Original articleA comparison of physician and patient reports of pap smear histories
References (30)
Comparison of epidemiologic data from multiple sources
J Chron Dis
(1986)- et al.
Does screening by “Pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer?
Lancet
(1979) - et al.
Cervical dysplasia: association with sexual behaviour, smoking, and oral contraceptive use?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1985) An analysis of patient recall of their therapeutic regimens
J Chron Dis
(1980)- et al.
Reliability of the history
Lancet
(1975) - et al.
Case-control studies for the evaluation of screening
J Chron Dis
(1986) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
(1981)- et al.
A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings
Am J EEG Technol
(1971) - et al.
Discrete Muldvarlate Analysis: Theory and Practice
(1975) A review of validations of dietary assessment methods
Am J Epidemiol
(1982)
First drinking experience in addictive and nonaddictive drinkers
Arch Gen Psychiat
Accuracy of the family history method in affective illness
Arch Gen Psychist
Accuracy of recall of histories of oral contraceptive use
Br J Prev Soc Med
Reliability of recall of drug usage and other health-related information
Am J Epidemiol
Age at natural menopause and breast cancer risk: The effect of errors in recall
Am J Epidemiol
Cited by (86)
Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Status for People in Ontario Provincial Correctional Facilities
2019, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Similarly, the proportion of people up to date for colorectal cancer screening status was lower than the proportion found in the California study, at 22.9% compared with 31%.7 These differences may be due in part to the use of administrative data in this study rather than self-reported data, which could overestimate cancer screening.16,17 Because differences in screening rates between this study and these U.S. studies were large, the authors propose that at least part of the difference in screening rates is likely real.
Analysis of 13 million individual patient records pertaining to Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies and surgery on the uterine cervix (Belgium, 1996-2000)
2009, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :For instance at national level, for the year 2000, this difference was 11% (Demarest et al., 2002; Arbyn and Van Oyen, 2004). This discrepancy is probably due to reporting biases, which appear to be inherent to interview surveys (Walter et al., 1988; McKenna et al., 1992; Fruchter et al., 1992; Kottke et al., 1995; Montano and Phillips, 1995). Therefore, estimations of the screening coverage, derived from interview surveys should be interpreted with caution.
Self-report was a viable method for obtaining health care utilization data in community-dwelling seniors
2005, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :Such systematic reporting errors could introduce bias when comparing groups that differ on these characteristics. However, no investigator has observed a specific relationship [1–3, 5–6,8]. Research by Glandon et al. [8] focused on self-report of health care utilization by older individuals compared with medical records.
Mammographic screening: Case-control studies
2003, Annals of OncologyCitation Excerpt :In the evaluation of cervical Pap smear screening, for instance, the application of different rules defining which tests are counted as screens can affect the estimated benefit. Additionally, there may be differences in how tests are classified according to the source of information (clinical records or personal interviews) on symptoms [18, 19]. This issue appears not to have been explored for breast cancer.
Screening interval and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer
2003, Obstetrics and GynecologySociodemographic predictors of pap test receipt, currency and knowledge among Australian women
2002, Preventive Medicine