Table 2.

Multivariate models for the odds of providing obstetric care (2005–2006 to 2011–2012)

VARIABLESMODEL
DELIVERIES, OR (95% CI)ANY OBSTETRIC CARE, OR (95% CI)
Female sex0.84 (0.72–0.98)*1.46 (1.27–1.69)
Year (continuous)0.92 (0.89–0.95)0.92 (0.89–0.95)
Female sex–year interaction1.05 (1.02–1.09)1.02 (0.99–1.04)
Rurality-time interaction
  • Metropolitan0.98 (0.94–1.01)1.01 (0.98–1.04)
  • Urban0.97 (0.93–1.00)0.96 (0.92–1.00)*
Age, y
  • 35 to < 45 y0.76 (0.69–0.85)0.78 (0.71–0.86)
  • 45 to < 55 y0.79 (0.70–0.88)0.76 (0.68–0.84)
  • 55 to < 65 y0.63 (0.55–0.71)0.68 (0.61–0.76)
  • ≥ 65 y0.36 (0.30–0.44)0.50 (0.44–0.58)
Rurality
  • Metropolitan0.29 (0.24–0.35)0.52 (0.43–0.63)
  • Urban0.71 (0.58–0.87)*0.84 (0.68–1.04)
International training1.30 (1.08–1.56)*1.69 (1.39–2.05)
Rurality-training interaction
  • Metropolitan-international0.70 (0.55–0.89)*0.80 (0.64–0.99)*
  • Urban-international0.80 (0.63–1.02)0.87 (0.68–1.10)
Higher proportion of alternative payments0.35 (0.30–0.41)0.30 (0.27–0.33)
Higher proportion of contacts with female patients aged 18–44 y14.26 (10.78–18.87)2.79 (2.18–3.58)
Higher proportion of contacts with patients with ≥ 1 major ADGs0.44 (0.73–1.20)0.34 (0.28–0.41)
Higher proportion of contacts with patients in the lowest income quintile0.48 (0.32–0.60)0.67 (0.53–0.86)*
  • ADG—Aggregated Diagnostic Groups, OR—odds ratio.

  • * P < .05.

  • P < .0001.

  • P < .001.