Table 2.

Sample characteristics of interview respondents

CHARACTERISTICFAMILY PHYSICIANS
n (%), N = 17
PEDIATRICIANS
n (%), N = 4
MIDWIVES
n (%), N = 13*
TOTAL
n (%), N = 34
Practice setting
  • Academic 0 (0.0)1 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.9)
  • Non-academic17 (100.0)3 (75.0)13 (100.0)33 (97.1)
Practice type
  • Solo 1 (5.9)0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 2 (5.9)
  • Group16 (94.1)4 (100.0)12 (92.3)32 (94.1)
Method of reimbursement
  • Fee-for-service§ 4 (23.5)3 (75.0) 0 (0.0) 7 (20.6)
  • Non–fee-for-service13 (76.5)1 (25.0)13 (100.0)27 (79.4)
Practice location
  • Urban 9 (52.9)4 (100.0)10 (76.9)23 (67.6)
  • Rural 8 (47.1)0 (0.0)3 (23.1)11 (32.4)
Years in practice
  • 0-1513 (76.5)3 (75.0)11 (84.6)27 (79.4)
  • ≥ 16 4 (23.5)1 (25.0) 2 (15.4) 7 (20.6)
Sex
  • Female14 (82.4)4 (100.0)13 (100.0)31 (91.2)
  • Male 3 (17.6)0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (8.8)
Practice-based exposure to …
  • CF 4 (23.5)2 (50.0) 3 (23.1) 9 (26.5)
  • CF carrier 6 (35.3)1 (25.0) 6 (46.2)13 (38.2)
  • NBS results positive for CF 4 (23.5)2 (50.0) 7 (53.8)13 (38.2)
  • NBS results positive for another disorder 5 (29.4)4 (100.0) 8 (61.5)17 (50.0)
  • CF—cystic fibrosis, NBS—newborn screening.

  • *Fifteen midwives were interviewed but the audio for 1 interview (with 2 midwives) did not record properly, so data are reported for 13 participants.

  • Includes providers who see any patients in academic health sciences centres.

  • Includes interprofessional practice as well as single-discipline group practice.

  • §Includes providers who reported any fee-for-service. Midwives in Ontario are publicly funded but not fee-for-service.