Table 2.

Characteristics of and follow-up recommendations for discharged patients, stratified by hospital: All statistical analyses were not significant.

CHARACTERISTICS AND RECOMMENDATIONSHEJ (N = 234), N (%)HDL (N =134), N (%)CHUL (N = 56), N (%)
Age
  • ≥ 65 y57 (24.4)38 (28.3)13 (23.2)
  • ≥ 45 y167 (71.3)100 (74.6)38 (67.8)
Past medical history
  • CAD16 (6.8)19 (14.1)6 (10.7)
  • COPD27 (11.5)7 (5.2)1 (1.8)
  • Diabetes10 (10.6)9 (6.7)2 (3.6)
No. of rib fractures on ED radiographs*
  • 164 (27.6)28 (21.1)17 (30.3)
  • 246 (19.8)23 (17.2)11 (19.6)
  • 321 (9.1)12 (9.0)5 (8.9)
  • ≤ 414 (6.0)7 (5.3)0
  • Clinical diagnosis (ie, no rib fractures on x-ray scans)87 (37.5)63 (47.4)23 (41.1)
Injury mechanism*
  • Fall from the patient’s own height103 (44.9)52 (41.9)27 (50.0)
  • Fall from greater than the patient’s own height48 (21.0)28 (22.6)8 (14.8)
  • MVC26 (11.3)13 (10.5)6 (11.1)
  • Pedestrian and MVC2 (0.9)1 (0.8)0
  • Direct blunt injury37 (16.2)25 (20.1)9 (16.7)
  • Other13 (5.7)5 (4.0)4 (7.4)
Follow-up recommendations
  • Come back if there are any red flag symptoms79 (33.6)47 (33.1)13 (20.3)
  • Go see family doctor31 (13.2)22 (15.5)12 (18.8)
  • Surgical consultation3 (1.8)
  • No recommendation123 (52.3)78 (54.7)35 (54.7)
  • CAD—coronary artery disease, CHUL—Centre Hospitalier de l’Université Laval, COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ED—emergency department, HDL—Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, HEJ—Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus, MVC—motor vehicle collision.

  • * Missing data were noted on chart review for injury mechanism and number of rib fractures on ED radiographs.

  • Patients might have had more than 1 recommendation noted during review.