Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleRxFiles

Clinical pearls for management of migraines

Alex Crawley, Jacqueline Myers and Loren D. Regier
Canadian Family Physician May 2024; 70 (5) 325-327; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.7005325
Alex Crawley
Associate Director of the RxFiles Academic Detailing Program at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon and a pharmacist with the Sturgeon Lake Health Centre in Saskatchewan.
BSP ACPR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alex.crawley{at}usask.ca
Jacqueline Myers
HIV pharmacist with the Saskatchewan Health Authority in Regina and an academic detailer with the RxFiles Academic Detailing Program.
BSP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Loren D. Regier
Pharmacist in Saskatoon and consulting editor with the RxFiles Academic Detailing Program.
BA BSP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Migraines are common in patients in Canada, with a prevalence of around 10%.1 Women are 2 to 3 times more likely than men to have migraines2 and prevalence peaks in middle life.3 Evidence suggests that migraines are undertreated in many patients; for example, less than 10% of Canadians with migraines use a triptan4 and only around 30% of patients who might benefit from medications for migraine prophylaxis receive them.5

This article discusses 10 evidence-based clinical pearls for migraine management that may change your practice. These pearls were selected following one-on-one and group education visits on this topic provided by the RxFiles Academic Detailing Program of the University of Saskatchewan to family physicians in the province in 2022.

Ten clinical pearls for managing migraines

Long-acting triptans are also slow-acting triptans. In Canada, 5 fast-onset triptans are available: almotriptan, eletriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan. The oral formulations of these triptans have an onset time of 30 to 60 minutes.6 Two long-acting triptans are also available: frovatriptan and naratriptan. Frovatriptan has an onset time of 2 hours and a half-life of approximately 25 hours.6 Naratriptan has an onset time of 1 to 3 hours and a half-life of approximately 6 hours.6

Waiting more than an hour for a long-acting triptan to take effect is unacceptable to many patients. When treating patients with migraines, treatment success is more likely the sooner the inflammatory cascade can be interrupted. For this reason, naratriptan and frovatriptan may be inferior to fast-acting triptans for the average patient.7 A potential role for naratriptan or frovatriptan is for patients with difficulty tolerating fast-acting triptans—a slower onset typically means less nausea and other adverse effects. Due to having longer half-lives, frovatriptan and naratriptan also have evidence for twice-daily dosing in the prevention of menstrual migraine (eg, start taking the medication 2 days before menstruation and continue for approximately 6 days).8

Taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on an empty stomach may increase effectiveness in patients with migraines. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective for treatment of acute migraine in around 40% to 50% of patients.9,10 For many clinicians, “Take your NSAID with food” is standard advice given to patients with chronic pain to reduce stomach upset. However, food delays the onset of NSAIDs—for example, ibuprofen onset time is around 30 minutes on an empty stomach versus 60 minutes with food.11 In a patient with migraine this can reduce the efficacy of the NSAID.

Prokinetic agents can boost the efficacy of analgesic medications. Prokinetic agents, such as 10 mg of oral domperidone or metoclopramide, can help with the nausea commonly associated with migraines. Evidence suggests that prokinetics may also boost the efficacy of other analgesic medications when administered simultaneously, perhaps by enhancing the absorption of the analgesic. For example, a trial showed that a combination of 1000 mg of acetaminophen and 10 mg of metoclopramide had similar efficacy to 100 mg of oral sumatriptan.12

The most efficacious triptan is subcutaneous sumatriptan. Triptans typically have a response rate of around 50% to 60%. Subcutaneous sumatriptan, injected at a dose of 6 mg at the first sign of migraine pain, has a response rate of up to 80%.13 This is thought to be due to its faster onset than oral options and reliable absorption. As a result, it is a useful option for patients who do not respond to oral triptans. Subcutaneous sumatriptan is delivered by an autoinjector device for ease of patient use. Body sensations (such as pressure, tingling, heaviness, or tightness) and injection site reactions are common.14 Cost may also be a barrier (a single dose costs around $35).15

The risk of serotonin syndrome when combining a triptan and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) is low. As highlighted in a 2018 Canadian Family Physician article,16 triptans are unlikely to cause serotonin syndrome. Even when a triptan is combined with an SSRI, the risk of serotonin syndrome may be less than 0.03%.17 When initiating a triptan in a patient already taking an SSRI, monitor the patient for symptoms of serotonin syndrome such as agitation, delirium, fever, or tachycardia. Conversely, combining a triptan with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (eg, moclobemide) is an absolute contraindication due to the risk of serotonin syndrome.

Oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor blockers (gepants) can be useful when triptans are contraindicated. Calcitonin gene-related peptide is an inflammatory mediator. Gepants are a new class of small molecules that block the CGRP receptor and interrupt the migraine pain cascade. Two gepants are currently approved in Canada: atogepant for migraine prophylaxis and ubrogepant for acute migraines. In the United States, other gepants (rimegepant and zavegepant) have been approved for acute migraines, migraine prophylaxis, or both.

Gepants have some advantages for patients with acute migraines. Unlike triptans, they appear safe for patients with cardiovascular disease.18 They also have little to no risk of causing medication overuse headache (which is unsurprising since some are approved for migraine prophylaxis). Disadvantages include a likely lower chance of efficacy than triptans (although data from head-to-head trials are lacking) and cost—a single dose of ubrogepant costs around $20.15

Ensure a trial of 8 to 12 weeks at target dose before evaluating the effectiveness of prophylactic medications. There are more than 30 medications and herbal products from various classes that may help with migraine prophylaxis. Some medications are approved only for treating migraines (eg, CGRP antagonists) while some medications are approved for other conditions and used off-label for migraines (eg, metoprolol).

Evidence suggests that the efficacy of most medications for migraine prophylaxis is related to dose and duration of treatment.19 Titrating doses to target (Table 1)20 and ensuring an adequate trial of 8 to 12 weeks at the target dose before assessing efficacy give the best chance of success. Guidelines suggest a realistic goal of therapy for migraine prophylaxis is a reduction in headache severity or frequency of 50%.17 One of the best ways to evaluate efficacy is by encouraging patients to use headache diaries, which are freely available from Migraine Canada at https://migrainecanada.org/diaries.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Target doses for selected migraine prophylaxis medications

Candesartan is effective for migraine prophylaxis. Recent migraine guidance has highlighted the role of select angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in migraine prophylaxis.5,21 To date, the best-studied agent in this class is candesartan. Data from 2 randomized controlled trials suggest that around 40% of patients taking 16 mg per day of candesartan will have a clinically significant reduction in their number of headache days per month.22,23

Candesartan for migraine prophylaxis has several advantages. It is typically well tolerated, although it does require monitoring of electrolyte levels, serum creatinine level, and hypotensive symptoms. It is an excellent option for patients who have additional comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or chronic kidney disease. It is generally inexpensive. However, it may not be as effective as other first-line options such as amitriptyline or metoprolol (although data from head-to-head trials are sparse).

Starting prophylactic medication can help resolve medication overuse headaches. Medication overuse headache accounts for up to 50% of headaches in patients with chronic migraine (ie, 15 or more headache days per month).24,25 Medication overuse headache is typically associated with using acetaminophen or NSAIDs on more than 14 days per month, using a triptan or opioid on more than 9 days per month, or taking combinations of medications for more than 9 days per month (eg, combination acetaminophen and codeine).22

A recent trial examined 3 strategies for resolving medication overuse headache: stopping the offending medication, adding prophylaxis therapy, or both. All 3 approaches were similarly effective, reducing the mean number of days with headaches by 8.5, 10, and 12 days per month, respectively.26 For patients experiencing medication overuse headache, consider shared decision making to determine which management strategy might work best for them. A medication overuse headache patient booklet for guiding this conversation is available from RxFiles at https://www.rxfiles.ca/migraine.

Injectable CGRP antagonists have evidence for treatment-resistant migraine prophylaxis. Injectable CGRP antagonists are biologic antibodies that bind to either CGRP or the CGRP receptor; this new class of migraine therapy arrived on the Canadian market in 2018. Agents such as eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab provide effective migraine prophylaxis in approximately 40% of patients with migraine.18

Injectable CGRP antagonists are effective for migraine prophylaxis in patients for whom other therapies have failed27; most drug plans in Canada provide coverage for these agents after adequate trials of at least 2 oral options. Other advantages include no known drug interactions; dosing is required only every 1 to 3 months (depending on the agent); and there is potential for a rapid onset of action of a few days (although an adequate trial of 3 to 6 months is still encouraged).28 However, cardiovascular safety is uncertain (postmarketing reports have flagged a risk of developing hypertension)29 and injection site reactions are common. Medications from this class are expensive, costing approximately $600 per month.15

Conclusion

One theme of this article is that when a migraine therapy fails, there is often a solution. The following is a summary of examples of what to try when a therapy does not work:

  • When acute treatments fail, try faster-onset options. This may include adding a prokinetic agent to speed up analgesic absorption, switching to a faster-onset triptan or NSAID, ensuring an NSAID is taken on an empty stomach, or using subcutaneous sumatriptan.

  • Combining medications for acute migraines can increase efficacy, but monitor the patient closely for medication overuse headache (eg, maximum of 9 medication days per month).

  • With so many unique classes of medications available for migraine prophylaxis, few patients have truly “tried everything.” Further, before deeming a prophylactic medication ineffective, ensure the patient has done an adequate trial (at a target dose) for an adequate duration (8 to 12 weeks) with consistent documentation (ie, using a headache diary).

  • Recent trial evidence (eg, for candesartan and CGRP antagonists) provides new approaches in those for whom traditional therapies have failed.

Acknowledgment

The inspiration for this article was the audience response to a presentation given by 2 of the authors (Alex Crawley and Jacqueline Myers) at Family Medicine Forum in November 2023.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The RxFiles Academic Detailing Program is funded through a grant from Saskatchewan Health to the University of Saskatchewan; additional “not for profit; not for loss” revenue is obtained from sale of books, online subscriptions, and annual conference registrations. No external funding was received for the production of this manuscript.

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de mai 2024 à la page e66.

  • Copyright © 2024 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Graves EB,
    2. Gerber BR,
    3. Berrigan PS,
    4. Shaw E,
    5. Cowling TM,
    6. Ladouceur MP, et al.
    Epidemiology and treatment utilization for Canadian patients with migraine: a literature review. J Int Med Res 2022;50(9).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Stewart WF,
    2. Shechter A,
    3. Rasmussen BK.
    Migraine prevalence. A review of population-based studies. Neurology 1994;44(6 Suppl 4):S17-23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lipton RB,
    2. Bigal ME,
    3. Diamond M,
    4. Freitag F,
    5. Reed ML,
    6. Stewart WF, et al.
    Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007;68(5):343-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cooke LJ,
    2. Becker WJ.
    Migraine prevalence, treatment and impact: the Canadian Women and Migraine Study. Can J Neurol Sci 2010;37(5):580-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ailani J,
    2. Burch RC,
    3. Robbins MS; Board of Directors of the American Headache Society
    . The American Headache Society consensus statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache 2021;61(7):1021-39. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Worthington I,
    2. Pringsheim T,
    3. Gawel MJ,
    4. Gladstone J,
    5. Cooper P,
    6. Dilli E, et al.
    Canadian Headache Society guideline: acute drug therapy for migraine headache. Can J Neurol Sci 2013;40(S3):S1-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Thorlund K,
    2. Mills EJ,
    3. Wu P,
    4. Ramos E,
    5. Chatterjee A,
    6. Druyts E, et al.
    Comparative efficacy of triptans for the abortive treatment of migraine: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2014;34(4):258-67. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hu Y,
    2. Guan X,
    3. Fan L,
    4. Jin L.
    Triptans in prevention of menstrual migraine: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2013;14(1):7.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Law S,
    2. Derry S,
    3. Moore RA.
    Naproxen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(10):CD009455.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rabbie R,
    2. Derry S,
    3. Moore RA.
    Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(4):CD008039.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shin D,
    2. Lee SJ,
    3. Ha YM,
    4. Choi YS,
    5. Kim JW,
    6. Park SR, et al.
    Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation according to absorption differences in three formulations of ibuprofen. Drug Des Devel Ther 2017;11:135-41.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Derry S,
    2. Moore RA.
    Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(4):CD008040.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Derry CJ,
    2. Derry S,
    3. Moore RA.
    Sumatriptan (all routes of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults—overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(5):CD009108.
  14. 14.↵
    Imitrex [product monograph]. Mississauga, ON: GlaxoSmithKline; 2022. Available from: https://ca.gsk.com/media/6599/imitrex.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.
  15. 15.↵
    Saskatchewan drug plan [database]. Regina, SK: Government of Saskatchewan; 2024. Available from: https://formulary.drugplan.ehealthsask.ca/SearchFormulary. Accessed 2024 Apr 15.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Foong AL,
    2. Grindrod KA,
    3. Patel T,
    4. Kellar J.
    Demystifying serotonin syndrome (or serotonin toxicity). Can Fam Physician 2018;64:720-7 (Eng), e422-30 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Shapiro RE,
    2. Tepper SJ.
    The serotonin syndrome, triptans, and the potential for drug-drug interactions. Headache 2007;47(2):266-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mullin K,
    2. Hutchinson S,
    3. Smith T,
    4. Lipton R,
    5. Jensen C,
    6. Leroue C, et al.
    Rimegepant 75 mg for the acute treatment of migraine in adults with frequent migraine: long-term safety and clinical improvement versus baseline (poster 5054). Neurology 2021;96(15 Suppl).
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pringsheim T,
    2. Davenport WJ,
    3. Mackie G,
    4. Worthington I,
    5. Aubé M,
    6. Christie SN, et al.
    Canadian Headache Society guideline for migraine prophylaxis. Can J Neurol Sci 2012;39(S2):S1-59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Regier L,
    2. Jensen B,
    3. Downey S,
    4. Crawley A.
    Migraine overview and drug comparison chart. Saskatoon, SK: RxFiles Academic Detailing; 2023. Available from: https://www.rxfiles.ca/migraine. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Primary Care Management of Headache Work Group
    . VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the primary care management of headache. Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs; 2020. Available from: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/pain/headache/VADoDHeadacheCPGFinal508.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 2.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Stovner LJ,
    2. Linde M,
    3. Gravdahl GB,
    4. Tronvik E,
    5. Aamodt AH,
    6. Sand T, et al.
    A comparative study of candesartan versus propranolol for migraine prophylaxis: a randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, double cross-over study. Cephalalgia 2013;34(7):523-32. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Tronvik E,
    2. Stovner LJ,
    3. Helde G,
    4. Sand T,
    5. Bovim G.
    Prophylactic treatment of migraine with an angiotensin II receptor blocker: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;289(1):65-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society
    . The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38(1):1-211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Munksgaard SB,
    2. Jensen RH.
    Medication overuse headache. Headache 2014;54(7):1251-7. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Carlsen LN,
    2. Munksgaard SB,
    3. Nielsen M,
    4. Engelstoft IMS,
    5. Westergaard ML,
    6. Bendtsen L, et al.
    Comparison of 3 treatment strategies for medication overuse headache: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2020;77(9):1069-78.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ashina M,
    2. Lanteri-Minet M,
    3. Pozo-Rosich P,
    4. Ettrup A,
    5. Christoffersen CL,
    6. Josiassen MK, et al.
    Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2022;21(7):597-607.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Barbanti P,
    2. Aurilia C,
    3. Egeo G,
    4. Torelli P,
    5. Proietti S,
    6. Cevoli S, et al.
    Late response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Neurology 2023;101(11):482-8. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. De Vries Lentsch S,
    2. van der Arend BWH,
    3. Maassen VanDenBrink A,
    4. Terwindt GM.
    Blood pressure in patients with migraine treated with monoclonal anti-CGRP (receptor) antibodies: a prospective follow-up study. Neurology 2022;99(17):e1897-904. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 70 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 70, Issue 5
1 May 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical pearls for management of migraines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical pearls for management of migraines
Alex Crawley, Jacqueline Myers, Loren D. Regier
Canadian Family Physician May 2024, 70 (5) 325-327; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7005325

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Clinical pearls for management of migraines
Alex Crawley, Jacqueline Myers, Loren D. Regier
Canadian Family Physician May 2024, 70 (5) 325-327; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7005325
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Ten clinical pearls for managing migraines
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Perles cliniques sur la prise en charge des migraines
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How to help patients navigate genitourinary syndrome of menopause
  • Perles cliniques sur la prise en charge des migraines
Show more RxFiles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire