TY - JOUR T1 - Delivering evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in primary care practice JF - Canadian Family Physician JO - Can Fam Physician SP - e362 LP - e371 VL - 60 IS - 7 AU - Sophia Papadakis AU - Marie Gharib AU - Josh Hambleton AU - Robert D. Reid AU - Roxane Assi AU - Andrew L. Pipe Y1 - 2014/07/01 UR - http://www.cfp.ca/content/60/7/e362.abstract N2 - Objective To report on the delivery of evidence-based smoking cessation treatments (EBSCTs) within a sample of 40 Ontario family health teams (FHTs).Design In each FHT, consecutive patients were screened for smoking status and eligible patients completed a questionnaire immediately following their clinic visits (index visits). Multilevel analysis was used to examine FHT-level, provider-level, and patient-level predictors of EBSCT delivery.Setting Forty FHTs in Ontario.Participants Across the 40 participating FHTs, 24 033 patients were screened and 2501 eligible patients contributed data.Main outcome measures Provider performance in the delivery of EBSCTs during the preceding 12 months and during the index visits was assessed.Results The rate of provider delivery of EBSCT for the previous 12 months was 74.0% for the advise strategy. At the index visit, rates of EBSCT strategy delivery were 56.8% for ask; 46.9% for advise; 38.7% for assist; 11.6% for prescribing pharmacotherapy; and 11.3% for arrange follow-up. Significant intra-FHT and intraprovider variability in the rates of EBSCT delivery was identified. Family health teams with a physician champion (odds ratio [OR] 2.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.6; P < .01) and providers who highly ranked the importance of smoking cessation (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.7; P < .01) were more likely to deliver EBSCTs. Patient readiness to quit (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9; P < .001), presence of smoking-related illness (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.1; P < .01), and presenting for an annual health examination (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.5; P < .001) were associated with the delivery of EBSCTs.Conclusion Rates of smoking cessation advice were higher than previously reported for Canadian physicians; however, rates of assistance with quitting were lower. Future quality improvement initiatives should specifically target increasing the rates of screening and advising among low-performing FHTs and providers within FHTs, with a particular emphasis on doing so at all clinic appointments; and improving the rate at which assistance with quitting is delivered. ER -