Case report
Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02347-5Get rights and content

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Uterine artery embolization is an increasingly popular alternative to hysterectomy and myomectomy as a treatment for uterine leiomyoma. Whether this procedure is safe for women desiring future fertility is controversial.

CASES:

A primigravida who had previously undergone uterine artery embolization had premature rupture of membranes at 24 weeks. She had a cesarean delivery at 28 weeks, which was followed by uterine atony requiring hysterectomy. A primigravida who had previously undergone uterine artery embolization delivered appropriately grown dichorionic twins at 36 weeks. An analysis of the 50 published cases of pregnancy after uterine artery embolization revealed the following complications: malpresentation (17%), small for gestational age (7%), premature delivery (28%), cesarean delivery (58%), and postpartum hemorrhage (13%).

CONCLUSION:

Women who become pregnant after uterine artery embolization are at risk for malpresentation, preterm birth, cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage.

Section snippets

Case 1

A 33-year-old primigravida at 24 weeks’ gestation experienced premature rupture of membranes. Her antenatal course was complicated by uterine leiomyomata. She had undergone an abdominal myomectomy 6 years prior because of pain and menometrorrhagia. With continued symptoms and additional leiomyomata documented on ultrasound, a uterine artery embolization was performed the following year, 5 years before the described pregnancy. Her symptoms resolved after the embolization.

At the time of the

Case 2

A 42-year-old primigravida with dichorionic twins presented at 26 weeks with preterm labor and cervical dilation of 2 cm. Her antenatal course was complicated by uterine leiomyomata and infertility. Three years before conception she had undergone uterine artery embolization for symptoms of pain and menometrorrhagia. Later that same year she underwent a myomectomy secondary to persistent symptomatic leiomyomata.

The patient then underwent in vitro fertilization, which resulted in the dichorionic

Comment

Uterine artery embolization has been shown to be an effective treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata, although no long-term studies have been published. Spies2 reported improvement in heavy bleeding in 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86%, 95%) and bulk symptoms in 91% (95% CI 86%, 95%) at 1 year. Outcomes data regarding women who desire future fertility are less clear and very limited.

In our case 1, because of contributing factors, such as chorioamnionitis, prior myomectomy, and

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (164)

  • Long-term outcome and pre-interventional predictors for late intervention after uterine fibroid embolization

    2020, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Acquired uterine arteriovenous malformation in caesarean scar after a previous ectopic pregnancy: A case report

    2018, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Uterine artery embolization: A review of current concepts

    2018, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Nonsurgical Alternatives for Uterine Fibroids

    2016, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text