TY - JOUR T1 - IMG candidates' demographic characteristics as predictors of CEHPEA CE1 results JF - Canadian Family Physician JO - Can Fam Physician SP - 170 LP - 176 VL - 59 IS - 2 AU - Marla Nayer AU - Arthur Rothman Y1 - 2013/02/01 UR - http://www.cfp.ca/content/59/2/170.abstract N2 - Objective To assess the extent to which demographic characteristics are related to international medical graduate (IMG) candidate performance on the Centre for the Evaluation of Health Professionals Educated Abroad General Comprehensive Clinical Examination 1 (CE1). Design Retrospective study. Setting Toronto, Ont. Participants All IMG candidates who registered for and took the CE1 in 2007 (n = 430), 2008 (n = 480), and 2009 (n = 472) were included in this analysis. All candidates completed the Centre for the Evaluation of Health Professionals Educated Abroad CE1, a 12-station objective structured clinical examination. Main outcome measures Mean (SD) examination scores for groups based on demographic variables (age, region of medical training, and Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part 1 [MCCQE1] score) were calculated. Analysis of variance was done using CE1 examination total scores as the dependent variables. Results Candidates from countries where both medical education and patient care are conducted in English and those from South America and Western Europe achieved the highest scores, while candidates from the Western Pacific region and Africa achieved the lowest scores. Younger candidates achieved higher scores than older candidates. These results were consistent across the 3 years of CE1 examination administration. There was a significant relationship between MCCQE1 and CE1 scores in 2 of the 3 years: 2007 (r = 0.218, P < .001) and 2008 (r = 0.23, P < .01). Conclusion The CE1 includes an assessment of communication skills; hence it is reasonable that candidates with stronger English skills have the highest scores on the CE1. Age, as a proxy for time since graduation, also has a substantial effect on examination scores, possibly owing to those further from their training lacking some currency of knowledge or being in focused rather than general practices. It is reasonable that those who had higher scores on the written test (the MCCQE1) would also have higher scores on the clinical test (the CE1). Demographic characteristics appear to be related to performance on the CE1. ER -