Table 3.

Summary of meta-analyses comparing various durations of DAPT after coronary stent insertion

OUTCOMESSTUDY-DEFINED LONG (12, 18, 24, 30, AND 36 MO) VS SHORT (3, 6, AND 12 MO) DAPT24–31EXTENDED (18, 30, AND 36 MO) VS STANDARD (12 MO) DAPT24–28,30,31ABBREVIATED (3 AND 6 MO) VS STANDARD (12 AND 24 MO) DAPT24–28,30,31
Benefit
  • MIARR = 0.7%–1%; NNT = 100–143ARR = 1%–1.4%; NNT = 71–100NS
  • Stent thrombosisARR = 0.4%; NNT = 250ARR = 0.6%–0.7%; NNT = 143–167NS
Harm
  • All-cause mortalityARI = 0.3%; NNH = 334* (3 of 7 meta-analyses were NS)ARI = 0.4%; NNH = 250* (3 of 8 meta-analyses were NS)NS
  • Major bleedingARI = 0.5%–0.8%; NNH = 143–200ARI = 0.7%–1.1%; NNH = 91–143ARI = 0.2%–0.4%; NNH = 250–500
No benefit or harm
  • Cardiovascular mortalityNSNSNS
  • StrokeNSNSNS
  • ARI—absolute risk increase, ARR—absolute risk reduction, DAPT—dual antiplatelet therapy, MI—myocardial infarction, NNH—number needed to harm, NNT—number needed to treat, NS—not statistically significant

  • * Increased all-cause mortality risk was not found in all meta-analyses comparing different durations of DAPT.