Abstract
Though abortion is legal in Canada, policies currently in place at various levels of the health care system, and the individual actions of medical professionals, can inhibit access to abortion. This paper examines the various extra-legal barriers to abortion access that exist in Canada, and argues that these barriers are unjust because there are no good reasons for the restrictions on autonomy that they present. The paper then outlines the various policy measures that could be taken to improve access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
One exception is found in the second section of the paper where I discuss the possibility that moral reasons can be given for limiting women’s autonomy in accessing abortion.
There is currently a bill before parliament (Bill C-484) that would make it a crime to kill a fetus during the commission of a violent act against its mother. Introduced by a Conservative MP, this Bill is clearly an effort to set a precedent for fetal rights, which could lead to an attempt to re-criminalize abortion.
Three Canadian abortion providers have been shot since 1994. The Morgentaler clinic in Toronto was bombed in 1992 [19, p. 848].
On the social and psychological factors that contribute to impeding autonomous choice in reproductive matters, see Baylis [4, p. 789].
See Mummery v. Olsson, [33] for a recent case, and a summary of the relevant case law.
Erdman makes this point. See Erdman [21, p. 1144].
The issue of conscientious objection to providing referrals for abortion has been controversial in Canada over the past few years. See the editorial by Rodgers and Downie [42]. See also the resulting letters to the editor [15, 20, 27, 28, 40] and response by the authors [43]. The letters and response provoked a controversial “clarification” by Jeff Blackmer, the Executive Director of the Office of Ethics at the Canadian Medical Association, on the question of the duty to refer patients for abortion [6].
Carolyn MacLeod acknowledges that there may be some room for the conscientiously objecting physician to argue that he/she cannot agree to a compromise that includes the duty to refer for abortion [31]. If MacLeod is right, more argument may be needed than what I have given here in order to prove a moral obligation on the part of physicians to refer for abortion.
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2007). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385. The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 1203–1208.
Arthur, J. (1999). Abortion in Canada: History, law, and access. Pro-choice Action Network Website. Found at: http://www.prochoiceactionnetwork-canada.org/articles/canada.shtml. Accessed April 30, 2008.
Association pour l’accès à l’avortement c. Québec (Procureur général). (2006). J.Q. No. 8654.
Baylis, F. (1998). Dissenting with the dissent: Winnipeg child and family services (Northwest Area) v. G (D.F.). Alberta Law Review, 36(3), 785–798.
Bill C-43. (1991). An act respecting abortion, 2nd Sess., 34th Parl., (defeated on Third Reading 31 January 1991).
Blackmer, J. (2007). Clarification of the CMA’s position concerning induced abortion. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(9), 1310. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1070035.
British Columbia Civil Liberties Assn. v. British Columbia (Attorney General). (1988). B.C.J. No. 373.
Campaign Life Coalition. (2001). Alan Rock’s Hypocrisy on two-tier medicine. Press Releases. Found at: http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/press/2001/010105.html. Accessed September 25, 2007.
Canadian Abortion Rights Action League. (2003). Protecting abortion rights in Canada. Ottawa: CARAL.
Canadian Medical Association. (2004). Code of ethics. CMA Policy. Found at: http://policybase.cma.ca/PolicyPDF/PD04-06.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2008.
Canadian Medical Association. (1988). Induced abortion. CMA Policy. Found at: http://policybase.cma.ca/PolicyPDF/PD88-06.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2008.
CBC News. (2006). Anti-abortion group pressures Dumont Hospital Board. CBC News Website. Found at: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2006/06/20/nb-ryan-abortion20060620.html. Accessed April 30, 2008.
CBC News. (2008). Abortion information line disconnected. CBC News Website. Found at: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/prince-edward-island/story/2008/01/29/abortion-line.html. Accessed April 30, 2008.
Coren, M. (2008). An anniversary of death. The National Post, January 28, 2008, A10.
Côté, A. (2007). Untitled letter. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(4), 493–494. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1060184.
Dickens, B. M., & Cook, R. J. (2000). The scope and limits of conscientious objection. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 71, 71–77. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00330-1.
Downie, J., & Llewellyn, J. (2007). Relational theory and health law and policy. Health Law Journal, forthcoming.
Downie, J., & Sherwin, S. (1996). A feminist exploration of issues around assisted death. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 15(2), 303–330.
Eggertson, L. (2001). Abortion services in Canada: A patchwork quilt with many holes. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164(6), 847–849.
Epp Buckingham, J. (2007). Untitled letter. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(4), 492. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1070004.
Erdman, J. N. (2007). In the back alleys of health care: Abortion, equality, and community in Canada. Emory Law Journal, 56(4), 1093–1155.
Finer, L. B., Frohwirth, L. F., Dauphinee, L. A., Singh, S., & Moore, A. M. (2005). Reasons US women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37(3), 110–118. doi:10.1363/3711005.
Flood, C. M., Tuohy, C., & Stabile, M. (2006). What is in and out of medicare? Who decides? In C. M. Flood (Ed.), Just medicare: What’s in, what’s out, how we decide (pp. 15–41). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Gerstel, J. (2008). Floating clinic spreads word on abortion pill. The Toronto Star, January 25, 2008. Found at: http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/297216. Accessed April 21, 2008.
Guttmacher Institute. (1999). Sharing responsibility: Women, society, and abortion worldwide. Found at: https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sharing.pdf. Accessed January 24, 2007.
Hawkins, J. S., & Emanuel, E. J. (2005). Clarifying confusions about coercion. The Hastings Center Report, 35(5), 16–19. doi:10.2307/3528329.
Humber, N. (2007). Untitled letter. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(4), 493. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1060204.
Kotalik, J. F. (2007). Untitled letter. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(4), 492. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1060150.
Koyama, A., & Williams, R. (2005). Abortion in medical school curricula. McGill Journal of Medicine, 8(2), 157–160.
Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.
MacLeod, C. Referral in the wake of conscientious objection to abortion. Hypatia, forthcoming.
Medical Students for Choice. (2003). Fact sheet: The lack of abortion training and providers in Canada. Medical Students for Choice website. Found at: www.ms4c.org/ca_factsheet.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2008.
Mummery v. Olsson. (2001). O.J. No. 226.
National Council of Welfare. (2007a). Poverty by selected family types, 2004. National Council of Welfare Website. Found at: http://www.ncwcnbes.net/documents/researchpublications/ResearchProjects/PovertyProfile/2004/PovertyRates-FamiliesENG.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2008.
National Council of Welfare. (2007b). Poverty trends, all persons, 1980–2004. National Council of Welfare Website. Found at: http://www.ncwcnbes.net/documents/researchpublications/ResearchProjects/PovertyProfile/2004/PovertyRates-TrendsENG.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2008.
Ontario Ministry of Health, Task Group of Abortion Service Providers. (1992). Report on access to abortion services in Ontario. Toronto: Queen’s Park.
Ontario (A.G.) v. Dieleman. (1994). 20 O.R. (3d) 229.
R. v. Morgentaler (1988). S.C.J. No. 1.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Read, J. E., & Smith, B. J. (2007). Untitled letter. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(4), 492. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1060175.
Rodgers, S. (2006). Abortion denied: Bearing the limits of law. In C. M. Flood (Ed.), Just medicare: What’s in, what’s out, how we decide (pp. 107–136). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Rodgers, S., & Downie, J. (2006). Abortion: Ensuring access. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175(1), 9. doi:10.1503/cmaj.060548.
Rodgers, S., & Downie, J. (2007). The authors respond. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(4), 494. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1060202.
Sedgh, G., Henshaw, S., Singh, S., Åhman, E., & Shah, I. H. (2007). Induced abortion: Estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet, 379, 1338–1345. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X.
Shaw, J. (2006). Reality check: A close look at accessing abortion services in Canadian Hospitals. Ottawa: Canadians for Choice.
Sherwin, S. (1998). A relational approach to autonomy in health care. In S. Sherwin (Ed.), The politics of women’s health (pp. 19–47). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Statistics Canada. (2007). Induced abortion statistics 2004. Ottawa: Minister of Industry.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Jocelyn Downie and Susan Sherwin for reading and commenting on several drafts of this paper. This paper was originally presented at the 2007 Canadian Philosophical Association meeting in Saskatoon, and in a Works in Progress session in the Department of Bioethics at Dalhousie University in May 2007. My audiences on those occasions provided many helpful comments. I owe thanks as well to the members of Dalhousie’s Novel Tech Ethics group for reading and discussing various drafts with me.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaposy, C. Improving Abortion Access in Canada. Health Care Anal 18, 17–34 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-008-0101-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-008-0101-0