TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative efficacy of opioids for older adults presenting to the emergency department with acute pain JF - Canadian Family Physician JO - Can Fam Physician SP - e538 LP - e543 VL - 65 IS - 12 AU - Maaike de Vries AU - Jonathan Gravel AU - Daphne Horn AU - Shelley McLeod AU - Catherine Varner Y1 - 2019/12/01 UR - http://www.cfp.ca/content/65/12/e538.abstract N2 - Objective To systematically review the literature for studies comparing the efficacy of opioid analgesics for older adults (≥ 65 years) presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute pain.Data sources The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched up to August or September 2017. Reference lists were searched for potential articles and ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for unpublished trials.Study selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were sought that compared the efficacy of 2 or more opioid analgesics for acute pain in older patients (≥ 65 years) in the ED. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed study quality, and extracted data.Synthesis After screening titles and abstracts of 1315 citations, the full texts of 63 studies were reviewed and 1 RCT met the inclusion criteria. This study randomized older adult patients presenting to an urban academic ED with acute, severe pain to receive a single dose of either 0.0075 mg/kg intravenous hydromorphone or 0.05 mg/kg intravenous morphine. This study found no clinical or statistical difference between the 2 treatments.Conclusion The lack of published research in this area demonstrates a considerable gap in knowledge of the comparative efficacy of opioid analgesics in the growing older adult patient population. Physicians are often uncertain in their choice of analgesia, potentially contributing to the undertreatment of pain. It is clear that well designed RCTs are urgently needed. ER -