Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Review ArticleClinical Review

Approach to burn treatment in the rural emergency department

Cory Tremblay, Kathryn A. Albrecht, Christiaan C. Sonke and Sanjay Azad
Canadian Family Physician February 2024; 70 (2) 95-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.700295
Cory Tremblay
Third-year medical student at NOSM University in Sudbury, Ont.
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cortremblay@nosm.ca
Kathryn A. Albrecht
First-year internal medicine resident at the University of Calgary in Alberta.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christiaan C. Sonke
Second-year orthopedic surgery resident at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjay Azad
Consultant plastic reconstructive and aesthetic surgeon in the Department of Plastic Surgery at Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre in Ontario.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To outline an approach to the assessment and initial management of patients with burns in the rural emergency department setting. Three mnemonics are presented that can be used for both the assessment and the initial management of patients with burns in rural settings.

Quality of evidence Current and local guidelines compiled by a plastic surgeon were reviewed to develop a systematic approach to the treatment of patients with burns. PubMed and other databases were also searched for current literature on emergency care of patients with burns.

Main message Burn injuries are a common reason for presentation to the emergency department. However, the care of patients with these injuries can vary substantially depending on geographic location, provider training, and hospital resources. Classification of burns, fluid resuscitation guidelines, dressings and wound care, indications for referral, and pain management are discussed.

Conclusion Using a systematic approach may help improve burn injury outcomes for patients and provide practitioners with a step-by-step framework for the management of patients with burns in rural settings.

Burns are common trauma injuries for which patients often present to the emergency department (ED); most burns are minor and can be managed effectively in the ED. Burn injuries may be caused by friction, cold, heat, radiation, or chemical or electric sources, but most are caused by heat from liquids, solids, or fire.1 Specialized personnel and a multidisciplinary approach are required to adequately care for patients with large or more severe burn injuries.2,3 However, many smaller centres lack the specialized knowledge and standardized protocols to optimize burn care. Challenges related to the care of patients with burn injuries in rural centres include delayed treatment due to geographic location, limited access to resources or to individuals with specialized training, and information loss due to multiple handovers.4-6 Smaller centres would benefit from a standardized burn protocol specifying initial assessment, fluid resuscitation, management guidelines, admission parameters, and referral criteria.7,8 Thus, the purpose of this article is to propose a novel standardized burn protocol for the care of patients with burn wounds in rural and resource-deficient areas.

Quality of evidence

Current and local guidelines were compiled by a plastic surgeon (S.A.) and were reviewed to develop a systematic approach to burn treatment. PubMed and other databases were searched for current literature on emergency care for patients with burns to support the proposed treatment algorithm.

Main message

Rural EDs often lack staff with the specific expertise and experience required to assess and manage patients with severe burn injuries. We developed a standardized protocol to bridge such gaps and to optimize care for patients with burns. A summary of this approach can be found in Figure 1.1,9-11

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Assessment and management of patients with burns in the ED

Often patients will arrive via emergency medical services, and providing a standard approach to acute care for patients with burns following their arrival at the ED may be helpful. The initial focus should be on resuscitating the patient, covering them with a clean dry sheet to keep them warm, and providing pain control. Most patients will not need immediate resuscitation unless they are hypotensive and they will require only maintenance fluids to start. To facilitate transportation to a burn or trauma centre, consider early transport before the patient arrives at the hospital to expedite care. Coordination of the transport should occur while the patient is being medically stabilized.

Primary survey. The ABCDEF (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure, and flight or transport) initialism can simplify the approach to the primary survey. When the patient presents to the ED, a primary survey and a proper airway assessment must be done.1 Burns to the face or neck should prompt immediate evaluation of the patient’s airway and identification of potential inhalation injuries.12 The decision to intubate the patient early should be based on clinical findings such as deep burns to the face and neck, blisters or edema of the oropharynx, stridor, accessory muscle use, respiratory distress, and hypoventilation.13,14 Soot in the mouth, facial burns, body burns, and edema of the true or false vocal folds have been positively correlated with the need for early intubation.15 Using an endotracheal tube of 7.5 mm or larger will allow a bronchoscope to pass through to assess lung injury without extubating the patient. Oxygenation and ventilation should be optimized. Circumferential burns of the chest should be assessed since these burns can cause a tourniquet effect that may compromise adequate circulation and respiratory muscle movement.16 All patients can be started on 125 mL/h of Ringer lactate solution (RL), and if they are hypotensive a 500-mL bolus can be given before the initiation of maintenance fluids. If the patient is hypotensive, it is imperative that the source of hypotension is investigated, which is often not the burn, to adequately stabilize the patient. With burns that occurred indoors it is crucial to consider sources of toxicity such as carbon monoxide and cyanide. Cyanide is a deadly poison and exposure is rare; clinical findings are vague and mimic other conditions with hypoxia or hemodynamic insufficiencies.17 Exposure can occur due to smoke inhalation and burning plastic in an enclosed structure fire.18,19 There is currently no point-of-care test for cyanide poisoning on scene at a fire. Hydroxocobalamin is an ideal antidote due to its rapid onset, minimal side effects, and ease of administration, whereby it removes cyanide from tissue by forming cyanocobalamin, which is then excreted unchanged in the urine.19 Exposure of the patient’s burns across the extremities is an important consideration; pulses on the extremities should be located and marked early. Transport should be considered before the patient arrives at the hospital to expedite the process if needed.

Secondary survey. The initialism ABCD (anthropometric characteristics, blood work, calculate the percentage of total body surface area [TBSA] burned, and degree of the burn) provides a simple way to remember the steps of the secondary survey to follow once the primary survey has been completed. Anthropometric characteristics, specifically the patient’s weight before the burn injury, are needed to calculate fluid requirements from the time of the injury; fluid requirements need only be calculated for second- and third-degree burns. Initial blood work is required only for second- and third-degree burns and should include a complete blood count, basic metabolic panel, carboxyhemoglobin levels (if smoke inhalation is suspected), and blood type and screen.1,20 It would be beneficial to obtain these laboratory test results but it may not always be possible, and the focus should remain on the primary assessment and overall well-being of the patient. Calculating the percentage of TBSA is indicated only for second- and third-degree burns to avoid complications of fluid overload such as pulmonary edema. Burn degree is based on thickness and is classified as superficial, superficial partial thickness, deep partial thickness, and full thickness.1 Superficial and deep partial thickness burns are considered second-degree burns and full thickness burns are considered third-degree burns.1

Burn assessment. Burn characteristics to observe other than depth include blistering, colour (pink, white, or brown), blanchable versus nonblanchable, and painful versus nonpainful. The Lund and Browder chart is the most accurate method of estimating the percentage of TBSA burned for the purpose of predicting the amount of resuscitation fluid needed.10,21 Although it is the most accurate method, it is often the most time consuming and the most difficult. The “rule of 9s,” which divides the body into areas of 9% and 18%, can be a faster method.9 The “rule of palms” is a quick and easy way to estimate the percentage of TBSA burned, where the patient’s palm is assumed to be about 1% of the body’s surface area and can be used to measure the burned areas.22

Burn management. Once it has been established that the patient’s condition is stable, special considerations should be paid to burn management using the acronym PID-DOT (pain management, intravenous [IV] fluids, deroof or debride, dress wounds, other level of care, and tetanus prophylaxis). With regard to debridement, it is ideal to deroof blisters greater than 1 cm in diameter and gently wash burns with soap and water or with saline solution. However, since most rural EDs have only 1 physician covering the department, this would be very time consuming and may not be realistic. Large, painful blisters, those located over creases or joints, and those that have spontaneously drained should be deroofed while leaving other blisters intact. Blisters should also be deroofed to the edge of the burn area to promote healing and to minimize the risk of infection.23

Intravenous fluid resuscitation is recommended for burns covering more than 15% of TBSA in adults, while fluids can be started in children with burns covering more than 10% of TBSA.11 Importantly, fluid resuscitation should start as soon as possible after the time of the burn; fluid volume should be calculated using established formulas. The Parkland formula is often used to calculate fluid requirements, usually RL: 4 mL × percentage of TBSA × weight in kilograms, giving a final volume in millilitres. The first half of the calculated volume of solution is given over the first 8 hours and the second half of the solution is given over the next 16 hours.24 Ringer lactate solution is the preferred fluid for burn treatment in both children and adults, although 5% dextrose solution can be added to the RL for children who weigh 30 kg or less.11 For flame or scald burns in adults and children 14 years and older, use RL at 2 mL/kg/% TBSA.11 For flame or scald burns in infants and children younger than 14 years, RL at 3 mL/kg/% TBSA should be used.11 Maintenance fluids should be administered at 4 mL/kg/h for the first 10 kg of the patient’s weight, at 2 mL/kg/h for the next 10 kg (maximum up to 20 kg), and add 1 mL/kg/h for any weight above 20 kg.11 For electrical burns, regardless of age, 4 mL/kg/% TBSA of RL is recommended.11

