Clinical question
Can low-risk patients with β-lactam allergy receive an oral β-lactam challenge safely?
Bottom line
In adults with a history of nonsevere cutaneous reaction to a β-lactam more than 5 to 10 years ago, the penicillin allergy label can be removed 87% to 98% of the time. Direct oral challenge with a β-lactam is likely as safe and effective as doing a skin test first. The risk of severe adverse reaction is less than 1%.
Evidence
Oral challenge alone versus skin test followed by oral challenge (if skin test is negative):
- Two RCTs in patients recruited from outpatient allergy clinics with nonsevere cutaneous reaction to β-lactam more than 1 year ago (children)1 or more than 10 years ago (adults)1,2:
— In 1 RCT (382 adults) of 250 to 500 mg of amoxicillin,2 there were no serious adverse effects, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits. The allergy label was removed for more than 98% (both groups). There was 1 immune-mediated reaction in each group (cutaneous, mild) less than 1 hour after the test. There was delayed rash or urticaria in 3.2% versus 1.6% for skin test (no statistical difference).
— In 1 RCT (159 adults and children) of 20 to 40 mg of amoxicillin, then 200 to 400 mg 30 minutes later,1 reaction occurred less than 30 minutes after testing in 4% (cutaneous, mild) versus 0% for skin test (no statistical difference; PEER team calculation). The allergy label was removed in 96% versus 87% (no statistical difference).
Oral challenge with no prior skin testing:
- Six systematic reviews of cohort studies in children and adults (mostly outpatients, 2 to 31 cohorts, 595 to 6980 oral challenges)3-8:
- Immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions in 2.7% to 8.8%.3-7
- Severe reactions (eg, anaphylaxis needing epinephrine, serum-like illness, interstitial nephritis) occurred in 0% to 0.04%.6-8 An additional systematic review had inconsistent reporting.3
Limitations included variation in definitions of low-risk patients and harms (eg, anaphylaxis); and limited primary care data.
Context
About 10% of people report a penicillin allergy.9 The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with erroneous allergy labels has been associated with longer hospitalizations, increased risk of Clostridium difficile infections, and increased medical costs.10
Amoxicillin is associated with non–immunoglobulin E (delayed onset) rash in 7% or fewer children, usually with concurrent viral infection.10
Implementation
Guidelines recommend a direct amoxicillin challenge (with no preceding skin test) for adults with remote history (>5 years) of benign cutaneous reactions to β-lactams.10 An option would be 250 to 500 mg of amoxicillin with a 1-hour observation period (with antihistamine and epinephrine available). As RCTs come from specialty clinics, not primary care, referral to a specialist clinic would also be reasonable. For adults with a history of anaphylaxis or recent immunoglobulin E–mediated reaction, a skin test should be done before an oral challenge.10 Patients with a history of severe cutaneous reactions to β-lactams (eg, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Stevens-Johnson syndrome) should not be tested and should not take β-lactams.10
Notes
Tools for Practice articles in CFP are adapted from peer-reviewed articles at http://www.toolsforpractice.ca and summarize practice-changing medical evidence for primary care. Coordinated by Dr Adrienne J. Lindblad, articles are developed by the Patients, Experience, Evidence, Research (PEER) team and supported by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and its Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan Chapters. Feedback is welcome at toolsforpractice{at}cfpc.ca.
Footnotes
Competing interests
None declared
This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to https://www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.
La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à https://www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro d’avril 2025 à la page e66.
- Copyright © 2025 the College of Family Physicians of Canada