Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To review evidence relating to the measurement properties of multi-item generic patient or self-assessed measures of health in older people. Methods: Systematic literature searches to identify instruments. Pre-defined criteria relating to reliability, validity and responsiveness. Results: 122 articles relating to 15 instruments met the inclusion criteria. The most extensive evidence was found for the SF-36, COOP Charts, EQ-5D, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and SIP. Four instruments have evidence of both internal consistency and test–retest reliability – NHP, SF-12, SF-20, SF-36. Four instruments lack evidence of reliability – HSQ-12, IHQL, QWB, SQL. Most instruments were assessed for validity through comparisons with other instruments, global judgements of health, or clinical and socio-demographic variables. Five instruments lack evidence of responsiveness – GQL, HSQ-12, IHQL, QLI and QWB. Conclusion: There is good evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness for the SF-36, EQ-5D and NHP. There is more limited evidence for the COOP, SF-12 and SIP. The SF-36 is recommended where a detailed and broad ranging assessment of health is required, particularly in community dwelling older people with limited morbidity. The EQ-5D is recommended where a more succinct assessment is required, particularly where a substantial change in health is expected. Instrument content should be assessed for relevance before application. The concurrent evaluation of generic instruments in older people is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I Turpie D Strang P Darzins G. Guyatt (1997) ArticleTitleHealth status assessment of the elderly Pharmoeconomics. 12 IssueID5 533–546

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Service Framework for Older People. Modern Standards and Service Models. Department of Health (2001); March 2001

  3. Heyrman J, Van Hoeck K. et al. (1996). Chapter 12: Health outcome measures for older people. In: Hutchinson (ed). Health Outcome Measures in Primary and Out-Patient Care, 167–175

  4. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 2(14)

  5. AM Garratt L Schmidt A Macintosh R. Fitzpatrick (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures Br Med J. 324 IssueID7351 1417–1421

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Fitzpatrick (2004) Chapter Measures of health status, health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction P Pynsent J Fairbank A. Carr (Eds) Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Trauma EditionNumber2 Arnold Publishers London

    Google Scholar 

  7. GH Guyatt DH Feeny DL. Patrick (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring health-related quality of life Ann Int Med. 118 622–629 Occurrence Handle8452328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. I McDowell C. Newell (1996) Measuring Health: A guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. JE. Ware (1997) SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide EditionNumber2 The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre. Nimrod Press Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe EuroQol Group. (1990) ArticleTitleEuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life Health Policy 16 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Spilker (1996) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials Lipincott-Raven Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Bowling (1997) Measuring Health Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  13. RA Kane RL. Kane (1984) Assessing the elderly; A Practical Guide to Measurement Heath and Company Lexington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. A Fletcher E Dickinson I. Philp (1992) ArticleTitleReview – audit measures: Quality of life instruments for everyday use with elderly patients Age Ageing 21 142–150 Occurrence Handle1575094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. P Kliempt D Ruta M. McMurdo (2000) ArticleTitleMeasuring the outcomes of care in older people: A non-critical review of patient-based measures. I. General health status and quality of life instruments Rev Clin Gerontol 10 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Health Service (NHS) Research and Development (R&D) Strategic Review. Ageing and age-associated disease and disability. Report of Topic Working Group, June 1999

  17. Single Assessment Process. Assessment Tools and Scales. Department of Health, September (2002)

  18. Eiser C, Moore R. Quality of life measures in chronic disease of childhood. Health Technol Asses (2001); 5(4)

  19. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to their Development and Use, 3rd ed. Oxford Medical Publications, Inc, (2003)

  20. DL Patrick PE. Erickson (1993) Chapter 2: Assessing health-related quality of life in clinical decision-making SR Walker RM Rosser (Eds) Quality of Life Assessment – Key issues in the 1990’s Kluwer Academic Publishers London

    Google Scholar 

  21. CA. McHorney (1996) ArticleTitleMeasuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 Health Survey Gerontologist 36 571–583 Occurrence Handle8942101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. CA McHorney JE Ware AE. Raczek (1993) ArticleTitleThe MOS-36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II Psychometric and clinic tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Med Care 31 IssueID3 247–63 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1MnisVI%3D Occurrence Handle8450681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. AM Garratt L Schmidt R. Fitzpatrick (2002) ArticleTitlePatient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review Diabet Med 19 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  24. M Kosinski SD Keller HT Hatoum SX Kong JE Ware SuffixJr. (1999) ArticleTitleThe SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability Med Care 37 IssueID5 Suppl MS10–MS22

    Google Scholar 

  25. CB Terwee FW Dekker WM Wiersinga MF Prummel PMM. Bossuyt (2003) ArticleTitleOn assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation Qual Life Res 12 349–362 Occurrence Handle12797708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. KW Wyrwich FD. Wolinsky (2000) ArticleTitleIdentifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures J Eval Clin Prac. 6 IssueID1 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  27. GR Norman FG Sridhar GH Guyatt SD. Walter (2001) ArticleTitleRelation of distribution and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life Med Care 39 IssueID10 1039–1047 Occurrence Handle11567167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. JA Husted RJ Cook VT Farewell DD. Gladman (2000) ArticleTitleMethods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 53 459–468 Occurrence Handle10812317

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. B Kirshner G. Guyatt (1985) ArticleTitleA methodological framework for assessing health indices J Chron Dis 38 27–36 Occurrence Handle3972947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. RA Deyo P Diehr DL. Patrick (1991) ArticleTitleReproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures Statistics and strategies for evaluation Control Clin Trials 12 142S–158S Occurrence Handle1663851

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. JN Katz MG Larson CB Phillips AH Fossel MH. Liang (1992) ArticleTitleComparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments Med Care 30 IssueID10 917–925 Occurrence Handle1405797

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. M Bergner RA Bobbitt WB Carter et al. (1981) ArticleTitleThe Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure Med Care 19 787–805 Occurrence Handle7278416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. J Tidermark N Zethraeus O Svensson H Tornkvist S. Ponzer (2002) ArticleTitleFemoral neck fractures in the eldery: Functional outcome and quality of life according to the EuroQol Qual Life Res 11 473–481 Occurrence Handle12113394

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. J Tidermark N Zethraeus O Svensson H Tornkvist S. Ponzer (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation J Orthopaedic Trauma 16 IssueID1 34–38

    Google Scholar 

  35. C Jenkinson D Jenkinson S Shepperd R Layte S. Petersen (1997) ArticleTitleEvaluation of treatment for congestive heart failure in patents aged 60 years and older using generic measures of health status (SF-36 and COOP charts) Age Ageing 26 7–13 Occurrence Handle9143431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. C Anderson S Laubscher R. Burns (1996) ArticleTitleValidation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients Stroke 27 1812–1816 Occurrence Handle8841336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. JH Ahroni EJ. Boyko (2000) ArticleTitleResponsiveness of the SF-36 among veterans with diabetes mellitus J Diabet Complicat 14 IssueID1 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  38. McHorney CA, Teno J, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD, Ware JE. The use of standardised measures of functional status and well-being among cognitively impaired and intact elders: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Boston, MA, (1990)

  39. SG Parker SM Peet C Jagger M Farhan CM. Castleden (1998) ArticleTitleMeasuring health status in older patients. The SF-36 in practice Age Ageing. 27 13–18 Occurrence Handle9504361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. DG Seymour AE Ball EM Russell WR Primrose AM Garratt JR. Crawford (2001) ArticleTitleProblems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment J Eval Clin Practi 7 411–418

    Google Scholar 

  41. T Pettit G Livingston M Manela G Kitchen C Katona A. Bowling (2001) ArticleTitleValidation and normative data of health status measures in older people: The Islington study Int J Geriatr Psychiat 16 1061–1070

    Google Scholar 

  42. F Bureau-Chalot JL Novella D Jolly J Ankri F Guillemin F. Blanchard (2002) ArticleTitleFeasibility, acceptability and internal consistency reliability of the Nottingham Health Profile in Dementia Patients Gerontology 48 220–225 Occurrence Handle12053111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. EC Nelson J Wasson J. Kirk et al. (1987) ArticleTitleAssessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings J Chron Dis. 40 IssueIDSuppl 1 55S–63S Occurrence Handle3597698

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. JM Landgraf EC. Nelson (1992) ArticleTitleDartmouth COOP primary care network. Summary of the WONCA/COOP international health assessment field trial Aust Fam Physician 21 255–269 Occurrence Handle1605765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. AM Jette AR Davies PD. Cleary (1986) ArticleTitleThe Functional Status Questionnaire: Reliability and validity when used in primary care J Gen Int Med. 1 IssueIDMay/June 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  46. G Tibblin B Tibblin S Peciva S Kullman K. Svardsudd (1990) ArticleTitleThe Goteborg Quality of Life Instrument – An assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923 Scand J Primary Health Care. 8 IssueIDSuppl 1 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  47. InstitutionalAuthorNameHealth Outcome Institute. (1996) Twelve-item Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ-12) version 2.0 User Guide Health Outcomes Institute Bloomington, MN

    Google Scholar 

  48. SM Hunt SP McKenna J McEwen EM Backett J Williams E. Papp (1980) ArticleTitleA quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study J Epidemiol Commun Health 34 281–286

    Google Scholar 

  49. CE Ferrans MJ. Powers (1985) ArticleTitleQuality of Life Index: Development and psyshometric properties Adv Nurs Sci 8 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  50. JE Ware M Kosinski SD. Keller (1995) SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales EditionNumber2 The Health Institute New England Medical Center Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  51. JE Ware CD Sherbourne AR Davies (1992) Developing and testing the MOS 20-Item Short-Form Health Survey: A general population application AL Stewart JE Ware (Eds) Measuring Functioning and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach Duke University Press Durham, NC 277–290

    Google Scholar 

  52. WO Spitzer AJ Dobson J. Hall et al. (1981) ArticleTitleMeasuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A consise QL-Index for use by physicians J Chron Dis 34 585–597 Occurrence Handle7309824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R, McNeil H. (1997). The Australian Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument; initial validation. Working Paper 66. Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Monash University and the University of Melborne, Australia

  54. R Rosser M Cottee R Rabin C. Selai (1992) Chapter 7: Index of health-related quality of life A Hopkins (Eds) Measures of the Quality of Life and the Uses to Which Such Measures May Be Put Royal College of Physicians London

    Google Scholar 

  55. RM Kaplan JP. Anderson (1988) ArticleTitleA General Health Policy Model: Update and applications Health Serv Res 23 203–235 Occurrence Handle3384669

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. PR Yarnold FC Stille GJ. Martin (1995) ArticleTitleCross-sectional psychometric assessment of the functional status questionnaire: Use with geriatric versus non-geriatric ambulatory medical patients Int J Psychiat Med 25 305–317

    Google Scholar 

  57. C Nygren S Iwarsson A Isacsson O. Dehlin (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of care in geriatric rehabilitation: Clients’ perceptions, ADL dependence and subjective well-being in a one-year perspective Scand J Occup Therapy 8 IssueID3 148–156

    Google Scholar 

  58. A Bowling J. Windsor (1997) ArticleTitleDiscriminative power of the health status questionnaire 12 in relation to age, sex, and long-standing illness: Findings from a survey of households in Great Britain J Epidemiol Commun Health 51 564–573

    Google Scholar 

  59. M Schofield G. Mishra (1998) ArticleTitleValidity of the SF-12 compared with the SF-36 health survey in pilot studies of the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health J Health Psychol 3 259–271

    Google Scholar 

  60. K Stadnyk J Calder K. Rockwood (1998) ArticleTitleTesting the measurement properties of the Short Form-36 Health Survey in a frail elderly population J Clin Epidemiol 51 827–835 Occurrence Handle9762875

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. P Stolee K Stadnyk AM Myers K. Rockwood (1996) ArticleTitleAn individualised approach to outcome measurement in geriatric rehabilitation Gerontologist 36 97

    Google Scholar 

  62. Osborne RH, Hawthorne G, Lew EA, Gray LC. (2003). Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: Validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument and comparison with the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 138–147

  63. JE Brazier SJ Walters JP Nicholl B. Kohler (1996) ArticleTitleUsing the SF-36 and EuroQol on an elderly population Life Res 5 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  64. RM Rosser R Allison C Butler et al. (1993) Chapter 8: The Index of Health-Related Quality of Life (IHQL): A new tool for audit and cost-per QALY analysis RS Walker RM Rosser ParticleDordrecht (Eds) Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  65. EM Andresen B Rothenberg R Panzer P Katz MP. McDermott (1998) ArticleTitleSelecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults: A comparison of candidate instruments Eval Health Profess 21 244–264

    Google Scholar 

  66. H Tamim J McCusker N. Dendukuri (2002) ArticleTitleProxy reporting of quality of life using the EQ-5D Med Care 40 IssueID12 1186–1195 Occurrence Handle12458301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. U Pierre SL Wood Dauphinee N Korner Bitensky D Gayton J. Hanley (1998) ArticleTitleProxy use of the Canadian SF-36 in rating health status of the disabled elderly J Clin Epidemiol 51 983–990 Occurrence Handle9817116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. A Ball E Russell D Seymour W Primrose A. Garratt (2001) ArticleTitleProblems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities Gerontology 47 334–340 Occurrence Handle11721148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. JY Yip KH Wilber RC Myrtle DN. Grazman (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of older adult subject and proxy responses on the SF-36 health-related quality of life instrument Aging Mental Health 5 136–142 Occurrence Handle11511060

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. E Nelson J Landgraf R Hays J Wasson J. Kirk (1990) ArticleTitleThe functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians’ offices? Med Care 28 1111–1126 Occurrence Handle2250496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. B Resnick ES. Nahm (2001) ArticleTitleReliability and validity testing of the revised 12-item Short-Form Health Survey in older adults J Nurs Meas Fall. 9 IssueID2 151–161

    Google Scholar 

  72. R Van Balen ML Essink Bot E Steyerberg H Cools DF. Habbema (2003) ArticleTitleQuality of life after hip fracture: A comparison of four health status measures in 208 patients Disabil Rehabil 25 IssueID10 507–519 Occurrence Handle12745962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. LD Sharples CJ Todd N Caine S. Tait (2000) ArticleTitleMeasurement properties of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 health status measures in a population sample of elderly people living at home: Results from ELPHS Br J Health Psychol 5 217–233

    Google Scholar 

  74. LL-Y Lim JD. Fisher (1999) ArticleTitleUse of the 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) Health Survey in an Australian heart and stroke population Qual Life Res 8 1–8 Occurrence Handle10457733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. CP Iglesias YF Birks DJ. Torgerson (2001) ArticleTitleImproving the measurement of quality of life in older people: The York SF-12 Quart J Med 94 695–698

    Google Scholar 

  76. N Harada V Chiu C Tsuneishi S Fukuhara T. Makinodan (1998) ArticleTitleCross-cultural adaptation of the SF-36 Health Survey for Japanese-American Elderly J Aging Ethnicity 1 IssueID2 59–80

    Google Scholar 

  77. SP Azen JM Palmer M. Carlson et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePsychometric properties of a chinese translation of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in the Well lderly Study J Aging Health 11 IssueID2 240–251 Occurrence Handle10558437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. J Ware M Kosinski SD. Keller (1994) SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual The Health Institute New England Medical Centre Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  79. PD Cleary AM. Jette (2000) ArticleTitleReliability and validity of the functional status questionnaire Qual Life Res 9 IssueID6A 747–753

    Google Scholar 

  80. S Sherman D. Reuben (1998) ArticleTitleMeasures of functional status in community-dwelling elders J Gen Int Med 13 817–823

    Google Scholar 

  81. G Andersson L Melin P Lindberg B. Scott (1995) ArticleTitleDispositional optimism, dysphoria, health, and coping with hearing impairment in elderly adults Audiology 34 76–84 Occurrence Handle8561685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. RM Kleinpell CE. Ferrans (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of life of elderly patients after treatment in the ICU Res Nurs Health. 25 IssueID3 212–221 Occurrence Handle12015783

