Summary of the 21 articles included in the scoping review of primary care and SCI
STUDY DETAILS | METHODS | OUTCOME |
---|---|---|
Ashe et al,162009; Canada; D&B score* = 11; survey; N = 22 | Population: 22 physiatrists treating patients with SCI Treatment: None Purpose: To assess opinions about bone health and treatments among physiatrists Outcome measures: A survey assessing opinions and practice patterns relating to bone health after SCI |
|
Munce et al,17 2009; Canada; D&B score = 12; observational; N = 559 | Population: 559 adult (136 female) patients with SCI, > 1 y after discharge from acute care Treatment: None Purpose: To examine physician use from various Ontario health databases for the years 2003 to 2006 Outcome measures: Physician use, including FP, specialist, and ED; Charlson index (comorbidity) and Rurality Index for Ontario |
|
Van Loo et al,18 2010; Netherlands; D&B score = 12; survey; N = 453 | Population: 453 adults with SCI; average 13 y after injury Treatment: None Purpose: To determine care and needs related to secondary conditions, and to determine if the secondary conditions were preventable Outcome measures: Questionnaire on frequency of SCI-related contacts with health professionals in past year, secondary conditions, and how the condition could have been prevented |
|
Bloemen-Vrencken et al,19 2007; Netherlands; D&B score = 15; prospective controlled study; N = 62 | Population: 62 adults with SCI in first year after discharge (31 experimental and 31 control subjects) Purpose: To evaluate nurse-led outreach from rehabilitation to primary care Treatment: Transmural care (nurse as a liaison between patient, primary care, and rehabilitation centre) in addition to usual follow-up care Control: Usual follow-up including periodic outpatient visits to rehabilitation centre Outcome measures: Prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; number and duration of readmissions to hospital and rehabilitation centres owing to pressure sores or bladder and bowel problems in the first year after discharge |
|
Booth and Kendall,20 2007; Australia; D&B score = 9; observational; N = 40 | Population: 40 adults with new SCI discharged to non-metropolitan areas Purpose: To evaluate effectiveness of TR for people with SCI in rural Australia Treatment: Home-based TR program; multidisciplinary team allowed completion of rehabilitation in real-world environment Outcome measures: Benefits and challenges of TR programs |
|
Donnelly et al,21 2007; Canada, United States, and United Kingdom; D&B score = 10; survey; N = 373 | Population: 373 individuals with SCI, average 36 y after injury Treatment: None Purpose: To describe use, accessibility, and satisfaction with primary and preventive health care services; to compare across Canada, United States, and United Kingdom Outcome measures: HCQ, PSHCPS |
|
Gontkovsky et al,22 2007; United States; D&B score = 12; survey; N = 82 | Population: 82 patients with SCI, average 7 y after injury; mean (SD) age 42 (14) y Treatment: None Purpose: To examine the perceived information needs of individuals with chronic SCI and determine the factors that influence these needs Outcome measures: Questionnaire on access to health information since inpatient discharge (23 domains) |
|
Collins et al,23 2005; United States; D&B score = 16; survey; N = 853 | Population: 853 veterans with SCI; mean age 59 y Treatment: None Purpose: To assess patient satisfaction with the annual CPHE Outcome: Survey of satisfaction with CPHE, whether needs were met, what respondents valued about the examination, and health concerns they would like to see addressed |
|
Goetz et al,24 2005; United States; D&B score = 13; posttest; N = 4432 | Population: 4432 veterans with SCI; mean age 54 y Purpose: To evaluate effect of CPG on bowel care Treatment: CPG for management of neurogenic bowel; implementation strategies included practice tools such as reporting forms and flow sheets Outcome measures: Adherence measured before implementation (T1), after publication (T2), and after targeted dissemination and implementation strategies (T3) |
|
McDermott et al,25 2005; United States; D&B score = 15; observational; N = 35 SCI patients | Population: 35 adults with SCI, mean age 35y; total sample 3636 (1552 with disability, 2084 controls) Treatment: None Purpose: To determine rate of depression among individuals with disabilities Outcome measures: Review of computerized medical records from 1990 to 2003 and companion paper records |
|
Williams,26 2005; United Kingdom; D&B score = 4; survey; N = 31 | Population: 31 adults with SCI seen at a community clinic Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of follow-up clinics to promote improved health information Treatment: Nurse-led clinic; holistic nursing assessment and peer support Outcome measures: Effectiveness of nurse-led services |
|
Prabhaka and Thakker,27 2004; India; D&B score = 8; posttest; N = 546 | Population: 546 adults with SCI living in communities across India Purpose: To evaluate the effects of long-distance home visiting as an alternative to clinical follow-up for rural areas Treatment: A home visit program with an outreach team (counselor, surgeon, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, prosthetist, orthotist, social worker, nurse); aim to decrease the rate of hospital readmissions Outcome measures: Complete assessment including bladder and bowel function, sexual rehabilitation, problems faced by SCI patients and family, social relations, available support, and opportunities for vocational rehabilitation |
|
Beatty et al,28 2003; United States; D&B score = 14; survey; N = 800 (169 with SCI) | Population: 169 adults with SCI; total sample 800 Treatment: None Purpose: To survey patterns of need and access to specific health care services, and factors identified as predictors of access Outcome measure: 80-item self-report questionnaire on perceived need for and access to PCP, SC, PR, AE, PM; analyzed by health plan (fee-for-service and managed care) |
|
Beck and Scroggins,29 2001; United States; D&B score = 6; posttest; N = 19 | Population: 3 adults with quadriplegia and 16 long-term health care providers Purpose: To evaluate an interdisciplinary education and support program Treatment: Health Maintenance Education Program including interdisciplinary workshop, collaborative home visit for individualized assessment, education and intervention, ongoing support Outcome measures: Program evaluation forms |
|
Vaidyanathan et al,30 2001; United Kingdom; D&B score = 10; survey; N = 128 | Population: 128 SCI patients attending regional follow-up clinic Treatment: None Purpose: To assess need for information about changes in condition; to assess potential for information to cause anxiety to patients, relatives, or caregivers Outcome measures: 28-item survey |
|
Cox et al,31 2001; Australia; D&B score = 9; survey; N = 54 | Population: 54 adults with SCI, mean age 39 y Treatment: None Purpose: To assess the nature and extent of unmet health needs Outcome measures: Telephone survey of need for specialist multidisciplinary outreach service, most important barriers to meeting needs, preferred service delivery options |
|
Oshima et al,32 1998; United States; D&B score = 9; survey; N = 44 | Population: 30 IM and 14 ObGyn residents Purpose: To assess knowledge and comfort of medical residents to provide sexual and reproductive care to patients with SCI Treatment: None Outcome measures: Students were asked how they would treat a hypothetical case of a pregnant woman with quadriplegia; questions addressed conducting an examination, dealing with spasticity, transferring the patient to the examination table, self-rating of comfort level in managing the patient |
|
Bockeneck,33 1997; United States; D&B score = 8; survey; N = 144 | Population: 144 SCI outpatients Treatment: None Purpose: To survey if primary care needs of outpatients with SCI were met Outcome measures: Self-reported survey assessing the ability of the local community to provide primary care services, and to determine whether additional services were needed from a rehabilitation facility |
|
Glickman et al,34 1996; England; survey; D&B score = 6; N = 139 | Population: 139 GPs with SCI patients Treatment: None Purpose: To examine the workload and common problems facing primary care teams in SCI management Outcome measures: Mailed survey inquiring about annual number of consultations with the patient; prevalence of gastrointestinal, urologic, and dermatologic problems, pain, and spasticity |
|
Francisco et al,35 1995; United States; D&B score = 11; survey; N = 104 | Population: 54 physiatrists and 50 physiatry residents Treatment: None Purpose: To determine physiatrists’ and residents’ opinions on their competency, qualification, and desire to provide primary care for patients Outcome: Self-report questionnaire on level of training regarding primary care provision by physiatrists; reasons why or why not to provide primary care; disabled patients that should receive primary care by physiatrists |
|
Warms,36 1987; United States; D&B score = 9; survey; N = 59 | Population: 59 adults with SCI, at least 2 y after injury; age 21 to 60 y Treatment: None Purpose: To survey health care received by individuals with SCI and to describe what health care services are desired Outcome measures: A self-reported survey assessing source of health care, content of care, and health care services desired but not obtained |
|
AE—assistive equipment, CPG—clinical practice guideline, CPHE—comprehensive preventive health evaluation, ED—emergency department, HCQ—Health Care Questionnaire, IM—internal medicine, LCP—local care provider, MRI—magnetic resonance imaging, ObGyn—obstetrics and gynecology, OR—odds ratio, PCP—primary care physician, PM—prescription medications, PR—physical rehabilitation, PSHCPS—Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Provider Scale, SC—specialist care, SCI—spinal cord injury, SIS—spinal injury specialist, TBI—traumatic brain injury, TR—transitional rehabilitation.
↵* Methodologic rigour score, evaluated on a scale from 1 to 20, with higher scores corresponding with higher levels of methodologic rigour; Downs and Black, 1998.37