Table 1

Summary of the 21 articles included in the scoping review of primary care and SCI

STUDY DETAILSMETHODSOUTCOME
Ashe et al,162009; Canada; D&B score* = 11; survey; N = 22Population: 22 physiatrists treating patients with SCI
Treatment: None
Purpose: To assess opinions about bone health and treatments among physiatrists
Outcome measures: A survey assessing opinions and practice patterns relating to bone health after SCI
  • 86% of physiatrists considered bone health after SCI to be an important issue

  • Most physiatrists reported that pharmacologic treatments were most beneficial, whereas rehabilitation modalities had lower support for effectiveness

Munce et al,17 2009; Canada; D&B score = 12; observational; N = 559Population: 559 adult (136 female) patients with SCI, > 1 y after discharge from acute care
Treatment: None
Purpose: To examine physician use from various
Ontario health databases for the years 2003 to 2006
Outcome measures: Physician use, including FP, specialist, and ED; Charlson index (comorbidity) and Rurality Index for Ontario
  • Women had a higher number of FP visits; men had a higher number of specialist visits (physiatrist)

  • Older (≥ 70 y) age (OR = 3.64), discharge to chronic care (OR = 3.62), and in-hospital complications (OR = 2.34) associated with > 50 visits/y

  • Younger age (OR = 0.19) and direct discharge to chronic care (OR = 11.52) were associated with ≥ 50 specialist visits/y

  • Rurality Index for Ontario results predicted ≥ 2 visits to the ED (OR = 2.16)

Van Loo et al,18 2010; Netherlands; D&B score = 12; survey; N = 453Population: 453 adults with SCI; average 13 y after injury
Treatment: None
Purpose: To determine care and needs related to secondary conditions, and to determine if the secondary conditions were preventable
Outcome measures: Questionnaire on frequency of SCI-related contacts with health professionals in past year, secondary conditions, and how the condition could have been prevented
  • 77% had SCI-related contact with their general physicians, 57% with physiatrists, and 65% with other specialists

  • On average, participants mentioned 8 secondary conditions, including bladder and bowel regulation, pain, spasms, sexual problems, and pressure sores

  • 50% of the pressure sores and 25% of the bladder, bowel, and sexual problems could have been prevented according to the participants

  • 72% indicated the need for additional care of secondary conditions

Bloemen-Vrencken et al,19 2007; Netherlands; D&B score = 15; prospective controlled study; N = 62Population: 62 adults with SCI in first year after discharge (31 experimental and 31 control subjects)
Purpose: To evaluate nurse-led outreach from rehabilitation to primary care
Treatment: Transmural care (nurse as a liaison between patient, primary care, and rehabilitation centre) in addition to usual follow-up care
Control: Usual follow-up including periodic outpatient visits to rehabilitation centre
Outcome measures: Prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; number and duration of readmissions to hospital and rehabilitation centres owing to pressure sores or bladder and bowel problems in the first year after discharge
  • No significant difference seen in prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections between groups

  • No significant differences seen in readmission rates between groups

  • Quality of follow-up care experienced not significantly different between groups

Booth and Kendall,20 2007; Australia; D&B score = 9; observational; N = 40Population: 40 adults with new SCI discharged to non-metropolitan areas
Purpose: To evaluate effectiveness of TR for people with SCI in rural Australia
Treatment: Home-based TR program; multidisciplinary team allowed completion of rehabilitation in real-world environment
Outcome measures: Benefits and challenges of TR programs
  • Extra time and resources allowed TR staff to coordinate with LCPs, increase family involvement, enhance social and community supports, and ensure availability of specialist support for equipment, mobility, and adjustment problems

Donnelly et al,21 2007; Canada, United States, and United Kingdom; D&B score = 10; survey; N = 373Population: 373 individuals with SCI, average 36 y after injury
Treatment: None
Purpose: To describe use, accessibility, and satisfaction with primary and preventive health care services; to compare across Canada, United States, and United Kingdom
Outcome measures: HCQ, PSHCPS
  • 93% had FPs, 63% had SISs, and 56% had both; 36% had only FPs, 6% had only SISs, and 1% had no doctor at all

  • Issues of sexual health, alcohol use, community functioning, and emotional health were not addressed for > 70% of participants

  • The highest use of FPs was for pain (86%, P < .05) and fatigue (84%, P < .05); the highest use of SISs was for routine rehabilitation follow-up (91%, P < .05)

  • FPs showed problems with physical accessibility of office and equipment

  • Satisfaction was rated as 74% for FPs and 76% for SISs

Gontkovsky et al,22 2007; United States; D&B score = 12; survey; N = 82Population: 82 patients with SCI, average 7 y after injury; mean (SD) age 42 (14) y
Treatment: None
Purpose: To examine the perceived information needs of individuals with chronic SCI and determine the factors that influence these needs
Outcome measures: Questionnaire on access to health information since inpatient discharge (23 domains)
  • Information needed on aging (73%) and SCI research (66%)

  • ≥ 16% of the sample reported information needs in each of the 23 domains

  • Ethnic minority participants endorsed considerably more information needs

Collins et al,23 2005; United States; D&B score = 16; survey; N = 853Population: 853 veterans with SCI; mean age 59 y
Treatment: None
Purpose: To assess patient satisfaction with the annual CPHE
Outcome: Survey of satisfaction with CPHE, whether needs were met, what respondents valued about the examination, and health concerns they would like to see addressed
  • 76% of respondents had completed CPHEs within the previous year

  • Main reason was to get medication and supplies refilled and to talk to doctors

  • Topics discussed during the CPHE were muscle strength and weakness, bladder care, chronic pain, digestion and bowel care issues, and equipment problems

  • Satisfaction with the CPHE was 81%

  • Completion of the CPHE was related to other health care use and having health needs met

Goetz et al,24 2005; United States; D&B score = 13; posttest; N = 4432Population: 4432 veterans with SCI; mean age 54 y
Purpose: To evaluate effect of CPG on bowel care
Treatment: CPG for management of neurogenic bowel; implementation strategies included practice tools such as reporting forms and flow sheets
Outcome measures: Adherence measured before implementation (T1), after publication (T2), and after targeted dissemination and implementation strategies (T3)
  • Overall adherence to recommendations did not change between T1 and T2

  • Statistically significant increase in adherence for 3 of 6 recommendations from T2 to T3 (P < .001)

  • Publication alone did not alter adherence; targeted implementation increased adherence

McDermott et al,25 2005; United States; D&B score = 15; observational; N = 35 SCI patientsPopulation: 35 adults with SCI, mean age 35y; total sample 3636 (1552 with disability, 2084 controls)
Treatment: None
Purpose: To determine rate of depression among individuals with disabilities
Outcome measures: Review of computerized medical records from 1990 to 2003 and companion paper records
  • Patients with disabilities have significantly higher rates of depression (P = .019)

  • 28.6% of people with SCI were found to be depressed

  • Trauma (SCI and TBI) related to significantly earlier onset of depression compared with controls (P = .0007)

  • By age 50 y, 16% to 17% of patients with trauma had depression; by age 60 y, 45% of trauma patients had depression, compared with 18% of controls

Williams,26 2005; United Kingdom; D&B score = 4; survey; N = 31Population: 31 adults with SCI seen at a community clinic
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of follow-up clinics to promote improved health information
Treatment: Nurse-led clinic; holistic nursing assessment and peer support
Outcome measures: Effectiveness of nurse-led services
  • Participants reported benefits from nurses’ up-to-date knowledge of specific bowel or bladder problem-solving approaches

  • Participants perceived nurses to be more understanding and better informed; found sessions informative, practical, and helpful

Prabhaka and Thakker,27 2004; India; D&B score = 8; posttest; N = 546Population: 546 adults with SCI living in communities across India
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of long-distance home visiting as an alternative to clinical follow-up for rural areas
Treatment: A home visit program with an outreach team (counselor, surgeon, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, prosthetist, orthotist, social worker, nurse); aim to decrease the rate of hospital readmissions
Outcome measures: Complete assessment including bladder and bowel function, sexual rehabilitation, problems faced by SCI patients and family, social relations, available support, and opportunities for vocational rehabilitation
  • Home visit program decreased the number of readmissions, improved status of rehabilitation, and raised quality of care for patients

Beatty et al,28 2003; United States; D&B score = 14; survey; N = 800 (169 with SCI)Population: 169 adults with SCI; total sample 800
Treatment: None
Purpose: To survey patterns of need and access to specific health care services, and factors identified as predictors of access
Outcome measure: 80-item self-report questionnaire on perceived need for and access to PCP, SC, PR, AE, PM; analyzed by health plan (fee-for-service and managed care)
  • Overall need for health services: 62.7% reported a need for PCP, 57.4% for SC, 39.1% for PR, 69.2% for AE, and 94.1% for PM

  • Need vs actual receipt of services: Only 67% of needed PCP care was received, 75.3% of SC, 40.9% of PR, 69.2% of AE, and 93.1% of PM

  • Factors affecting access: health plan type, condition, health status, severity, coverage, income, age. No differences were found across sex and region of residence

Beck and Scroggins,29 2001; United States; D&B score = 6; posttest; N = 19Population: 3 adults with quadriplegia and 16 long-term health care providers
Purpose: To evaluate an interdisciplinary education and support program
Treatment: Health Maintenance Education Program including interdisciplinary workshop, collaborative home visit for individualized assessment, education and intervention, ongoing support
Outcome measures: Program evaluation forms
  • Significant increase in knowledge of prevention of respiratory complications (P < .05), prevention and treatment of autonomic dysreflexia (P < .05), prevention of spasticity (P < .01), reportable symptoms (P < .01), effects of aging (P < .001), availability of community resources (P < .01)

Vaidyanathan et al,30 2001; United Kingdom; D&B score = 10; survey; N = 128Population: 128 SCI patients attending regional follow-up clinic
Treatment: None
Purpose: To assess need for information about changes in condition; to assess potential for information to cause anxiety to patients, relatives, or caregivers
Outcome measures: 28-item survey
  • 83% of patients wished to receive written information following clinic visits

  • 93% wished for information about changes in their medical conditions after readmission to the spinal unit

  • 90% wanted copies of MRI results with interpretation and wanted them shared with their GPs

  • 95% thought that written information would not cause needless anxiety

Cox et al,31 2001; Australia; D&B score = 9; survey; N = 54Population: 54 adults with SCI, mean age 39 y
Treatment: None
Purpose: To assess the nature and extent of unmet health needs
Outcome measures: Telephone survey of need for specialist multidisciplinary outreach service, most important barriers to meeting needs, preferred service delivery options
  • 25% indicated high or very-high need for specialist outreach services

  • Barriers to meeting health needs included limited local expert knowledge (81%), inadequate funding (56%), complicated process or service fragmentation (31%)

  • Preferred mode of service delivery: telephone advice (79%) or home visiting (43%)

Oshima et al,32 1998; United States; D&B score = 9; survey; N = 44Population: 30 IM and 14 ObGyn residents
Purpose: To assess knowledge and comfort of medical residents to provide sexual and reproductive care to patients with SCI
Treatment: None
Outcome measures: Students were asked how they would treat a hypothetical case of a pregnant woman with quadriplegia; questions addressed conducting an examination, dealing with spasticity, transferring the patient to the examination table, self-rating of comfort level in managing the patient
  • 75% of IM and 67% of ObGyn residents would conduct a pelvic examination

  • 53% of IM and 64% of ObGyn residents would ask staff to lift the patient on the table; 21% of ObGyn residents reported access to an elevating table

  • 40% of IM residents said they did not have the necessary resources or knowledge

  • 17% of IM and 14% of ObGyn residents did not know how to manage spasticity; 36% expressed concern about spasticity

  • 43% would refer to physiatry

  • Most reported comfort level as neutral to uncomfortable

Bockeneck,33 1997; United States; D&B score = 8; survey; N = 144Population: 144 SCI outpatients
Treatment: None
Purpose: To survey if primary care needs of outpatients with SCI were met
Outcome measures: Self-reported survey assessing the ability of the local community to provide primary care services, and to determine whether additional services were needed from a rehabilitation facility
  • 50% of SCI outpatients considered their rehabilitation physician to be their PCP

  • 48% had general medical problems treated by GPs

  • 96% of SCI patients reported that their physicians’ offices were accessible

  • 90% had no difficulty receiving medical care in the community

  • 51% of SCI patients preferred obtaining all medical care at a rehabilitation facility

Glickman et al,34 1996; England; survey; D&B score = 6; N = 139Population: 139 GPs with SCI patients
Treatment: None
Purpose: To examine the workload and common problems facing primary care teams in SCI management
Outcome measures: Mailed survey inquiring about annual number of consultations with the patient; prevalence of gastrointestinal, urologic, and dermatologic problems, pain, and spasticity
  • Average annual consultation rate with GP in surgery = 4.03; GP home visit = 4.57; other team member in surgery = 0.56; other team member home visit = 50.94

  • 78.5% of SCI patients had multiple current health problems; 11.5% had 0 problems; 10.1% had 1 problem

  • 72% had urologic problems; 49.6% had bowel issues; 41.7% had skin problems; 65.5% had spasticity; 55.4% had pain

  • 29.5% were offered psychological or social counseling

Francisco et al,35 1995; United States; D&B score = 11; survey; N = 104Population: 54 physiatrists and 50 physiatry residents
Treatment: None
Purpose: To determine physiatrists’ and residents’ opinions on their competency, qualification, and desire to provide primary care for patients
Outcome: Self-report questionnaire on level of training regarding primary care provision by physiatrists; reasons why or why not to provide primary care; disabled patients that should receive primary care by physiatrists
  • 53% believed physiatrists were competent to provide primary care; only 40% were willing to assume the role

  • 38% believed that physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs adequately trained physiatrists in primary care

  • Conditions for which most respondents believed that primary care should be provided by physiatrists were SCI (60%) and brain injury (51%)

Warms,36 1987; United States; D&B score = 9; survey; N = 59Population: 59 adults with SCI, at least 2 y after injury; age 21 to 60 y
Treatment: None
Purpose: To survey health care received by individuals with SCI and to describe what health care services are desired
Outcome measures: A self-reported survey assessing source of health care, content of care, and health care services desired but not obtained
  • 54.2% reported consulting rehabilitation medicine physicians in the past year; 44% consulted FPs in the past year

  • 80% of issues raised were related to disability

  • 52.9% discussed bladder or kidney problems, 47.1% discussed pressure sore prevention, 23% reported spasticity, and 23% discussed bowel issues

  • Unmet needs were reported for health promotion, fitness, and diet

  • AE—assistive equipment, CPG—clinical practice guideline, CPHE—comprehensive preventive health evaluation, ED—emergency department, HCQ—Health Care Questionnaire, IM—internal medicine, LCP—local care provider, MRI—magnetic resonance imaging, ObGyn—obstetrics and gynecology, OR—odds ratio, PCP—primary care physician, PM—prescription medications, PR—physical rehabilitation, PSHCPS—Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Provider Scale, SC—specialist care, SCI—spinal cord injury, SIS—spinal injury specialist, TBI—traumatic brain injury, TR—transitional rehabilitation.

  • * Methodologic rigour score, evaluated on a scale from 1 to 20, with higher scores corresponding with higher levels of methodologic rigour; Downs and Black, 1998.37