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. DJ Carver CA Chapman VS Thomas KJ Stadnyk K. Rockwood (1999) ArticleTitleValidity and reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20 questionnaire as a measure of quality of life in elderly people living at home Age Ageing 28 169–174 Occurrence Handle10350414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. EM Andresen N Bowley BM Rothenberg R Panzer P. Katz (1996) ArticleTitleTest–retest performance of a mailed version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey among older adults Med Care 34 1165–1170 Occurrence Handle8962582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. KM Beusterien B Steinwald J. Ware (1996) ArticleTitleUsefulness of the SF-36 Health Survey in measuring health outcomes in the depressed elderly J Geriatr Psychiat Neurol 9 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  86. S Wood Dauphinee L Gauthier B Gandek L Magnan U. Pierre (1997) ArticleTitleReadying a US measure of health status, the SF-36, for use in Canada Clin Investi Med 20 224–238

    Google Scholar 

  87. CA McHorney JE Ware JFR Lu CD. Sherbourne (1994) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups Med Care 32 IssueID1 40–66 Occurrence Handle8277801

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. M Murray S Lefort V. Ribeiro (1988) ArticleTitleThe SF-36: reliable and valid for the institutionalized elderly? Aging Mental Health 2 24–27

    Google Scholar 

  89. FD Wolinsky GJ Wan WM. Tierney (1998) ArticleTitleChanges in the SF-36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disadvantaged older adults Med Care 36 1589–1598 Occurrence Handle9821946

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. SJ Walters JF Munro JE. Brazier (2001) ArticleTitleUsing the SF-36 with older adults: A cross-sectional community-based survey Age Ageing 30 337–343 Occurrence Handle11509313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. RA Lyons HM Perry BNC. Littlepage (1994) ArticleTitleEvidence for the validity of the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population Age Ageing 23 182–184 Occurrence Handle8085500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. CM Mangione ER Marcantonio L. Goldman et al. (1993) ArticleTitleInfluence of age on measurement of health status in patients undergoing elective surgery J Am Geriatri Soc 41 377–383

    Google Scholar 

  93. EM Andresen GW Gravitt ME Aydelotte CA. Podgorski (1999) ArticleTitleLimitations of the SF-36 in a sample of nursing home residents Age Ageing 28 562–566 Occurrence Handle10604509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. ML Rothman S Hedrick T. Inui (1989) ArticleTitleThe Sickness Impact Profile as a measure of the health status of non-cognitively impaired nursing home residents Med Care 27 S157–S167 Occurrence Handle2493537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. JMM Jannink-Nijlant JPM Diederiks MAH Brouwers JFM. Metsemakers (1999) ArticleTitleScreening for mobility disorders by the Mobility Control subscale of the short version of the Sickness Impact Profile Clin Rehabil 13 492–497 Occurrence Handle10588535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. B Resnick R. Parker (2001) ArticleTitleSimplified scoring and psychometrics of the revised 12-item Short-Form Health Survey Outcomes Manage Nurs Pract 5 IssueID4 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  97. FD Wolinsky TE. Stump (1996) ArticleTitleA measurement model of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey in a clinical sample of disadvantaged, older, black, and white men and women Med Care 34 537–548 Occurrence Handle8656720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. PR Dexter TE Stump WM Tierney FD. Wolinsky (1996) ArticleTitleThe psychometric properties of the SF-36 health survey among older adults in a clinical setting J Clin Geropsychol 2 225–237

    Google Scholar 

  99. J Tidermark G Bergstrom O Svensson H Tornkvist S. Ponzer (2003) ArticleTitleResponsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures Qual Life Res 12 IssueID8 1069–1079 Occurrence Handle14651424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. AJ Crockett JM Cranston JR Moss JH. Alpers (1996) ArticleTitleThe MOS SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire in severe chronic airflow limitation: Comparison with the Nottingham Health Profile Qual Life Res 5 330–338 Occurrence Handle8763801

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. R Van Balen EW Steyerberg JJ Polder TLM Ribbers JDF Habbema HJM. Cools (2001) ArticleTitleHip fracture in elderly patients: Outcomes for function, quality of life, and type of residence Clin Orthopaed Rela Res 390 IssueIDSep 232–243

    Google Scholar 

  102. M Weinberger B Nagle JT. Hanlon et al. (1994) ArticleTitleAssessing health-related quality of life in elderly outpatients: Telephone versus face-to-face administration J Am Geriatr Soc 42 1295–1299 Occurrence Handle7983296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. EM Andresen B Rothenberg R Panzer P Katz MP. McDermott (1998) ArticleTitleSelecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults: a comparison of candidate instruments Eval Health Profess 21 244–264

