RECOMMENDATION | DISCUSSION |
---|---|
Install a desktop calculator having characteristics congruent with your practice | CCS algorithms using FRS might be most appropriate for Canada8,10 Quantification of dietary, exercise, and statin interventions are helpful Tool should include the following:
|
Use 10-y CVD risk as threshold for treatment in place of LDL level | LDL levels are referenced only as extremes of the primary prevention spectrum and are no longer used as thresholds for intervention |
Abandon treatment goals | In place of treatment goals ...
|
Use statin dosing according to level of FRS and patient tolerance | If intolerant, remember that a low-dose statin can give two-thirds of maximal lipid lowering13 High-risk patients require high-intensity dosing or maximally tolerated dosing Myalgia might respond to changes in dosing, timing, statin type, or dosing intensity14 |
Abandon hsCRP measurement as part of risk assessment | No longer part of treatment decision |
Treat all patients with diabetes aged 40 to 75 y according to recommendations | Treat with moderate-intensity statin if no risk factors are present Treat with high-intensity statin if risk factors are present or the 10-y CVD risk is ≥ 7.5% |
Treat all adults with LDL ≥ 5.0 mmol/L according to recommendations | Consider a secondary cause or familial hyperlipidemia Consider consultation |
Make the patient part of the intervention decision | A lifestyle commitment can modify risk and reduce need for drug use15 Patients’ understanding of absolute risk reduction using statins might influence treatment threshold A 10-y CVD risk treatment threshold of 7.5% is always negotiable |
CCS—Canadian Cardiovascular Society, CVD—cardiovascular disease, FRS—Framingham risk score, hsCRP—high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, LDL—low-density lipoprotein.