Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleOncology Briefs

Colon cancer in primary care

Miki J. Lackman and Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician January 2024; 70 (1) 33-37; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.700133
Miki J. Lackman
General practitioner oncologist at the Ottawa Hospital in Ontario.
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna N. Wilkinson
Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, a family physician with the Ottawa Academic Family Health Team, a general practitioner oncologist at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Program Director of PGY-3 FP-Oncology, and Regional Cancer Primary Care Lead for Champlain Region.
MSc MD CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As of 2023, it is estimated that colorectal cancer (CRC) will be the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada, accounting for 11% of all new cancer diagnoses.1 Patients with localized CRCs have a 90% relative 5-year survival rate compared with 14% in those with distant metastases at diagnosis.2 While the incidence of CRC in individuals 65 years or older has declined steadily in the United States since the mid-1990s, the incidence in those 64 years or younger has increased.2 Based on comparisons with 2010 incidence rates from the United States, data modelling suggests CRC incidence rates will increase by 90.0% for patients aged 20 to 34 years and by 27.7% for patients aged 35 to 49 years by 2030,3 and data from Canada show similar trends.4 In 2021 the US Preventive Services Task Force5 recommended the age to commence screening for CRC be lowered to 45 from 50. Current Canadian guidelines6 suggest initiating CRC screening at age 50. Approximately 20% of patients with CRC have a first-degree relative with the disease and about 5% of patients with CRC have an identified genetic susceptibility.7 Hereditary nonpolyposis CRC (Lynch syndrome) and familial adenomatous polyposis pose genetic susceptibility to CRC.7 This article reviews the diagnosis, workup, and treatment of colon cancer to better support family physicians as they care for these patients. Treatment of rectal cancer differs and is not included in this review.

Pathophysiology

Colon cancer develops over approximately 10 to 15 years owing to an accumulation of genetic mutations that result in the development of precancerous and subsequently malignant lesions from normal colonic mucosa.8 Colon cancer screening aims to detect and remove precancerous lesions prior to transformation into invasive disease. Adenocarcinomas account for 90% of CRCs.8 Colon cancer most commonly spreads to the liver and lung but can also spread to the peritoneum and distant lymph nodes.9 Colon cancer does not commonly spread to bone or to the brain.

Right-sided versus left-sided tumours. The location of the primary tumour is not only prognostic but also predictive of response to treatment. Right-sided tumours (cecum to hepatic flexure) generally have poorer overall survival compared with left-sided ones.10 Right-sided tumours typically present with subtle clinical features, such as new-onset anemia, whereas left-sided tumours generally present symptomatically, with bowel habit changes and hematochezia. As a result, right-sided tumours are commonly diagnosed later and are more likely to be metastatic at time of diagnosis.8

Workup and staging

Once the diagnosis of colon cancer is made, a complete workup is required to determine stage of the cancer and eligibility for resection. Family physicians should ensure newly diagnosed patients undergo colonoscopy with biopsy of the primary tumour; a complete blood count; a carcinoembryonic antigen test; and baseline computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. A positron emission tomography scan is not indicated for preoperative workup.7

Staging of colon cancer is based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification (Table 1).11 Clinical, pathological, and surgical features can be used to determine poor prognostic CRC, which are high risk and may require more intensive therapy (Box 1).6 Stage I cancers (T1 to T2) and most stage II (T3 to T4 without high-risk features [Box 1])6 do not routinely receive adjuvant treatment (systemic treatment that follows surgical resection), and therefore ongoing surveillance is often provided by the patient’s family physician.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

TNM staging of colon cancer

Box 1.

Characteristics of patients at high risk and with poor prognostic features of colon cancer

  • T4 tumours (stage IIb or IIc)

  • Poorly differentiated or undifferentiated histology

  • Lymphovascular invasion

  • Perineural invasion

  • Tumour budding

  • Bowel obstruction

  • Lesions with localized perforation

  • Close, indeterminate, or positive margins

  • Inadequately sampled lymph nodes (<12)

Data from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.6

Molecular diagnostics: tumour biomarkers and mismatch repair genes

Pathology reports will include immunohistochemistry stains assessing the nuclear expression of the mismatch repair (MMR) protein; MMR genes code for proteins involved in the repair of base-base mismatches occurring during DNA replication. Mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cells lead to an accumulation of DNA replication errors, known as microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H).12 In contrast, MMR proficient (pMMR) cells or microsatellite stability (MSS) refers to wild-type (or nonmutated) MMR genes. Status of MMR genes affects recommended treatment, so testing for MMR deficiency is now routine for all patients with newly diagnosed CRCs. A tumour that is dMMR or MSI-H can result from somatic mutations (at the cancer cell level) due to methylation of 1 or more MMR genes in the cancer cells. However, in some cases, dMMR or MSI-H can be indicative of germline alterations where the patients’ normal cells are affected, increasing the risk of development of multiple cancers. This condition is known as hereditary nonpolyposis CRC (Lynch syndrome).13 Individuals suspected to have hereditary nonpolyposis CRC should be referred to a medical geneticist for assessment.

In the metastatic setting, tumour biomarkers such as KRAS and NRAS, and BRAF mutations are tested to determine whether targeted therapies are indicated. These biomarkers mediate signalling pathways driving growth and proliferation of tumour cells, so therapies directed against these targets can arrest or slow tumour growth.

Treatment of patients with resectable stage I to III colon cancer

Patients with stage I to III CRC are optimally treated with surgical resection upfront, which involves bowel and lymph node dissection (Figure 1). Patients with stage I CRC are typically treated with surgery alone while those with stage II have surgery that may be followed by 3 to 6 months of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) chemotherapy (Box 2)7,14 if it is MSS or pMMR with high-risk features (Box 1).6 Patients with stage II disease that is MSS or pMMR and low risk or dMMR do not require adjuvant treatment. Those with stage III disease will typically be treated with 3 to 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.7

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Summary of treatment for patients with resectable stage I to III colon cancer

Box 2.

Common chemotherapy agents used to treat patients with colon cancer

  • Capecitabine

  • 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin

  • FOLFOX

  • FOLFIRI

  • CAPOX

Additional information, including common side effects of these chemotherapy agents, can be found in “Chemotherapy basics for family physicians”14

CAPOX—capecitabine and oxaliplatin; FOLFIRI—leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan; FOLFOX—leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin. Data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.7

Severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. Some individuals are at increased risk of severe toxicity from fluoropyrimidines, which can be given in an intravenous or infusion (5-fluorouracil) form or orally as capecitabine. Fluoropyrimidines are broken down by the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme. Individuals with variants of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene are unable to metabolize this drug adequately and are at increased risk of severe toxicities such as life-threatening inflammation and ulceration of the gastrointestinal system.14 While these individuals may be given lower doses of the chemotherapy, it is contraindicated in those with severe dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.15 It is becoming increasingly common to routinely test individuals for this gene prior to commencing treatment.

Management of patients with metastatic disease

Surgical management. In the setting of limited metastatic disease, patients diagnosed with stage IV colon cancer can be evaluated for consideration of surgical resection of liver and lung metastases.7 If a patient is deemed to be a good candidate for surgery, then the goal of treatment is to cure.

Patients with metastatic spread limited to the peritoneum may be considered for cytoreductive surgery (peritoneal stripping surgery) in combination with perioperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis without extra-abdominal metastases.7 Resection of the primary colon tumour is rarely indicated in patients with unresectable metastases.

Systemic treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. Treatment of metastatic disease depends on the primary tumour location, MMR gene profile of the tumour, biomarker mutations, and prior treatments received. The median overall survival for those with metastatic colon cancer is about 30 months.16

First-line chemotherapies include FOLFOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin), FOLFIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan), or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin).7 Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have shown similar benefit when comparing first-line FOLFOX with CAPOX for metastatic disease.7 Capecitabine is oral, while 5-fluorouracil is delivered as a bolus along with leucovorin followed by a 46-hour infuser. Progression-free survival and median overall survival are similar when comparing FOLFIRI with FOLFOX. Progression-free survival has been estimated at 8.5 months for CAPOX and FOLFIRI and 8 months for FOLFOX.17,18 Patients continue to take first-line treatment until there is evidence of progression or until treatment intolerance. Following progression, subsequent lines of treatment are considered (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Lines of treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic colon cancer: First-line treatment depends on MMR status and microsatellite stability (MMR deficient vs proficient and MSS vs MSI-H), location of primary tumour (right vs left sided), molecular biomarkers (BRAF and KRAS mutation status), and patient fitness. If there is evidence of progression or treatment intolerance, the patient may be offered subsequent lines of treatment.

