Table 2.

Factors contributing to the need for improved teaching in preventive health care

FACTORCONCEPTS FOR TEACHING
Evolving understanding of the harms and benefits of screening
  • There is a trade-off between benefits and harms

  • A better understanding of concepts, such as overdiagnosis and the natural history of disease, related to screening decision making is needed

Multiplicity of guideline recommendations on screening
  • Guidelines can have conflicting recommendations on screening for the same condition

Rise of social media and online sources of health care information on screening
  • Patients have many sources of information that can be biased or misleading

  • Consider the media reliance of the survivor21,27

More rigorous methods for evaluating the quality of evidence
  • Use GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation28

New tools to evaluate guideline trustworthiness and quality
  • Use G-TRUST: Guideline Trustworthiness, Relevance, and Utility Scoring Tool29

Need for effective communication with patients on the potential harms and benefits of screening
  • Use natural frequencies to foster insight

  • Use knowledge translation tools in decision making with patients

  • Recognize and employ shared decision making in clinical situations where there are trade-offs between harms and benefits

Evolution of strong patient advocacy groups on screening
  • Understand how belief systems influence clinical decision making

Need to understand the complex, adaptive nature of primary care
  • Screening decisions can be influenced by factors including patient values and preferences

  • Different patients with similar issues will make different screening choices