    Google Scholar 

  104. EM Andresen DL Patrick WB Carter JA. Malmgren (1995) ArticleTitleComparing the performance of health status measures for healthy older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 43 1030–1034 Occurrence Handle7657920

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. GH Guyatt DJ Eagle B. Sackett et al. (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life in the frail elderly J Clin Epidemiol 46 1433–1444 Occurrence Handle8263570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. DB Reuben LA Valle RD Hays AL. Siu (1995) ArticleTitleMeasuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: A comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures J Am Geriatr Soc 43 17–23 Occurrence Handle7806733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. D Irvine LL O’Brien-Pallas M Murray et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe reliability and validity of two health status measures for evaluating outcomes of home care nursing Res Nurs Health 23 43–54 Occurrence Handle10686572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. S Jaglal Z Lakhani J. Schatzker (2000) ArticleTitleReliability, validity and responsiveness of the Lower Extremity Measure for patients with a hip fracture J Bone Joint Surg. 82 IssueIDA7(July) 955–962 Occurrence Handle10901310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. I Philp P Newton KJ McKee S Dixon G Rowse PA. Bath (2001) ArticleTitleGeriatric assessment in primary care: Formulating best practice Br J Commun Nurs 6 290–295

    Google Scholar 

  110. J Brazier J Roberts M. Deverill (2002) ArticleTitleThe estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 J Health Econ 21 271–292 Occurrence Handle11939242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. R Theiler HA Bischoff M Good D. Uebelhart (2002) ArticleTitleRofecoxib improves quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis Swiss Med Weekly. 132 IssueID39–40 566–573

    Google Scholar 

  112. SA Page MJ Verhoef CG. Emes (1995) ArticleTitleQuality of life, bypass surgery and the elderly Can J Cardiol. 11 IssueID9 777–782 Occurrence Handle7585276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. J Liddle L March B. Carfrae et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCan occupational therapy intervention play a part in maintaining independence and quality of life in older people? Aust NZ J Public Health 20 574–578

    Google Scholar 

  114. JE Ware M Kosinski JE. Dewey (2000) How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey Quality Metric, Inc. Lincoln, RI

    Google Scholar 

  115. CA McHorney M Kosinski JE. Ware (1994) ArticleTitleComparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey Med Care 32 551–567 Occurrence Handle8189774

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. NG Castle J. Engberg (2004) ArticleTitleResponse formats and satisfaction surveys for elders Gerontologist 44 IssueID3 358–367 Occurrence Handle15197290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. CA Alessi KR Josephson JO Harker FM Pietruszka MT Hoyl LZ. Rubenstein (2003) ArticleTitleThe yield, reliability, and validity of a postal survey for screening community-dwelling older people J Am Geriatr Soc 51 IssueID2 194–202 Occurrence Handle12558716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. J Coast TJ Peters SH Richards DJ. Gunnell (1998) ArticleTitleUse of the EuroQol among elderly acute care patients Qual Life Res 7 1–10 Occurrence Handle9481146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. RW Fowler P Congdon S. Hamilton (2000) ArticleTitleAssessing health status and outcomes in a geriatric day hospital Public Health. 114 440–445 Occurrence Handle11114753

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. L Smeeth AE Fletcher S. Stirling et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRandomised comparison of three methods of administering a screening questionnaire to elderly people: Findings from the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community Br Med J. 323 1403–1407

    Google Scholar 

  121. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Mackintosh AE, Fitzpatrick R. Health Status and Quality of Life in Older People: A structured review of patient-assessed health instruments. Report from the Patient-assessed Health Instruments Group to the Department of Health, April 2004

  122. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R. Older people specific health status and quality of life: A structured review of self-assessed instruments. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (in press)

  123. A. Bowling (1998) ArticleTitleMeasuring health related quality of life among older people Editorial. Aging Mental Health. 2 IssueID1 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  124. IJ Higginson A. Carr (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting Education and Debate. Br Med J. 322 IssueID26 May 1297–1300

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Haywood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haywood, K.L., Garratt, A.M. & Fitzpatrick, R. Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual Life Res 14, 1651–1668 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1743-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1743-0

Keywords

Navigation