Table 5.

Mean scores on the practice monitor-evaluate scale: Respondents answered the question “Does your practice site use the following methods to monitor and/or evaluate the effectiveness of services/programs it offers?” using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = definitely not or never to 4 = definitely or always).

TYPE OF ACTIVITY OR SCORECHC N = 34FFS AND FHG N = 34FHN N = 35HSO N = 31P VALUE
Surveys of the practice patients3.91.51.81.9< .001
Community surveys3.51.51.51.5< .001
Feedback from community organizations or community advisory boards3.51.61.61.8< .001
Feedback from the practice staff3.73.22.93.4< .001
Analysis of local data or vital statistics3.31.72.02.0< .001
Systematic evaluations of the practice programs and services provided3.41.71.92.0< .001
Community health workers3.61.71.62.2< .001
Have a patient on the board of directors or advisory committee3.61.21.31.3< .001
Other (please specify)*2201NA
Overall monitor-evaluate score0.850.450.470.53< .001
Proportion of scores below 0.506656342< .001
Proportion of practices indicating no activities33300.82
  • CHC—community health centre, FFS—fee for service, FHG—family health group, FHN—family health network, HSO—health service organization, NA—not applicable, STIs—sexually transmitted infections, TB—tuberculosis.

  • * Number of practices providing a response.

  • Overall score is the average score normalized (divided by 4).