Comparison of the effect of detergent versus hypochlorite cleaning on environmental contamination and incidence of Clostridium difficile infection
Introduction
Clostridium difficile is the major infective cause of hospital-acquired diarrhoea. Despite increasing awareness of the need to avoid high-risk antibiotics in susceptible elderly patients, reports of C. difficile infection (CDI) continue to increase in England and Wales.1 In addition to hands, environmental contamination is considered an important factor in hospital-acquired infections.2., 3. However, there is little evidence of how best to decontaminate the hospital environment.4
Spores may persist in the hospital environment for months, and are resistant to many commonly used cleaning agents.5 We reported widespread environmental contamination of elderly medicine wards, which tends to increase when detergent-based cleaners are used.6 Daily detergent-based cleaning of side-rooms used for isolation of patients with CDI still led to 25% of all environmental samples taken over four-week periods being contaminated with C. difficile, down from 35% at the start of the study.7 Cleaning agents also show marked differences in their ability to promote sporulation of C. difficile, which can be enhanced when cultured in faeces exposed to chlorine-free cleaners.8
It is unclear, however, whether these laboratory findings have relevance in vivo. We, therefore, carried out this study to determine whether environmental cleaning with a hypochlorite disinfectant as compared with a neutral detergent could reduce the incidence of CDI.
Section snippets
Methods
We carried out a two-year (March 1999–February 2001) ward-based cross-over study to compare the effect of environmental cleaning with either hypochlorite (Saniclor, Henkel Ecolab Professional Hygiene Ltd, Wiltshire, UK; 1000 ppm available chlorine) or neutral liquid detergent (Hospec, Youngs Detergents Lancare Ltd, Cheshire, UK; 1/1000 dilution) on CDI incidence in an endemic setting, on hand carriage by healthcare workers and environmental prevalence of C. difficile. Two elderly medicine wards
Results
We examined 1128 environmental samples, of which 35% were C. difficile positive. A comparison of the two cleaning regimens indicated a significant decrease in CDI on ward X, from 8.9 to 5.3 cases per 100 admissions (P<0.05), associated with the use of hypochlorite. This represented 17 fewer cases of C. difficile cytotoxin-positive diarrhoea during hypochlorite cleaning (N=38) compared with detergent cleaning (N=21) (Figure 1). On ward Y, however, there was no similar significant effect; CDI
Discussion
In general evidence for an important role for environmental contamination in the aetiology of hospital-acquired infection is poor, and several attempts to reduce infection rates by enhancing environmental cleaning have proved unsuccessful.10., 11., 12. Not surprisingly, floor cleaning with either detergent or disinfectant did not affect nosocomial infection rates.10 Recently Pittet et al.12 also found that the incidence of nosocomial infections did not change during a four month trial of
Acknowledgements
We thank the Hospital Infection Society and the Trustees of The General Infirmary at Leeds for research grants that made this study possible. The invaluable support of nursing and domestic staff on the elderly medicine wards is also gratefully acknowledged.
References (23)
- et al.
Clinical and molecular epidemiology of sporadic and clustered cases of nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhoea
Am J Med
(1996) - et al.
Prospective evaluation of environmental contamination by Clostridium difficile in isolation side-rooms
J Hosp Infect
(2001) - et al.
Hospital disinfectants and spore formation by Clostridium difficile
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Value of lysozyme agar incorporation and alkaline thioglycollate exposure for the environmental recovery of Clostridium difficile
J Hosp Infect
(2000) - et al.
Nosocomial infections on nursing units with floors cleaned with a disinfectant compared with detergent
J Hosp Infect
(1987) Mopping up hospital infection
J Hosp Infect
(1999)- et al.
Routine disinfection of patients' environmental surface. Myth or reality?
J Hosp Infect
(1999) - et al.
Is Clostridium difficile endemic in chronic-care facilities?
Lancet
(1986) - et al.
Isolation of patients with Clostridium difficile infection
J Hosp Infect
(1997) - et al.
Financial burden of hospital acquired Clostridium difficile infection
J Hosp Infect
(1996)
Clostridium difficile in England and Wales: 1999
Commun Dis Rep CDR Weekly
Cited by (228)
Disinfection and sterilization: New technologies
2023, American Journal of Infection ControlResults of an international pilot survey on health care environmental hygiene at the facility level
2022, American Journal of Infection ControlJapanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection
2022, Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy