PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jill Tinmouth
AU  - Paul Ritvo
AU  - S. Elizabeth McGregor
AU  - Danielle Claus
AU  - George Pasut
AU  - Ronald E. Myers
AU  - Crissa Guglietti
AU  - Lawrence F. Paszat
AU  - Robert J. Hilsden
AU  - Linda Rabeneck
TI  - A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake
DP  - 2011 Jan 01
TA  - Canadian Family Physician
PG  - e7--e15
VI  - 57
IP  - 1
4099  - http://www.cfp.ca/content/57/1/e7.short
4100  - http://www.cfp.ca/content/57/1/e7.full
SO  - Can Fam Physician2011 Jan 01; 57
AB  - Objective To obtain data that could be used to optimize the content and design of the targeted, mailed invitations that Ontario’s provincewide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program plans to use to increase screening uptake; to identify other strategies to increase CRC screening uptake; and to describe the effects of this qualitative work on a subsequent quantitative pilot study. Design Qualitative study using semistructured focus groups. Setting Four different Ontario communities. Participants Six focus groups comprising a total of 62 participants. Methods Six focus groups were conducted in 4 different Ontario communities. For 3 of the communities, participants were recruited from the general population by a private marketing firm, using random-digit dialing, and received a small honorarium for participating. In Sault Ste Marie, participants were convenience samples recruited from a large primary care practice and were not offered compensation. Responses were elicited regarding various strategies for promoting CRC screening. Findings represent all responses observed as well as recommendations to program planners based on focus groups observations. Main findings Key themes identified included the importance of receiving a CRC screening invitation from one’s family physician; a desire for personalized, brief communications; and a preference for succinct information in mailed materials. Strong support was indicated for direct mailing of the CRC screening kit (fecal occult blood test). Our findings substantially influenced the final design and content of the envelope and letter to be mailed in the subsequent quantitative pilot study. Conclusion We report strong support from our focus groups for a succinct, personalized invitation for CRC screening from one’s own family physician. We have also shown that qualitative evaluation can be used to provide decision makers with pertinent and timely knowledge. Our study is highly relevant to other public health programs, particularly other Canadian jurisdictions planning organized CRC screening programs.