Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
    • Politique du MFC en matière d'IA
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://cfpc.my.site.com/s/login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://cfpc.my.site.com/s/login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
    • Politique du MFC en matière d'IA
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleOncology Briefs

Melanoma crash course

Rosalind Ashton and Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician April 2024; 70 (4) 254-257; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.7004254
Rosalind Ashton
General practitioner at the Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre in Ontario.
MD MSc CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna N. Wilkinson
Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, a family physician with the Ottawa Academic Family Health Team, a general practitioner oncologist at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Program Director of PGY-3 FP-Oncology, and Regional Cancer Primary Care Lead for Champlain Region.
MD MSc CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Cutaneous melanoma represents about 4% of skin cancers but is responsible for more than 75% of deaths from skin cancer. The incidence of cutaneous melanoma is reported as 25 per 100,000 people in North America and 60 per 100,000 people in Australia and New Zealand.1 Melanoma diagnoses are increasing worldwide, possibly owing to improved detection; in Canada the largest increase in age-standardized incidence of melanoma has occurred in males, with an increase of 2.2% per year between 1984 and 2019.2 Mortality rates for melanoma have declined since 2013 due to the use of immunotherapy2; however, there has been no noted reduction in mortality among non-White patients or among populations with lower socioeconomic status, with a study demonstrating that these populations have higher incidences of thick melanoma with poorer prognoses.3,4

There is insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of skin cancer screening in reducing melanoma mortality, with an Australian study published in 2022 finding that skin screening increases the risks of biopsy and melanoma in situ without increasing the detection rate of invasive melanoma, compared with unscreened individuals.5 The United States Preventive Services Task Force also does not recommend regular skin checks in the average individual as part of age-appropriate screening guidelines.6 A guideline published by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, based on reports from Australia and New Zealand, recommends regular skin examinations for those at high risk of melanoma (Table 1).7

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Risk factors for melanoma

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a key causative factor of cutaneous melanoma and primary prevention education aimed at reducing exposure to UV radiation is imperative. Consistent sunscreen use reduces dyspigmentation, fine-line formation, and the risk of all skin cancers (including melanoma).8 Sunscreen use, avoidance of the sun at peak hours, use of UV-blocking clothing, and shade-seeking are all encouraged. Physicians should ask patients about tanning bed use and quantify their exposure. Use of tanning beds before age 25 and repeated sessions (>10) are most strongly associated with development of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers, especially in female patients younger than 45.9,10 Consistent sunscreen use does not meaningfully compromise vitamin D levels.11

Evaluation of a melanocytic lesion

Family physicians most commonly assess skin lesions of concern, and can use the ABCDE (asymmetry, border, colour, diameter, evolution) criteria to determine which skin lesions should be considered for further workup.12 Lesions satisfying 1 or more of the criteria should be considered for biopsy (Box 1).12 An example of melanoma in situ is shown in Figures 1A and 1B.

Box 1.

ABCDE criteria for skin lesion evaluation

  • Asymmetry

  • Border

    • - Irregular, blurred

  • Colour

    • - Multicolour or uneven

  • Diameter

    • - Greater than 6 mm

  • Evolution

    • - Recent change in size, shape, colour, or presence of crusting or ulceration

Data from Abbasi et al.12

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Example of a melanoma in situ: A) patient with a background of substantial sun damage had a mole with unusual features upon first presentation (black dots, asymmetry): The patient declined biopsy at the first appointment, so the dermatologist elected for surveillance. B) At a reassessment 12 months later, regression of pigment in the centre was noted: The macule was biopsied and the patient was later diagnosed with melanoma in situ.

Dermoscopy is a technique that uses a magnifier and polarized light to examine the surface of the skin. It increases the accuracy of melanoma diagnosis by a dermatologist by 10% to 27%.13 Primary care physicians who used dermoscopy after a 1-day training course were able to increase their sensitivity for detecting melanoma by approximately 25%.14 Technologies such as reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography, as well as artificial intelligence pattern recognition, are emerging but are not the standard of care at this time.15,16

When a patient presents with a concerning pigmented macule or plaque, the biopsy should include a full thickness sample with adequate depth, as melanoma thickness on pathologic analysis is a key prognostic factor and dictates recommended treatment. Biopsy techniques such as punch biopsy and excision with narrow margins are acceptable, and deep shave can be considered if the clinician can ensure adequate depth of the sample. The entire lesion should be excised, but if removing the entire specimen is not possible clinicians should comment on the size of the original lesion, note where the biopsy was taken, and consider multiple specimens if the lesion is large. If the lesion is on an extremity, orientation of the biopsy specimen should be longitudinal so as not to interfere with lymphatic drainage for potential future lymph node biopsy.13

Pathology

Classically, 4 histologic subtypes of melanoma have been described: superficial spreading, nodular, lentigo maligna melanoma, and acral lentiginous. All subtypes expand along the basement membrane of the epidermis in a radial growth phase, creating nests of mutated melanocytes before moving into the vertical growth phase, during which the melanoma extends deeper into the dermis. Nodular melanoma, the most aggressive subtype with the poorest prognosis, moves quickly into the vertical growth phase, allowing less time for detection. Dysplastic nevi, where pathology reports cytologic atypia and not architectural disorder, are usually treated as melanoma in situ.

In addition to histologic subtype, pathology reports will comment on the depth of the tumour (Breslow thickness), mitotic rate, ulceration, presence of perineural or perivascular disease, and margin status.17 Pathologic features that indicate a poor prognosis for melanomas are shown in Box 2.17 Pathology may also report mutations in BRAF, MEK, and KIT genes. Mutations in BRAF occur in 50% to 80% of superficial spreading and nodular melanomas. The presence of these mutations has implications for the ability to use targeted therapies.

Box 2.

Poor prognostic features of melanoma on histopathologic examination

  • Breslow thickness >2 mm

  • Ulceration

  • Mitotic rate >1/mm2

  • Lymphovascular invasion

  • Regression

Data from Swetter et al.17

More recently, melanomas arising on chronically sun-damaged skin have been differentiated from those that develop on skin exposed to intermittent sunlight. Melanomas on sun-damaged skin, such as lentigo maligna melanoma and desmoplastic melanoma, are genetically different, with BRAF mutations present only in 10% to 21% of cases.18

Staging of and surgery for melanoma

Once the diagnosis of melanoma is confirmed with biopsy, definitive management of the melanoma is required, usually requiring referral to a plastic or general surgeon. Nodal basins should be examined clinically for nodal metastases and ultrasound can be employed if examination is equivocal. Broadly, melanomas can be considered localized when there is no nodal involvement (stages I and II), regional when there is nodal involvement (stage III), or metastatic (stage IV). Staging investigations should be performed for regional disease.

A wide local excision is employed to remove the primary tumour, with surgical margins dictated by the thickness of the lesion (Table 2).17 If there is no clinically evident nodal disease but the Breslow thickness is greater than 0.8 mm with ulceration or 0.8 mm to 1.0 mm without ulceration (T1a and T1b, respectively), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be considered at the time of wide excision. In SLNB, a radioactive tracer and dye are injected into the primary melanoma site and a probe is used to detect the target node to which the lymphatic systems drain. The target node is then excised and sent for pathologic examination. Completion nodal dissection is no longer routinely recommended for patients with nodal disease identified on SLNB; rather, these patients may be followed with close ultrasound surveillance of the nodal basin. Patients with clinically evident nodal disease are typically still recommended to have completion lymph node dissection. Patients with any confirmed nodal disease should be considered for adjuvant therapy.19

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Recommended margins for wide local excision of melanoma: Removal of all tissue to the level of, and not into, the fascia is recommended.

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy

Immune checkpoint proteins such as programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 are expressed by tumours to prevent autoimmune attack by T cells. This allows the cancer to “immune escape” checkpoint proteins and proliferate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, also called immunotherapy, can be used to restore immunosurveillance by the body’s T cells to recognize and destroy cancer cells.

Immunotherapy has proven very effective in patients with melanoma: a landmark trial found that patients with metastatic melanoma treated with doublet immunotherapy (cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) had a median overall survival of 72.1 months.20 Immunotherapy is now the standard of care for patients with stage IV melanoma and as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk or unresectable stage II or III melanomas. Family physicians should be aware that immunotherapy may result in immune-related adverse events, where an overactivation of the immune system causes an autoimmune attack on any tissue or organ in the body. These can develop months after the last treatment and were described in a previous Oncology Briefs article in Canadian Family Physician.21-23

Tumours with BRAF mutations can be treated with targeted BRAF inhibitors such as dabrafenib, encorafenib, and vemurafenib. Due to resistance, MEK inhibitors such as trametinib are used in conjunction with these agents.24

Follow-up

Patients who have a history of melanoma have a 4% to 8% risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas.25,26 Most metastases occur in the first 3 to 5 years after treatment of the primary tumour. The most common site of recurrence or metastasis is the skin or subcutaneous tissue, but in 18% to 27% of people, distant organs such as the lungs, brain, liver, and bones are involved.26

Recommendations for clinical follow-up are highly variable in the literature, but a recent review of multiple guidelines indicates that survivorship care should consist of self-examinations and lifelong annual skin and lymph node examinations by a clinician, especially in patients with more advanced stages of disease.27 Obtaining serial serum lactate dehydrogenase levels is not recommended. British guidelines recommend that patients with melanoma in situ may be discharged after postsurgical follow-up and do not require ongoing surveillance.28

Conclusion

Family physicians are involved in all aspects of melanoma care, especially in diagnosis and follow-up. This brief provides an up-to-date review of melanoma treatment and highlights notable improved mortality rates in patients with later-stage disease as well as the need for family physicians to be aware of immune-related adverse events as they follow patients with a diagnosis of melanoma.

Notes

Oncology Briefs is a quarterly series that provides evidence-based reviews of key oncology topics relevant to family practice and postgraduate education. The series covers topics ranging from screening, diagnosis, and treatment to survivorship care and more. The series is coordinated by Dr Anna N. Wilkinson of the Cancer Care MIG (Member Interest Group) at the College of Family Physicians of Canada; articles are reviewed by members of the Cancer Care MIG.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright © 2024 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Ervik M,
    3. Lam F,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Colombet M,
    6. Mery L, et al.
    Global Cancer Observatory: cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2023. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today. Accessed 2023 Dec 20.
  2. 2.↵
    Cancer statistics. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2024. Available from: https://cancer.ca/en/research/cancer-statistics. Accessed 2024 Jan 24.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chen ML,
    2. de Vere Hunt IJ,
    3. John EM,
    4. Weinstock MA,
    5. Swetter SM,
    6. Linos E.
    Differences in thickness-specific incidence and factors associated with cutaneous melanoma in the US from 2010 to 2018. JAMA Oncol 2022;8(5):755-9. Erratum in: JAMA Oncol 2022:8(10):1518.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lam M,
    2. Zhu JW,
    3. Hu A,
    4. Beecker J.
    Racial differences in the prognosis and survival of cutaneous melanoma from 1990 to 2020 in North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cutan Med Surg 2022;26(2):181-8. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Whiteman DC,
    2. Olsen CM,
    3. MacGregor S,
    4. Law MH,
    5. Thompson B,
    6. Dusingize JC, et al.
    The effect of screening on melanoma incidence and biopsy rates. Br J Dermatol 2022;187(4):515-22. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Final recommendation statement. Skin cancer: screening. Rockville, MD: US Preventive Services Task Force; 2023. Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/skin-cancer-screening#fullrecommendationstart. Accessed 2024 Jan 12.
  7. 7.↵
    Melanoma 2008 critical appraisal report. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care; 2014. Available from: https://canadiantaskforce.ca/guidelines/appraised-guidelines/melanoma/. Accessed 2024 Mar 13.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Green AC,
    2. Williams GM,
    3. Logan V,
    4. Strutton GM.
    Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(3):257-63. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ting W,
    2. Schultz K,
    3. Cac NN,
    4. Peterson M,
    5. Walling HW.
    Tanning bed exposure increases the risk of malignant melanoma. Int J Dermatol 2007;46(12):1253-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ghiasvand R,
    2. Rueegg CS,
    3. Weiderpass E,
    4. Green AC,
    5. Lund E,
    6. Veierød MB.
    Indoor tanning and melanoma risk: long-term evidence from a prospective population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2017;185(3):147-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Passeron T,
    2. Bouillon R,
    3. Callender V,
    4. Cestari T,
    5. Diepgen TL,
    6. Green AC, et al.
    Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status. Br J Dermatol 2019;181(5):916-31. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Abbasi NR,
    2. Shaw HM,
    3. Rigel DS,
    4. Friedman RJ,
    5. McCarthy WH,
    6. Osman I, et al.
    Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria. JAMA 2004;292(22):2771-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Tran KT,
    2. Wright NA,
    3. Cockerell CJ.
    Biopsy of the pigmented lesion—when and how. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;59(5):852-71. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Argenziano G,
    2. Puig S,
    3. Zalaudek I,
    4. Sera F,
    5. Corona R,
    6. Alsina M, et al.
    Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(12):1877-82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Phillips M,
    2. Marsden H,
    3. Jaffe W,
    4. Matin RN,
    5. Wali GN,
    6. Greenhalgh J, et al.
    Assessment of accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm to detect melanoma in images of skin lesions. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2(10):e1913436. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open 2019;2(11):e1916430.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dinnes J,
    2. Deeks JJ,
    3. Saleh D,
    4. Chuchu N,
    5. Bayliss SE,
    6. Patel L, et al.
    Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;12(12):CD013190.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Swetter SM,
    2. Thompson JA,
    3. Albertini MR,
    4. Barker CA,
    5. Baumgartner J,
    6. Boland G, et al.
    NCCN guidelines® insights: melanoma: cutaneous, version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):364-76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Curtin JA,
    2. Fridlyand J,
    3. Kageshita T,
    4. Patel HN,
    5. Busam KJ,
    6. Kutzner H, et al.
    Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2005;353(20):2135-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Easson AM,
    2. Cosby R,
    3. McCready DR,
    4. Temple C,
    5. Petrella T,
    6. Wright F, et al.
    Surgical management of patients with lymph node metastases from cutaneous melanoma of the trunk or extremities. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario; 2018. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/guidelines-advice/types-of-cancer/806. Accessed 2024 Mar 11.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Wolchok JD,
    2. Chiarion-Sileni V,
    3. Gonzalez R,
    4. Grob JJ,
    5. Rutkowski P,
    6. Lao CD, et al.
    CheckMate 067: 6.5-year outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2021;39 (15 Suppl):9506.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kennedy LB,
    2. Salama AKS.
    A review of immune-mediated adverse events in melanoma. Oncol Ther 2019;7(2):101-20. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    1. Puzanov I,
    2. Diab A,
    3. Abdallah K,
    4. Bingham CO 3rd,
    5. Brogdon C,
    6. Dadu R, et al.
    Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer 2017;5(1):95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wilkinson AN.
    Immunotherapy. Can Fam Physician 2021;67:512-5 (Eng), e174-7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Knight A,
    2. Karapetyan L,
    3. Kirkwood JM.
    Immunotherapy in melanoma: recent advances and future directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15(4):1106.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lallas A,
    2. Apalla Z,
    3. Kyrgidis A,
    4. Papageorgiou C,
    5. Boukovinas I,
    6. Bobos M, et al.
    Second primary melanomas in a cohort of 977 melanoma patients within the first 5 years of monitoring. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;82(2):398-406. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Fusi S,
    2. Ariyan S,
    3. Sternlicht A.
    Data on first recurrence after treatment for malignant melanoma in a large patient population. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91(1):94-8.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Johnston L,
    2. Starkey S,
    3. Mukovozov I,
    4. Robertson L,
    5. Petrella T,
    6. Alhusayen R.
    Surveillance after a previous cutaneous melanoma diagnosis: a scoping review of melanoma follow-up guidelines. J Cutan Med Surg 2023;27(5):516-25. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Marsden JR,
    2. Newton-Bishop JA,
    3. Burrows L,
    4. Cook M,
    5. Corrie PG,
    6. Cox NH, et al.
    Revised U.K. guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(2):238-56. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 70 (4)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 70, Issue 4
1 Apr 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Melanoma crash course
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Melanoma crash course
Rosalind Ashton, Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2024, 70 (4) 254-257; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7004254

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Melanoma crash course
Rosalind Ashton, Anna N. Wilkinson
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2024, 70 (4) 254-257; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7004254
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Evaluation of a melanocytic lesion
    • Pathology
    • Staging of and surgery for melanoma
    • Immunotherapy and targeted therapy
    • Follow-up
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Having hard conversations
  • Cardiotoxicity of cancer treatment
  • Cancer survivorship road map
Show more Oncology Briefs

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2026 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire