Table 2

Results from the REFLECT rubric, the CanMEDS understanding scores, and the LEAP rubric

STORYLEAP RUBRIC*DID THE STORY SHOW UNDERSTANDING ABOUT THE SPECIFIED CanMEDS ROLE?REFLECT RUBRIC DESCRIPTIVE ELEMENTS FOR EVALUATING NARRATIVES
VOICE AND PRESENCEDESCRIPTION OF CONFLICT OR DISORIENTING DILEMMA, INSIGHT, AND REFLECTIONATTENDING TO EMOTIONSCRITICAL ANALYSIS AND MEANING MAKINGOVERARCHING CONCEPT OR CONSTRUCT OR DEFINITION
Story 1 (V)333.53333
Story 2 (V)4333333
Story 3 (V)02332.533
Story 4 (V)5444444
Story 5 (C)4343333
Story 6 (C)4443333
Story 7 (C)5443.5343
Story 8 (C)4443333
  • C—classroom group, V—virtual group.

  • * Possible scores range from 0 to 6, with higher numbers indicating more reflective capacity.

  • Scoring was as follows: 1—very little, 2—somewhat, 3—good, 4—excellent.

  • Scoring was as follows: 1—unsatisfactory, 2—needs improvement, 3—satisfactory, 4—superior.