Pain management must be prioritized at the onset of care—before blister care—and throughout the entire process. Intravenous or oral morphine is an effective choice to use during initial wound cleaning and dressing changes and for procedural pain.25 Midazolam is considered first-line treatment to address anxiety and fear in patients with burn injuries owing to its fast onset, high potency, and short duration of action.26 Although it does not provide any analgesic effects, intranasal midazolam has been shown to be an effective option for pediatric patients due to its sedating, anxiolytic, and amnesic effects.27,28 Ketamine is a safe and reliable analgesic option29 and it has a distinct advantage over opioids since it preserves airway and spontaneous respiratory function, causes less respiratory depression, and maintains cardiovascular stability; it is the anesthetic of choice in rural EDs.30-32

Before wounds are dressed, take photographs of burn areas to provide useful information for consultation. Burns heal best in moist environments and dressings should be selected based on minimizing frequency of change.11 Most rural EDs carry the following dressing supplies: gauze, nonadherent dressings, antibacterial creams, conforming bandages, petrolatum ointments, and other basic wound care supplies. Dressing options we recommend include the following: 1) apply a sterile, amorphous hydrogel dressing and cover with moist gauze; self-adhesive, nonwoven tape for dressing fixation, a conforming bandage, and netting to secure it, and change the dressing every 3 days; or 2) apply a nonadhering dressing, cover with gauze and a conforming bandage, and change the dressing every 2 days. Dressings should not be tightly wrapped circumferentially on limbs, and digits should be dressed individually. Injured areas should be elevated if possible to allow mobility, which decreases the risk of contracture. Full thickness or deep partial thickness burns will require consultation with a plastic surgeon for debridement and skin grafting. Finally, tetanus vaccines should be given to all patients with more than a first-degree burn.33

Guidelines for admission, referral, and transfer. If a patient meets any of the following criteria, they should be transferred to a burn centre for specialized treatment11:

  • partial thickness burns with a TBSA greater than 10%;

  • burns involving the face, hands, feet, genitals or perineum, or major joints;

  • third-degree burns (full thickness) at any age;

  • electrical burns, including lightning injury;

  • chemical burns;

  • inhalation injury;

  • patients with pre-existing medical issues that would complicate management, prolong recovery, or affect outcomes;

  • patients with burns and concomitant trauma (fractures) in which the burn poses greatest risk of morbidity or mortality;

  • children with burns in hospitals without qualified personnel or equipment to care for children; and

  • burn injury in patients who will require special social, emotional, or rehabilitative interventions.

If the patient does not require transfer, they should be admitted to hospital and wound care or plastic surgery should be considered, or they should be managed in the ED, as outlined in Figure 1.1,9-11 If patients are discharged without admission or consultation, follow-up should occur within 48 to 72 hours given that burns can extend or deepen and evolve rapidly with infection.

Suspicion of abuse. Being able to detect potential signs of abuse can be challenging but it is a very important consideration. Most burns in children occur between the ages of 0 and 4 years old and are scald injuries caused by hot liquids.34 Evaluation of the burn pattern should be precise and findings of a detailed history and physical examination should inform the suspicion of abuse. If there is a high index of suspicion, the clinical assessment and evaluation should include an understanding and recognition of intentional injury features so that potential signs of abuse can be investigated and managed appropriately to protect the child.

Conclusion

This article presents a simple and comprehensive approach to the management of patients with burns presenting to rural EDs. Important guidelines to note when managing patients with burns are the use of the primary survey in the assessment of a burn injury as well as the use of standardized formulas for determining burn size and fluid resuscitation. To protect burn wounds, dressing supplies should be chosen appropriately to allow for infrequent dressing changes while maintaining a hydrated environment free of pathogens. Transfer to higher-level burn centres should not be delayed when criteria for transfer are met and should be initiated before patients arrive at the hospital.

Notes

Editor’s key points

  • ▸ Rural emergency departments often lack staff with the specific expertise and experience required to assess and manage patients with severe burn injuries. This article presents a simple and comprehensive approach to the management of patients with burns presenting to rural emergency departments.

  • ▸ The initial focus should be on resuscitation, keeping patients warm, and providing pain control. Most patients will not need immediate resuscitation unless they are hypotensive and will require only maintenance fluids to start. Important guidelines to note when managing patients with burns are the use of the primary survey in the assessment of a burn injury as well as the use of standardized formulas for determining burn size and fluid resuscitation. To protect burn wounds, dressing supplies should be chosen appropriately to allow for infrequent dressing changes while maintaining a hydrated environment free of pathogens.

  • ▸ Transfer to a higher-level burn centre should not be delayed when criteria for transfer are met and should be initiated before the patient arrives at the hospital. Coordination of transport should occur while the patient is being medically stabilized.

Footnotes

  • Contributors

    All authors contributed to conducting the literature review and to preparing the manuscript for submission.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numero de février 2024 à la page e31.

  • Copyright © 2024 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Jeschke MG,
    2. van Baar ME,
    3. Choudhry MA,
    4. Chung KK,
    5. Gibran NS,
    6. Logsetty S.
    Burn injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6(1):11.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Yurt RW,
    2. Bessey PQ.
    The development of a regional system for care of the burn-injured patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2009;10(5):441-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brigham PA,
    2. Dimick AR.
    The evolution of burn care facilities in the United States. J Burn Care Res 2008;29(1):248-56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Saffle JR,
    2. Edelman L,
    3. Morris SE.
    Regional air transport of burn patients: a case for telemedicine? J Trauma 2004;57(1):57-64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Hendriks TCC,
    2. Botman M,
    3. Binnerts JJ,
    4. Mtui GS,
    5. Nuwass EQ,
    6. Meij-de Vries A, et al.
    Acute burn care in resource-limited settings: A cohort study on treatment and outcomes in a rural regional referral hospital in Tanzania. Burns 2022;48(8):1966-79.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Carter JE,
    2. Neff LP,
    3. Holmes JH 4th.
    Adherence to burn center referral criteria: are patients appropriately being referred? J Burn Care Res 2010;31(1):26-30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bezuhly M,
    2. Gomez M,
    3. Fish JS.
    Emergency department management of minor burn injuries in Ontario, Canada. Burns 2004;30(2):160-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bell N,
    2. Simons R,
    3. Hameed SM,
    4. Schuurman N,
    5. Wheeler S.
    Does direct transport to provincial burn centres improve outcomes? A spatial epidemiology of severe burn injury in British Columbia, 2001-2006. Can J Surg 2012;55(2):110-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cheah AKW,
    2. Kangkorn T,
    3. Tan EH,
    4. Loo ML,
    5. Chong SJ.
    The validation study on a three-dimensional burn estimation smart-phone application: accurate, free and fast? Burns Trauma 2018;6:7.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Miminas DA.
    A critical evaluation of the Lund and Browder chart. Wounds UK 2007;3(3):58-68.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pham TN,
    2. Bettencourt AP,
    3. Bozinko GM,
    4. Chang PH,
    5. Chung KK,
    6. Craig CK, et al.
    , editors. Advanced Burn Life Support course. Provider manual 2018 update. Chicago, IL: American Burn Association; 2018. Available from: https://ameriburn.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2018-abls-providermanual.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jan 17.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Walker PF,
    2. Buehner MF,
    3. Wood LA,
    4. Boyer NL,
    5. Driscoll IR,
    6. Lundy JB, et al.
    Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review. Crit Care 2015;19:351.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mlcak RP.
    Inhalation injury from heat, smoke, or chemical irritants. Waltham, MA: UpToDate; 2023. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inhalation-injury-from-heat-smoke-or-chemical-irritants. Accessed 2024 Jan 11.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Onishi S,
    2. Osuka A,
    3. Kuroki Y,
    4. Ueyama M.
    Indications of early intubation for patients with inhalation injury. Acute Med Surg 2017;4(3):278-85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Madnani DD,
    2. Steele NP,
    3. de Vries E.
    Factors that predict the need for intubation in patients with smoke inhalation injury. Ear Nose Throat J 2006;85(4):278-80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Labib A,
    3. Hughes PG.
    Escharotomy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29489153. Accessed 2024 Jan 11.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Panigrahi N,
    2. Haranath SP,
    3. Ma A,
    4. Srinivas Y,
    5. Sirga S,
    6. Ramkumar, et al.
    Cyanide toxicity!! Colour of blood says it all. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(3):155-6.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Borron SW,
    2. Baud FJ.
    Acute cyanide poisoning: clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and treatment. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 1996;47(3):307-22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hall AH,
    2. Saiers J,
    3. Baud F.
    Which cyanide antidote? Crit Rev Toxicol 2009;39(7):541-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hettiaratchy S,
    2. Papini R.
    Initial management of a major burn: I—overview. BMJ 2004;328(7455):1555-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rumpf RW,
    2. Stewart WCL,
    3. Martinez SK,
    4. Gerrard CY,
    5. Adolphi NL,
    6. Thakkar R, et al.
    Comparison of the Lund and Browder table to computed tomography scan three-dimensional surface area measurement for a pediatric cohort. J Surg Res 2018;221:275-84. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Giretzlehner M,
    2. Ganitzer I,
    3. Haller H.
    Technical and medical aspects of burn size assessment and documentation. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57(3):242.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Garg R,
    2. Rakesh D,
    3. Mittal RK,
    4. Kathpal SS,
    5. Kaur A,
    6. Singh K.
    Managing blisters in minor burns. Should they be deroofed? Indian J Burns 2021;29(1):31-5.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ete G,
    2. Chaturvedi G,
    3. Barreto E,
    4. Paul M K.
    Effectiveness of Parkland formula in the estimation of resuscitation fluid volume in adult thermal burns. Chin J Traumatol 2019;22(2):113-6. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Griggs C,
    2. Goverman J,
    3. Bittner EA,
    4. Levi B.
    Sedation and pain management in burn patients. Clin Plast Surg 2017;44(3):535-40. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Holtman JR Jr,
    2. Jellish WS.
    Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and burn pain. J Burn Care Res 2012;33(6):692-701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Fagin A,
    2. Palmieri TL.
    Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia. Burns Trauma 2017;5:28.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Pansini V,
    2. Curatola A,
    3. Gatto A,
    4. Lazzareschi I,
    5. Ruggiero A,
    6. Chiaretti A.
    Intranasal drugs for analgesia and sedation in children admitted to pediatric emergency department: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med 2021;9(2):189.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Abdollahpour A,
    2. Saffarieh E,
    3. Hosseinzadeh Zoroufchi B.
    A review on the recent application of ketamine in management of anesthesia, pain, and health care. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9(3):1317-24.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. McGuinness SK,
    2. Wasiak J,
    3. Cleland H,
    4. Symons J,
    5. Hogan L,
    6. Hucker T, et al.
    A systematic review of ketamine as an analgesic agent in adult burn injuries. Pain Med 2011;12(10):1551-8. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.
    1. Baumgartner L,
    2. Townsend N,
    3. Winkelman K,
    4. MacLaren R.
    The efficacy and safety of an RN-driven ketamine protocol for adjunctive analgesia during burn wound care. Am J Nurs 2018;118(7):26-31.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Lintner AC,
    2. Brennan P,
    3. Miles MVP,
    4. Leonard C,
    5. Alexander KM,
    6. Kahn SA.
    Oral administration of injectable ketamine during burn wound dressing changes. J Pharm Pract 2021;34(3):423-7. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rice PL Jr,
    2. Orgill DP.
    Emergency care of moderate and severe thermal burns in adults. Waltham, MA: UpToDate; 2022. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/emergency-care-of-moderate-and-severe-thermal-burns-in-adults/print. Accessed 2024 Jan 30.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Toon MH,
    2. Maybauer DM,
    3. Arceneaux LL,
    4. Fraser JF,
    5. Meyer W,
    6. Runge A, et al.
    Children with burn injuries—assessment of trauma, neglect, violence and abuse. J Inj Violence Res 2011;3(2):98-110.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 70 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 70, Issue 2
1 Feb 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Approach to burn treatment in the rural emergency department
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Approach to burn treatment in the rural emergency department
Cory Tremblay, Kathryn A. Albrecht, Christiaan C. Sonke, Sanjay Azad
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2024, 70 (2) 95-99; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.700295

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Approach to burn treatment in the rural emergency department
Cory Tremblay, Kathryn A. Albrecht, Christiaan C. Sonke, Sanjay Azad
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2024, 70 (2) 95-99; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.700295
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Quality of evidence
    • Main message
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Approche du traitement des brûlures dans un département d’urgence rural
  • In every disadvantage there is an advantage
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Il y a un avantage a chaque inconvenient: Penuries de medicaments et autres defis en medecine familiale
  • In every disadvantage there is an advantage: Drug shortages and other challenges in family medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Top studies of 2024 relevant to primary care
  • Approach to steatotic liver disease in the office
  • Foreskin care
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire