In response to Dr Rashid et al’s Clinical Review, “Home blood testing for celiac disease,”1 published in the February 2009 issue, I would like to point out that a major problem with all the studies on celiac disease is that the wrong question keeps getting asked. The real question is, “Does the rapid test provide any true benefit to the patient?” The real test question, therefore, should be, “Does a gluten-free diet work?” Although gastrointestinal specialists will gasp in shock and disbelief, this does not require a blood test or a biopsy. What difference does it make to the patient whether or not diagnosis is confirmed if they won’t be able to follow a diet regimen either way? It would be nice not to have a “disease” diagnosis that will cost the system a ton of money when the treatment is a test in and of itself and actually affects patient outcomes. Save the confirmatory test (and the endoscopy) for when the diagnosis is still unclear despite an adequate trial of dietary intervention. That will free up the endoscopy suite for patients that actually need something scoped and will leave some money in the budget for interventions that will actually help patients. Insurance companies will love this test as another excuse to jack up rates for no good reason.
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada