Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients: Long-Term Outcomes

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of central venous stenosis in patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis. Five hundred sixty-three patients with AVFs who were referred for a fistulogram were enrolled in this study. Among them, 44 patients showed stenosis (n = 35) or occlusions (n = 9) in the central vein. For the initial treatment, 26 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and 15 patients underwent stent placements. Periods between AVF formation and first intervention ranged from 3 to 144 months. Each patient was followed for 14 to 60 months. Procedures were successful in 41 of 44 patients (93.2%). Primary patency rates for PTA at 12 and 36 months were 52.1% and 20.0%, and assisted primary patency rates were 77.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Primary patency rates for stent at 12 and 36 months were 46.7% and 6.7%, and assisted primary patency rates were 60.0% and 20.0%, respectively. Fifteen of 26 patients with PTAs underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis. Fourteen of 15 patients with a stent underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis and combined migration (n = 1) and shortening (n = 6) of the first stent. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement (> 0.05). Average AVF patency duration was 61.8 months and average number of endovascular treatments was 2.12. In conclusion, endovascular treatments of central venous stenosis could lengthen the available period of AVFs. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lumsden AB, MacDonald MJ, Isiklar H et al (1997) Central venous stenosis in the hemodialysis patient: incidence and efficacy of endovascular treatment. Cardiovasc Surg 5(5):504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwab SJ, Quarles LD, Middleton JP et al (1988) Hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis. Kidney Int 33(6):1156–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sprouse LR II, Lesar CJ, Meier GH III et al (2004) Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis [corrected]. J Vasc Surg 39(3):578–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayarragaray JE (2003) Surgical treatment of hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: another option to maintain vascular access. J Vasc Surg 37(5):1043–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wisselink W, Money SR, Becker MO et al (1993) Comparison of operative reconstruction and percutaneous balloon dilatation for central venous obstruction. Am J Surg 166(2):200–204 discussion 204–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maya ID, Saddekni S, Allon M (2007) Treatment of refractory central vein stenosis in hemodialysis patients with stents. Semin Dial 20(1):78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oderich GS, Treiman GS, Schneider P et al (2000) Stent placement for treatment of central and peripheral venous obstruction: a long-term multi-institutional experience. J Vasc Surg 32(4):760–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oderich GS, Treiman GS, Schneider P et al (2006) Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl 1):S176–S247

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dammers R, de Haan MW, Planken NR et al (2003) Central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: results of radiological and surgical intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(3):317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatia DS, Money SR, Ochsner JL et al (1996) Comparison of surgical bypass and percutaneous balloon dilatation with primary stent placement in the treatment of central venous obstruction in the dialysis patient: one-year follow-up. Ann Vasc Surg 10(5):452–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakken AM, Protack CD, Saad WE et al (2007) Long-term outcomes of primary angioplasty and primary stenting of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Surg 45(4):776–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal AK, Patel BM, Haddad NJ (2007) Central vein stenosis: a nephrologist’s perspective. Semin Dial 20(1):53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreno R, Fernandez C, Alfonso F et al (2004) Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels: a meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(11):1964–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeller T (2007) Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease. Vasc Med 12(3):223–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Sullivan GJ, Semba CP, Bittner CA et al (2000) Endovascular management of iliac vein compression (May-Thurner) syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(7):823–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Knipp BS, Ferguson E, Williams DM et al (2007) Factors associated with outcome after interventional treatment of symptomatic iliac vein compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg 46(4):743–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fillinger MF, Reinitz ER, Schwartz RA et al (1990) Graft geometry and venous intimal-medial hyperplasia in arteriovenous loop grafts. J Vasc Surg 11(4):556–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Itkin M, Kraus MJ, Trerotola SO (2004) Extrinsic compression of the left innominate vein in hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(1; Pt 1):51–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammer F, Becker D, Goffette P et al (2000) Crushed stents in benign left brachiocephalic vein stenoses. J Vasc Surg 32(2):392–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vesely TM, Hovsepian DM, Pilgram TK et al (1997) Upper extremity central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients: treatment with Wallstents. Radiology 204(2):343–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shoenfeld R, Hermans H, Novick A et al (1994) Stenting of proximal venous obstructions to maintain hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 19(3):532–538 discussion 538–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aytekin C, Boyvat F, Yagmurdur MC et al (2004) Endovascular stent placement in the treatment of upper extremity central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. Eur J Radiol 49(1):81–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maskova J, Komarkova J, Kivanek J et al (2003) Endovascular treatment of central vein stenoses and/or occlusions in hemodialysis patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 26(1):27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Honnef D, Wingen M, Gunther RW et al (2005) Sharp central venous recannalization by means of a TIPS needle. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 28(5):673–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrell T, Lang EV, Barnhart W (1999) Sharp recannalization of central venous occlusions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10(2; Pt 1):149–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajan DK, Saluja JS (2007) Use of nitinol stents following recannalization of central venous occlusions in hemodialysis patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(4):662–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verstandig AG, Bloom AI, Sasson T et al (2003) Shortening and migration of Wallstents after stenting of central venous stenoses in hemodialysis patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 26(1):58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamaguchi M, Sugimoto K, Zamora CA et al (2006) Placement of self-expanding stents with different diameters in the porcine venous system: an experimental study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17(1):113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Surowiec SM, Fegley AJ, Tanski WJ et al (2004) Endovascular management of central venous stenoses in the hemodialysis patient: results of percutaneous therapy. Vasc Endovascular Surg 38(4):349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Quinn SF, Schuman ES, Demlow TA et al (1995) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus endovascular stent placement in the treatment of venous stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: intermediate results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6(6):851–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Glanz S, Gordon DH, Lipkowitz GS et al (1988) Axillary and subclavian vein stenosis: percutaneous angioplasty. Radiology 168(2):371–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Haage P, Vorwerk D, Piroth W et al (1999) Treatment of hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: results of primary Wallstent placement and follow-up in 50 patients. Radiology 212(1):175–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Yun Won.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y.C., Won, J.Y., Choi, S.Y. et al. Percutaneous Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients: Long-Term Outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32, 271–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9511-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9511-0

Keywords

Navigation