RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Contextual factors in clinical decision making: national survey of Canadian family physicians. JF Canadian Family Physician JO Can Fam Physician FD The College of Family Physicians of Canada SP 1106 OP 1107 VO 51 IS 8 A1 C Shawn Tracy A1 Guilherme Coelho Dantas A1 Rahim Moineddin A1 Ross E G Upshur YR 2005 UL http://www.cfp.ca/content/51/8/1106.abstract AB OBJECTIVE Many factors are at play in the process of clinical decision making, but to date, the interaction of these factors has not been well understood. Such information could have important implications for teaching and promoting evidence-based medicine (EBM) in primary care. This study was designed to explore the relationship between physician-related variables and management of patient-related contextual factors in clinical decision making. A secondary objective was to examine the extent to which this relationship varies by type of clinical decision. DESIGN Cross-sectional randomized postal survey of 1134 Canadian primary care physicians stratified by age, sex, and practice location. Nonrespondents were sent reminders at 4 weeks and again at 8 weeks; at 12 weeks, all remaining nonrespondents were mailed replacement copies of the questionnaire. SETTING Family practices in Canada. PARTICIPANTS Of the final sample of 431 family physicians, 52% were men, 63% practised in urban locations, and 71% were in group practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported likelihood of considering various contextual factors during the course of clinical decision making. RESULTS Despite the three follow-up mailings, the final response rate was 42%; however, nonrespondents did not differ significantly from respondents on three important demographic factors: age, sex, and practice location. Using multinomial logistic regression analysis, the data showed that female family physicians and practitioners less strongly identified with EBM were more likely to consider contextual factors in clinical decision making. The effect was more obvious for ordering tests than for decisions about treatment. CONCLUSION The evolving model of EBM should consider important physician-related variables in clinical decision making. Our data indicate that physicians' sex and identification with the tenets of EBM influence management of contextual factors. These results have important implications because they indicate that clinicians strongly identified with the EBM model of clinical practice are less sensitive to context, which might be an obstacle to efforts to integrate patient values and clinical circumstances into patient-centred care. We believe these findings support continued development of the model of "context-sensitive medicine" previously proposed as an alternative to EBM.