ArticleAccess to health care services among people with chronic or disabling conditions: patterns and predictors 1☆,
Section snippets
Sampling
Data for this research came from the first year of a 3-year longitudinal national survey of adults with the following conditions: cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury (SCI), or arthritis (rheumatoid or osteoarthritis). This survey was performed with funding from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research as a joint project of the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Managed Care and Disability, the Missouri Arthritis Rehabilitation
Differences and similarities between managed care and FFS enrollees
There were several demographic differences between participants who were enrolled in FFS and managed care health plans (table 1). Participants enrolled in managed care plans tended to be younger, less likely to have activity limitations, more likely to be covered by a private insurance plan, more likely to be in a higher income bracket, and more likely to live in the western United States than were those covered by FFS plans. Health plan type was not significantly related to health status,
Discussion
Perhaps the most challenging health care policy issue in the United States is the provision of timely, appropriate, and high-quality health care to its most vulnerable citizens. This study examined variables that may influence access to health care among adults with disabilities or chronic conditions. The results suggest that people with chronic or disabling conditions often require a comprehensive array of health care services but that such care is not consistently available.
The analyses
Conclusion
Health care reform policies aimed at increasing access to services for people with chronic or disabling conditions will not resolve access problems if they focus solely on tightening the reins on MCOs. Relatively large proportions of people with chronic or disabling conditions are still covered by traditional FFS plans. However, neither FFS nor MCO plans have made meaningful changes to increase access to services for members of this population. The unmet needs identified in this study suggest
References (36)
- et al.
Managed care and people with disabilitiesframing the issues
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1998) - et al.
Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional coverageperceptions of health care among beneficiaries with disabilities
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2001) - et al.
Assistive technologyproblems and policy alternatives
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1994) Primary carespecialists or generalists
Mayo Clin Proc
(1996)- et al.
Disability and health policythe role of markets in the delivery of health services
The Health Security Act of 1993 and health care for persons with disabilities
Health Care Manag
(1994)- et al.
Disabled Medicare beneficiaries in HMOs
Health Aff (Millwood)
(1997) - et al.
The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities
Milbank Q
(2002) - et al.
Access barriers for persons with disabilitiesthe consumers’ perspective
J Disabil Policy Stud
(2003) - et al.
Understanding the consequences of access barriers to health careexperiences of adults with disabilities
Disabil Rehabil
(2003)
Healthcare organizational changeimplications for access to care and its measurement
Health Serv Res
Beyond coverage and supplymeasuring access to healthcare in today’s market
Health Serv Res
Prescription drugs for working-age Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities. Health and disability policy brief
Executive summary: disability, Medicare, and prescription drugs, July 31, 2000
Do HMOs make a difference? Access to health care
Inquiry
Health promotion for people with disabilitiesmoving beyond rehabilitation
Am J Health Promot
Evaluation of Medicaid managed caresatisfaction, access, and use
JAMA
Access to care in HMOs and traditional insurance plans
Health Aff (Millwood)
Cited by (156)
Is There Variation in Time to and Type of Treatment for Hip Osteoarthritis Based on Insurance?
2024, Journal of ArthroplastyIt's time for the NIH to formally designate people with disabilities as a US health disparity population
2023, Disability and Health JournalDisability in Radiology
2023, Academic RadiologyDeterminants of Hospital-Based Health Service Utilization in Cerebral Palsy: a Systematic Review
2022, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationSex and gender inequality in precision medicine: Socioeconomic determinants of health
2022, Sex and Gender Bias in Technology and Artificial Intelligence: Biomedicine and Healthcare Applications
- ☆
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Managed Care and Disability, US Department of Education (grant no. H133B970003), the Missouri Arthritis Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (grant no. H1330980022), and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Health and Wellness (grant no. H133B990019). The contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education or the federal government.
- 1
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.