TY - JOUR T1 - Partner notification by family physicians for sexually transmitted infections JF - Canadian Family Physician JO - Can Fam Physician SP - e182 LP - e189 DO - 10.46747/cfp.6806e182 VL - 68 IS - 6 AU - Alexandra Choi AU - Audrey Campbell AU - Theodora Consolacion AU - Jasmine Pawa AU - Brian Ng AU - Jason Wong Y1 - 2022/06/01 UR - http://www.cfp.ca/content/68/6/e182.abstract N2 - Objective To explore Canadian FPs’ experiences with, perceived barriers to, and perceived facilitators of FP-initiated partner notification (PN) for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), as well as to inform the development of tools that might enhance this work.Design Online survey.Setting British Columbia.Participants A total of 146 FPs recruited through the Divisions of Family Practice community-based networks of FPs throughout the province.Main outcome measures Family physicians’ current STI and PN practices, opinions regarding FP-initiated PN, perceived barriers to and facilitators of FP-initiated PN, and preferred PN resources.Results More than 90% of FPs had diagnosed an STI within the past year, and most (60.3% to 96.6%, depending on the STI) told patients to inform their partners. Two-thirds (66.4%) felt that PN should not be done by FPs, and fewer than 10% reported contacting partners. Reported barriers included inaccurate or incomplete lists of partners (67.1%), poor compensation (54.1%), and insufficient time (54.1%). Facilitators chosen by respondents included another health professional assigned to follow up with PN (77.4%) and improved remuneration (74.7%). Electronic PN tools directed at patients (eg, PN slips) were favoured over resources directed at providers.Conclusion Family physicians regularly manage STIs and currently take part in PN primarily through educating index cases. However, most do not feel that PN should be conducted by FPs, and most believe that FP-initiated PN would require additional personnel, remuneration, and legal guidance. ER -