Immunotherapy (ie, pembrolizumab) is effective for dMMR or MSI-H tumours and is recommended as first-line therapy in these settings.7 Median progression-free survival was found to be significantly longer with pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy (16.5 vs 8.2 months; P=.0002).19

Targeted agents are indicated alone or in combination with chemotherapy depending on biomarker status. Some targeted agents include the following:

Bevacizumab: This monoclonal antibody inhibits anti–vascular endothelial growth factor and suppresses tumour angiogenesis. When added to chemotherapy there is benefit in improving overall survival (median survival of 17.9 vs 14.6 months; P=.008).20-23

Cetuximab and panitumumab: These are epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and are indicated in patients with wild-type (ie, nonmutated) KRAS and BRAF genes. Approximately 30% to 50% of colorectal cancers have a mutation in the KRAS gene.7 These agents are not effective on tumours with a mutation in either KRAS or BRAF, as inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab or panitumumab is bypassed.7 Treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab can be considered when combined with a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib.7

Regorafenib: This is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has antitumour and anti-angiogenic features.24

It has been demonstrated that patients with right-sided tumours have longer overall survival if treated with bevacizumab rather than cetuximab (29.2 months vs 13.7 months; P=.11). However, overall survival was prolonged with cetuximab rather than bevacizumab in individuals with left-sided primary tumours (39.3 months vs 32.6 months; P=.05).25 Therefore, cetuximab or panitumumab should be used for KRAS wildtype left-sided tumours in the first-line setting.

Conclusion

Colon cancer remains one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Canada. Treatment recommended for CRC depends on the primary tumour location, stage, and biomarkers. Localized disease is typically treated surgically up front, followed by the possibility of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III and selected stage II cancers. Various treatment options, including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, are used in the metastatic setting. With the advancement of treatment options throughout the past decade, individuals diagnosed with metastatic disease have a median overall survival of about 30 months. Family physicians will inevitably care for individuals with colon cancer over the course of their careers. Understanding the pathophysiology, workup, and treatment options for these patients is important in providing comprehensive care.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de janvier 2024 à la page e14.

  • Copyright © 2024 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    Canadian cancer statistics 2023. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee, Canadian Cancer Society, Statistics Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada; 2023. Available from: https://cancer.ca/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2023-EN. Accessed 2023 Dec 21.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Goding Sauer A,
    4. Fedewa SA,
    5. Butterly LF,
    6. Anderson JC, et al.
    Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70(3):145-64. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bailey CE,
    2. Hu CY,
    3. You YN,
    4. Bednarski BK,
    5. Rodriguez-Bigas MA,
    6. Skibber JM, et al.
    Increasing disparities in the age-related incidences of colon and rectal cancers in the United States, 1975-2010. JAMA Surg 2015;150(1):17-22. Erratum in: JAMA Surg 2015;150(3):277.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. O’Sullivan DE,
    2. Hilsden RJ,
    3. Ruan Y,
    4. Forbes N,
    5. Heitman SJ,
    6. Brenner DR.
    The incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer in Canada continues to increase. Cancer Epidemiol 2020;69:101828. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Clinician summary of USPSTF recommendation: screening for colorectal cancer. Rockville, MD: US Preventive Services Task Force; 2021. Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/ClinicalSummaryFinal/colorectal-cancer-screening. Accessed 2023 Nov 28.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
    . Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. CMAJ 2016;188(5):340-8. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Colon cancer. Plymouth Meeting, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2023. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1428. Accessed 2023 Sept 12.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lotfollahzadeh S,
    2. Recio-Boiles A,
    3. Cagir B.
    Colon cancer. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470380/. Accessed 2023 Nov 28.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hugen N,
    2. van de Velde CJH,
    3. de Wilt JHW,
    4. Nagtegaal ID.
    Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype. Ann Oncol 2014;25(3):651-7. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Yahagi M,
    2. Okabayashi K,
    3. Hasegawa H,
    4. Tsuruta M,
    5. Kitagawa Y.
    The worse prognosis of right-sided compared with left-sided colon cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2016;20(3):648-55. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Amin MB,
    2. Edge SB,
    3. Greene FL,
    4. Byrd DR,
    5. Brookland RK,
    6. Washington MK, et al.
    AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer Cham; 2017.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kheirelseid EA,
    2. Miller N,
    3. Chang KH,
    4. Curran C,
    5. Hennessey E,
    6. Sheehan M, et al.
    Mismatch repair protein expression in colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2013;4(4):397-408.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Richman S.
    Deficient mismatch repair: read all about it (review). Int J Oncol 2015;47(4):1189-202. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wilkinson AN,
    2. Sumar N.
    Chemotherapy basics for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2022;68:30-4 (Eng), e5-9 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux
    . DPYD status and risk of severe toxicities with 5-FU or capecitabine-based chemotherapies. Québec, QC: Government of Quebec. Available from: https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Rapports/Oncologie/Outil-clinique-DPYD_EN.pdf. Accessed 2023 Dec 1.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zeineddine FA,
    2. Zeineddine MA,
    3. Yousef A,
    4. Gu Y,
    5. Chowdhury S,
    6. Dasari A, et al.
    Survival improvement for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer over twenty years. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023;7(1):16.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Cassidy J,
    2. Clarke S,
    3. Díaz-Rubio E,
    4. Scheithauer W,
    5. Figer A,
    6. Wong R, et al.
    Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(12):2006-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tournigand C,
    2. André T,
    3. Achille E,
    4. Lledo G,
    5. Flesh M,
    6. Mery-Mignard D, et al.
    FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(2):229-37. Epub 2003 Dec 2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. André T,
    2. Shiu KK,
    3. Kim TW,
    4. Jensen BV,
    5. Jensen LH,
    6. Punt C, et al.
    Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability-high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;383(23):2207-18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hurwitz H,
    2. Fehrenbacher L,
    3. Novotny W,
    4. Cartwright T,
    5. Hainsworth J,
    6. Heim W, et al.
    Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350(23):2335-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Kabbinavar F,
    2. Hurwitz HI,
    3. Fehrenbacher L,
    4. Meropol NJ,
    5. Novotny WF,
    6. Lieberman G, et al.
    Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(1):60-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Kabbinavar FF,
    2. Schulz J,
    3. McCleod M,
    4. Patel T,
    5. Hamm JT,
    6. Hecht JR, et al.
    Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(16):3697-705. Epub 2005 Feb 28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kabbinavar FF,
    2. Hambleton J,
    3. Mass RD,
    4. Hurwitz HI,
    5. Bergsland E,
    6. Sarkar S.
    Combined analysis of efficacy: the addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil/leucovorin improves survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(16):3706-12. Epub 2005 May 2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Venook AP,
    2. Niedzwiecki D,
    3. Innocenti F,
    4. Fruth B,
    5. Greene C,
    6. O’Neil BH, et al.
    Impact of primary (1°) tumor location on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2016;34(15_suppl):3504.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Arnold D,
    2. Lueza B,
    3. Douillard JY,
    4. Peeters M,
    5. Lenz HJ,
    6. Venook A, et al.
    Prognostic and predictive value of primary tumour side in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and EGFR directed antibodies in six randomized trials. Ann Oncol 2017;28(8):1713-29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 70 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 70, Issue 1
1 Jan 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Colon cancer in primary care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Colon cancer in primary care
Miki J. Lackman, Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2024, 70 (1) 33-37; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.700133

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Colon cancer in primary care
Miki J. Lackman, Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2024, 70 (1) 33-37; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.700133
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Pathophysiology
    • Workup and staging
    • Molecular diagnostics: tumour biomarkers and mismatch repair genes
    • Treatment of patients with resectable stage I to III colon cancer
    • Management of patients with metastatic disease
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Le cancer du côlon en soins primaires
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Having hard conversations
  • Cardiotoxicity of cancer treatment
  • Cancer survivorship road map
Show more Oncology Briefs

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire