Table 3.

Primary care providers’ perspectives on NBS and notification of results

CHARACTERISTICFAMILY PHYSICIANS
n (%), N = 208*
PEDIATRICIANS
n (%), N = 68*
MIDWIVES
n (%), N = 45*
P VALUE
Up to date on NBS< .01
  • Strongly agree or agree90 (43.7)57 (85.1)35 (81.4)
  • Strongly disagree, disagree, or neutral116 (56.3)10 (14.7)8 (18.6)
Important role in NBS in general< .01
  • Strongly agree or agree153 (74.3)59 (88.1)44 (100.0)
  • Strongly disagree, disagree, or neutral53 (25.7)8 (11.9)0 (0.0)
Important role in notification of NBS results.07
  • Strongly agree or agree183 (88.4)56 (83.6)44 (97.8)
  • Strongly disagree, disagree, or neutral24 (11.6)11 (16.4)1 (2.2)
Confidence regarding notification.17
  • Extremely or very confident132 (63.8)51 (75.0)36 (80.0)
  • Moderately confident57 (27.5)14 (20.6)8 (17.8)
  • Not very or not at all confident18 (8.7)3 (4.4)1 (2.2)
Perceived barriers to notifying within 3 d.02
  • Extremely or very significant17 (8.2)7 (10.3)0 (0.0)
  • Moderately significant40 (19.3)22 (32.4)8 (17.8)
  • Not very or not at all significant150 (72.5)39 (57.4)37 (82.2)
Perceived barriers to notify within 1 d.01
  • Extremely or very significant72 (35.0)28 (43.1)9 (20.5)
  • Moderately significant65 (31.6)16 (24.6)9 (20.5)
  • Not very or not at all significant69 (33.5)21 (32.3)26 (59.1)
Preference for point-of-care information§< .01
  • Written information44 (21.7)13 (19.7)6 (13.6)
  • Verbal communication with treatment centre provider17 (8.4)2 (3.0)0 (0.0)
  • Both written and verbal120 (59.1)47 (71.2)38 (86.4)
  • Either written or verbal (does not matter which)22 (10.8)4 (6.1)0 (0.0)
  • NBS—newborn screening.

  • *Denominators vary owing to missing data.

  • Embedded Image2 test.

  • Fisher exact test.

  • §Excluded 7 respondents who selected more than 1 response and 1 who selected “other.”