value of comprehensive, primary care performed primarily by family physicians.

Family physicians provide most of the health care in Canada. About 70% of Canadian health care is provided by family physicians.7 In Alberta, for example, family physicians are the sole managers of most patients with common chronic conditions, including 86% of those with hypertension and 71% of those with diabetes.8

Family physicians provide care to complex patients. Family physicians see more patients with multiple comorbidities than specialists do9 and perform as well as specialists in managing diseases such as cardiovascular disease in older individuals, diabetes, and depression.10-12 An analysis of 14 different medical specialties concluded that family medicine is the most complex of the medical disciplines.1

Adding family physicians to a population improves health outcomes. Adding family physicians to a population yields more health benefits than adding any other physician group. For every additional 10 family physicians per 100,000 population, there are 15 fewer deaths, 40 fewer hospitalizations,13 and an average increase in life expectancy of 52 days.14

Family physician care also benefits patients with specific diseases. Studies, several from Canada, have reported on these benefits.

  • Congestive heart failure: decreased readmissions and death at 1 year,15 with approximately 10% to 15% fewer deaths or readmissions compared with no follow-up visits, and 3% to 4% fewer compared with follow-up with an “unfamiliar” physician (eg, cardiologist).

  • Asthma: decreased number of emergency visits (60% to 75% relative) and hospitalizations (about 25%).16

  • Diabetes (in older patients): decreased hospitalization and death.17

  • Dementia (community-dwelling patients): decreased emergency visits and hospitalizations.18

  • Chronic kidney disease: decreased hospitalizations.19

  • Opioid use disorder: greater treatment retention and patient satisfaction for those treated in primary care.20

  • Perinatal mortality and adverse maternal outcomes: similar for deliveries performed by family physicians or obstetricians.21

  • Infant mortality: reduced with access to primary care.22

Family physicians provide continuity of care. As continuity of care with a primary care provider increases, emergency department visits, hospital admissions or readmissions, and all-cause mortality fall, and health care costs decrease. In a systematic review of 22 cohort studies, 18 studies found that increased continuity of care in general (mainly provided by family physicians or mixed groups of physicians) decreased all-cause mortality.23 Similar results were found when only primary care physician continuity was studied.24 Using data from more than 6500 American primary care physicians (family physicians or general internists), the authors found that patients with the lowest continuity of care cost the system 14% more, or approximately $1000 per year more, compared with patients with high continuity.25 An examination of data on the cost of government-funded health care services in British Columbia assessed continuity of primary care as the factor in health care provision with the strongest relationship to health care costs for 8 common chronic medical conditions, with high continuity associated with lower costs.26

Patients benefit from longitudinal care provided by family physicians. The longer a patient’s relationship with a family physician, the greater the decrease in after-hours care, hospital admissions, and mortality. A recent nationwide Norwegian study found relatively linear relationships between the length of the patient-physician relationship and emergency care visits, hospital admissions, and overall mortality.27 The researchers found that patients who had a regular general practitioner relationship for more than 15 years had reductions of approximately 30% in after-hours care or hospital admissions and approximately 25% in overall mortality compared with those who had a regular general practitioner for 1 year.27 Canadian studies show that retention of family physicians in rural communities decreases hospitalization rates by approximately 6% to 20%, depending on the length of study and how retention was defined.28,29 In Alberta, complex patients cared for by comprehensive family physicians are less likely to end up in the emergency department or admitted to hospital.30

Comprehensive primary care led by a family physician improves patient outcomes. These include lowering of mortality, health care use (ie, decreased emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and readmissions), and health care costs. Paradoxically, while there has never been more evidence for the benefits of care delivered by family physician, never have we been so short of these providers. Primary care is in crisis, but this situation also implies opportunity. We are hopeful that solutions, with a focus on funding to empower primary care, are truly being considered and will soon be implemented. Let us help family physicians continue doing an impossible job, impossibly well.

