Table 6.

Comparison among the 3 pathways of patient demographic and clinical characteristics, length of episode, no. of visits, and health care impact variables for epigastric pain: N=65.

VARIABLEPATHWAY 1*
n=33 (50.8%)
PATHWAY 2*
n=10 (15.4%)
PATHWAY 3*
n=22 (33.8%)
Mean age, y55.6459.3059.86
Female sex, n (%)22 (66.7)8 (80.0)17 (77.3)
Prior psychological conditions, n (%) 7 (21.2)3 (30.0) 9 (40.9)
Prior chronic conditions, n (%) P=.00228 (84.8)4 (40.0)20 (90.9)
No. of visits, n (%)
    • 130 (90.9)0 (0.0)21 (95.5)
    • 21 (3.0)5 (50.0)1 (4.5)
    • ≥32 (6.1)5 (50.0)0 (0.0)
Mean length of episode, mo P<.0010.9410.100.00
Mean no. of visits P<.0011.242.701.05
Common diagnosesNAAnxiety
GI infection
Peptic ulcer
Esophageal disease (28.0%)
Anxiety
Stomach function disorder
Prescribed medications, n (%) P=.02527 (81.8)10 (100.0)13 (59.1)
Received investigations, n (%)13 (39.4)6 (60.0) 6 (27.3)
Received laboratory tests, n (%) 4 (12.1)1 (10.0)1 (4.5)
Received referrals, n (%) 4 (12.1)3 (30.0) 7 (31.8)
  • GI—gastrointestinal, NA—not applicable.

  • * Pathway 1—symptom remains with no diagnosis; pathway 2—diagnosis made and symptom persists; pathway 3—diagnosis made and no further visits for the symptom.

  • Tested using Embedded Image2 test.

  • Tested using ANOVA (analysis of variance).