MODEL OF PRIMARY CARE | LEAST SQUARE MEAN ESTIMATES OF PROVIDER-REPORTED FCC, BY MODEL OF PRIMARY CARE SERVICE DELIVERY, CRUDE AND ADJUSTED ANALYSIS | ||
---|---|---|---|
UNADJUSTED FCC ESTIMATE (95% CI) | ADJUSTED (PATIENT*) FCC ESTIMATE (95% CI) | ADJUSTED (PATIENT* AND PROVIDER†) FCC ESTIMATE (95% CI) | |
CHC | 0.89 (0.87 to 0.91)‡ | 0.89 (0.87 to 0.91)§ | 0.89 (0.86 to 0.91)|| |
FFS | 0.84 (0.82 to 0.87) | 0.84 (0.81 to 0.87) | 0.84 (0.81 to 0.88) |
FHN | 0.82 (0.80 to 0.85) | 0.82 (0.80 to 0.85) | 0.83 (0.80 to 0.85) |
HSO | 0.83 (0.80 to 0.86) | 0.83 (0.80 to 0.87) | 0.84 (0.80 to 0.88) |
CHC—community health centre, FCC–family-centred care, FFS—fee for service, FHN—family health network, HSO–health service organization.
↵* Adjusted for patient sex, annual household income, length of time attending the practice, and the number of family members attending the practice.
↵† Adjusted for provider sex and length of routine visit.
↵‡ Significant pairwise comparisons with Tukey adjustment as follows (mean difference [95% CI]): CHC > FFS, 0.047 (0.015 to 0.079), P = .024; CHC > FHN, 0.066 (0.037 to 0.096), P < .001; CHC > HSO, 0.061 (0.026 to 0.095), P = .004.
↵§ Significant pairwise comparisons with Tukey adjustment as follows (mean difference [95% CI]): CHC > FHN, 0.069 (0.029 to 0.108), P = .004.
↵|| Significant pairwise comparisons with Tukey adjustment as follows (mean difference [95% CI]): CHC > FHN, 0.061 (0.017 to 0.105), P = .035.