Notes

Tools for Practice articles in CFP are adapted from peer-reviewed articles at http://www.toolsforpractice.ca and summarize practice-changing medical evidence for primary care. Coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan and Dr Adrienne J. Lindblad, articles are developed by the Patients, Experience, Evidence, Research (PEER) team and supported by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and its Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan Chapters. Feedback is welcome at toolsforpractice{at}cfpc.ca.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright © 2023 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Katerndahl D,
    2. Wood R,
    3. Jaén CR.
    Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines. Healthc (Amst) 2015;3(2):89-96. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nandiwada S,
    2. Manca DP,
    3. Yeung RO,
    4. Lau D.
    Achievement of treatment targets among patients with type 2 diabetes in 2015 and 2020 in Canadian primary care. CMAJ 2023;195(1):E1-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Allan GM,
    2. Kraut R,
    3. Crawshay A,
    4. Korownyk C,
    5. Vandermeer B,
    6. Kolber MR.
    Contributors to primary care guidelines. What are their professions and how many of them have conflicts of interest? Can Fam Physician 2015;61:52-8 (Eng), e50-7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Porter J,
    2. Boyd C,
    3. Skandari MR,
    4. Laiteerapong N.
    Revisiting the time needed to provide adult primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2023;38(1):147-55. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Korownyk C,
    2. McCormack J,
    3. Kolber MR,
    4. Garrison S,
    5. Allan GM.
    Competing demands and opportunities in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:664-8 (Eng), e371-6 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Johansson M,
    2. Guyatt G,
    3. Montori V.
    Guidelines should consider clinicians’ time needed to treat. BMJ 2023;380:e072953.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Stewart M,
    2. Ryan B.
    Ecology of health care in Canada. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:449-53 (Eng), e249-54 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kirkwood JEM,
    2. Ton J,
    3. Korownyk C,
    4. Kolber MR,
    5. Allan GM,
    6. Garrison SR.
    Where chronic disease management takes place. A population-based retrospective cohort study of the province of Alberta, Canada. Can Fam Physician. In press.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Starfield B,
    2. Lemke KW,
    3. Bernhardt T,
    4. Foldes SS,
    5. Forrest CB,
    6. Weiner JP.
    Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in ‘case’ management. Ann Fam Med 2003;1(1):8-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Harris S,
    2. Yale JF,
    3. Dempsey E,
    4. Gerstein H.
    Can family physicians help patients initiate basal insulin therapy successfully? Randomized trial of patient-titrated insulin glargine compared with standard oral therapy: lessons for family practice from the Canadian INSIGHT trial. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:550-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    1. Wisniewski SR,
    2. Rush AJ,
    3. Nierenberg AA,
    4. Gaynes BN,
    5. Warden D,
    6. Luther JF, et al.
    Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? Am J Psychiatry 2009;166(5):599-607. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Strandberg TE,
    2. Pitkala KH,
    3. Berglind S,
    4. Nieminen MS,
    5. Tilvis RS.
    Multifactorial intervention to prevent recurrent cardiovascular events in patients 75 years or older. The Drugs and Evidence-Based Medicine in the Elderly (DEBATE) study: a randomized, controlled trial. Am Heart J 2006;152(3):585-92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chang CH,
    2. O’Malley AJ,
    3. Goodman DC.
    Association between temporal changes in primary care workforce and patient outcomes. Health Serv Res 2017;52(2):634-55. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Berkowitz SA,
    3. Phillips RL,
    4. Bitton A,
    5. Landon BE,
    6. Phillips RS.
    Association of primary care physician supply with population mortality in the United States, 2005-2015. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179(4):506-14.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. McAlister FA,
    2. Youngson E,
    3. Bakal JA,
    4. Kaul P,
    5. Ezekowitz J,
    6. van Walraven C.
    Impact of physician continuity on death or urgent readmission after discharge among patients with heart failure. CMAJ 2013;185(14):E681-9. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Cree M,
    2. Bell NR,
    3. Johnson D,
    4. Carriere KC.
    Increased continuity of care associated with decreased hospital care and emergency department visits for patients with asthma. Dis Manag 2006;9(1):63-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Worrall G,
    2. Knight J.
    Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes. Retrospective cohort study of mortality and hospitalization. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:e16-20. Available from: https://www.cfp.ca/content/57/1/e16.long. Accessed 2023 Mar 5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Godard-Sebillotte C,
    2. Strumpf E,
    3. Sourial N,
    4. Rochette L,
    5. Pelletier E,
    6. Vedel I.
    Primary care continuity and potentially avoidable hospitalization in persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021;69(5):1208-20. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wiebe N,
    2. Klarenbach SW,
    3. Allan GM,
    4. Manns BJ,
    5. Pelletier R,
    6. James MT, et al.
    Potentially preventable hospitalization as a complication of CKD: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64(2):230-8. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Korownyk C,
    2. Perry D,
    3. Ton J,
    4. Kolber MR,
    5. Garrison S,
    6. Thomas B, et al.
    Managing opioid use disorder in primary care. PEER simplified guideline. Can Family Physician 2019;65:321-30 (Eng), e173-84 (Fr). Erratum in: Can Fam Physician 2019;65:687.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Aubrey-Bassler K,
    2. Cullen RM,
    3. Simms A,
    4. Asghari S,
    5. Crane J,
    6. Wang PP, et al.
    Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable. CMAJ 2015;187(15):1125-32. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Russo LX,
    2. Scott A,
    3. Sivey P,
    4. Dias J.
    Primary care physicians and infant mortality: evidence from Brazil. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0217614.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Pereira Gray DJ,
    2. Sidaway-Lee K,
    3. White E,
    4. Thorne A,
    5. Evans PH.
    Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open 2018;8(6):e021161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Baker R,
    2. Freeman GK,
    3. Haggerty JL,
    4. Bankart MJ,
    5. Nockels KH.
    Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2020;70(698):e600-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bazemore A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Bruno R,
    5. Chung Y,
    6. Phillips RL Jr.
    Higher primary care physician continuity is associated with lower costs and hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med 2018;16(6):492-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hollander MJ,
    2. Kadlec H.
    Financial implications of the continuity of primary care. Perm J 2015;19(1):4-10. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Sandvik J,
    2. Hetlevik Ø,
    3. Blinkenberg J,
    4. Hunskaar S.
    Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway. Br J Gen Pract 2022;72(715):e84-90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mathews M,
    2. Ouédraogo AM,
    3. Lam M,
    4. Gozdyra P,
    5. Green M.
    A cross-sectional study of community-level physician retention and hospitalization in rural Ontario, Canada. J Rural Health 2023;39(1):69-78. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Knight JC,
    2. Mathews M,
    3. Aubrey-Bassler K.
    Relation between family physician retention and avoidable hospital admission in Newfoundland and Labrador: a population-based cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2017;5(4):E746-52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. McDonald T,
    2. Green L.
    A cluster analysis exploring the relationship between daily patient volume, provider panel size, service day provision and patient health outcomes in Alberta general practitioner practices. Presented at: Alberta College of Family Physicians Family Medicine Summit; 2020 Mar 6; Banff, AB.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 69 (4)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 69, Issue 4
1 Apr 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The value of family medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The value of family medicine
Michael R. Kolber, Christina S. Korownyk, Jennifer Young, Scott Garrison, Jessica Kirkwood, G. Michael Allan
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2023, 69 (4) 269-270; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6904269

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The value of family medicine
Michael R. Kolber, Christina S. Korownyk, Jennifer Young, Scott Garrison, Jessica Kirkwood, G. Michael Allan
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2023, 69 (4) 269-270; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6904269
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Risk of muscle symptoms while taking statins
  • Bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids for postinfectious cough
Show more Tools for Practice

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire