Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Article CommentaryCommentary

Early relational health care

What is known and what is new for family physicians

Amanda Bell and Richa Agnihotri
Canadian Family Physician May 2024; 70 (5) 298-302; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.7005298
Amanda Bell
Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the Niagara Campus of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University in St Catharines, Ont.
MD MSc CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bellam@mcmaster.ca
Richa Agnihotri
Community pediatrician in St Catharines, Ont, and Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor at McMaster University.
MBChB FRCPC DipABLM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Years ago, a medical encounter with a young child and their family might have started with the question “What is wrong with you?” More recently, as part of patient-centred and trauma-informed care, a family doctor is more likely to ask “What has happened to you and your family?”1 A newer paradigm—early relational health (ERH) care—encourages primary care providers to ask parents, “What is going right with you and your family?”2-5 Family physicians have the necessary expertise to assess strengths of relationships (eg, closeness, support, protection, love) and positive function (eg, healthy routines, supportive networks) in the families they see.5

In 2023 the Canadian Paediatric Society’s Early Years Task Force published a position statement examining a shift in focus from adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to ERH.6 The position paper was inspired in part by the work of Dr Andrew Garner, an author of American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on this topic, and of Dr David Willis, a senior fellow with the Center for the Study of Social Policy.7-10 Rooted in the latest research on child development, ERH builds on the earliest emotional connections between infants or young children and their primary caregivers to promote healthy development, lead to positive experiences, and buffer negative effects of stress, adversity, and trauma.7,10-12 Early relational health care looks first for a family’s assets rather than its deficits and emphasizes that any clinical interaction is an opportunity to “check in” and reinforce these strengths.13 We propose adopting an ERH lens in all clinical encounters with a child and their family, rather than thinking about ERH as a separate assessment, as summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Strategies for promoting early relational health in all clinical encounters with children and families in any practice setting

Familiar and unfamiliar concepts

In line with trauma-informed care practices, ERH recognizes, acknowledges, and validates specific family struggles, even when they are difficult to modify or influence, such as racism, systemic oppression, and poverty.10,14 Family physicians are aware of these challenges in the lives of their patients. Screening routinely for parental mental health issues can have positive long-term effects on parent-child relationships and on family life. Their regular engagement in antenatal and infant care enables family practitioners to build on relational opportunities in exceptional ways. For example, by asking parents about their own upbringing—with the goal of eliciting past and present parenting styles—concerns can be addressed preemptively. Concepts in ERH may seem familiar to family physicians who have learned related concepts under other names such as trauma-informed care or ACEs, as described in Table 2.15-17 Early relational health is a new lens through which the provision of care aims to enhance healthy child and family development.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Comparison of trauma-informed care, ACEs, and ERH concepts

What may be less familiar is that ERH assessment begins with ongoing self-assessment. Health care providers bring their implicit biases (unconscious attitudes or stereotyping) to everyday practice as a normal—but malleable—component of social cognitive processing.18 Cultural humility involves recognizing this and reflecting on how personal biases may influence medical encounters, especially with families from populations that are marginalized. Continually mitigating bias is part of culturally safe practice and is an essential step in ERH care, which depends on respectful in-office processes and mutually trusting relationships.19,20 A culturally safe practice honours each family’s cultural identity and socioeconomic background and includes their perspectives and input as part of health care planning and delivery.21

Early relational health assessment involves strategies that family physicians use every day, such as developmental monitoring, directed history taking, observing relationships,21 active listening, and health teaching. Any visit is an opportunity to evaluate parent-child attachment based on signs practitioners look for routinely: exchanges of gaze, touch, and sensitivity and reciprocity of response.9,21 How the ERH approach differs is through its closer attention to the safe, stable, and nurturing relationships in each child’s life, which research in child development increasingly shows are foundational to healthy development and to building resilience.7,10 Early relational health assessment verifies whether a child has at least 1 caring, supportive, and emotionally available adult in their life and builds from there.22-24

Family-based interventions

The negative impact of toxic stress on individual and family function has been demonstrated in ACE- and ERH-based research.13,25 The parent-child relationship is a leading—and modifiable—mechanism of risk and resilience.2,23 When secure attachment is lacking, family-based interventions can help. Family-centred, ACE-based, and ERH care models all recommend taking a 2-generation approach to intervention7,25,26 with the experiences of children as the central focus.2,10 And while it is ideal to encourage and reinforce positive routines and effective parenting prenatally or during a child’s earliest years,27 evidence also suggests it is never too late to promote, teach, and model relational skills with families.23,28 Programs that promote parental sensitivity can help mitigate or interrupt intergenerational effects of ACEs.25,29

In an ERH model, parents and physicians are partners who share responsibility for care and for decision making. In practice, this means respecting parents as experts in their lived experiences; eliciting their observations and input on what works best for their child; and inviting them to guide discussion, establish boundaries, and choose next steps for care planning.2,4,20,23,24,27,30 Partnership may mean accepting that some parents wish to be less involved and some will be “team leaders” when required. It also means attending to parental self-care by providing information and resources.2,13,21,31-34

Another opportunity for connection is when we understand how families are part of communities and what support they receive from their communities. Many family physicians routinely inquire about the presence of other caring adults in children’s lives whose involvement is supportive of parents,5,23,35 is enriching for children, and can help buffer against toxic stress and adversity. Many also maintain lists of community resources and regularly connect families with libraries, child care centres, public health units, recreational facilities, and culturally specific programs to promote social connection and build resilience.23,25,29,31,34

Implementation

Implementation of ERH in the context of a family practice can occur during any visit for preventive care, acute illness, or chronic illness in children. For example, your patient Sapna (age 35) presents with her 4-month-old baby, Rohan, for his well-baby visit. Before you enter the room you check your own biases and knowledge gaps about this specific family, their circumstances, and their cultural background. While watching Sapna interact with Rohan, you notice she makes frequent eye contact, holds him in a comforting position, and chats with him. You highlight and encourage this interaction, informing Sapna that talking in a “singsongy” voice, singing, and playing with or reading to Rohan all encourage his speech and language development.

While examining Rohan you describe what you are doing for mom and baby and use his name while speaking. After his immunizations, Rohan is fussing and Sapna comforts him with a hug and gentle words. Throughout the visit you acknowledge positive behaviour with Sapna, letting her know that she is helping her baby feel loved and safe and that he can rely on her. You praise her attention to his needs and point out how quickly he calms down in her arms, letting her know she is helping Rohan learn to deal with discomfort, to regulate his emotions, and to trust his mother to provide comfort and safety. This sense of safety and security can help him build resilience, which may in turn help cushion against negative effects of stressful experiences in life, leading to better health in the short and longer term. You praise the secure attachment Rohan has clearly formed with Sapna thanks to her attentiveness. You ask about community services the family is currently accessing, and she shares they are new to the community and have not accessed any services yet. You give Sapna a brochure for the local EarlyON Child and Family Centre (a government-funded program in Ontario),36 which lists drop-in hours and infant-parent offerings. You wave goodbye to Rohan and Sapna and express eagerness to see them again when Rohan is 6 months old or sooner if they have any concerns.

The need for enhanced training and support in early child development and ERH-based approaches is pressing. The Keystones of Development program in the United States teaches the ERH approach to both medical learners and physicians in practice.37 It has been adopted by more than 300 US residency programs and advocates are calling for Canadian programs to do so, as well. Making ERH an intentional focus in clinic visits will improve outcomes at no additional cost while we continue to call on governments for increased funding for community support services that encourage development and strengthen parenting skills, such as EarlyON centres, allied child health providers, and interprofessional health care teams that include social workers and early childhood specialists. Other resources available to help family physicians learn more about ERH are provided in Box 1.

Box 1.

Early relational health resources

Nurture Connection. Why ERH matters: early relational health explained. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Social Policy; 2024. Available from: https://nurtureconnection.org/early-relational-health/early-relational-health-explained. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.

Early relational health. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2022. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/early-childhood/early-relational-health. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.

Garner AS, Shonkoff JP; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care; Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics 2012;129(1):e224-31. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

Li J, Ramirez T. Early relational health: a review of research, principles, and perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Burke Foundation; 2023. Available from: https://www.gse.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2023-09/ERH-Report_final.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.

Conclusion

Early relational health is a proactive and holistic approach to health care that family physicians are well qualified to deliver, especially with community support services. Family doctors engage in care across generations of families and have unparalleled opportunities to model, teach, reinforce, and celebrate ERH approaches. With appropriate support, family physicians can be leaders in and strong advocates for ERH approaches, which have the potential to mitigate effects of childhood trauma and enhance the health and well-being of an entire generation of children.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the support of Dr Robin Foster, Elizabeth Moreau, and Jennie Strickland from the Canadian Paediatric Society in the preparation and editing of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 305.

  • Copyright © 2024 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Perry BD,
    2. Winfrey O.
    What happened to you? Conversations on trauma, resilience, and healing. New York, NY: Flatiron/Macmillan Books; 2021.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gupta RC,
    2. Randell KA,
    3. Dowd MD.
    Addressing parental adverse childhood experiences in the pediatric setting. Adv Pediatr 2021;68:71-88. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    1. Ginwright S.
    The future of healing: shifting from trauma informed care to healing centered engagement. Medium 2018 May 31. Available from: https://ginwright.medium.com/the-future-of-healing-shifting-from-trauma-informed-care-to-healing-centered-engagement-634f557ce69c. Accessed 2023 Jun 7.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Charlot-Swilley D,
    2. Condon MC,
    3. Rahman T.
    At the feet of storytellers: implications for practicing early relational health conversations. Infant Ment Health J 2022;43(3):378-89. Epub 2022 May 17.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Narayan AJ,
    2. Rivera LM,
    3. Bernstein RE,
    4. Harris WW,
    5. Lieberman AF.
    Positive childhood experiences predict less psychopathology and stress in pregnant women with childhood adversity: a pilot study of the Benevolent Childhood Experiences (BCEs) Scale. Child Abuse Negl 2018;78:19-30. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Williams RC.
    From ACEs to early relational health: implications for clinical practice. Paediatr Child Health 2023;28(6):377-84.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Garner A,
    2. Yogman M; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Council on Early Childhood
    . Preventing childhood toxic stress: partnering with families and communities to promote relational health. Pediatrics 2021;148(2):e2021052582.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    Early relational health. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2022. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/early-childhood/early-relational-health. Accessed 2024 Mar 28.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Willis DW.
    Early relational health (ERH): an introduction [webinar slides]. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Social Policy; 2019. Available from: https://cssp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Early-Relational-Health-Webinar-6.12.19.pdf. Accessed 2023 Jun 7.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Willis DW,
    2. Paradis N,
    3. Johnson K.
    The paradigm shift to early relational health: a network movement. Washington, DC: Zero to Three; 2022: Available from: https://www.zerotothree.org/resources/4420-the-paradigm-shift-to-early-relational-health-a-network-movement. Accessed 2023 Jun 7.
  11. 11.
    1. Burstein D,
    2. Yang C,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. Linkenbach J,
    5. Sege R.
    Transforming practice with HOPE (Healthy Outcomes from Positive Experiences). Matern Child Health J 2021;25(7):1019-24. Epub 2021 May 5.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bethell C,
    2. Jones J,
    3. Gombojav N,
    4. Linkenbach J,
    5. Sege R.
    Positive childhood experiences and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample: associations across adverse childhood experiences levels. JAMA Pediatr 2019;173(11):e193007. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Erratum in: JAMA Pediatr 2019;173(11):1110.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Traub F,
    2. Boyton-Jarrett R.
    Modifiable resilience factors to childhood adversity for clinical pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2017;139(5):e20162569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gerlach AJ,
    2. Browne AJ,
    3. Suto MJ.
    Relational approaches to fostering health equity for Indigenous children through early childhood intervention. Health Sociol Rev 2018;27(1):104-19. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Trauma-Informed Care Implementation Resource Center
    . What is trauma-informed care? Hamilton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies; 2024. Available from: https://www.traumainformedcare.chcs.org/what-is-trauma-informed-care. Accessed 2024 Jan 14.
  16. 16.
    1. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention
    . Fast facts: preventing adverse childhood experiences. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/fastfact.html. Accessed 2024 Jan 14.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Agnihotri R,
    2. Williams R.
    Mitigating risk using early relational health (ERH), for paediatric healthcare providers. Keynote presentation at: Canadian Children, Youth and Communities Health In Equity Conference. University of Toronto; 2023 Oct 20-21; Toronto, ON.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Raphael JL,
    2. Oyeku SO.
    Implicit bias in pediatrics: an emerging focus in health equity research. Pediatrics 2020;145(5):e20200512. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ward MGK,
    2. Baird B; Canadian Paediatric Society, Child and Youth Maltreatment Section
    . Medical neglect: working with children, youth, and families. Paediatr Child Health 2022;27(6):372-6. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Cultural safety and humility. West Vancouver, BC: First Nations Health Authority; 2024. Available from: https://www.fnha.ca/what-we-do/cultural-safety-and-humility. Accessed 2024 Mar 28.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Forkey H.
    Putting your trauma lens on. Pediatr Ann 2019;48(7):e269-73. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Sege RD,
    2. Harper Browne C.
    Responding to ACEs with HOPE: Health Outcomes from Positive Experiences. Acad Pediatr 2017;17(7S):S79-85.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Forkey H,
    2. Szilagyi M,
    3. Kelly ET,
    4. Duffee J; American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care, Council on Community Pediatrics, Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health
    . Trauma-informed care. Pediatrics 2021;148(2):e2021052580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Duffee J,
    2. Szilagyi M,
    3. Forkey H,
    4. Kelly ET; American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Community Pediatrics, Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care, Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health
    . Trauma-informed care in child health systems. Pediatrics 2021;148(2):e2021052579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bifulco A,
    2. Moran PM,
    3. Ball C,
    4. Jacobs C,
    5. Baines R,
    6. Bunn A, et al.
    Childhood adversity, parental vulnerability and disorder: examining inter-generational transmission of risk. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002;43(8):1075-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lê-Scherban F,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Boyle-Steed KH,
    4. Pachter LM.
    Intergenerational associations of parent adverse childhood experiences and child health outcomes. Pediatrics 2018;141(6):e20174274. Epub 2018 May 21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. McDonald S,
    2. Kehler H,
    3. Bayrampour H,
    4. Fraser-Lee N,
    5. Tough S.
    Risk and protective factors in early child development: results from the All Our Babies (AOB) pregnancy cohort. Res Dev Disabil 2016;58:20-30. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hambrick EP,
    2. Bawner TW,
    3. Perry BD,
    4. Brandt K,
    5. Hofmeister C,
    6. Collins JO.
    Beyond the ACE score: examining relationships between timing of developmental adversity, relational health and developmental outcomes in children. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2019;33(3):238-47. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Folger AT,
    2. Eismann EA,
    3. Stephenson NB,
    4. Shapiro RA,
    5. Macaluso M,
    6. Brownrigg ME, et al.
    Parental adverse childhood experiences and offspring development at 2 years of age. Pediatrics 2018;141(4):e20172826.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gillespie RJ,
    2. Folger AT.
    Feasibility of assessing parental ACEs in pediatric primary care: implications for practice-based implementation. J Child Adol Trauma 2017;10(3):249-56.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Hospital Care and Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care
    . Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics 2012;129(2):394-404. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    1. Hudziak JJ.
    ACEs and pregnancy: time to support all expectant mothers [comment]. Pediatrics 2018;141(4):e20180232. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Winders Davis D,
    2. Myers J,
    3. Logsdon MC,
    4. Bauer NS.
    The relationship among caregiver depressive symptoms, parenting behaviour, and family-centered care. J Pediatr Health Care 2016;30(2):121-32. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bair-Merritt MH,
    2. Zuckerman B.
    Exploring parents’ adversities in pediatric primary care. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170(4):313-4.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Murphy A,
    2. Steele M,
    3. Dube SR,
    4. Bate J,
    5. Bonuck K,
    6. Meissner P, et al.
    Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) questionnaire and adult attachment interview (AAI): implications for parent child relationships. Child Abuse Negl 2014;38(2):224-33. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Government of Ontario
    . Find an EarlyON child and family centre. Toronto, ON: King’s Printer for Ontario; 2023. Available from: https://www.ontario.ca/page/find-earlyon-child-and-family-centre. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.
  37. 37.↵
    Keystones of Development provider portal [website]. New York, NY: Mount Sinai Parenting Center; 2022. Available from: https://parenting.mountsinai.org/providers. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 70 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 70, Issue 5
1 May 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Early relational health care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Early relational health care
Amanda Bell, Richa Agnihotri
Canadian Family Physician May 2024, 70 (5) 298-302; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7005298

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Early relational health care
Amanda Bell, Richa Agnihotri
Canadian Family Physician May 2024, 70 (5) 298-302; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7005298
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Familiar and unfamiliar concepts
    • Family-based interventions
    • Implementation
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • La santé relationnelle précoce
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reflections on the value of Canadian multiculturalism in health care delivery
  • The environmental elephant in the office: medications
  • Six-sentence and 3-citation research proposals
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire