Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
EditorialEditorial

Qualitative research in family medicine

Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician March 2025; 71 (3) 152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.7103152
Sarah Fraser
MSc MD CCFP
Roles: DEPUTY EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

In addition to this month’s clinical content, Canadian Family Physician features 2 qualitative family medicine research articles. One explores the referral practices of physicians providing obstetric care in remote locations, examining the reasons for referral to urban centres (page 185).1 The other examines how early-career family physicians integrate social accountability into their practices, including the factors that both facilitate and hinder its adoption (page 192).2

Qualitative research as a concept is debated, especially in the scientific realm, and it is sometimes viewed as inferior, with the randomized controlled trial (RCT) considered the criterion standard. But is this hierarchy warranted?

First, let us define qualitative research. While quantitative research focuses on statistical analyses of numerical data, qualitative research “gathers participants’ experiences, perceptions, and behavior.”3 The methodology may include in-depth interviews, focus groups, surveys, and more. While quantitative research derives strength from factors such as sample size and statistics, qualitative research values richness in data. Rather than having participants selected randomly, sampling in qualitative studies is done purposively, so that appropriate, informative participants are selected to answer the research question.3

At the same time, given the clinical content we offer, journals such as ours have limited space to publish research. Medical publications as a whole often do not prioritize qualitative research. In 2016, a group of academics from around the world criticized the BMJ for the decision to halt publishing qualitative research.4 They argued that qualitative research provides critical insights into areas such as why certain interventions fail in practice, how health care professionals think, and the lived experiences of patients. One example cited was a qualitative study from 1996 exploring parental concerns when their children were acutely ill; currently, this paper has been cited more than 351 times.5

Qualitative research may be even more relevant for specific communities and populations. For example, there is a movement to decolonize Indigenous research, and qualitative methodologies are at the forefront of these efforts. In writing this editorial, I learned about an Indigenous research method called yarning, a form of conversation from Indigenous culture.6 As a white family physician, this topic was new to me, but the practice of yarning has existed for centuries.6 Other authors have gone so far as to argue that RCTs are inappropriate in certain groups, such as in the field of adolescent transgender health care.7

In a research landscape where space is at a premium, what is the best path forward for qualitative studies? The article in this issue by Martel et al1 demonstrates the perspective a qualitative study may yield by including a quote from a physician participant:

If babies are no longer being born in the community or in the hospital, there will still be people dying. So there becomes an imbalance there where there is only grief associated with the hospital—with health care—and not the celebration. I think communities that lose rural obstetrics struggle with that. The hospital ends up becoming a place for the ill and dying.1

Given the current strain on medical systems and high rates of physician burnout, should we place more emphasis on qualitative research to enhance our understanding of patient and physician experiences? Or, with limited journal space, should we prioritize quantitative research instead?

As the debate continues, the value of qualitative research cannot be overlooked. While RCTs and large data sets are invaluable for identifying important health outcomes, qualitative studies provide insights into the human elements of our work—insights that could ultimately lead us to practice more effectively and compassionately, keeping people at the forefront of what we do. In a time marked by immense pressures on the health care system, qualitative research is a key tool in fostering a more patient-centred approach to care. We hope the content in this month’s issue of Canadian Family Physician does just that.

Footnotes

  • The opinions expressed in editorials are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 153.

  • Copyright © 2025 the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Martel N,
    2. Tsang T,
    3. Ramsden VR,
    4. Irvine JDC.
    Family physicians’ perspectives on advising patients on an obstetric delivery location. Study from a remote community. Can Fam Physician 2025;71:185-91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mills L,
    2. Gormley A,
    3. Sheppard A,
    4. Moravac C,
    5. Scott I,
    6. Lavergne MR.
    How early-career family physicians integrate social accountability into practice. Findings from a multijurisdictional qualitative study. Can Fam Physician 2025;71:192-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tenny S,
    2. Brannan JM,
    3. Brannan GD.
    Qualitative study. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395. Accessed 2025 Mar 3.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Greenhalgh T,
    2. Annandale E,
    3. Ashcroft R,
    4. Barlow J,
    5. Black N,
    6. Bleakley A, et al.
    An open letter to the BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ 2016;352:i563. Erratum in: BMJ 2016;352:i957.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kai J.
    What worries parents when their preschool children are acutely ill, and why: a qualitative study. BMJ 1996;313(7063):983-86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bessarab D,
    2. Ng’andu B.
    Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in Indigenous research. Int J Crit Ind Stud 2010;3(1):37-50.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ashley F,
    2. Tordoff DM,
    3. Olson-Kennedy J,
    4. Restar AJ.
    Randomized-controlled trials are methodologically inappropriate in adolescent transgender healthcare. Int J Transgend Health 2023;25(3):407-18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 71 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 71, Issue 3
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Qualitative research in family medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Qualitative research in family medicine
Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2025, 71 (3) 152; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7103152

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Qualitative research in family medicine
Sarah Fraser
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2025, 71 (3) 152; DOI: 10.46747/cfp.7103152
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Family physicians’ perspectives on advising patients on an obstetric delivery location
  • How early-career family physicians integrate social accountability into practice
  • La recherche qualitative en médecine familiale
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil
  • The more things change, the more they stay the same
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire